Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrer
1.
Eur J Neurol ; 24(8): 1016-1021, 2017 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28649759

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials have shown that bridging endovascular therapy (EVT) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) therapy improves outcome in patients with stroke with large-artery anterior circulation stroke compared with IVT alone. It remains unknown whether IVT adds any benefit to EVT in these patients. The aim of this study was to assess recanalization rates and thrombus dislocation before initiation of EVT in patients receiving bridging therapy. METHODS: All patients in the Bernese stroke registry (2008-2015) in whom bridging therapy was considered were included in this analysis. Relevant recanalization before EVT, thrombus dislocation and increase in thrombus load between initial and control imaging were assessed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were included. Relevant recanalization before EVT occurred in 8.8% and thrombus dislocation in 7.2% of patients before EVT. Recanalization rates were significantly higher in distal compared with large and more proximal vessel occlusions of the anterior circulation (occlusion of internal carotid artery, 5.4%; middle cerebral artery segment M1, 8.1%; middle cerebral artery segment M2, 17.6%) and in drip-and-ship patients compared with mother-ship patients. In multivariable regression analysis the occlusion site was the only independent predictor of relevant recanalization before EVT (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Relevant recanalization after IVT and prior to EVT in patients receiving bridging therapy was highly dependent on the occlusion site. These findings suggest that future randomized controlled trials should consider occlusion site and treatment paradigm to specify patients who benefit most from bridging therapy in comparison to EVT or IVT alone.


Sujet(s)
Encéphalopathie ischémique/traitement médicamenteux , Fibrinolytiques/usage thérapeutique , Accident vasculaire cérébral/traitement médicamenteux , Traitement thrombolytique/méthodes , Administration par voie intraveineuse , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Enregistrements , Études rétrospectives , Résultat thérapeutique
2.
Ann Oncol ; 27(5): 856-61, 2016 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26884590

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib (S), a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the standard of care for first-line systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Everolimus (E) is a potent inhibitor of mTOR, a pathway frequently activated in HCC. Preclinical data suggest that the combination S + E has additive effects compared with single-agent S. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC and Child-Pugh ≤7 liver dysfunction were randomized to receive daily S 800 mg alone or with E 5 mg until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival at 12 weeks (PFS12). The secondary end points included response rate, PFS, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), duration of disease stabilization (DDS), safety, and quality-of-life (QoL) assessments. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were randomized: 46 patients received S and 60 patients received S + E. Ninety-three patients were assessable for the primary end point and 105 patients for the safety analysis. The PFS12 rate was 70% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54-83] and 68% (95% CI 53-81) in patients randomized to S and S + E, respectively. The RECIST (mRECIST) response rate was 0% (23%) in the S arm and 10% (35%) in the S + E arm. Median PFS (6.6 versus 5.7 months), TTP (7.6 versus 6.3 months), DDS (6.7 versus 6.7 months), and OS (10 versus 12 months) were similar in the S and S + E arms, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 72% and 86% of patients in arm S and arm S + E, respectively. Patients had similar QoL scores over time, except for a greater worsening in physical well-being and mood in the arm S + E. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found that S + E improves the efficacy compared with S alone. Combining 5 mg E with full-dose S is feasible, but more toxic than S alone. Further testing of this drug combination in molecularly unselected HCCs appears unwarranted. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01005199.


Sujet(s)
Carcinome hépatocellulaire/traitement médicamenteux , Évérolimus/administration et posologie , Tumeurs du foie/traitement médicamenteux , Nicotinamide/analogues et dérivés , Phénylurées/administration et posologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/administration et posologie , Carcinome hépatocellulaire/anatomopathologie , Survie sans rechute , Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments/classification , Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments/anatomopathologie , Femelle , Humains , Tumeurs du foie/anatomopathologie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Stadification tumorale , Nicotinamide/administration et posologie , Sorafénib
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 77(2): 113-7, 2011 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21194789

RÉSUMÉ

Gram-negative bacteria expressing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL) have emerged worldwide. ESBL colonisation can persist for years and may favour ESBL transmission. Interventions include contact isolation precautions and restriction of antibiotic use, but decolonisation (DC) for ESBL is not established. We performed a prospective controlled open-label cohort-study from 1/2000 to 1/2008 to determine the effectiveness of a standardised DC programme. ESBL-positive patients routinely underwent screening from rectum, throat, and urine. DC included: chlorhexidine 0.2% mouth rinse three times daily (throat colonisation), paromomycin 4 × 1 g daily (intestinal colonisation), and oral antibiotics for urinary tract colonisation. ESBL elimination was defined as ≥ 1 set of negative follow-up screenings (throat, rectal, urine). Of 100 enrolled patients, 83% of patients were infected and 17% colonised with ESBL. Escherichia coli (71%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (25%) were the most frequent pathogens. Overall, 76% (76/100) of patients became negative for ESBL at follow-up. Fifty-five percent (42/76) of the successfully treated patients received systemic treatment for infection. Of those who completed DC, 83% (15/18) were free of ESBL at follow-up. DC success correlated with the number of risk factors and colonised sites. DC may be beneficial in a selected group of patients, potentially shortening duration of ESBL colonisation and subsequently reducing the risk for transmission.


Sujet(s)
Désinfection/normes , Enterobacteriaceae/enzymologie , bêta-Lactamases/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Études de cohortes , Désinfection/méthodes , Enterobacteriaceae/isolement et purification , Infections à Enterobacteriaceae/prévention et contrôle , Infections à Enterobacteriaceae/transmission , Femelle , Humains , Unités de soins intensifs , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Surveillance de la population , Études prospectives , Suisse , Jeune adulte , bêta-Lactamases/biosynthèse , bêta-Lactamases/génétique , bêta-Lactamases/isolement et purification
4.
Internist (Berl) ; 51(2): 161-8, 2010 Feb.
Article de Allemand | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20062960

RÉSUMÉ

Respiratory tract infections belong to the most important infections in children and adults. One third of all infection-related hospitalizations are due to respiratory tract infections. Upper respiratory tract infections are one of the most important reasons for absence from school or work. The majority of respiratory tract infections are of viral origin. Viral infections are usually highly contagious. They are transmitted mainly by droplets, but also by direct or indirect contact via contaminated objects. Isolation precautions in respiratory tract infections are important to protect health-care workers from infection and prevent nosocomial transmission in the hospital and ambulatory care setting. Unlike for the hospital setting there are no detailed recommendations available for isolation precautions in the ambulatory care setting. Isolation precautions for outpatients are described in this article.


Sujet(s)
Infection croisée/prévention et contrôle , Épidémies de maladies/prévention et contrôle , Isolement du patient/méthodes , Prévention primaire/méthodes , Infections de l'appareil respiratoire/prévention et contrôle , Maladies virales/prévention et contrôle , Adulte , Enfant , Humains
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 29(6): 510-6, 2008 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18510460

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a standardized regimen for decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers and to identify factors influencing decolonization treatment failure. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from January 2002 to April 2007, with a mean follow-up period of 36 months. SETTING: University hospital with 750 beds and 27,000 admissions/year. PATIENTS: Of 94 consecutive hospitalized patients with MRSA colonization or infection, 32 were excluded because of spontaneous loss of MRSA, contraindications, death, or refusal to participate. In 62 patients, decolonization treatment was completed. At least 6 body sites were screened for MRSA (including by use of rectal swabs) before the start of treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Standardized decolonization treatment consisted of mupirocin nasal ointment, chlorhexidine mouth rinse, and full-body wash with chlorhexidine soap for 5 days. Intestinal and urinary-tract colonization were treated with oral vancomycin and cotrimoxazole, respectively. Vaginal colonization was treated with povidone-iodine or, alternatively, with chlorhexidine ovula or octenidine solution. Other antibiotics were added to the regimen if treatment failed. Successful decolonization was considered to have been achieved if results were negative for 3 consecutive sets of cultures of more than 6 screening sites. RESULTS: The mean age (+/- standard deviation [SD]) age of the 62 patients was 66.2 +/- 19 years. The most frequent locations of MRSA colonization were the nose (42 patients [68%]), the throat (33 [53%]), perianal area (33 [53%]), rectum (36 [58%]), and inguinal area (30 [49%]). Decolonization was completed in 87% of patients after a mean (+/-SD) of 2.1 +/- 1.8 decolonization cycles (range, 1-10 cycles). Sixty-five percent of patients ultimately required peroral antibiotic treatment (vancomycin, 52%; cotrimoxazole, 27%; rifampin and fusidic acid, 18%). Decolonization was successful in 54 (87%) of the patients in the intent-to-treat analysis and in 51 (98%) of 52 patients in the on-treatment analysis. CONCLUSION: This standardized regimen for MRSA decolonization was highly effective in patients who completed the full decolonization treatment course.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens , État de porteur sain , Résistance à la méticilline , Staphylococcus aureus/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Canal anal/microbiologie , Antibactériens/administration et posologie , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Anti-infectieux locaux/administration et posologie , Anti-infectieux locaux/usage thérapeutique , État de porteur sain/traitement médicamenteux , État de porteur sain/microbiologie , État de porteur sain/prévention et contrôle , Chlorhexidine/administration et posologie , Chlorhexidine/usage thérapeutique , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mupirocine/administration et posologie , Mupirocine/usage thérapeutique , Nez/microbiologie , Pharynx/microbiologie , Povidone iodée/administration et posologie , Povidone iodée/usage thérapeutique , Rectum/microbiologie , Infections à staphylocoques/traitement médicamenteux , Infections à staphylocoques/microbiologie , Infections à staphylocoques/prévention et contrôle , Staphylococcus aureus/isolement et purification , Résultat thérapeutique , Association triméthoprime-sulfaméthoxazole/administration et posologie , Association triméthoprime-sulfaméthoxazole/usage thérapeutique , Vancomycine/administration et posologie , Vancomycine/usage thérapeutique
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...