How healthy participants value additional diagnostic testing with amyloid-PET in patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment - a bidding game experiment.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the perceived value of additional testing with amyloid-PET in Euros in healthy participants acting as analogue patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: One thousand four hundred thirty-one healthy participants acting as analogue MCI patients (mean age 65 ± 8, 929 (75%) female) were recruited via the Dutch Brain Research Registry. Participants were asked to identify with a presented case (video vignette) of an MCI patient and asked whether they would prefer additional diagnostic testing with amyloid PET in this situation. If yes, respondents were asked how much they would be willing to pay for additional diagnostic testing. Monetary value was elicited via a bidding game in which participants were randomized over three conditions: (A) additional testing results in better patient management, (B) Same as condition A and a delay in institutionalization of 3 months, and (C) same as A and a delay in institutionalization of 6 months. Participants who were not willing to take a test were compared with participants who were willing to take a test using logit models. The highest monetary value per condition was analyzed using random-parameter mixed models. RESULTS: The vast majority of participants acting as analogue MCI patients (87% (n = 1238)) preferred additional testing with amyloid PET. Participants who were not interested were more often female (OR = 1.61 95% CI [1.09-2.40]) and expressed fewer worries to get AD (OR = 0.64 [0.47-0.87]). The median "a priori" (i.e., before randomization) monetary value of additional diagnostic testing was €1500 (IQR 500-1500). If an additional amyloid PET resulted in better patient management (not further specified; condition A), participants were willing to pay a median price of €2000 (IQR = 1000-3500). Participants were willing to pay significantly more than condition A (better patient management) if amyloid-PET testing additionally resulted in a delay in institutionalization of 3 months (€530 [255-805] on top of €2000, condition B) or 6 months (€596 [187-1005] on top of €2000, condition C). CONCLUSIONS: Members of the general population acting as MCI patients are willing to pay a substantial amount of money for amyloid-PET and this increases when diagnostic testing leads to better patient management and the prospect to live longer at home.

High occurrence of transportation and logistics occupations among vascular dementia patients: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests a role of occupation in the emergence and manifestation of dementia. Occupations are often defined by complexity level, although working environments and activities differ in several other important ways. We aimed to capture the multi-faceted nature of occupation through its measurement as a qualitative (instead of a quantitative) variable and explored its relationship with different types of dementia. METHODS: We collected occupational information of 2121 dementia patients with various suspected etiologies from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (age 67 ± 8, 57% male; MMSE 21 ± 5). Our final sample included individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia (n = 1467), frontotemporal dementia (n = 281), vascular dementia (n = 98), Lewy body disease (n = 174), and progressive supranuclear palsy/corticobasal degeneration (n = 101). Within the AD group, we used neuropsychological data to further characterize patients by clinical phenotypes. All participants were categorized into 1 of 11 occupational classes, across which we evaluated the distribution of dementia (sub)types with χ2 analyses. We gained further insight into occupation-dementia relationships through post hoc logistic regressions that included various demographic and health characteristics as explanatory variables. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the distribution of dementia types across occupation groups (χ2 = 85.87, p < .001). Vascular dementia was relatively common in the Transportation/Logistics sector, and higher vascular risk factors partly explained this relationship. AD occurred less in Transportation/Logistics and more in Health Care/Welfare occupations, which related to a higher/lower percentage of males. We found no relationships between occupational classes and clinical phenotypes of AD (χ2 = 53.65, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Relationships between occupation and dementia seem to exist beyond the complexity level, which offers new opportunities for disease prevention and improvement of occupational health policy.

[Doctor, is my mother suffering from dementia?] / Dokter, heeft mijn moeder dementie?

- The Netherlands health service features a stepwise diagnostic course in primary, secondary and tertiary care. In the diagnostic process for dementia the patient can go to the general practitioner, then to one of the 100 memory clinics and finally to one of the 4 academic Alzheimer centres.- The diagnostic process for dementia is described in the care practice guideline 'Dementia', the NHG (Dutch College of General Practitioners) practice guideline 'Dementia' and the multidisciplinary guideline 'Dementia diagnostics'.- Most patients will only have to follow part of this care chain before an adequate diagnosis is made and appropriate care can be implemented.- New validated instruments for dementia diagnostics have recently become available, including the Amsterdam instrumental activities of daily living (A-IADL) scale, biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the Medial temporal atrophy (MTA) scale for interpreting MRI scans.- The individual risk of dementia can be estimated using the MMSE score, MRI scans and the results of CSF investigations.

EFNS-ENS/EAN Guideline on concomitant use of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have indicated clinical benefits of a combination of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) and memantine over ChEI monotherapy in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our objective was the development of guidelines on the question of whether combined ChEI/memantine treatment rather than ChEI alone should be used in patients with moderate to severe AD to improve global clinical impression (GCI), cognition, behaviour and activities of daily living (ADL). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials based on a literature search in ALOIS, the register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, was carried out with subsequent guideline development according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Pooled data from four trials including 1549 AD patients in the moderate to severe disease stage demonstrated significant beneficial effects of combination therapy compared to ChEI monotherapy for GCI [standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.31; -0.09], cognitive functioning (SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.37; -0.17) and behaviour (SMD -0.19; 95% CI -0.31; -0.07). The quality of evidence was high for behaviour, moderate for cognitive function and GCI and low for ADL. Agreement of panellists was reached after the second round of the consensus finding procedure. The desirable effects of combined ChEI and memantine treatment were considered to outweigh undesirable effects. The evidence was weak for cognition, GCI and ADL so that the general recommendation for using combination therapy was weak. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest the use of a combination of ChEI plus memantine rather than ChEI alone in patients with moderate to severe AD. The strength of this recommendation is weak.

Trajectories of cognitive decline in different types of dementia.

BACKGROUND: To investigate trajectories of cognitive decline in patients with different types of dementia compared to controls in a longitudinal study. METHOD: In 199 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), 10 with vascular dementia (VaD), 26 with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 20 with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), 15 with language variant frontotemporal dementia (lvFTD) and 112 controls we assessed five cognitive domains: memory, language, attention, executive and visuospatial functioning, and global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE). All subjects had at least two neuropsychological assessments (median 2, range 2-7). Neuropsychological data were standardized into z scores using baseline performance of controls as reference. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to estimate baseline cognitive functioning and cognitive decline over time for each group, adjusted for age, gender and education. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with dementia performed worse than controls in all cognitive domains (p < 0.05) except visuospatial functioning, which was only impaired in patients with AD and DLB (p < 0.001). During follow-up, patients with AD declined in all cognitive domains (p < 0.001). DLB showed decline in every cognitive domain except language and global cognition. bvFTD showed rapid decline in memory, language, attention and executive functioning (all p < 0.01) whereas visuospatial functioning remained fairly stable. lvFTD declined mostly in attention and executive functioning (p < 0.01). VaD showed decline in attention and executive functioning. CONCLUSIONS: We show cognitive trajectories of different types of dementia. These estimations of natural disease course have important value for the design of clinical trials as neuropsychological measures are increasingly being used as outcome measures.

New research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease applied in a memory clinic population.

BACKGROUND: In the newly proposed research criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD), patients are defined as having memory dysfunction in addition to either hippocampal atrophy or an abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile. This study applies the criteria in a memory clinic population, using clinical criteria as the reference criterion. METHODS: 138 AD patients, 145 nondemented subjects, 78 patients with other dementias and 91 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were included. Dichotomized medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) score on MRI and dichotomized CSF profiles (based on beta-amyloid1-42, tau and phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 levels) were used in combination with an episodic memory test to assess sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) of the newly proposed criteria and their components separately. RESULTS: We found specificities of 95 and 49% for comparison with nondemented subjects and other demented patients, respectively, with a sensitivity of 86% for AD. Specificity was highest (100 and 77%, respectively, LR+ = 48) when both MTA score and CSF profile were abnormal in addition to the episodic memory test, at the cost of a low sensitivity (48%). CONCLUSION: The newly proposed research criteria for AD yield a good specificity for comparison with nondemented subjects. When the type of dementia is clinically doubted, however, at least two supportive features should be considered (i.e. abnormal MTA score and CSF profile) in addition to memory impairment as core diagnostic criterion.

CSF biomarkers in relationship to cognitive profiles in Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between CSF biomarkers and cognitive profiles in Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: We included 177 patients with AD. Digit Span, Visual Association Test (VAT), VAT object naming, Trail Making Test (TMT), and category fluency were used to assess cognitive functions. Disease severity was assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination; functional impairment was rated by Clinical Dementia Rating. In CSF, levels of amyloid-beta 1-42 (Abeta(1-42)), tau, and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau) were measured. K-means cluster analysis was performed with the three biomarkers to obtain three clusters. Multivariate analysis of variance for repeated measures was performed with CSF cluster as between-subjects factor, neuropsychological z scores as within-subjects variable, and age, sex, and education as covariates. RESULTS: Cluster 1 consisted of 88 patients (49%) with relatively high levels of Abeta(1-42) and low levels of tau and p-tau. Cluster 2 contained 72 patients (41%) with relatively low levels of Abeta(1-42) and high levels of tau and p-tau. Cluster 3 was made up of 17 patients (10%) with low levels of Abeta(1-42) and very high levels of tau and p-tau. No differences between clusters on age, sex, education, APOE genotype, disease duration, functional impairment, or disease severity were found. Patients in cluster 3 performed worse on VAT, TMT-A and -B, and fluency. CONCLUSIONS: Clusters of CSF biomarker levels are related to cognitive profiles in Alzheimer disease. A subgroup of patients with extremely high CSF levels of tau and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 shows a distinct cognitive profile with more severe impairment of memory, mental speed, and executive functions, which cannot be explained by disease severity.

Multicenter assessment of CSF-phosphorylated tau for the prediction of conversion of MCI.

BACKGROUND: The measurement of hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) in CSF has been proposed as a biomarker candidate for the prediction of Alzheimer disease (AD) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, a standard quantitative criterion of p-tau has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess in a multicenter study the predictive accuracy of an a priori defined criterion of tau phosphorylated at threonine 231 (p-tau(231)) for the prediction of conversion from MCI to AD during a short-term observation interval. METHODS: The study included 43 MCI converters, 45 stable MCI (average follow-up interval = 1.5 years), and 57 healthy controls (at baseline only). Subjects were recruited at four international expert sites in a retrospective study design. Cox regression models stratified according to center were used to predict conversion status. Bootstrapped 95% CIs of classification accuracy were computed. RESULTS: Levels of p-tau(231) were a significant predictor of conversion (B = 0.026, p = 0.001), independent of age, gender, Mini-Mental State Examination, and ApoE genotype. For an a priori-defined cutoff point (27.32 pg/mL), sensitivity ranged between 66.7 and 100% and specificity between 66.7 and 77.8% among centers. The bootstrapped mean percentage of correctly classified cases was 79.95% (95% CI = 79.9 to 80.00%). Post hoc defined cutoff values yielded a mean bootstrapped classification accuracy of 80.45% (95% CI = 80.24 to 80.76%). CONCLUSIONS: An a priori defined cutoff value of p-tau(231) yields relatively stable results across centers, suggesting a good feasibility of a standard criterion of p-tau(231) for the prediction of Alzheimer disease.

Longitudinal changes of CSF biomarkers in memory clinic patients.

OBJECTIVE: In Alzheimer disease (AD), longitudinal changes of beta-amyloid(1-42) (Abeta(1-42)), tau, and phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 (ptau-181) in CSF have been reported in small studies only. We evaluated the natural course of CSF biomarkers in patients with AD, subjective complaints, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: One hundred five patients (50 AD, 38 MCI, 17 subjective complaints) underwent two lumbar punctures, with a mean interval of 21 +/- 9 months. CSF levels of Abeta(1-42), tau, and ptau-181 were measured. RESULTS: CSF Abeta(1-42) and tau levels showed main effects for both diagnosis and time (all p < 0.05), with average increases of 47 +/- 72 and 49 +/- 143 pg/mL. The interaction terms were not significant, which implies a similar time effect for all diagnostic groups. CSF ptau-181 levels showed a main effect for diagnosis (p = 0.01) but not for time (p = 0.27, increase of 1.0 +/- 12 pg/mL). CONCLUSION: Levels of CSF beta-amyloid(1-42) and tau but not phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 increased over time in this memory clinic patient cohort with comparable change in all diagnostic groups. The cross-sectional difference between diagnostic groups, however, exceeded by far the longitudinal changes within individuals, suggesting that these biomarkers are not sensitive as markers of disease progression.

CSF biomarkers and medial temporal lobe atrophy predict dementia in mild cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVE: To study CSF biomarkers, beta-amyloid(1-42) (Abeta(1-42)) and tau, and medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) on MRI in their ability to predict dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: Fifty-nine MCI patients (49% male, mean age 69+/-8), follow-up 19 months, were included. Baseline CSF levels of Abeta(1-42), tau and MTA-score were dichotomized. RESULTS: Thirty-three (56%) of the MCI patients progressed to dementia, 30 of which had Alzheimer's disease. Lower CSF Abeta(1-42) level, higher CSF-tau and higher MTA-scores at baseline were found in progressed patients. Cox proportional hazards models revealed that abnormal CSF Abeta(1-42), CSF tau and MTA were significantly associated with dementia at follow-up (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 4.0 (1.3-12.1), 5.9 (1.6-21.7) and 2.1 (1.0-4.6)). A fourfold higher risk was found for patients with both abnormal CSF biomarkers and MTA compared to patients with either test abnormal. Ninety-four percent of patients with both abnormalities converted to dementia. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest an added value of CSF to MRI in the diagnostic work up of patients presenting at a memory clinic.

Variable progression of HIV-associated dementia.

A consecutive series of 71 patients diagnosed with HIV-associated dementia (HAD) (1984-1994) were studied to characterize the clinical course of HAD, and to identify predictive markers of rapid neurologic progression. Neurologic progression rate was determined from the change in the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) dementia severity score from diagnosis to death. Those with the most rapid progression in neurologic disability were compared with those with slow or no progression. Autopsy material was immunostained for macrophage activation markers and gp41 in 30 individuals. Median survival was 3.3 months and 6.1 months for rapid-progression and no-progression patients, respectively. Rapid progression was associated with injection drug use but not with race, gender, or age. CD4+ cell counts were lower at diagnosis among rapid-progression than no-progression patients but no differences in AIDS-defining illnesses or patterns of antiretroviral therapy were found. At presentation, rapid-progression patients had more prominent symptoms of mental slowing than those with no progression; however, no other clinical features, CSF, or imaging features distinguished the groups. Less abundant macrophage activation in both basal ganglia and midfrontal gyrus regions, as judged by HAM56 immunostaining, was noted in 9 no-progression patients, compared with 12 rapid-progression patients. Neurologic progression and survival with HAD is highly variable. A significant proportion of individuals with dementia have prolonged survival of more than 12 months and remain cognitively stable. A history of injection drug use and presentation with prominent psychomotor slowing is associated with more rapid neurologic progression, and these patients tend to show more abundant macrophage activation within the CNS.