Bridging the Gap: How to Get Osteopathic Residents Into Fellowships.

Introduction The fellowship match process is convoluted, with each specialty having its match on its timeline- with some programs having a Post Graduate Year (PGY) 4th-year or 5th-year match. This study aims to identify tangible recommendations for osteopathic surgery residents to use to improve their applications and, ultimately, the success rate for matching into post-graduate fellowship training. Methods In October 2021, as a part of the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons (ACOS) Strategic Planning efforts, the ACOS Resident Student Section sent a questionnaire to the listed email contact for each surgical fellowship program. Fellowship coordinators and program directors were included in the survey. The programs that were included in the study were vascular, thoracic (which included cardiothoracic), surgical critical care, endocrine, hepatobiliary, transplant, pediatric, surgical oncology, breast, minimally invasive, and colorectal surgery. Results Of the 108 programs that answered the survey, 36% of them reported they currently had an osteopathic fellow, and another 29% said they had an osteopathic fellow in the past. 35% of the programs listed that they had never had an osteopathic fellow in their program. In regards to how residents can improve their application for fellowship matches the most common answer was research in the field, they were trying to match into. They wanted to see high scores on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) exams. They also noted that they wanted candidates from more well know residency programs, where they knew the residents would have gotten good training. Conclusion We recommend that any potential fellowship applicant focus on the following three areas increase competitiveness for matching into fellowship training: publication in the desired field, increased overall scholarly activity, and increased ABSITE scores.

Does altitude increase the risk of traumatic aortic injuries? A retrospective cohort study among six level I trauma centers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic aortic injuries (TAIs) are rare but are associated with a high mortality. Prior studies have shown skiers and pilots, whose injuries occur at high altitudes, are at an increased risk for a TAI. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of altitude on the incidence of TAIs across all causes of injury. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at six Level I trauma centers (8/1/2016-1/1/2020) included adult blunt trauma patients with a chest or abdomen injury. High altitude injuries (> 5000 ft.) were compared to low altitude injuries (≤ 5000 ft.). The primary outcome was incidence of TAI. RESULTS: There were 8562 patients, 37% were at high altitude and 63% at low altitude. High altitude patients were older (p < 0.01), more often Caucasian (p < 0.01) and had a higher ISS (p < 0.01). There was a significantly greater incidence of TAI at high altitude than low altitude (1.5% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.01). The median altitude was significantly higher for patients with a TAI than for patients without a TAI (5100 ft. vs. 1400 ft., p = 0.01). After adjustment, high altitude patients had 2-fold [OR: 2.4 (1.6, 3.7)] greater odds of having a TAI than low altitude patients. CONCLUSION: TAIs were more prevalent among high altitude injuries. Providers should be aware of the increased incidence of TAIs at high altitudes particularly when there is a delay in diagnosis and transfer to a trauma center with appropriate resources to manage these critical injuries. TAI screening at high altitude trauma centers may improve survival rates.

A rare case of a large low-grade appendicular mucinous neoplasm causing compressive symptoms.

Primary neoplasm of the appendix is often diagnosed incidentally after an appendectomy. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) make up a small portion of these neoplasms. We present a rare case of a patient with a slow-growing LAMN causing urinary retention and constipation. The mass was initially found incidentally 25 years prior, but the patient declined further workup since he was asymptomatic at that time. The patient experienced progressively worsening abdominal discomfort related to urinary retention and difficulty in evacuating his bowels. Imaging identified a large abdominal mass (19.3 × 8.7 × 13.5 cm). The mass was surgically resected. Pathology was consistent with a LAMN. In general, an incidental finding of an abdominal mass should be further investigated regardless of symptomology. Patients should be educated about the potential of malignancy and the need for a major abdominal surgery in the future if they choose not to have a mass further evaluated.

Rare case of obturator hernia: Surgical anatomy, planning, and considerations.

Obturator hernia is a rare variation of abdominal hernias that cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly population. Incidence rates vary but account for approximately 0.07%-1.0% of all hernias. Literature on laparoscopic versus laparotomy, as well as types of closure (primary vs mesh) have not been well described in the literature. Obturator hernias, although rare, require a high index of suspicion and care in surgical management as many of these patients will be elderly with a multitude of comorbid conditions. Further research and reporting on technique and type of closures utilized when these rare hernias are encountered by surgeons would benefit the surgical community on practices and management of obturator hernias. Here, we present a case of an elderly female who presented with complaints of obstructive symptoms and abdominal pain secondary to an obturator hernia.

Unscreened: Urgent and Emergent Surgical Outcomes in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background Creating useful recommendations for changes in surgical protocols during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has been difficult due to a lack of studies based on representative samples. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes and characteristics of patients undergoing urgent or emergent surgeries. Methods This is a multi-center (eight-hospital), retrospective, observational study of urgent and emergent surgical patients from Colorado and Kansas, the United States, in the early stages of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Patient groups were divided based on their coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status: positive, negative and untested. COVID-19 testing was performed after the surgery if patients were symptomatic. Results The analysis includes 5,547 patients who underwent surgery from March 1, 2020 to May 17, 2020. Seventy-four percent (4,096) were not tested for COVID-19 due to lack of symptoms. Out of the 1,451 tested patients, 1,412 tested negative, and 39 tested positive. Out of all the patients who tested positive, 69.23% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), whereas 16.72% of untested and 21.25% of the negative patients. The invasive ventilation rate for the patients that tested positive was 46.15%, 4.22% for untested, and 8.85% for patients who tested negative. The mortality rate in the positive group was 7.69%, 1.10% in the untested group, and 1.56% in the positive group.    Conclusion Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 had worse clinical outcomes than patients who tested negative and untested. We recommend creating criteria for testing based on patient characteristics and surgical procedure rather than testing all patients awaiting surgery; this would allow us to conserve resources moving forward.

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding localization using preoperative super-selective mesenteric angiography and intraoperative methylene blue injection: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Currently available diagnostic tests for localizing the source of gastrointestinal bleeding include esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, push enteroscopy, video capsule endoscopy, deep enteroscopy, nuclear scan, angiography, radiographic contrast studies of the small bowel, intraoperative enteroscopy, and computed tomography scanning. Despite these diagnostic modalities obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) can be difficult to localize, making surgical intervention challenging. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report the case of a 78-year-old patient who presented with OGIB, melena and passing bright red blood per rectum, with a hemoglobin of 4.8 g/dl requiring multiple blood transfusions. Initially the source of the bleeding was difficult to identify. Eventually, a preoperative superior mesenteric angiogram was performed, identifying an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) within the small bowel as the source of OGIB. Intraoperative methylene blue was then injected through the previously placed angiogram catheter to further localize the bowel segment with the lesion. DISCUSSION: Despite multiple diagnostic modalities, OGIB, especially originating in the small bowel, is challenging to localize, making surgical intervention difficult. Methylene blue is frequently used intraoperatively to properly identify anatomic landmarks. CONCLUSION: In cases of OGIB, superselective mesenteric angiography (SSMA) with intraoperative methylene blue injection can be used as an adjunct to routine diagnostic modalities to guide surgical interventions for controlling hemorrhage and for limiting the extent of bowel resection.

Acute myocardial infarction following penetrating thoracic trauma: A case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as a result of penetrating thoracic trauma (PTT) is rare; however, there have been a few reports of AMI from gunshot wounds. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A patient without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) presented with stab wounds to the left chest and underwent a left anterior thoracotomy, left lung wedge resection, negative pericardial window, and negative exploratory laparotomy. Shortly after leaving the operating room (OR) in a stable condition, the patient experienced a STEMI. An acute thrombus in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery was identified. DISCUSSION: AMI as a result of trauma, both blunt and penetrating, is extremely rare. There have been more reports of AMI secondary to blunt trauma, but it is much less common to find reports in literature of AMI from PTT. CONCLUSION: AMI as a result of penetrating trauma is rare, but can occur secondary to an acute thrombus, even in the absence of a direct cardiac injury. MI should be a consideration in patients with penetrating trauma to the chest, regardless of the intensity of the trauma. At minimum, a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and a baseline troponin should be obtained at initial evaluation and post-operatively, if surgically managed. If ECG demonstrates findings concerning for MI, it should be followed with an echocardiogram and/or cardiac angiogram to further help guide management, with an early cardiology consultation.