RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: In the randomized phase II REGOMA trial, regorafenib showed promising activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. We conducted a large, multicenter, prospective, observational study to confirm the REGOMA data in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The major inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed diagnosis of glioblastoma according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification and relapse after radiotherapy with concurrent/adjuvant temozolomide treatment, good performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS 0-1)] and good liver function. Regorafenib was administered at the standard dose of 160 mg/day for 3 weeks on/1 week off. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was carried out within 14 days before starting regorafenib and every 8-12 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), safety and health-related quality of life. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria were used for response evaluation and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 for assessment of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: From September 2020 to October 2022, 190 patients with recurrent glioblastoma were enrolled from 30 cancer centers in Italy: their median age was 58.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 53-67 years], 68% were male and 85 (44.7%) were in optimal clinical condition (ECOG PS 0). The number of patients taking steroids at baseline was 113 (60%); the second surgery was carried out in 39 (20.5%). O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) was methylated in 80 patients (50.3%) and 147 (92.4%) of the patients analyzed had isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type. The median follow-up period was 20 months (IQR 15.6-25.5 months). The median OS was 7.9 months ([95% confidence interval (CI) 6.5-9.2 months] and the median PFS was 2.6 months (95% CI 2.3-2.9 months). Radiological response was partial response and stable disease in 13 (7.3%) and 26 (14.6%) patients, respectively, with a DCR of 21.9%. The median number of regorafenib cycles per patient was 3 (IQR 2.0-4.0). Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events were reported in 22.6% of patients. A dose reduction due to AEs was required in 36% of patients. No deaths were considered as treatment-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: This large, real-world observational study showed similar OS with better tolerability of regorafenib in patients with relapsed glioblastoma compared with the REGOMA study.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du cerveau , Glioblastome , Récidive tumorale locale , Phénylurées , Pyridines , Humains , Glioblastome/traitement médicamenteux , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectives , Pyridines/usage thérapeutique , Pyridines/pharmacologie , Sujet âgé , Phénylurées/usage thérapeutique , Phénylurées/pharmacologie , Tumeurs du cerveau/traitement médicamenteux , Italie , Adulte , Antinéoplasiques/usage thérapeutique , Antinéoplasiques/pharmacologie , Qualité de vie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma can lead to self-immune side-effects such as vitiligo-like depigmentation (VLD). Beyond the reported association with favorable prognosis, there are limited data regarding VLD patient features and their echo on the therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: To assess the association between VLD and a series of clinical and biological features as well as therapeutic outcomes, we built an observational cohort study by recruiting patients who developed VLD during checkpoint inhibitors. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients from 15 centers (101 men, median age 66 years, BRAF mutated 23%, M1c 42%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 0/1 99%, normal lactate dehydrogenase 74%) were enrolled. VLD was induced by ipilimumab, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, and their combination in 32%, 56%, and 12%, respectively. The median onset was 26 weeks and it was associated with other skin and nonskin toxicities in 27% and 28%, respectively. After 3 years of VLD onset, 52% (95% confidence interval 39% to 63%) were progression free and 82% (95% confidence interval 70% to 89%) were still alive. The overall response rate was 73% with 26% complete response. Univariable analysis indicated that BRAF V600 mutation was associated with a better overall survival (P = 0.028), while in multivariable analysis a longer progression-free survival was associated with BRAF V600 (P = 0.093), female sex (P = 0.008), and M stage other than 1a (P = 0.024). When VLD occurred, there was a significant decrease of white blood cell (WBC) count (P = 0.05) and derived WBC-to-lymphocytes ratio (dWLR; P = 0.003). A lower monocyte count (P = 0.02) and dWLR (P = 0.01) were also reported in responder patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among VLD population, some features might help to identify patients with an effective response to immunotherapy, allowing clinicians to make more appropriate choices in terms of therapeutic options and duration.
Sujet(s)
Inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaires/effets indésirables , Ipilimumab/effets indésirables , Mélanome , Vitiligo , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaires/usage thérapeutique , Ipilimumab/usage thérapeutique , Italie/épidémiologie , Mâle , Mélanome/traitement médicamenteux , Vitiligo/induit chimiquement , Vitiligo/diagnosticRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: This study compared the central nervous system (CNS) metastasis incidence between a temozolomide- and a dacarbazine-based regimen in untreated stage IV melanoma patients. METHODS: A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral temozolomide (200 mg m(-2) per day; days 1-5) or intravenous dacarbazine (800 mg m(-2); day 1), in combination with intravenous cisplatin (75 mg m(-2); day 1) and subcutaneous interleukin-2 (3 MU twice daily; days 9-18), every 28 days (CTI and CDI). RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were eligible for an intention-to-treat analysis (CTI: n=74, CDI: n=75). The 1-year cumulative CNS incidence failure was 20.6% for CTI and 31.1% for CDI (P=0.22). In all 24 patients in CTI (32%) and 34 (45%) in CDI developed CNS metastases; 31 patients died of early systemic progression, before CNS evaluation. Median survival time was 8.4 months in the CTI and 8.7 in the CDI arm; in patients with CNS metastases the median survival time was 13.5 months in the CTI and 11.5 in the CDI arm. No difference in toxicity was observed between the two arms. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CNS failures in metastatic melanoma was not significantly reduced and the clinical course was not modified substituting a dacarbazine-based regimen with a temozolomide-based regimen. Patients who developed CNS metastases did not have a worse prognosis than patients progressing in other sites and should not be excluded from new investigational studies.
Sujet(s)
Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Tumeurs du cerveau/secondaire , Dacarbazine/analogues et dérivés , Dacarbazine/usage thérapeutique , Mélanome/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs cutanées/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/effets indésirables , Barrière hémato-encéphalique , Dacarbazine/administration et posologie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Mélanome/anatomopathologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs cutanées/anatomopathologie , TémozolomideRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) by means of skin expander is currently one of the most widely used methods of breast reconstruction in mastectomized patients. However, given that many breast cancer patients usually receive adjuvant chemotherapy, the adoption of IBR raises new questions concerning possible cumulative toxicity. The present study reports our experience in the use of concurrent adjuvant chemotherapy and immediate breast reconstruction with skin expander after mastectomy for breast cancer and the acute cumulative toxicity of the treatments. METHODS: We evaluated a consecutive series of 52 breast cancer patients who have received IBR by skin expander after radical mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy concurrently during skin expansion between 1995 and 1998 (IBR/CT group). We identified two series of control patients treated during the same period: 51 consecutive patients undergoing radical mastectomy and IBR without adjuvant chemotherapy (IBR group) and 63 consecutive patients undergoing radical mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy without IBR (CT group). For each patient, we evaluated the incidence of surgical complications and chemotherapy's side effects and dose intensity. RESULTS: The interval between surgery and the start of expander inflation was similar in IBR/CT (range 0-19, median 5 days) and IBR groups (range 0-40, median 5 days) and the timing of inflation was not influenced by chemotherapy. The overall incidence of surgical complications in patients undergoing IBR was low: seroma in eight cases, infection in one, skin necrosis in one, expander rupture in two and erythema in three. There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of complications between the IBR/CT and IBR groups. The dose intensity of chemotherapy was similar between IBR/CT and CT groups, with a median dose intensity of 96% and 95% of the projected dose, respectively. The only statistically significant difference in terms of chemotherapy side effects (p = 0.03) was that stomatitis was more frequent and intense in the CT than in the IBR/CT group. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent treatment with IBR and adjuvant chemotherapy appears feasible and safe, it does not increase acute surgical complications or chemotherapy side effects, and does not require any changes in dose intensity or the timing of inflation.
Sujet(s)
Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Tumeurs du sein/thérapie , Épithélioma in situ/thérapie , Carcinome canalaire du sein/thérapie , Carcinome lobulaire/thérapie , Mammoplastie/méthodes , Mastectomie radicale , Expanseurs tissulaires , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Traitement médicamenteux adjuvant , Association thérapeutique , Femelle , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
Between 1/1986 and 6/1996, 37 consecutive patients affected by node-positive gastric cancer (GC) were treated with radical surgery and received 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and mitomycin C (FEM) as adjuvant treatment. Only 57% of the patients received all six cycles and the reasons for treatment withdrawal were mainly related to concomitant pathologies and prolonged leukopenia. After a median follow-up of 39 months, the 3-year disease-free survival, disease-related survival and overall survival were 75.8%, 83.7% and 78.6% respectively. A statistically significant difference in survival was found in the subgroup of patients receiving more than three courses of treatment.