[Induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes in term pregnancy using dinoprostone vs oxytocin. An aleatory study]. / Inducción de parto en pacientes con ruptura prematura de membranas en embarazos a término con dinoprostona versus oxitocina. Un estudio aleatorio.

It was accomplished a random comparative study to evaluate the effects of dinoprostone in the Hospital de Gineco Obstetricia No. 60 of the Mexican Institute of the Social Security, from June of 1997 to December of the same year, in relationship to the inducement cervical repening and vaginal delivery in patients with score less than or equal Bishop to 4. They were studied a total of 156 patients split into two groups: 78 patients who were administered by intracervical gel of Dinoprostone and to the remainders 78 were administered oxitocin with the same purpose, being this last the control group. We found that the duration time of induction with dinoprostone is 2 hours in average less than the inducement with oxitocin (p > 0.05). The were achieved 67 deliveries with dinoprostone and 65 deliveries with oxitocina, being not significantly. (p < 0.05) The percentage of inducement defect was considered in relationship to the absence of cervical modifications in 12 hours of administration of dinoprostone or oxitocin, being only 3 patients in each group in these conditions. The observed complications were the same in both groups and the conditions of the newborn were better in the Dinoprostone group. The septic complications of mothers were smaller in Dinoprostone group than Oxitocin group and were significantly (p > 0.05). We can conclude that the dinoprostone intracervical application reduce the induction and expulsion time, with better conditions of the new born, and less percent of infectious complications, in relationship to the Oxitocin control group.

Scarlet fever and group A streptococcal surgical wound infection traced to an anal carrier.

Four patients developed group A streptococcal wound infections shortly following orthopedic surgery. Two of these patients developed scarlet fever which provided an early indication of the presence of a streptococcal epidemic. A single antigenically characteristic strain of group A streptococci was recovered from the wounds of all four patients and from the anus of one surgeon who had participated in the surgery on three of the patients.