Practice Patterns and Challenges of Performing and Interpreting Prostate MRI: A Survey by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease-Focused Panel.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to report on the practice patterns and challenges of performing and interpreting prostate MRI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. An electronic survey regarding prostate MRI practice patterns and challenges was sent to members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology. RESULTS. The response rate was 15% (212/1446). Most (65%) of the respondents were academic abdominal radiologists with 1-5 (52%), 6-10 (20%), 11-20 (15%), and more than 20 (5%) years of experience in reporting prostate MRI. The numbers of prostate MRI examinations reported per week were 0-5 (43%), 6-10 (38%), 11-20 (12%), 21-30 (5%), and more than 30 (2%). Imaging was performed at 3 T (58%), 1.5 T (20%), or either (21%), and most examinations (83%) were performed without an endorectal coil. Highest b values ranged from 800 to 5000 s/mm2; 1400 s/mm2 (26%) and 1500 s/mm2 (30%) were the most common. Most respondents (79%) acquired dynamic contrast-enhanced images with temporal resolution of less than 10 seconds. Most (71%) of the prostate MRI studies were used for fusion biopsy. PI-RADS version 2 was used by 92% of the respondents and template reporting by 80%. Challenges to performing and interpreting prostate MRI were scored on a 1-5 Likert scale (1, easy; 2, somewhat easy; 3, neutral; 4, somewhat difficult; 5, very difficult). The median scores were 2 or 3 for patient preparatory factors. Image acquisition and reporting factors were scored 1-2, except for performing spectroscopy or using an endorectal coil, both of which scored 4. Acquiring patient history scored 2 and quality factors scored 3. CONCLUSION. Most radiologists perform prostate MRI at 3 T without an endorectal coil and interpret the images using PI-RADS version 2. Challenges include obtaining quality images, acquiring feedback, and variability in the interpretation of PI-RADS scores.

Virtual Dissection with Clinical Radiology Cases Provides Educational Value to First Year Medical Students.

RATIONALE AND AIM: In virtual dissection, three-dimensional computed tomography scans are viewed on a near-life size virtual dissection table and through touchscreen technology, students work together to manipulate the data to perform their dissection. The purpose of this study was to develop a Virtual Dissection Curriculum for first year medical students and to assess its educational value as well as students' preferred pedagogy for learning with this new technology. METHODS: One hundred and five first-year medical students participated in a case-based virtual dissection curriculum and were invited to complete a theory-based post experience survey. Eight unique clinical cases were selected based on the first-year curricular objectives and divided into four 30-minute sessions. In groups of 6-8, students reviewed the cases with a radiologist. First, students' reactions to virtual dissection were measured by three constructs using a 5-point Likert scale: quality of curriculum design (11 questions), impact on learning (7 questions), and comfort with technology (3 questions). Second, students ranked the usefulness of six pedagogical approaches for this technology. Responses were tabulated and rank order item lists were generated statistically using the Schulze method where appropriate. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 83% (87/105). Overall, students' reactions to virtual dissection were positive across all three measured constructs. Most students indicated that the cases were of an appropriate level of difficulty (90%) and that virtual dissection improved their understanding of disease and pathology (89%), the clinical relevance of anatomy (77%), and visuospatial relationships (64%). Almost all students (94%) reported that the curriculum improved understanding of the role of the radiologist in patient care. Students felt that the "very useful" pedagogical approaches were small group demonstration (68%) and problem-based learning (51%). CONCLUSION: First-year medical students perceive the use of virtual dissection as a valuable tool for learning anatomy and radiology. This technology enables the integration of clinical cases and radiology content into preclinical learning.

Rethinking the PGY-1 Basic Clinical Year: A Canadian National Survey of Its Educational Value for Diagnostic Radiology Residents.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the relevance of the postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) Basic Clinical Year for radiology residents has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine the attitude of radiologists and trainees toward this year and which clinical rotations they perceived as most valuable to clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, an anonymous online survey was administered to Canadian radiologists and radiology trainees. In addition to reporting demographic information, respondents were asked to rank the usefulness of individual rotations on a five-point Likert scale. To assess whether there are differences in the ratings and therefore rankings of the rotations by gender, position, and level of training, the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test was used with significance defined as P < .05. The Schulze method was used to rank the perceived usefulness of clinical rotations considered. RESULTS: Of the 275 respondents, 73.1% were male and 47.3% were trainees. A total of 71.3% of respondents were in favor of the basic clinical year, whereas 16.4% opposed. There was a statistically significant difference between the responses of staff radiologists and trainees, with the staff more strongly favoring the Basic Clinical Year (84.1%) than the trainees (56.9%) (P < .0001). As a whole, the respondents favored general surgery rotations as most relevant to their clinical practice (agreement rate of 48.3%). Interventional radiologists found general and subspecialty surgical rotations to be equally relevant. The rotations deemed to be "essential" were emergency medicine (48.7%) and general surgery (46.6%), and the rotations deemed to be "very useful" were orthopedics (45.8%), trauma (44.4%), neurosurgery (43.3%), neurology (42.2%), and hepatobiliary surgery (38.9%). There was no statistical difference between the respondents' choices based on their level of experience and scope of practice. CONCLUSIONS: Most radiologists and radiology trainees were in favor of completing the PGY-1 Basic Clinical Year. However, programs should maximize the education value of this year by including more of the top-ranked rotations. As the practice of radiology evolves, it is important to ensure that training paradigms continue to prepare residents for independent practice.

The influence of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on sedentary time in overweight and obese adults.

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) elicits health benefits but it is unclear how HIIT impacts sedentary behaviour. In this preliminary study, we compared the effects of supervised HIIT or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on sedentary time in overweight/obese adults. In both groups, percentage of time spent in sedentary activities was significantly reduced during the supervised exercise intervention (time main effect, P = 0.03), suggesting that both HIIT and MICT replaced time spent previously being sedentary.

Accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure measurements in obese patients.

This article describes an evidence-based literature review, comparing upper arm and forearm blood pressure measurements using non-invasive devices on obese patients. The focus on blood pressure monitoring was in response to regularly witnessing inappropriately applied blood pressure cuffs on obese patient's upper arms in practice. An inaccurately obtained blood pressure measurement can result in the misdiagnosis and treatment of hypertension. As the prevalence of obesity grows worldwide, healthcare settings need to ensure they have the necessary equipment and trained staff to accurately measure obese patients' blood pressure. The aim of this review was to identify whether a forearm measurement provided a suitable alternative to upper arm measurements. The article discusses the development and execution of a search strategy, as well as the critical appraisal of a selected article. The results of the review demonstrated that forearm blood pressure measurements in obese patients do not replace upper arm blood pressure measurements taken with an appropriate cuff. It is recommended that further research is undertaken in order to identify suitable alternatives for obtaining an accurate non-invasive blood pressure measurement in obese patients.