How to Assess the Glomerular Filtration Rate, and Which Method is Deemed Most Reliable?

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to rise globally, paralleled by an increase in associated morbidity and mortality, as well as significant implications for patient quality of life and national economies. Chronic kidney disease often progresses unrecognized by patients and physicians, despite diagnosis relying on two simple laboratory measures: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine analysis. GFR measurement has been grounded in renal physiology, specifically the concept of clearance, with creatinine identified as a suitable endogenous marker for estimating creatinine clearance (CrCl). On this foundation, various equations have been developed to calculate CrCl or estimated GFR (eGFR) using four variables that incorporate creatinine and certain demographic information, such as sex and age. However, creatinine measurement requires standardization to minimize assay variability across laboratories. Moreover, the accuracy of these equations remains contentious in certain patient subgroups. For these reasons, additional mathematical models have been devised to enhance CrCl estimation, for example, when urine collection is impractical, in elderly or debilitated patients, and in individuals with trauma, diabetes, or obesity. Presently, eGFR in adults can be immediately measured and reported using creatinine-based equations traceable through isotope dilution mass spectrometry. In conclusion, leveraging insights from renal physiology, eGFR can be employed clinically for early diagnosis and treatment of CKD, as well as a public health tool to estimate its prevalence.

[Steroid-Dependent Nephrotic Syndrome Due to Minimal Change Glomerulonephritis Treated with Rituximab].

47-year-old woman suffering from minimal lesion glomerulonephritis previously undergone high-dose steroid therapy and subjected to exacerbations of nephrotic syndrome after therapy discontinuation. It was decided to initiate off-label treatment with Rituximab at a dosage of 375 mg/m2 administred at zero-time, one-month and three months with good therapeutic response and resolution of the clinical laboratory picture. The therapy was well tolerated and had no side effects. This scheme could be an alternative to the conventional therapeutic scheme with steroids or other classes of immunosuppressive drugs, especially in order to avoid problems related to prolonged exposure to steroid therapy.