RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays.

Tools for radiation exposure reconstruction are required to support the medical management of radiation victims in radiological or nuclear incidents. Different biological and physical dosimetry assays can be used for various exposure scenarios to estimate the dose of ionizing radiation a person has absorbed. Regular validation of the techniques through inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) is essential to guarantee high quality results. In the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison, the performance quality of established cytogenetic assays [dicentric chromosome assay (DCA), cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay (CBMN), stable chromosomal translocation assay (FISH) and premature chromosome condensation assay (PCC)] was tested in comparison to molecular biological assays [gamma-H2AX foci (gH2AX), gene expression (GE)] and physical dosimetry-based assays [electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), optically or thermally stimulated luminescence (LUM)]. Three blinded coded samples (e.g., blood, enamel or mobiles) were exposed to 0, 1.2 or 3.5 Gy X-ray reference doses (240 kVp, 1 Gy/min). These doses roughly correspond to clinically relevant groups of unexposed to low exposed (0-1 Gy), moderately exposed (1-2 Gy, no severe acute health effects expected) and highly exposed individuals (>2 Gy, requiring early intensive medical care). In the frame of the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison, samples were sent to 86 specialized teams in 46 organizations from 27 nations for dose estimation and identification of three clinically relevant groups. The time for sending early crude reports and more precise reports was documented for each laboratory and assay where possible. The quality of dose estimates was analyzed with three different levels of granularity, 1. by calculating the frequency of correctly reported clinically relevant dose categories, 2. by determining the number of dose estimates within the uncertainty intervals recommended for triage dosimetry (±0.5 Gy or ±1.0 Gy for doses <2.5 Gy or >2.5 Gy), and 3. by calculating the absolute difference (AD) of estimated doses relative to the reference doses. In total, 554 dose estimates were submitted within the 6-week period given before the exercise was closed. For samples processed with the highest priority, earliest dose estimates/categories were reported within 5-10 h of receipt for GE, gH2AX, LUM, EPR, 2-3 days for DCA, CBMN and within 6-7 days for the FISH assay. For the unirradiated control sample, the categorization in the correct clinically relevant group (0-1 Gy) as well as the allocation to the triage uncertainty interval was, with the exception of a few outliers, successfully performed for all assays. For the 3.5 Gy sample the percentage of correct classifications to the clinically relevant group (≥2 Gy) was between 89-100% for all assays, with the exception of gH2AX. For the 1.2 Gy sample, an exact allocation to the clinically relevant group was more difficult and 0-50% or 0-48% of the estimates were wrongly classified into the lowest or highest dose categories, respectively. For the irradiated samples, the correct allocation to the triage uncertainty intervals varied considerably between assays for the 1.2 Gy (29-76%) and 3.5 Gy (17-100%) samples. While a systematic shift towards higher doses was observed for the cytogenetic-based assays, extreme outliers exceeding the reference doses 2-6 fold were observed for EPR, FISH and GE assays. These outliers were related to a particular material examined (tooth enamel for EPR assay, reported as kerma in enamel, but when converted into the proper quantity, i.e. to kerma in air, expected dose estimates could be recalculated in most cases), the level of experience of the teams (FISH) and methodological uncertainties (GE). This was the first RENEB ILC where everything, from blood sampling to irradiation and shipment of the samples, was organized and realized at the same institution, for several biological and physical retrospective dosimetry assays. Almost all assays appeared comparably applicable for the identification of unexposed and highly exposed individuals and the allocation of medical relevant groups, with the latter requiring medical support for the acute radiation scenario simulated in this exercise. However, extreme outliers or a systematic shift of dose estimates have been observed for some assays. Possible reasons will be discussed in the assay specific papers of this special issue. In summary, this ILC clearly demonstrates the need to conduct regular exercises to identify research needs, but also to identify technical problems and to optimize the design of future ILCs.

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Dicentric Chromosome Assay.

After large-scale radiation accidents where many individuals are suspected to be exposed to ionizing radiation, biological and physical retrospective dosimetry assays are important tools to aid clinical decision making by categorizing individuals into unexposed/minimally, moderately or highly exposed groups. Quality-controlled inter-laboratory comparisons of simulated accident scenarios are regularly performed in the frame of the European legal association RENEB (Running the European Network of Biological and Physical retrospective Dosimetry) to optimize international networking and emergency readiness in case of large-scale radiation events. In total 33 laboratories from 22 countries around the world participated in the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison 2021 for the dicentric chromosome assay. Blood was irradiated in vitro with X rays (240 kVp, 13 mA, ∼75 keV, 1 Gy/min) to simulate an acute, homogeneous whole-body exposure. Three blood samples (no. 1: 0 Gy, no. 2: 1.2 Gy, no. 3: 3.5 Gy) were sent to each participant and the task was to culture samples, to prepare slides and to assess radiation doses based on the observed dicentric yields from 50 manually or 150 semi-automatically scored metaphases (triage mode scoring). Approximately two-thirds of the participants applied calibration curves from irradiations with γ rays and about 1/3 from irradiations with X rays with varying energies. The categorization of the samples in clinically relevant groups corresponding to individuals that were unexposed/minimally (0-1 Gy), moderately (1-2 Gy) or highly exposed (>2 Gy) was successfully performed by all participants for sample no. 1 and no. 3 and by ≥74% for sample no. 2. However, while most participants estimated a dose of exactly 0 Gy for the sham-irradiated sample, the precise dose estimates of the samples irradiated with doses >0 Gy were systematically higher than the corresponding reference doses and showed a median deviation of 0.5 Gy (sample no. 2) and 0.95 Gy (sample no. 3) for manual scoring. By converting doses estimated based on γ-ray calibration curves to X-ray doses of a comparable mean photon energy as used in this exercise, the median deviation decreased to 0.27 Gy (sample no. 2) and 0.6 Gy (sample no. 3). The main aim of biological dosimetry in the case of a large-scale event is the categorization of individuals into clinically relevant groups, to aid clinical decision making. This task was successfully performed by all participants for the 0 Gy and 3.5 Gy samples and by 74% (manual scoring) and 80% (semiautomatic scoring) for the 1.2 Gy sample. Due to the accuracy of the dicentric chromosome assay and the high number of participating laboratories, a systematic shift of the dose estimates could be revealed. Differences in radiation quality (X ray vs. γ ray) between the test samples and the applied dose effect curves can partly explain the systematic shift. There might be several additional reasons for the observed bias (e.g., donor effects, transport, experimental conditions or the irradiation setup) and the analysis of these reasons provides great opportunities for future research. The participation of laboratories from countries around the world gave the opportunity to compare the results on an international level.

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Assay.

The goal of the RENEB inter-laboratory comparison 2021 exercise was to simulate a large-scale radiation accident involving a network of biodosimetry labs. Labs were required to perform their analyses using different biodosimetric assays in triage mode scoring and to rapidly report estimated radiation doses to the organizing institution. This article reports the results obtained with the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Three test samples were exposed to blinded doses of 0, 1.2 and 3.5 Gy X-ray doses (240 kVp, 13 mA, ∼75 keV, 1 Gy/min). These doses belong to 3 triage categories of clinical relevance: a low dose category, for no exposure or exposures inferior to 1 Gy, requiring no direct treatment of subjects; a medium dose category, with doses ranging from 1 to 2 Gy, and a high dose category, after exposure to doses higher than 2 Gy, with the two latter requiring increasing medical attention. After irradiation the test samples (no. 1, no. 2 and no. 3) were sent by the organizing laboratory to 14 centers participating in the micronucleus assay exercise. Laboratories were asked to setup micronucleus cultures and to perform the micronucleus assay in triage mode, scoring 500 binucleated cells manually, or 1,000 binucleated cells in automated/semi-automated mode. One laboratory received no blood samples, but scored pictures from another lab. Based on their calibration curves, laboratories had to provide estimates of the administered doses. The accuracy of the reported dose estimates was further analyzed by the micronucleus assay lead. The micronucleus assay allowed classification of samples in the corresponding clinical triage categories (low, medium, high dose category) in 88% of cases (manual scoring, 88%; semi-automated scoring, 100%; automated scoring, 73%). Agreement between scoring laboratories, assessed by calculating the Fleiss' kappa, was excellent (100%) for semi-automated scoring, good (83%) for manual scoring and poor (53%) for fully automated scoring. Correct classification into triage scoring dose intervals (reference dose ±0.5 Gy for doses ≤2.5 Gy, or reference dose ±1 Gy for doses >2.5 Gy), recommended for triage biodosimetry, was obtained in 79% of cases (manual scoring, 73%; semi-automated scoring, 100%; automated scoring, 67%). The percentage of dose estimates whose 95% confidence intervals included the reference dose was 58% (manual scoring, 48%; semiautomated scoring, 72%; automated scoring, 60%). For the irradiated samples no. 2 and no. 3, a systematic shift towards higher dose estimations was observed. This was also noticed with the other cytogenetic assays in this intercomparison exercise. Accuracy of the rapid triage modality could be maintained when the number of manually scored cells was scaled down to 200 binucleated cells. In conclusion, the micronucleus assay, preferably performed in a semi-automated or manual scoring mode, is a reliable technique to perform rapid biodosimetry analysis in large-scale radiation emergencies.

Absence of genotoxic impact assessed by micronucleus frequency in circulating lymphocytes of workers exposed to cadmium.

PURPOSE: Cd is considered as a genotoxic carcinogen for which a threshold can be identified. This threshold has, however, not been established and the shape of the relationship between Cd exposure and genotoxic effects is unknown. The aim of the present study was to analyse the shape of the dose-response relationship for the genotoxic effects of Cd in occupational settings. METHODS: The study has a cross-sectional design and includes 60 healthy male and female workers with known Cd exposure selected from two plants manufacturing or recycling nickel-Cd batteries. The frequency of MN was measured in circulating lymphocytes, and related to internal Cd doses (Cd-B, Cd-U). Determinants of MN frequency were traced by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Cd exposure covered a wide range as measured by Cd-B (0.02-1.26 µg/dL), Cd-U (0.26-15.80 µg/g creat) and seniority in the plant (1-42 years). Gender was the only parameter significantly associated with MN frequency, women having on average 8.5 additional MN/1000 BN cells compared to men. Cd-B, Cd-U or Ni-U did not influence MN frequency when adjusted for gender and other potential confounders. CONCLUSION: This finding is consistent with the existing knowledge on the mechanisms governing the genotoxic activity of Cd, which are all non-stochastic and thresholded. The threshold for systemic genotoxic effects of Cd is thus beyond the range of internal exposure considered in the present investigation.

BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 mutations and CHEK2 c.1100delC in different South African ethnic groups diagnosed with premenopausal and/or triple negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge of the aetiology of hereditary breast cancer in the four main South African population groups (black, coloured, Indian and white) is limited. Risk assessments in the black, coloured and Indian population groups are challenging because of restricted information regarding the underlying genetic contributions to inherited breast cancer in these populations. We focused this study on premenopausal patients (diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 50; n = 78) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (n = 30) from the four South African ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 and to evaluate the presence of the CHEK2 c.1100delC allele in these patients. METHODS: In total, 108 South African breast cancer patients underwent mutation screening using a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) approach in combination with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) to detect large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2. RESULTS: In 13 (12 %) patients a deleterious mutation in BRCA1/2 was detected, three of which were novel mutations in black patients. None of the study participants was found to have an unequivocal pathogenic mutation in PALB2. Two (white) patients tested positive for the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation, however, one of these also carried a deleterious BRCA2 mutation. Additionally, six variants of unknown clinical significance were identified (4 in BRCA2, 2 in PALB2), all in black patients. Within the group of TNBC patients, a higher mutation frequency was obtained (23.3 %; 7/30) than in the group of patients diagnosed before the age of 50 (7.7 %; 6/78). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of evaluating germline mutations in major breast cancer genes in all of the South African population groups. This NGS study shows that mutation analysis is warranted in South African patients with triple negative and/or in premenopausal breast cancer.

The use of IL-2 cultures to measure chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients.

Enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients has been demonstrated in several studies. To investigate the chromosomal radiosensitivity of lymphocytes in breast cancer patients the G2 and micronucleus (MN) assays are often used. In these assays blood samples are exposed to ionizing radiation and the number of radiation-induced micronuclei or chromatid breaks are scored. In most studies investigating the in vitro chromosomal radiosensitivity of breast cancer patients the G2 and MN assays were performed on freshly drawn blood. The disadvantage of working with fresh blood samples is that in most cases only one blood sample can be obtained and that the assay cannot be easily repeated without further blood sampling. To allow repeated testing we propose the use of long-term cultures of T lymphocytes (IL-2 cultures). In this study we therefore investigated whether the radiation-induced MN response in IL-2 cultures was the same as in concordant whole blood cultures. For this study the MN assay (2 Gy) was performed on IL-2 cultures of 11 sensitive breast cancer patients and 20 healthy women. The results demonstrate that the enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity observed in whole blood cultures of breast cancer patients is not present in IL-2 cultures derived from the same blood samples. Therefore, care has to be taken when IL-2 cultures are used to assess chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients.

The use of EBV-transformed cell lines of breast cancer patients to measure chromosomal radiosensitivity.

To investigate the chromosomal radiosensitivity of lymphocytes in cancer patients the micronucleus (MN) assay is often used and performed on freshly drawn peripheral blood lymphocytes. The use of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines may have a lot of advantages (e.g. large pool of cells) compared with fresh blood samples. In this study we have investigated whether the response of EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines to irradiation in the G1/S/G2 phases of the cell cycle is the same as in concordant whole blood cultures where primary lymphocytes were irradiated in the G0 phase of the cell cycle. For this study the MN assay (2 Gy) was performed on EBV-transformed cell lines of breast cancer patients and a group of healthy women. Those breast cancer patients were selected who showed an elevated chromosomal radiosensitivity in fresh blood samples in a previous study. The results demonstrated that the enhanced chromosomal radiosensitivity observed in fresh blood cultures of breast cancer patients is not present in EBV-transformed cell lines derived from the same blood samples. Therefore, care must be taken when EBV cell lines are used to assess chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients.

Impact of the European Clinical Trials Directive on academic clinical research.

With the adoption of the Clinical Trials Directive it was Europe's intention to make the performance of multi-national clinical trials in Europe easier through the harmonization of the regulatory procedures. As the Directive was mainly conceived to facilitate the performance of multi-national clinical trials to develop new drugs, it is to be determined to what extent academic clinical trials will be concerned by the Directive and more importantly what will be its impact on daily academic clinical research. Contrary to several national regulations the scope of the Directive is very large only excluding non-interventional trials. This implies that most of the academic clinical trials will be concerned by the Directive. Besides the handling of the regulatory procedures in the different countries, issues related to insurance, labeling requirements and provision of the investigational medical products will expose the academic sponsor to additional administrative and financial challenges that will have to be handled appropriately, as the academic sponsors will be controlled by Inspectors regarding their compliance with the new regulations to come.

Chromosomal aberrations and in vitro radiosensitivity: intra-individual versus inter-individual variability.

In order to assess the applicability of the micronucleus (MN) and G2 assays as biomarkers of in vitro radiosensitivity and cancer susceptibility, we investigated the inter- and intra-individual variation of these endpoints. For the MN assay unstimulated blood cultures from 57 healthy donors were exposed in vitro to 3.5 Gy Co gamma-rays and for the G2 assay PHA stimulated cultures were irradiated with a dose of 0.4 Gy Co gamma-rays in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. For 14 donors, 2-15 repeat samples were tested over a period of 3 years. The repeat experiments revealed that the intra-individual variability was not significantly different from the inter-individual variability for both G2 and MN assays. As the intra-individual variability determines the reproducibility of the assay, our results highlight the limitations of these endpoints in detecting reproducible differences in radiation sensitivity between individuals within a normal population. Due to the high intra-individual variability and no significant difference with the inter-individual variability found in our study we conclude that care has to be taken when results obtained with chromosomal aberration assays based on one blood sample are used to assess the individual radiosensitivity. Multiple blood sampling may be necessary to draw reliable conclusions. Although more validation studies on the reliability of the G2 and MN assay will be required before they can be used in a confident way as biomarkers of individual radiosensitivity or cancer susceptibility the assays are very valuable to examine population radiosensitivity and the relationship between radiosensitivity, cancer predisposition and genotype.

Chromosomal radiosensitivity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

PURPOSE: The chromosomal radiosensitivity of a selected group of familial breast cancer patients carrying a mutation in BRCA1 (n=11) or BRCA2 (n=9) and a group of healthy mutation carriers (n=12) was investigated and compared to a reference group of breast cancer patients without a BRCA1/2 mutation (n=78) and a group of healthy women carrying no mutation (n=58). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chromosomal radiosensitivity was assessed with the G2 and the G0-micronucleus (MN)-assay on fresh blood samples and on Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines. For the MN-assay, lymphocytes were exposed in vitro to 3.5 Gy and 2 Gy 60Co gamma-rays at a high dose rate (HDR) or low dose rate (LDR). 70-h post-irradiation cultures were arrested and micronuclei were scored in 1000 binucleate cells. For the G2-assay lymphocytes were irradiated in vitro with a dose of 0.4 Gy 60Co gamma-rays after 71h incubation. Cultures were arrested 90 min after irradiation and chromatid breaks were scored in 50 metaphases. RESULTS: The group of breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 or 2 mutation was on average more radiosensitive than the control group, but not different from breast cancer patients without a BRCA mutation. The radiation response of healthy BRCA1/2 carriers was not significantly different from the control group and also not different from relatives without a BRCA mutation. Comparing the radiation response in EBV cell lines derived from breast cancer patients with or without a BRCA1 mutation revealed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that chromosomal radiosensitivity observed in breast cancer patients heterozygous for BRCA1 or 2 mutations, could not be demonstrated in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. This suggests that mutations in BRCA1 or 2 genes are not playing a main role in chromosomal radiosensitivity, this although BRCA1 and 2 are both involved in DNA repair/signalling processes.

Chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients with a known or putative genetic predisposition.

The chromosomal radiosensitivity of breast cancer patients with a known or putative genetic predisposition was investigated and compared to a group of healthy women. The chromosomal radiosensitivity was assessed with the G2 and the G0-micronucleus assay. For the G2 assay lymphocytes were irradiated in vitro with a dose of 0.4 Gy (60)Co gamma-rays after 71 h incubation, and chromatid breaks were scored in 50 metaphases. For the micronucleus assay lymphocytes were exposed in vitro to 3.5 Gy (60)Co gamma-rays at a high dose rate or low dose rate. 70 h post-irradiation cultures were arrested and micronuclei were scored in 1000 binucleate cells. The results demonstrated that the group of breast cancer patients with a known or putative genetic predisposition was on the average more radiosensitive than a population of healthy women, and this with the G2 as well as with the high dose rate and low dose rate micronucleus assay. With the G2 assay 43% of the patients were found to be radiosensitive. A higher proportion of the patients were radiosensitive with the micronucleus assay (45% with high dose rate and 61% with low dose rate). No correlation was found between the G2 and the G0-micronucleus chromosomal radiosensitivity. Out of the different subgroups considered, the group of the young breast cancer patients without family history showed the highest percentage of radiosensitive cases in the G2 (50%) as well as in the micronucleus assay (75-78%).

Induction and disappearance of G2 chromatid breaks in lymphocytes after low doses of low-LET gamma-rays and high-LET fast neutrons.

PURPOSE: To determine by means of the G2 assay the number of chromatid breaks induced by low-LET gamma-rays and high-LET neutrons, and to compare the kinetics of chromatid break rejoining for radiations of different quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The G2 assay was performed on blood samples of four healthy donors who were irradiated with low-LET gamma-rays and high-LET neutrons. In a first set of experiments a dose-response curve for the formation of chromatid breaks was carried out for gamma-rays and neutrons with doses ranging between 0.1 and 0.5 Gy. In a second set of experiments, the kinetics of chromatid break formation and disappearance were investigated after a dose of 0.5 Gy using post-irradiation times ranging between 0.5 and 3.5 h. For the highest dose of 0.5 Gy, the number of isochromatid breaks was also scored. RESULTS: No significant differences in the number of chromatid breaks were observed between low-LET gamma-rays and high-LET neutrons for the four donors at any of the doses given. The dose-response curves for the formation of chromatid breaks are linear for both radiation qualities and RBEs = 1 were obtained. Scoring of isochromatid breaks at the highest dose of 0.5 Gy revealed that high-LET neutrons were, however, more effective at inducing isochromatid breaks (RBE = 6.2). The rejoining experiments further showed that the kinetics of disappearance of chromatid breaks following irradiation with low-LET gamma-rays or high-LET neutrons were not significantly different. Half-times of 0.92 h for gamma-rays and 0.84 h for neutrons were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the G2 assay, the results demonstrate that at low doses of irradiation, the induction as well as the disappearance of chromatid breaks is independent of the LET of the radiation qualities used (0.24 keV x microm(-1) 60Co gamma-rays and 20 keV x microm(-1) fast neutrons). As these radiation qualities produce the same initial number of double-strand breaks, the results support the signal model that proposes that chromatid breaks are the result of an exchange process which is triggered by a single double-strand break.

The micronucleus and G2-phase assays for human blood lymphocytes as biomarkers of individual sensitivity to ionizing radiation: limitations imposed by intraindividual variability.

As part of a program to assess the applicability of the micronucleus (MN) and G2-phase assays as biomarkers of cancer susceptibility, we investigated the inter- and intraindividual variations of these end points. For the MN assay, unstimulated blood cultures from 14 healthy donors were exposed in vitro to 3.5 Gy 60Co gamma rays; for the G2-phase assay, PHA-stimulated cell cultures were irradiated with a dose of 0.4 Gy 60Co gamma rays in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Two of the 14 volunteers were assayed 9 times over a period of 1 year. The repeat experiments revealed that the intraindividual variability was not significantly different from the interindividual variability for both the G2-phase and MN assays. Since the intraindividual variability determines the reproducibility of the assay, our results highlight the limitations of these end points in detecting reproducible differences in radiation sensitivity between individuals within a normal population. For example, one donor of the population was identified as being radiosensitive (based on the 90th percentile criterion) but turned out to be normal when the assay was repeated twice. We conclude that the determination of individual radiosensitivity with these two cytogenetic assays is unreliable when based on one blood sample.

Regulatory issues for clinical trials at EORTC: the way forward. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

Since the Declaration of Helsinki, the performance of clinical trials is subject to ethical and gradually also legal requirements. As the EORTC is performing clinical trials in more then 30 countries, it gained expertise in the field of Regulatory Affairs of all those countries. This paper intends to address the general approach with regard to European Regulatory Affairs. Furthermore, it is focusing on the role of the EORTC at the level of the competent regulatory authorities. As recently things are moving and changing on a European level, it describes the perception of the current and future European regulatory framework, and last, but not least, it is explained in what respect the achievements of the EORTC could be of benefit to society when defining their cancer treatment policies.

Chromosomal radiosensitivity study of temporary nuclear workers and the support of the adaptive response induced by occupational exposure.

PURPOSE: To study chromosomal radiosensitivity in a population of radiation workers and investigate the possibility of an adaptive response in lymphocytes of workers after short-term occupational exposure to ionizing radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The studied group comprised 41 workers temporarily employed at the Nuclear Power Plant Doel (Belgium) for reactor maintenance. A blood sample was taken before and directly after the exposure period of about 1 month. Chromosomal radiosensitivity was assessed in vitro by the G2 assay and the G0 micronucleus (MN) assay. For the MN assay, a low dose-rate (LDR) in vitro irradiation protocol was applied in addition to high dose-rate (HDR) irradiation of the blood samples in order to determine the dose-rate sparing (DRS) effect. RESULTS: No statistically significant effect of the occupational exposures (up to 10 mSv) on the baseline MN frequencies without in vitro irradiation was observed. A comparison of the number of chromatid aberrations pre- and post-exposure shows no effect of the occupational exposure. On the other hand, the G0-MN assay with the LDR irradiation protocol reveals a systematic reduction in chromosomal radiosensitivity by the exposure, increasing with dose. For workers who received the highest dose (4-10 mSv) a statistically significant (p <0.05) decrease of the in vitro induced MN yields and increase of the dose-rate sparing was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term low-dose occupational exposure may act as an in vivo adaptive dose and stimulate repair in G0 lymphocytes.