RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: Pediatric direct admissions (DA) have multiple benefits including reduced emergency department (ED) volumes, greater patient and provider satisfaction, and decreased costs without compromising patient safety. We sought to compare resource utilization and outcomes between patients with a primary diagnosis of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia directly admitted with those admitted from the ED. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study at a large, academic, free-standing children's hospital (2017-2021). Patients were between 24 hours and 14 days old with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks, admitted with a primary diagnosis of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), time to clinical care, resource utilization, NICU transfer, and 7-day readmission for phototherapy. RESULTS: A total of 1098 patients were included, with 276 (25.1%) ED admissions and 822 (74.9%) DAs. DAs experienced a shorter median time to bilirubin level collection (1.9 vs 2.1 hours, P = .003), received less intravenous fluids (8.9% vs 51.4%, P < .001), had less bilirubin levels collected (median of 3.0 vs 4.0, P < .001), received phototherapy sooner (median of 0.8 vs 4.2 hours, P < .001), and had a shorter LOS (median of 21 vs 23 hours, P = .002). One patient who was directly admitted required transfer to the NICU. No differences were observed in the 7-day readmission rates for phototherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Directly admitting patients for the management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is a preferred alternative to ED admission as our study demonstrated that DAs had a shorter time to clinical care, shorter LOS, and less unnecessary resource utilization with no difference in 7-day readmissions for phototherapy.
Sujet(s)
Service hospitalier d'urgences , Hyperbilirubinémie néonatale , Durée du séjour , Réadmission du patient , Humains , Nouveau-né , Études rétrospectives , Hyperbilirubinémie néonatale/thérapie , Mâle , Femelle , Service hospitalier d'urgences/statistiques et données numériques , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Réadmission du patient/statistiques et données numériques , Photothérapie/méthodes , Admission du patient/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Failure to recognize and mitigate critical patient deterioration remains a source of serious preventable harm to hospitalized pediatric cardiac patients. Emergency transfers (ETs) occur 10-20 times more often than code events outside the intensive care unit (ICU) and are associated with morbidity and mortality. This quality improvement project aimed to increase days between ETs and code events on an acute care cardiology unit (ACCU) from a baseline median of 17 and 32 days to ≥70 and 90 days within 12 months. Methods: Institutional leaders, cardiology-trained physicians and nurses, and trainees convened, utilizing the Institution for Healthcare Improvement model to achieve the project aims. Interventions implemented focused on improving situational awareness (SA), including a "Must Call List," evening rounds, a visual management board, and daily huddles. Outcome measures included calendar days between ETs and code events in the ACCU. Process measures tracked the utilization of interventions, and cardiac ICU length of stay was a balancing measure. Statistical process control chart methodology was utilized to analyze the impact of interventions. Results: Within the study period, we observed a centerline shift in primary outcome measures with an increase from 17 to 56 days between ETs and 32 to 62 days between code events in the ACCU, with sustained improvement. Intervention utilization ranged from 87% to 100%, and there was no observed special cause variation in our balancing measure. Conclusions: Interventions focused on improving SA in a particularly vulnerable patient population led to sustained improvement with reduced ETs and code events outside the ICU.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Acute care hospitals increasingly provide care for youth experiencing mental health crises while they await transfer for psychiatric hospitalization. To inform quality improvement efforts, we aimed to characterize hospitalists' perceptions of health care quality during pediatric mental health boarding and their experiences of moral distress in caring for this population. METHODS: In March 2021, we conducted a web-based survey of hospitalists who participate in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRIS) network. Closed- and open-ended questions queried the quality of care provided to youth during boarding and clinician experience of moral distress in caring for these youth. We iteratively coded qualitative data for emergent themes. Moral distress was measured using 11 items from the Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals (MMD-HP), which categorizes sources of moral distress into system-, team-, and patient-level factors. RESULTS: Eighty-eight of 111 PRIS site leaders (79%) and 76 of 383 other PRIS members (20%) responded, representing 12 community hospitals, 38 freestanding children's hospitals, and 35 children's hospitals in adult centers. Emergent themes related to health care quality included the following: access to psychiatric services; safety; standardized workflows; clinician training; compassion/patient engagement; and collaboration and disposition planning. Hospitals often lacked desired resources, resulting in poor perceived therapeutic value of care, limited patient engagement, and provider moral distress. Four of the 5 highest MMD-HP item scores were related to system-level factors. CONCLUSION: Hospitalists identified several foci for quality improvement and described significant moral distress in caring for youth experiencing boarding, particularly related to health system factors.
Sujet(s)
Médecins hospitaliers , Adulte , Adolescent , Humains , Enfant , Santé mentale , Personnel de santé/psychologie , Qualité des soins de santé , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Sens moralRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: Develop and deploy a disease cohort-based machine learning algorithm for timely identification of hospitalized pediatric patients at risk for clinical deterioration that outperforms our existing situational awareness program. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide Children's Hospital, a freestanding, quaternary-care, academic children's hospital in Columbus, OH. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to inpatient units participating in the preexisting situational awareness program from October 20, 2015, to December 31, 2019, excluding patients over 18 years old at admission and those with a neonatal ICU stay during their hospitalization. INTERVENTIONS: We developed separate algorithms for cardiac, malignancy, and general cohorts via lasso-regularized logistic regression. Candidate model predictors included vital signs, supplemental oxygen, nursing assessments, early warning scores, diagnoses, lab results, and situational awareness criteria. Model performance was characterized in clinical terms and compared with our previous situational awareness program based on a novel retrospective validation approach. Simulations with frontline staff, prior to clinical implementation, informed user experience and refined interdisciplinary workflows. Model implementation was piloted on cardiology and hospital medicine units in early 2021. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Deterioration Risk Index (DRI) was 2.4 times as sensitive as our existing situational awareness program (sensitivities of 53% and 22%, respectively; p < 0.001) and required 2.3 times fewer alarms per detected event (121 DRI alarms per detected event vs 276 for existing program). Notable improvements were a four-fold sensitivity gain for the cardiac diagnostic cohort (73% vs 18%; p < 0.001) and a three-fold gain (81% vs 27%; p < 0.001) for the malignancy diagnostic cohort. Postimplementation pilot results over 18 months revealed a 77% reduction in deterioration events (three events observed vs 13.1 expected, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of pediatric inpatient deterioration requires acknowledgement of the unique pathophysiology among cardiology and oncology patients. Selection and weighting of diverse candidate risk factors via machine learning can produce a more sensitive early warning system for clinical deterioration. Leveraging preexisting situational awareness platforms and accounting for operational impacts of model implementation are key aspects to successful bedside translation.
Sujet(s)
Aggravation clinique , Tumeurs , Nouveau-né , Enfant , Humains , Adolescent , Études rétrospectives , Patients hospitalisés , Unités de soins intensifs pédiatriques , Algorithmes , Apprentissage machineRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To compare hospital costs and resource utilization for pediatric asthma admissions based on the hospitals' availability of continuous albuterol aerosolization administration (CAA) in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children ages 2-17 years admitted in 2019 with a principal diagnosis of asthma using the Pediatric Health Information System. Hospitals and hospitalizations were categorized based on location of CAA administration, ICU-only versus general inpatient floors. Hospitals preforming CAA in an intermediate care unit were excluded. We calculated total cost, standardized unit costs and rates of interventions. Groups were compared using Chi-Square, t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test as indicated. A log linear mixed model was created to evaluate potential confounders. RESULTS: Twenty-one hospitals (7084 hospitalizations) allowed CAA on the floor.Twenty-four hospitals (6100 hospitalizations) allowed CAA in the ICU-only. Median total cost was $4639 (Interquartile Range (IQR) $3060-$7512) for the floor group and $5478 (IQR $3444-$8539) for the ICU-only group (p < 0.001) (mean cost difference of $775 per patient). Hospitalization costs were $4,726,829 (95% CI $3,459,920-$5,993,860) greater for the children treated at hospitals restricting CAA to the ICU. We observed higher standardized laboratory, imaging, clinical and other unit costs, along with higher use of interventions in the ICU-only group. After adjustment, we found that ICU stay and hospital LOS were the main drivers of cost difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was cost savings and decreased resource utilization for hospitals that performed CAA on the floor. Further studies exploring variations in asthma management are warranted.
Sujet(s)
Salbutamol , Asthme , Humains , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Adolescent , Durée du séjour , Études rétrospectives , Hôpitaux , Coûts hospitaliersRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Emergency transfers are associated with increased inpatient pediatric mortality. Therefore, interventions to improve system-level situational awareness were utilized to decrease a subset of emergency transfers that occurred within four hours of admission to an inpatient medical-surgical unit called very rapid emergency transfers (VRET). Specifically, we aimed to increase the days between VRET from non-ICU inpatient units from every 10 days to every 25 days over 1 year. Methods: Using the Model for Improvement, we developed an interdisciplinary team to reduce VRET. The key drivers targeted were the admission process from the emergency department and ambulatory clinics, sepsis recognition and communication, and expansion of our situational awareness framework. Days between VRET defined the primary outcome metric for this improvement project. Results: After six months of interventions, our baseline improved from a VRET every 10 days to every 79 days, followed by another shift to 177 days, which we sustained for 3 years peaking at 468 days between events. Conclusion: Interventions targeting multiple admission sources to improve early recognition and communication of potential clinical deterioration effectively reduced and nearly eliminated VRET at our organization.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in neonatal use of acute care services during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We hypothesized neonatal visits would decrease and the degree of decline would vary by condition. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of neonatal visits to the urgent cares, emergency departments, inpatient units, and intensive care units at a free-standing pediatric healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic and a comparator period. We included visits of infants presenting for acute care within the first 30 days of life. Transfers from a referring nursery, inpatient unit, or ICU were excluded. Data collected included demographics, patient characteristics, and visit characteristics. Descriptive statistics and χ2 tests were used for analyses and to determine statistically significant differences. RESULTS: We identified 4439 neonatal acute care visits, of which 2677 occurred in the prepandemic period and 1762 in the COVID-19 pandemic period, representing a 34.2% decline. Urgent cares and emergency departments experienced the greatest decline in visits for infectious conditions (49%) and the proportion of these visits also significantly decreased. Similarly, the largest clinically significant declines in hospitalizations were for infectious and respiratory diagnoses (48% and 52%, respectively) and the proportions of these hospitalizations also significantly decreased. Despite a small decline in hospitalizations for jaundice, the proportion of jaundice hospitalizations significantly increased by 5.7% (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant reduction in neonatal visits across a spectrum of acute care settings. The impact on use varied by diagnosis with the most notable decline in visits for infectious conditions.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Maladies transmissibles , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Enfant , Service hospitalier d'urgences , Hospitalisation , Humains , Nourrisson , Nouveau-né , Pandémies , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Pediatric abdominal pain is challenging to diagnose and often results in unscheduled return visits to the emergency department. External pressures and diagnostic momentum can impair physicians from thoughtful reflection on the differential diagnosis (DDx). We implemented a diagnostic time-out intervention and created a scoring tool to improve the quality and documentation rates of DDx. The specific aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to increase the frequency of resident and attending physician documentation of DDx in pediatric patients admitted with abdominal pain by 25% over 6 months. METHODS: We reviewed a total of 165 patients admitted to the general pediatrics service at one institution. Sixty-four history and physical (H&P) notes were reviewed during the baseline period, July-December 2017; 101 charts were reviewed post-intervention, January-June 2018. Medical teams were tasked to perform a diagnostic time-out on all patients during the study period. Metrics tracked monthly included percentage of H&Ps with a 'complete' DDx and quality scores (Qs) using our Differential Diagnosis Scoring Rubric. RESULTS: At baseline, 43 (67%) resident notes and 49 (77%) attending notes documented a 'complete' DDx. Post-intervention, 59 (58%) resident notes and 69 (68%) attending notes met this criteria. Mean Qs, pre- to post-intervention, for resident-documented differential diagnoses increased slightly (2.41-2.47, p = 0.73), but attending-documented DDx did not improve (2.85-2.82, p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a marginal improvement in the quality of resident-documented DDx. Expansion of diagnoses considered within a DDx may contribute to higher diagnostic accuracy.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To develop a diagnostic error index (DEI) aimed at providing a practical method to identify and measure serious diagnostic errors. STUDY DESIGN: A quality improvement (QI) study at a quaternary pediatric medical center. Five well-defined domains identified cases of potential diagnostic errors. Identified cases underwent an adjudication process by a multidisciplinary QI team to determine if a diagnostic error occurred. Confirmed diagnostic errors were then aggregated on the DEI. The primary outcome measure was the number of monthly diagnostic errors. RESULTS: From January 2017 through June 2019, 105 cases of diagnostic error were identified. Morbidity and mortality conferences, institutional root cause analyses, and an abdominal pain trigger tool were the most frequent domains for detecting diagnostic errors. Appendicitis, fractures, and nonaccidental trauma were the 3 most common diagnoses that were missed or had delayed identification. CONCLUSIONS: A QI initiative successfully created a pragmatic approach to identify and measure diagnostic errors by utilizing a DEI. The DEI established a framework to help guide future initiatives to reduce diagnostic errors.
Sujet(s)
Erreurs de diagnostic/prévention et contrôle , Hôpitaux pédiatriques/normes , Amélioration de la qualité/organisation et administration , Indicateurs qualité santé/statistiques et données numériques , Retard de diagnostic/prévention et contrôle , Retard de diagnostic/statistiques et données numériques , Erreurs de diagnostic/statistiques et données numériques , Hôpitaux pédiatriques/statistiques et données numériques , Humains , Ohio , Amélioration de la qualité/statistiques et données numériques , Indicateurs qualité santé/normes , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Delays in hospital discharge can negatively impact patient care, bed availability, and patient satisfaction. There are limited studies examining how the electronic health record (EHR) can be used to improve discharge timeliness. This study aimed to implement an EHR discharge optimization tool (DOT) successfully and achieve a discharge before noon (DBN) percentage of 25%. METHODS: We conducted a single-center quality improvement study of patients discharged from 3 pediatric hospital medicine teaching service teams at a quaternary care academic children's hospital. The multidisciplinary team created a DOT centrally embedded within the care team standard workflow to communicate anticipated time until discharge. The primary outcome was the monthly percentage of patients discharged before noon. Secondary outcomes included provider utilization of the DOT, tool accuracy, and patient length of stay. Balancing measures were 7- and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS: The DBN percentage increased from 16.4% to an average of 19.3% over the 13-month intervention period (P = 0.0005). DOT utilization was measured at 87.2%, and the overall accuracy of predicting time until discharge was 75.6% (P < 0.0001). Median length of stay declined from 1.75 to 1.68 days (P = 0.0033), and there was no negative impact on 7- or 30-day readmission rates. CONCLUSION: This initiative demonstrated that a highly utilized and accurate discharge tool could be created in the EHR to assist medical care teams with improving DBN percentage on busy, academic teaching services.