A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Preoperative MRI in In-breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the identification of additional tumors in the breast using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) results in a lower risk of in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies were performed. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: From 768 citations, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. The 20 studies consisted of 14 retrospective reviews, 3 matched cohorts, and 3 randomized controlled trials. Whereas 2 studies reported a statistically significant lower rate of IBTR with pMRI, 18 studies showed no difference, and no studies reported a higher rate. Of the 18 studies showing no significant difference, 12 demonstrated a trend toward a lower IBTR rate in the pMRI group. The criteria for meta-analysis were met by 16 studies. A meta-analysis of 11 studies that reported hazard ratios (HR) for IBTR showed a trend toward a lower rate of IBTR for patients who received preoperative MRI (hazard ratio (HR), 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-1.05). A meta-analysis of five studies that reported event rates and had similar follow-up duration for both groups demonstrated a lower relative risk (RR) of IBTR (RR, 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Although some evidence supports the hypothesis that identification of additional tumors in the breast using pMRI results in lower rates of IBTR after BCS, the main meta-analysis in this study did not confirm this hypothesis.

Breast-Conserving Surgery Margin Guidance Using Micro-Computed Tomography: Challenges When Imaging Radiodense Resection Specimens.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is an integral component of early-stage breast cancer treatment, but costly reexcision procedures are common due to the high prevalence of cancer-positive margins on primary resections. A need exists to develop and evaluate improved methods of margin assessment to detect positive margins intraoperatively. METHODS: A prospective trial was conducted through which micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) with radiological interpretation by three independent readers was evaluated for BCS margin assessment. Results were compared to standard-of-care intraoperative margin assessment (i.e., specimen palpation and radiography [abbreviated SIA]) for detecting cancer-positive margins. RESULTS: Six hundred margins from 100 patients were analyzed. Twenty-one margins in 14 patients were pathologically positive. On analysis at the specimen-level, SIA yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 42.9%, 76.7%, 23.1%, and 89.2%, respectively. SIA correctly identified six of 14 margin-positive cases with a 23.5% false positive rate (FPR). Micro-CT readers achieved sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV ranges of 35.7-50.0%, 55.8-68.6%, 15.6-15.8%, and 86.8-87.3%, respectively. Micro-CT readers correctly identified five to seven of 14 margin-positive cases with an FPR range of 31.4-44.2%. If micro-CT scanning had been combined with SIA, up to three additional margin-positive specimens would have been identified. DISCUSSION: Micro-CT identified a similar proportion of margin-positive cases as standard specimen palpation and radiography, but due to difficulty distinguishing between radiodense fibroglandular tissue and cancer, resulted in a higher proportion of false positive margin assessments.

Surgical Trainee Perspectives on the Opioid Crisis: The Influence of Explicit and Hidden Curricula.

OBJECTIVE: In order to effectively create and implement an educational program to improve opioid prescribing practices, it is important to first consider the unique perspectives of residents on the frontlines of the opioid epidemic. We sought to better understand resident perspectives on opioid prescribing, current practices in pain management, and opioid education as a needs assessment for designing future educational interventions. DESIGN: This is a qualitative study using focus groups of surgical residents at 4 different institutions. SETTING: We conducted focus groups using a semistructured interview guide in person or over video conferencing. The residency programs selected for participation represent a broad geographic range and varying residency sizes. PARTICIPANTS: We used purposeful sampling to recruit general surgery residents from the University of Utah, University of Wisconsin, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. All general surgery residents at these locations were eligible for inclusion. Participants were assigned to focus groups by residency site and their status as junior (PGY-2, PGY-3) or senior resident (PGY-4, PGY-5). RESULTS: We completed 8 focus groups with a total of 35 residents included. We identified 4 main themes. First, residents relied on clinical and nonclinical factors when making decisions about opioid prescribing. However, hidden curricula based on unique institutional cultures and attending preferences heavily influenced residents' prescribing practices. Second, residents acknowledged that stigma and biases towards certain patient groups influenced opioid prescribing practices. Third, residents encountered barriers within their health systems to evidence-based opioid prescribing. Fourth, residents did not routinely receive formal education on pain management or opioid prescribing. Residents recommended several interventions to improve the current state of opioid prescribing, including standardized prescribing guidelines, improved patient education, and formal training during the first year of residency. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted several areas of opioid prescribing that can be improved upon through educational interventions. These findings can be used to develop programs aimed at improving residents' opioid prescribing practices, both during and after training, and ultimately the safe care of surgical patients. ETHICS STATEMENT: This project was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board, ID # 00118491. All participants provided written informed consent.

Reasons for Long-term Opioid Prescriptions After Guideline-directed Opioid Prescribing and Excess Opioid Pill Disposal.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and reasons for long-term opioid prescriptions (rxs) after surgery in the setting of guideline-directed prescribing and a high rate of excess opioid disposal. BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have demonstrated that 5% to 10% of opioid-naïve patients prescribed opioids after surgery will receive long-term (3-12 months after surgery) opioid rxs, little is known about the reasons why long-term opioids are prescribed. METHODS: We studied 221 opioid-naïve surgical patients enrolled in a previously reported prospective clinical trial which used a patient-centric guideline for discharge opioid prescribing and achieved a high rate of excess opioid disposal. Patients were treated on a wide variety of services; 88% of individuals underwent cancer-related surgery. Long-term opioid rxs were identified using a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program search and reasons for rxs and opioid adverse events were ascertained by medical record review. We used a consensus definition for persistent opioid use: opioid rx 3 to 12 months after surgery and >60day supply. RESULTS: 15.3% (34/221) filled an opioid rx 3 to 12 months after surgery, with 5.4% and 12.2% filling an rx 3 to 6 and 6 to 12 months after surgery, respectively. The median opioid rx days supply per patient was 7, interquartile range 5 to 27, range 1 to 447 days. The reasons for long-term opioid rxs were: 51% new painful medical condition, 40% new surgery, 6% related to the index operation; only 1 patient on 1 occasion was given an opioid rx for a nonspecific reason. Five patients (2.3%) developed persistent opioid use, 2 due to pain from recurrent cancer, 2 for new medical conditions, and 1 for a chronic abscess. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of prospectively studied opioid-naïve surgical patients discharged with guideline-directed opioid rxs and who achieved high rates of excess opioid disposal, no patients became persistent opioid users solely as a result of the opioid rx given after their index surgery. Long-term opioid use did occur for other, well-defined, medical or surgical reasons.

A pilot multi-institutional study to evaluate the accuracy of a supine MRI based guidance system, the Breast Cancer Locator™, in patients with palpable breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evaluate whether the Breast Cancer Locator™ (BCL), a novel guidance system based on supine MRI images, can be safely and effectively deployed by several surgeons at multiple sites. METHODS: Patients with palpable breast cancer underwent supine MRI at their local institution. A three dimensional (3D) digital image of the tumor in the breast was derived from supine MRI images and used to generate 1) an interactive 3D virtual image of the tumor in the breast (Visualizer) and 2) a plastic bra-like form that allowed the surgeon to place a central wire and bracketing wires in the breast (BCL). The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients who had the central localization wire deployed within the cancer on specimen mammogram. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled at 4 different sites by 6 surgeons. BCLs were successfully manufactured for all patients. The central wire was deployed within the tumor on specimen mammogram in 12 of the 13 patients who had a central wire placed (92%). The cancer was excised with negative margins in 14/14 cases (100%). No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Supine MRI image acquisition was accomplished successfully across multiple sites. Multiple surgeons utilized the BCL system to localize cancers accurately and safely.

Opioid Dependence and Overdose After Surgery: Rate, Risk Factors, and Reasons.

OBJECTIVE: To determine: (1) incidence of " opioid never events " ( ONEs ), defined as the development of opioid dependence or overdose in an opioid-naive surgical patient who is prescribed opioids postoperatively and (2) risk factors predicting ONEs. BACKGROUND: Patients receiving opioids after surgery are at risk of experiencing life-threatening opioid-related adverse events. METHODS: An electronic medical record review identified surgical patients at an academic medical center between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, followed through March 31, 2020. ONEs were determined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/10th Revision (ICD-9/10) codes, and electronic medical record review. RESULTS: A total of 35,335 opioid-naive surgical patients received a perioperative opioid prescription. The median follow-up was 3.47 years (range: 1.25-5.25 years). ONEs occurred in 0.19% (67/35,335) of patients. The ONE rate was 5.6 per 10,000 person-years of follow-up. Ten of 67 ONE patients overdosed on opioids. The median time to ONE was 1.6 years; the highest ONE rate was observed 1 to 2 years after surgery. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving opioid prescriptions 90 to 180 or 90 to 360 days after surgery had the highest risk of developing ONEs [hazard ratio (HR)=6.39, confidence interval (CI): 3.72-10.973; HR=6.87, CI: 4.24-11.12, respectively]. Surgical specialty (HR=5.21, 2.65-0.23) and patient age (HR=4.17, CI: 2.50-6.96) were also risk factors for ONEs. Persistent opioid use 90 to 360 days after surgery was present in 45% of patients developing ONEs. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative opioid dependence or overdose is a significant health problem, affecting roughly 2 per 1000 opioid-naive surgical patients prescribed an opioid and followed for 5 years. Risk factors for the development of ONEs include opioid use 3 to 12 months after surgery, patient age, and surgical procedure.

Surgery Prescription Opioid Misuse and Diversion in US Adults and Associated Risk Factors.

INTRODUCTION: To justify a practice change, it is critical to determine if opioids prescribed after surgery, surgery prescription (Rx) opioids, are in fact associated with opioid misuse and diversion. Currently, there is only limited data to support this assumption. METHODS: We administered a 40-question survey to US adults (18+) who had received a surgery Rx opioid within the last 5 y on Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing worksite. Incidence and risk factors for surgery Rx opioid misuse, self-reported taking of surgery Rx opioids in a way other than instructed by a provider, and diversion, self-reported having one's surgery Rx opioids shared, sold, or stolen, were analyzed. The government validated Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) was used. RESULTS: A total of 966 participants from all 50 states met inclusion: 52% were male, 43% were aged 30-39 y, and 79% self-identified as white. Overall, 34% (n = 333) of respondents reported misusing their surgery Rx opioids and risk factors included working in healthcare, scoring high on the ORT, experiencing an elevated mood with opioids, refilling a Rx, and keeping leftover pills. A total of 22% (n = 212) reported diverting their surgery Rx opioids, and risk factors included working in healthcare, scoring high on the ORT, undergoing plastic surgery, refilling a Rx, and keeping leftover pills. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of surgery Rx opioid misuse and diversion in the US may be as high as one in three and one in five adults, respectively. Efforts to improve leftover pill disposal and risk stratification for prescribing patterns may help to mitigate risk.

First-In-Human Study in Cancer Patients Establishing the Feasibility of Oxygen Measurements in Tumors Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance With the OxyChip.

OBJECTIVE: The overall objective of this clinical study was to validate an implantable oxygen sensor, called the 'OxyChip', as a clinically feasible technology that would allow individualized tumor-oxygen assessments in cancer patients prior to and during hypoxia-modification interventions such as hyperoxygen breathing. METHODS: Patients with any solid tumor at ≤3-cm depth from the skin-surface scheduled to undergo surgical resection (with or without neoadjuvant therapy) were considered eligible for the study. The OxyChip was implanted in the tumor and subsequently removed during standard-of-care surgery. Partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) at the implant location was assessed using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry. RESULTS: Twenty-three cancer patients underwent OxyChip implantation in their tumors. Six patients received neoadjuvant therapy while the OxyChip was implanted. Median implant duration was 30 days (range 4-128 days). Forty-five successful oxygen measurements were made in 15 patients. Baseline pO2 values were variable with overall median 15.7 mmHg (range 0.6-73.1 mmHg); 33% of the values were below 10 mmHg. After hyperoxygenation, the overall median pO2 was 31.8 mmHg (range 1.5-144.6 mmHg). In 83% of the measurements, there was a statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) response to hyperoxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of baseline pO2 and response to hyperoxygenation using EPR oximetry with the OxyChip is clinically feasible in a variety of tumor types. Tumor oxygen at baseline differed significantly among patients. Although most tumors responded to a hyperoxygenation intervention, some were non-responders. These data demonstrated the need for individualized assessment of tumor oxygenation in the context of planned hyperoxygenation interventions to optimize clinical outcomes.

Optical scatter imaging of resected breast tumor structures matches the patterns of micro-computed tomography.

In patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS), the rate of re-excision procedures to remove residual tumor left behind after initial resection can be high. Projection radiography, and recently, volumetric x-ray imaging are used to assess margin adequacy, but x-ray imaging lacks contrast between healthy, abnormal benign, and malignant fibrous tissues important for surgical decision making. The purpose of this study was to compare micro-CT and optical scatter imagery of surgical breast specimens and to demonstrate enhanced contrast-to intra-tumoral morphologies and tumor boundary features revealed by optical scatter imaging. A total of 57 breast tumor slices from 57 patients were imagedex vivoby spatially co-registered micro-CT and optical scatter scanning. Optical scatter exhibited greater similarity with micro-CT in 89% (51/57) of specimens versus diffuse white light (DWL) luminance using mutual information (mean ± standard deviation of 0.48 ± 0.21 versus 0.24 ± 0.12;p < 0.001) and in 81% (46/57) of specimens using the Sørensen-Dice coefficient (0.48 ± 0.21 versus 0.33 ± 0.18;p < 0.001). The coefficient of variation (CV) quantified the feature content in each image. Optical scatter exhibited the highest CV in every specimen (optical scatter: 0.70 ± 0.17; diffuse luminance: 0.24 ± 01; micro-CT: 0.15 ± 0.03 for micro-CT;p < 0.001). Optical scatter also exhibited the highest contrast ratios across representative tumor boundaries with adjacent healthy/benign fibrous tissues (1.5-3.7 for optical scatter; 1.0-1.1 for diffuse luminance; 1.0-1.1 for micro-CT). The two main findings from this study were: first, optical scatter contrast was in general similar to the radiological view of the tissue relative to DWL imaging; and second, optical scatter revealed additional features associated with fibrous tissue structures of similar radiodensity that may be relevant to diagnosis. The value of micro-CT lies in its rapid three-dimensional scanning of specimen morphology, and combined with optical scatter imaging with sensitivity to fibrous surface tissues, may be an attractive solution for margin assessment during BCS.

Effect of intraoperative secretin on operative outcomes in pancreatic resection: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Objectives: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine if using Secretin intra-operatively to identify leaks and subsequently target operative intervention would decrease the frequency of clinically significant post-operative pancreatic fistula formation. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy were randomized to receive intra-operative Secretin or placebo intra-operatively following the completed pancreaticojejunostomy or closure of the cut remnant stump. If a potential leak was identified, targeted therapy with directed suture placement was performed. RESULTS: 170 patients were randomized; 83 receiving placebo and 87 receiving Secretin. The rate of clinically significant fistula formation was 3% (3/87) in the Secretin group and 6% (5/83) in the placebo group (p = 0.489). The rate of biochemical leak was 29% (25/87) in the Secretin group and 19% (16/83) in the placebo group (p = 0.157). There were no Grade C post-operative fistula in either group. Of the 9% of patients in the Secretin group who had a targeted intra-operative intervention, none developed a clinically significant fistula. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, intra-operative Secretin administration was not associated with an overall reduction in clinically significant pancreatic fistula formation. However, patients with an intra-operative leak identified by Secretin may benefit from intervention (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02160808).

Guidelines for Patient-CenteredOpioid Prescribing and Optimal FDA-Compliant Disposal of Excess Pills after Inpatient Operation: Prospective Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: To optimize responsible opioid prescribing after inpatient operation, we implemented a clinical trial with the following objectives: prospectively validate patient-centered opioid prescription guidelines and increase the FDA-compliant disposal rate of leftover opioid pills to higher than currently reported rates of 20% to 30%. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively enrolled 229 patients admitted for 48 hours or longer after elective general, colorectal, urologic, gynecologic, or thoracic operation. At discharge, patients received a prescription for both nonopioid analgesics and opioids based on their opioid usage the day before discharge: if 0 oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were used, then five 5-mg oxycodone pill-equivalents were prescribed; if 1 to 29 MME were used, then fifteen 5-mg oxycodone pill-equivalents were prescribed; if 30 or more MME were used, then thirty 5-mg oxycodone pill-equivalents were prescribed. We considered patients' opioid pain medication needs to be satisfied if no opioid refills were obtained. To improve FDA-compliant disposal of leftover pills, we implemented patient education, convenient drop-box, reminder phone call, and questionnaire. RESULTS: Our opioid guideline satisfied 93% (213 of 229) of patients. Satisfaction was significantly higher in lower opioid usage groups (p = 0.001): 99% (99 of 100) in the 0 MME group, 90% (91 of 101) in the 1 to 29 MME group, and 82% (23 of 28) in the 30 or more MME group. Overall, 95% (217 of 229) of patients used nonopioid analgesics. Sixty percent (138 of 229) had leftover pills; 83% (114 of 138) disposed of them using an FDA-compliant method and 51% (58 of 114) used the convenient drop-box. Of 2,604 prescribed pills, only 187 (7%) were kept by patients. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial prospectively validated a patient-centered opioid discharge prescription guideline that satisfied 93% of patients. FDA-compliant disposal of excess pills was achieved in 83% of patients with easily actionable interventions.

What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata.

BACKGROUND: Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with early-stage breast cancer are more likely to report poorer physician-patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery, lower involvement in decision making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. The objective of this study was to understand how to support women across socioeconomic strata in making breast cancer surgery choices. METHODS: We conducted a 3-arm (Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, and usual care), multisite, randomized controlled superiority trial with surgeon-level randomization. The Option Grid (text only) and Picture Option Grid (pictures plus text) conversation aids were evidence-based summaries of available breast cancer surgery options on paper. Decision quality (primary outcome), treatment choice, treatment intention, shared decision making (SDM), anxiety, quality of life, decision regret, and coordination of care were measured from T0 (pre-consultation) to T5 (1-year after surgery. RESULTS: Sixteen surgeons saw 571 of 622 consented patients. Patients in the Picture Option Grid arm (n = 248) had higher knowledge (immediately after the visit [T2] and 1 week after surgery or within 2 weeks of the first postoperative visit [T3]), an improved decision process (T2 and T3), lower decision regret (T3), and more SDM (observed and self-reported) compared to usual care (n = 257). Patients in the Option Grid arm (n = 66) had higher decision process scores (T2 and T3), better coordination of care (12 weeks after surgery or within 2 weeks of the second postoperative visit [T4]), and more observed SDM (during the surgical visit [T1]) compared to usual care arm. Subgroup analyses suggested that the Picture Option Grid had more impact among women of lower SES and health literacy. Neither intervention affected concordance, treatment choice, or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Paper-based conversation aids improved key outcomes over usual care. The Picture Option Grid had more impact among disadvantaged patients. LAY SUMMARY: The objective of this study was to understand how to help women with lower incomes or less formal education to make breast cancer surgery choices. Compared with usual care, a conversation aid with pictures and text led to higher knowledge. It improved the decision process and shared decision making (SDM) and lowered decision regret. A text-only conversation aid led to an improved decision process, more coordinated care, and higher SDM compared to usual care. The conversation aid with pictures was more helpful for women with lower income or less formal education. Conversation aids with pictures and text helped women make better breast cancer surgery choices.

The shape of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the three-dimensional shape of breast cancer. Implicit to approaches that localize the center of the tumor for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) of non-palpable cancers is the assumption that breast cancers are spherical about a central point, which may not be accurate. METHODS: Pre-operative supine breast MRI images were obtained of 83 breast cancer patients undergoing partial mastectomy using supine MRI-guided resection techniques. Three-dimensional (3D) tumor models were derived after radiologists outlined tumor edges on successive MRI slices. Ideal resection volumes were determined by adding 1 cm in every dimension to the actual tumor volume. Geometrically defined parameters were used to define tumor shapes and associations between clinical variables and shapes were examined. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients had invasive cancer. Breast cancers were categorized into four tumor shapes: 34% of tumors were discoidal, 29% segmental, 19% spherical, and 18% irregular. If hypothetical spherical excisions were performed, non-spherical cases would excise 143% more tissue than the ideal resection volume. When the 3D shape of each tumor was provided to the surgeon during MR-guided BCS, the percentage of tissue overexcised in non-spherical cases was significantly less (143% vs. 66%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Information obtained from a supine MRI can be used to generate 3D tumor models and rapidly classify breast tumor shapes. The vast majority of invasive cancers and DCIS are not spherical. Knowledge of tumor shape may allow surgeons to excise breast cancer more precisely.

Plasma DNA as a "liquid biopsy" incompletely complements tumor biopsy for identification of mutations in a case series of four patients with oligometastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA in plasma may present a minimally invasive opportunity to identify tumor-derived mutations to inform selection of targeted therapies for individual patients, particularly in cases of oligometastatic disease where biopsy of multiple tumors is impractical. To assess the utility of plasma DNA as a "liquid biopsy" for precision oncology, we tested whether sequencing of plasma DNA is a reliable surrogate for sequencing of tumor DNA to identify targetable genetic alterations. METHODS: Blood and biopsies of 1-3 tumors were obtained from 4 evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer. One patient provided samples from an additional 7 tumors post-mortem. DNA extracted from plasma, tumor tissues, and buffy coat of blood were used for probe-directed capture of all exons in 149 cancer-related genes and massively parallel sequencing. Somatic mutations in DNA from plasma and tumors were identified by comparison to buffy coat DNA. RESULTS: Sequencing of plasma DNA identified 27.94 ± 11.81% (mean ± SD) of mutations detected in a tumor(s) from the same patient; such mutations tended to be present at high allelic frequency. The majority of mutations found in plasma DNA were not found in tumor samples. Mutations were also found in plasma that matched clinically undetectable tumors found post-mortem. CONCLUSIONS: The incomplete overlap of genetic alteration profiles of plasma and tumors warrants caution in the sole reliance of plasma DNA to identify therapeutically targetable alterations in patients and indicates that analysis of plasma DNA complements, but does not replace, tumor DNA profiling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Subjects were prospectively enrolled in trial NCT01836640 (registered April 22, 2013).

Eliminating Opioids from Breast Conserving Surgery: Perioperative Pain Management Pathway.

BACKGROUND: Opioid prescribing guidelines for partial mastectomy (PM) and PM with sentinel lymph node biopsy (PM-SLNB) recommend prescribing anywhere from 0 to 15 oxycodone pills for postoperative pain. We sought to eliminate opioids after breast-conserving surgery. STUDY DESIGN: In January 2017, we implemented a perioperative pathway in which patients received (1) preoperative acetaminophen, (2) pre-incisional bupivacaine skin infiltration, (3) post-excision bupivacaine wound deposition, (4) intraoperative ketorolac, (5) instructions to use both acetaminophen and ibuprofen for postoperative analgesia, and (6) counseling to set the expectation that opioids would not be required. We measured the percentage of patients who received, filled, and used opioid prescriptions. We compared this to historical institutional data from 2016. RESULTS: There were 226 patients (mean age: 62 ± 13 years) who underwent surgery: 50% (114 of 226) underwent PM alone and 50% (112 of 226) PM-SLNB. Twenty-four patients (11%) required opioids in the recovery unit, and 14 (6%) were discharged home with a prescription. Five of the 14 patients (36%) did not fill their prescription. Among the patients who did fill their prescription, only 1 patient used opioids. In addition, 2 (1%) patients had difficulty managing their postoperative pain and were prescribed opioids within 7 days of surgery. Ultimately, 99% (223 of 226) of patients managed their postoperative pain after discharge without opioids. This represents a significant decrease in opioid use after breast conserving surgery, from 40% in 2016 to 1% after pathway implementation, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: When a multimodal nonopioid pain pathway was implemented, 99% of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery did not require opioids after discharge.

Opioid Stewardship in Urology: Quality Improvement Summit 2018.

INTRODUCTION: We summarize the 2018 AUA (American Urological Association) Quality Improvement Summit, Opioid Stewardship in Urology, highlighting appropriate urological opioid use as well as reviewing programs that have been successful in reducing opioid prescribing. The AUA brought together nearly 100 attendees from across the United States, including clinicians who specialize in urology and other specialties, as well as researchers, government officials and others. METHODS: The 2018 AUA Quality Improvement Summit was a 1-day meeting held at AUA headquarters in Linthicum, Maryland. Talks and panels highlighted opioid stewardship programs and emphasized research on the nature and management of postoperative pain. RESULTS: The impact of the opioid epidemic is profound and the contribution of postoperative prescribing is noteworthy (eg 6% of opioid naïve patients demonstrate new persistent use habits after surgery and up to 70% of opioid pills prescribed after surgery go unused). Speakers raised awareness of these facts and detailed opportunities to improve, including prudent prescribing, opioid reclamation, use of nonopioid alternatives, and outreach and education. CONCLUSIONS: The 2018 AUA Quality Improvement Summit provided a platform for urologists to discuss the opioid epidemic and to learn strategies for combatting this issue from multidisciplinary experts. Physician led opioid stewardship and research, facilitated by this Summit, may enhance the quality and safety of medical care and improve the lives of patients, their families and their communities.

Association of Decreased Postsurgical Opioid Prescribing With Patients' Satisfaction With Surgeons.

Importance: Opioid overdose is the leading cause of injury-related death in the United States. Several studies have shown that surgeons overprescribe opioids, and guidelines for appropriate opioid prescribing are available. Concern about patient-reported satisfaction scores may be a barrier to surgeons adopting guideline-directed prescribing. Objective: To determine whether decreased opioid prescribing is associated with a decrease in patient-reported satisfaction with their surgeon. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective analysis of clinician satisfaction scores at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center obtained in 2 periods: 1 before (period A) and 1 after (period B) an educational intervention that resulted in decreased opioid prescribing. The analysis included 11 surgeons who performed 5 common outpatient general surgical operations on 996 patients. Data were analyzed between March and August 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported overall satisfaction rating of the surgeon (scale, 0-10). This was collected by a nonstudy-related, routine general institutional survey of approximately 40% of all outpatient encounters. Results: Of the total number of patients, 67% were women (667 of 996), and the mean patient age was 58 years. Comparing period A with B, the proportion of patients prescribed opioids decreased from 90.2% (n = 367 of 407) to 72.8% (n = 429 of 589) (P < .001). The mean number of opioid pills per prescription decreased from 28.3 to 13.3 (P < .001) and significantly decreased for each of the 11 surgeons. One hundred five of 996 patients (10.5%) undergoing index operations responded to the survey. There was no difference in the mean clinician satisfaction ratings from period A vs B (9.70 vs 9.65; P = .69). During the study periods, 640 total surveys were collected referencing these surgeons (including outpatient encounters associated with operations other than the 5 index cases). There was no difference in the mean satisfaction ratings from period A vs period B (9.55 vs 9.59; P = .62). When individual clinicians were analyzed, none had a significant difference in overall satisfaction rating from period A vs period B. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite a marked decrease in the proportion of patients receiving opioids and in the number of pills prescribed, there was no significant change in clinician satisfaction ratings.