[Compulsive Sexual Behaviour Disorder and Sexual Motivations]. / A kompulzív szexuális viselkedési zavar és a szexuális motivációk összefüggései.

INTRODUCTION: Compulsive sexual behaviour or hypersexuality has been the subject of growing interest among academic circles. However, relatively few reliable predictors have been identified. The aim of the present study was to examine whether different types of sexual motivations based on Self-Determination Theory can account for compulsive sexual behaviour. METHOD: The study was conducted on a non-clinical sample of nearly 1000 participants. Sexual motivation was assessed using the Sexual Motivation Scale and compulsive sexual behaviour was assessed using the Hypersexual Behaviour Inventory. Both measures showed adequate reliability. Multiple linear regression was performed to analyse the relationship between the variables. RESULTS: In the regression, controlling for gender, of the six motivational factors, integrated (ß = 0.167), introjected (ß = 0.074) and amotivation (ß = 0.128) were found significant (p <0.001), and identified was nearly significant (ß = 0.53; p = 0.065). The intrinsic (ß = -0.032; p = 0.366) and extrinsic (ß = -0.027; p = 0.168) forms of motivation had no impact on hypersexuality. The total explained variance of the model was 18% (p <0.001). Results indicated that three of the six motivational factors positively and weakly predicted hypersexuality. CONCLUSION: The original hypothesis of the study, that less self-determined motivated sexual behaviour would be a better predictor of compulsive sexual behaviour, was not confirmed. In practice, positively related variables, especially amotivation, may play an important role in psychotherapeutic processes. However, in order to better understand compulsive sexual behaviour, additional factors still need to be explored.

[Psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale - Short Version (IUS-12)]. / Az alkoholhasználat és az öndetermináció kapcsolata: a Kezelési Önszabályozási Kérdoív pszichometriai jellemzoi magyar mintán.

INTRODUCTION: Intolerance of uncertainty is the tendency to react negatively to an uncertain situation, regardless of the probability of the occurrence of the event and its consequences. Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) can also be conceptualized as a personality trait that is prominent in many anxiety and rumination-related pathologies. A growing body of research highlights its key role in understanding anxiety disorders. METHOD: The aim of present study was to investigate the dimensionality, validity and reliability of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale in a large non-clinical sample (N = 1747). Former was analysed by confirmatory factor analysis, the validity by correlation with the Perceived Stress Scale. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest analysis. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis failed to confirm the hypothesized two-factor structure (CFI = 0.907; TLI = 0.885; RMSEA = 0.103 [90% CI = 0.096-0.110]; SRMR = 0.071). However, the exploratory factor analysis identified the same two factors as in the original study: "Prospective" and "Inhibitory". The scale showed excellent internal reliability (α = 0.897) and test-retest reliability. There was moderate correlation with the Perceived Stress Scale (r = 0.438). CONCLUSION: Based on the results, the Hungarian version of the BTS-12 is a valid and reliable measurement tool. However, before its use in a Hungarian sample, its psychometric properties need to be confirmed by further studies on a large sample. In the future, the questionnaire will be useful in measuring intolerance of uncertainty and may be useful in identifying susceptibility to anxiety disorders.