RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was two-fold. First, to evaluate the association between the change in the angle of progression (AoP) on maternal pushing and labor outcome. Second, to assess the incidence and clinical significance of the reduction of AoP on maternal pushing. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy at term. AoP was measured at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver before the onset of labor, and the difference between AoP on maximum Valsalva and that at rest (ΔAoP) was calculated for each woman. Following delivery and data collection, we assessed the association between ΔAoP and various labor outcomes, including Cesarean section (CS), duration of the first, second and active second stages of labor, Apgar score and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The prevalence of women with reduction of AoP on maximum Valsalva maneuver (AoP-regression group) was calculated and its association with the mode of delivery and duration of different stages of labor was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 469 women were included in the analysis. Among these, 273 (58.2%) had spontaneous vaginal birth, 65 (13.9%) had instrumental delivery and 131 (27.9%) underwent CS. Women in the CS group were older, had narrower AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva, higher rate of epidural administration and lower 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores in comparison with the vaginal-delivery group. ΔAoP was comparable between the two groups. On Pearson's correlation analysis, AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver had a significant negative correlation with the duration of the first stage of labor. ΔAoP showed a significant negative correlation with the duration of the active second stage of labor (Pearson's r, -0.125; P = 0.02). Cox regression model analysis showed that ΔAoP was associated independently with the duration of the active second stage (hazard ratio, 1.014 (95% CI, 1.003-1.025); P = 0.012) after adjusting for maternal age and body mass index. AoP reduction on maximum Valsalva was found in 73 (15.6%) women. In comparison with women who showed no change or an increase in AoP on maximum Valsalva, the AoP-regression group did not demonstrate significant difference in maternal characteristics, mode of delivery, rate of epidural analgesia, duration of the different stages of labor or rate of NICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: In nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor, narrower AoP at rest and on maximum Valsalva, reflecting fetal head engagement, is associated with a higher risk of Cesarean delivery. The increase in AoP from rest to Valsalva, reflecting more efficient maternal pushing, is associated with a shorter active second stage of labor. Fetal head regression on maternal pushing is present in about 16% of women and does not appear to have clinical significance. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Sujet(s)
Tête/embryologie , Début du travail/physiologie , Présentation foetale , Naissance à terme/physiologie , Manoeuvre de Vasalva/physiologie , Adulte , Score d'Apgar , Césarienne/statistiques et données numériques , Accouchement (procédure)/statistiques et données numériques , Femelle , Humains , Nouveau-né , Travail obstétrical/physiologie , Grossesse , Études prospectives , Repos/physiologieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between application of fundal pressure during the second stage of labor (Kristeller maneuver) and the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) injury. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control study of women recruited immediately after their first vaginal delivery in our university hospital between March 2014 and September 2016. Women who underwent the Kristeller maneuver were recruited as cases. For each case, a control (no Kristeller) was recruited matched for body mass index, use of epidural analgesia, duration of second stage of labor and birth weight. All women were invited to undergo four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound (TPU) 3-6 months postpartum. The main outcome measure was the presence of LAM avulsion on 4D-TPU. TPU results were compared between cases and controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for LAM avulsion. RESULTS: During the study period, 134 women in the Kristeller maneuver group and 128 women in the control group underwent TPU assessment. Women who underwent the Kristeller maneuver had a higher prevalence of LAM avulsion than did controls (38/134 (28.4%) vs 18/128 (14.1%); P = 0.005). In addition, women in the Kristeller-maneuver group had a larger hiatal area on maximum Valsalva maneuver and a greater increase in hiatal area from rest to maximum Valsalva. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of the Kristeller maneuver was the only independent factor associated with LAM avulsion (odds ratio, 2.5 (95% CI, 1.29-4.51)). CONCLUSION: The Kristeller maneuver is associated with an increased risk of LAM avulsion when applied in women during their first vaginal delivery. This should be taken into account when deciding to use fundal pressure to accelerate the second stage of labor and when counseling women following childbirth. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Sujet(s)
Canal anal/traumatismes , Second stade du travail , Troubles du plancher pelvien/épidémiologie , Pression/effets indésirables , Adulte , Canal anal/imagerie diagnostique , Études cas-témoins , Accouchement (procédure)/méthodes , Femelle , Humains , Italie/épidémiologie , Complications du travail obstétrical/épidémiologie , Complications du travail obstétrical/étiologie , Troubles du plancher pelvien/étiologie , Grossesse , Issue de la grossesse , Études prospectives , Facteurs de risqueRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of a new technique for three-/four-dimensional (3D/4D) ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: OmniView™ volume contrast imaging (VCI) for measurement of the pelvic hiatal area on maximum contraction and Valsalva maneuver. In addition, we aimed to study the intermethod agreement between the new technique and the 3D/4D render method. METHODS: We acquired one static 3D and two dynamic 4D transperineal volumes (one obtained during contraction and one during Valsalva maneuver) from 35 nulliparous asymptomatic healthy volunteers and 35 women with symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. Each 3D dataset was analyzed using the OmniView-VCI technique to measure the pelvic hiatal area at rest, on maximum contraction and on maximum Valsalva. Analysis was performed twice by the same operator and once by another operator in order to assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility. All measurements were repeated by one operator using the 3D/4D render method to evaluate the intermethod agreement. Reproducibility and intermethod agreement were studied by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Measurement of hiatal area using the OmniView-VCI technique showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in both asymptomatic and symptomatic women at rest, on contraction and on Valsalva maneuver. In addition, excellent agreement was demonstrated between OmniView-VCI and 3D/4D render in both groups (ICCs on Valsalva in asymptomatic and symptomatic women were 0.894 and 0.975, respectively). No systematic difference was noted in any of the reliability studies performed. CONCLUSIONS: OmniView-VCI is a reliable method for pelvic hiatal area measurement. Both rendering mode and OmniView-VCI can be used interchangeably for assessing pelvic hiatal area. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.