Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
J Wound Care ; 25(2): S10-5, 2016 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26878369

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Porcine xenograft (PX) has become a valuable part of the armamentarium of treatment options in a US paediatric burn centre. The use in adult patients has been well described in the burn literature, but there is minimal literature describing its use in children. The objective of this article is to describe a three-years' experience with PX use in paediatric burns. METHOD: A retrospective medical record review of patients with superficial partial-thickness burns treated with PX admitted to a paediatric burn centre between February 2009 and November 2012. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients met the inclusion criteria. Burn total body surface area (TBSA) ranged from 0.5% to 28%. After the placement of PX, significant decreases were seen in the need for narcotic analgesics and burn dressing changes. Only four of 164 patients (2.4%) developed infections, although only one of these infections was at the site of the xenograft. CONCLUSION: PX appears to reduce pain and eliminate the need for procedural intravenous sedation in many patients. This can make burn wound care more child-friendly and shorten hospital length of stay. The complication rate is low and manageable. The authors believe that PX is an effective and safe treatment for superficial partial-thickness burns in children. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: P. M.Glat, is a paid consultant and speaker for Mölnlycke Health Care, the manufacturer of EZ Derm.


Sujet(s)
Brûlures/thérapie , Hétérogreffes/transplantation , Animaux , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Femelle , Humains , Nourrisson , Études rétrospectives , Suidae , Résultat thérapeutique , États-Unis , Cicatrisation de plaie
2.
J Wound Care ; 24 Suppl 4a: S4-S10, 2015 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25853563

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Mepilex Ag, a silver-impregnated foam dressing, was introduced to our institution in 2007 and our outcomes in the treatment of paediatric burns were observed to improve significantly. In order to confirm these observations, we wanted to evaluate the results of using the silver-impregnated foam dressing in partial-thickness paediatric burns. METHOD: In this retrospective study, the St. Christopher's Hospital burn registry was used to identify subjects, who were otherwise in excellent health at baseline, over an18-month period. Outcomes included length of stay, intravenous narcotic use, and time to healing. No direct comparative studies were performed. This was followed by a non-comparative prospective study involving 22 paediatric patients, aged 1-4 years, with partial-thickness burns. This was a sub-study of a larger randomised controlled trial involving adults with partial-thickness burns, comparing the silver-impregnated foam dressing with Silvadene. RESULTS: In the retrospective part of the study, the silver-impregnated foam dressing was used successfully for the treatment of partial-thickness paediatric burns, with few complications and infections, allowing a shorter hospital stay, fewer dressings, and less pain medication than for historical controls. In the non-comparative prospective study, of 22 paediatric patients 50% healed completely within 1 week of treatment. The mean length of stay was 3.77 days and the mean number of dressings used was 1.64. Although narcotic usage was not assessed, patient surveys showed stinging or burning to be recorded as 'never' in 13 patients, 'rarely' in 8 patients, and 'sometimes' in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: The silver-impregnated foam dressing is effective and safe for use in partial-thickness paediatric burns, eliminating the need for daily dressings. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The study was supported by an educational grant from Mölnlycke Health Care.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE