Implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers in routine practice.

PURPOSE: To report on patterns of relapse following implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and subsequent changes in practice in a tertiary care centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2011, 188 consecutive patients (mean age 59 years old) received intensity-modulated radiotherapies with curative intent for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity (17.5%), oropharynx (43%), hypopharynx (21%), larynx (14%), sinonasal cavities (6%), nasopharynx (1.5%) at the university hospital of Besançon. There were stage I and II 9%, III 24.5%, IV 66.5%. One hundred and thirty-eight underwent exclusive intensity-modulated radiotherapy, 50 underwent postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy, 174 had concurrent chemotherapy, 57 had induction chemotherapy. Dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with static fields was performed for all patients using sequential irradiation in 174 patients and simultaneous integrated boost irradiation in 14 patients. RESULTS: With a median follow-up was 27.5 months, there was 79% of locoregional failures occurred in the 95% isodose. Two-year overall survival, disease-free, local failure-free and locoregional failure-free survival rates were73%, 60%, 79% and 72%, respectively. Prognostic factors for disease-free survival were stage (IV vs. I-III) with a relative risk of 1.7 [1.1-2.8] (P=0.02) and T stage with 1.6 [1.04-2.5] (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: The current series showed similar patterns of failure as in other tertiary care centres. We did not identify intensity-modulated radiotherapy specific relapse risks.

[Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: experience from one centre]. / Chimioradiothérapie préopératoire du cancer du rectum : expérience d'un centre.

PURPOSE: In recent decades, the management of rectal cancer has been significantly improved by optimizing the surgical treatment with the total mesorectal excision and the development of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. In this study, we investigated the impact of changes in practice over a period of 15 years in an expert centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A monocentric study was conducted retrospectively on cT3-resectable T4 patients who received chemoradiotherapy for a locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma between 1993 and 2008. We studied sphincter preservation, pathological complete response (ypT0), survival, and toxicities by different concomitant chemotherapy and treatment period. RESULTS: Among the 179 patients who had a chemoradiotherapy, 56.4% were received concomitant 5-fluoro-uracil-leucovorin, 28.5% with concomitant capecitabine, and 15.1% with concomitant oxaliplatin and capecitabine. The average dose of radiotherapy was 45 Gy (25×1.8 Gy). Five-year disease-free survival was 74.3% and overall survival 68.8%. The rate of local recurrence and distant metastases were 6.1 and 23.6%. In multivariate analysis, concomitant chemotherapy oxaliplatin and capecitabine improved the pathological complete response rate (ypT0; capecitabine: 6%, 5-fluoro-uracil-leucovorin: 10.3%, capecitabine-oxaliplatin: 22.2%), but not significantly (P=0.12) and with more toxicities, and treatment interruptions. Sphincter preservation rate was not improved significantly during the study period (1993-2004 vs. 2005-2008), but disease-free survival improved from 72.2% up to 87.5% (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with those published in the literature. Concomitant chemotherapy with 5-fluoro-uracil or capecitabine remains the standard scheme. Upfront chemotherapy, before chemoradiotherapy, should be investigated with regard to the predominance of metastasis.