Long-Term Outcomes of Intravenous Ustekinumab Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Loss of Response to Subcutaneous Dosing.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab (UST) is commonly used to treat Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, some patients may experience diminishing response or require increased dosage. Intravenous (IV) UST maintenance is explored as a solution. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate IV UST maintenance effectiveness and safety in inflammatory bowel disease patients with partial or lost subcutaneous UST response. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of inflammatory bowel disease patients on IV UST maintenance. Clinical response and remission at weeks 12 and 52, defined as Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤4 for Crohn's disease or partial Mayo score ≤2 for ulcerative colitis. Objective markers reduction (fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein), UST trough levels pre- and post-IV maintenance, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included. Clinical remission at weeks 12 and 52 achieved by 47.5% and 64.3% respectively. 96.6% continued IV UST at follow-up. UST serum levels quadrupled. No adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: IV UST maintenance effectively sustained remission in most patients at 52 weeks.

When patients lose response to subcutaneous ustekinumab, strategies include reinduction, interval shortening, and less explored intravenous maintenance. Its high rescue rate and safety profile make it a valuable option for managing active inflammatory bowel disease.

Intravenous ustekinumab maintenance treatment in patients with loss of response to subcutaneous dosing.

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is indicated for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Despite having shown clinical effectiveness in the real world, some patients may lose response over time or need a higher dose to achieve it. In this context, UST intravenous (IV) maintenance has been proposed. Objectives: The primary endpoint of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance IV UST treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients who present with partial response or loss of response to subcutaneous (SC) UST. Design: We performed a monocentric observational retrospective study including patients with active IBD on maintenance treatment with IV UST. Methods: The clinical response and remission was analyzed at week 12, defined as either Harvey-Bradshaw Index ⩽ 4 for CD or partial Mayo Score ⩽ 2 for UC. The reduction of objective markers of disease activity, fecal calprotectin, and C-reactive protein was evaluated. Moreover, UST trough levels were measured pre- and post-UST IV maintenance and any adverse events were assessed. Results: We included 23 patients. Clinical remission at week 12 was achieved by 43.5% of the patients. The proportion of patients in clinical response after 12 weeks on UST IV maintenance was 82.6%. After a median follow-up of 9.3 months all patients remained on IV UST maintenance. No adverse events were recorded in any patient for the duration of the study. Conclusions: IV UST maintenance treatment was able to recapture response in most of the patients who had lost response to SC maintenance.

Ustekinumab en la enfermedad de Crohn: resultados en la vida real y posibles factores de respuesta / Ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: real-world outcomes and predictors of response

Antecedentes: ustekinumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal que inhibe las interleucinas IL-12 e IL-23, y está aprobado para el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Crohn (EC) y, más recientemente, también de la colitis ulcerosa (CU). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de ustekinumab, así como identificar posibles factores predictivos de respuesta en un entorno de la vida real.Métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo y multicéntrico en 4 hospitales de Andalucía. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos con diagnóstico confirmado de EC tratados con ustekinumab entre 2017 y 2019. Se analizó la respuesta clínica a los 3, 6 y 12 meses de tratamiento. La actividad clínica de la enfermedad se evaluó con el índice de Harvey-Bradshaw (HBI) y el índice de actividad de la enfermedad de Crohn (CDAI); La respuesta bioquímica se evaluó con parámetros de laboratorio como CRP y ESR. Se analizó la supervivencia al fármaco ustekinumab a un año.Resultados: Se analizaron un total de 98 pacientes (edad media, 43 años; el 52 % eran hombres); El 56 % había fracasado con ≥ 2 terapias biológicas previas. A los 3 meses, el 69 % de los pacientes estaban en respuesta y el 40,8 % en remisión. A los 6 meses, el 56 % estaba en remisión clínica. A los 12 meses, el 73,7 % estaba en respuesta clínica y el 60,5 % en remisión. La remisión sin corticosteroides fue del 32,4 %, 44 % y 47,4 % a los 3, 6 y 12 meses, respectivamente. La supervivencia acumulada tras un año de tratamiento con ustekinumab fue del 85,3 %. Los parámetros bioquímicos como CRP y ESR mostraron una disminución estadísticamente significativa entre los niveles de referencia y de control a los 3, 6 y 12 meses. Un HBI más bajo al inicio y el sexo femenino fueron predictores de remisión clínica libre de corticosteroides en un análisis univariante. (AU)

Rapidity of clinical response to adalimumab and improvement of quality of life in luminal Crohn's disease: RAPIDA study / Rapidez de la respuesta clínica a adalimumab y mejora de la calidad de vida en la enfermedad de Crohn luminal: estudio RAPIDA

Objective: No studies evaluating the rapidity of response to biological therapies are available for Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate rapidity of onset of clinical response and impact on quality of life (QoL) of adalimumab therapy in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD.Patients and methods: RAPIDA was an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Adult patients with moderately-to-severely active luminal CD, anti-TNF-naïve, and unresponsive to conventional therapy were treated with adalimumab. Clinical disease activity, QoL and inflammatory biomarkers were measured at day 4, and weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after treatment initiation. Results: Eighty-six patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. Clinical disease activity was reduced from a median of 9.0 points to 6.0 points at day 4. Clinical response (≥ 3-point reduction in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, HBI) was achieved by 61.6% (d4) and 75.6% (w1) of patients in the ITT population (median 2.5 days) and with non-responder imputation (NRI), by 55.8% and 53.4%, respectively. The proportion of patients in clinical remission (HBI<5) at weeks 2 and 4 in the ITT population was 54.7% and 62.8%, respectively (median 7.0 days), and 38.4% and 45.3% in the NRI population. All QoL scores significantly improved and inflammatory biomarkers significantly decreased from day 4 onwards (p<0.0001).Conclusion: Rapid clinical response and remission, improvement in QoL and fatigue, and a reduction of inflammatory biomarkers were achieved with adalimumab as early as day 4 in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD. (AU)

Objetivo: No hay estudios que evalúen la rapidez de la respuesta a las terapias biológicas en la enfermedad de Crohn (EC). El objetivo fue evaluar la rapidez del inicio de la respuesta clínica y el impacto en la calidad de vida (CdV) de la terapia con adalimumab en pacientes adultos con EC moderada-grave. Pacientes y métodos: RAPIDA fue un ensayo clínico abierto, de un solo brazo, prospectivo y multicéntrico. Se trató con adalimumab a pacientes adultos con EC luminal activa moderada-grave, sin tratamiento previo con anti-TNF y sin respuesta a terapia convencional. Se midieron la actividad clínica de la enfermedad, la CdV y los biomarcadores inflamatorios el día 4 y las semanas 1, 2, 4 y 12 tras el tratamiento.Resultados: Se incluyeron 86 pacientes en los análisis por intención de tratar (IdT). La actividad clínica de la enfermedad se redujo de una mediana de 9,0 a 6,0 puntos en el día 4. La respuesta clínica (reducción ≥3 puntos en el Índice Harvey-Bradshaw, IHB) se dio en un 61,4% (d4) y un 75,6% (s1) de los pacientes IdT y en un 55,8% y un 53,4% con imputación de no respondedores (INR). La proporción de pacientes IdT en remisión clínica (IHB<5) en las s2 y s4 fue de 54,7% y 62,8%, respectivamente, y 38,4% y 45,3% en la población INR. Todas las puntuaciones de CdV mejoraron significativamente y los biomarcadores inflamatorios disminuyeron significativamente desde el día 4 (p<0,0001).Conclusiones: Se logró una rápida respuesta clínica y remisión, mejoría en la CdV y fatiga, y una reducción de los biomarcadores inflamatorios en los pacientes tratados con adalimumab ya en el día 4. (AU)

Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo sobre la utilidad del probiótico Lactobacillus reuteri en la terapia de erradicación cuádruple con bismuto de la infección por Helicobacter pylori / Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the usefulness of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri in bismuth-containing quadruple eradication therapy for infection with Helicobacter pylori

Introducción: el objetivo principal de este estudio fue evaluar la reducción de los síntomas gastrointestinales de pacientes con terapia de erradicación cuádruple con bismuto, complementada con cepas de Lactobacillus reuteri (DSM 17938 y ATCC PTA 6475), frente a un placebo.Materiales y métodos: ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego, de brazos paralelos y controlado con placebo. Los pacientes recibieron en primera línea el régimen erradicador basado en subcitrato de bismuto potásico, metronidazol, clorhidrato de tetraciclina (cápsulas tres en uno) y omeprazol 40 mg dos veces al día durante diez días, más un comprimido (probiótico o placebo) durante treinta días. En el seguimiento se evaluaron los síntomas gastrointestinales mediante una escala de valoración (GSRS) y los eventos adversos a los 0, 14, 28 y 56 días.Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 80 pacientes desde febrero de 2018 a mayo de 2019 en un solo centro. El tratamiento erradicador fue eficaz en el 85 % de los pacientes, sin diferencias entre los dos brazos de tratamiento. En el grupo que recibió el probiótico, el dolor abdominal se redujo en el 42 % de los pacientes, en comparación con el 19 % del grupo de control (OR: 0,27; IC 95 %: 0,13-0,58; p < 0,001), y la distensión abdominal se redujo un 25 %, frente a un 17 % en el grupo de control (OR: 0,24; IC 95 %: 0,19-0,84; p < 0,001).Conclusiones: el tratamiento con L. reuteri consiguió reducir solo el dolor y la distensión abdominal. Se necesitan más estudios para determinar la contribución de los probióticos como terapia adyuvante en la erradicación de H. pylori. (AU)

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the usefulness of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri in bismuth-containing quadruple eradication therapy for infection with Helicobacter pylori.

INTRODUCTION: the primary goal of this study was to compare gastrointestinal symptom reduction in patients on bismuth-containing quadruple eradication therapy supplemented with Lactobacillus reuteri strains (DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 6475) or placebo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: this was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients received a first-line eradication regimen based on bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole, tetracycline hydrochloride (three-in-one capsules) and omeprazole 40 mg twice a day for ten days, plus a probiotic or placebo tablet for 30 days. During follow-up, gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using an evaluation scale (GSRS), and adverse events were collected at 0, 14, 28 and 56 days. RESULTS: a total of 80 patients were included from February 2018 to May 2019 at a single site. Eradication therapy was effective in 85 % of patients, with no differences between treatment arms. In the group receiving the probiotic, abdominal pain decreased in 42 % of patients, compared with 19 % in the control group (OR: 0.27; CI, 0.13-0.58; p < 0.001), and abdominal distension decreased in 25 % versus 17 % in the control group (OR: 0.24; IC, 0.19-0.84; p < 0.001); Conclusions: treatment with L. reuteri only reduced abdominal pain and distension. Further studies are needed to establish the role of probiotics as adjuvant therapy in H. pylori eradication.

Rapidity of clinical response to adalimumab and improvement of quality of life in luminal Crohn's disease: RAPIDA study.

OBJECTIVE: No studies evaluating the rapidity of response to biological therapies are available for Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate rapidity of onset of clinical response and impact on quality of life (QoL) of adalimumab therapy in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RAPIDA was an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Adult patients with moderately-to-severely active luminal CD, anti-TNF-naïve, and unresponsive to conventional therapy were treated with adalimumab. Clinical disease activity, QoL and inflammatory biomarkers were measured at day 4, and weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. Clinical disease activity was reduced from a median of 9.0 points to 6.0 points at day 4. Clinical response (≥ 3-point reduction in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, HBI) was achieved by 61.6% (d4) and 75.6% (w1) of patients in the ITT population (median 2.5 days) and with non-responder imputation (NRI), by 55.8% and 53.4%, respectively. The proportion of patients in clinical remission (HBI<5) at weeks 2 and 4 in the ITT population was 54.7% and 62.8%, respectively (median 7.0 days), and 38.4% and 45.3% in the NRI population. All QoL scores significantly improved and inflammatory biomarkers significantly decreased from day 4 onwards (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Rapid clinical response and remission, improvement in QoL and fatigue, and a reduction of inflammatory biomarkers were achieved with adalimumab as early as day 4 in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD.

Switch to subcutaneous infliximab during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: preliminary results.

A new subcutaneous formulation of the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 has recently been developed for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), providing response rates similar to intravenous treatment. The use of this new formulation was requested, in an effort to limit patient attendance at intravenous infusion centers and to maintain biological treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this observational, retrospective and descriptive study was to assess CT-P13 efficacy and safety after switching from intravenous to a subcutaneous formulation in patients with IBD receiving maintenance therapy. This article shows preliminary results after six months of follow-up.

Ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: real-world outcomes and predictors of response.

BACKGROUND: ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukins IL-12 and IL-23, and is approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and, more recently, also ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab, as well as to identify possible predictive factors of response in a real-life setting. METHODS: an observational, retrospective, multicenter study was carried out in 4 hospitals in Andalusia. Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CD treated with ustekinumab from 2017 to 2019 were included. Clinical response was analyzed at 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. Clinical disease activity was assessed with the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) and the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI); biochemical response was assessed with lab parameters such as CRP and ESR. One-year ustekinumab drug-survival was analyzed. RESULTS: a total of 98 patients were analyzed (mean age, 43 years; 52 % were male); 56 % had failed with ≥ 2 previous biologicals therapies. At 3 months, 69 % of the patients were in response and 40.8 % in remission. At 6 months, 56 % were in clinical remission. At 12 months, 73.7 % were in clinical response and 60.5 % in remission. Corticosteroid-free remission was 32.4 %, 44 %, and 47.4 % at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Cumulative survival after one year of treatment with ustekinumab was 85.3 %. Biochemical parameters such as CRP and ESR showed a statistically significant decrease between baseline and control levels at 3, 6, and 12 months. A lower HBI at baseline and female sex were predictors of corticosteroid-free clinical remission in a univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis no variables were found as predictors of corticosteroid-free clinical remission. CONCLUSION: ustekinumab therapy is safe and useful, inducing clinical response in more than 50 % of patients, including patients who failed with other biological therapies.

Comparison of the Mayo Endoscopy Score and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity and the Ulcerative Colitis Colonoscopy Index of Severity.

Background and study aims: Endoscopy plays an essential role in managing patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), as it allows us to visualize and assess the severity of the disease. As such assessments are not always objective, different scores have been devised to standardize the findings. The main aim of this study was to assess the interobserver variability between the Mayo Endoscopy Score (MES), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity (UCEIS) and Ulcerative Colitis Colonoscopy Index of Severity (UCCIS) analyzing the severity of the endoscopic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis. Patients and methods: This was a single-cohort observational study in which a colonoscopy was carried out on patients with UC, as normal clinical practice, and a video was recorded. The results from the video were classified according to the MES, UCEIS and UCCIS by three endoscopic specialists independently, and they were compared to each other. The Mayo Endoscopy Score (MES) was used to assess the clinical situation of the patient. The therapeutic impact was analyzed after colonoscopy was carried out. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The average age was 51 (SD ±â€Š16.7) and the average MES was 3.07 (SD ±â€Š2.54). The weighted Kappa index between endoscopists A and B for the MES was 0.8; between A and C 0.52; and between B and C 0.49. The intraclass correlation coefficient for UCEIS was 0.92 among the three endoscopists (CI 95 %: 0.83-0.96) and 0.96 for UCCIS among the three endoscopists (CI 95 % 0.94-0.97). A change in treatment for 34.3 % of the patients was implemented on seeing the results of the colonoscopy. Conclusions: There was an adequate, but not perfect, correlation between the different endoscopists for MES, UCEIS, UCCIS. This was higher with the last two scores. Thus, there is still some subjectivity to be minimized through special training, on assessing the seriousness of the endoscopic lesions in patients with UC.

Views of patients with inflammatory bowel disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: ACCU survey results.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has forced a substantial change in the care of patients with digestive pathologies, especially for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients taking immunosuppessive medications. In this regard, some national and international guidelines have indicated the standards to be taken into account. However, few studies have evaluated how patients have dealt with this infection. Therefore, this study was performed with the aim to determine how the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has affected our IBD patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: an online survey was performed among the members (295) of the Association of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (ACCU), which consisted of 19 questions. Finally, it was completed by 168 patients. RESULTS: fifty-eight per cent of cases were female, 63.7 % had Crohn's disease (CD) and 53 % received biologic therapy. Five per cent were infected by SARS-CoV-2 and were male. The main concern of the patients was the fear of acquiring the infection (80.9 %). More than 90 % continued their treatments and half of the patients worked from home during the pandemic period. CONCLUSIONS: the perspective of the patients is necessary to achieve an adequate management and evolution of the disease. More studies are needed to assess the impact that exceptional situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may have on IBD patients in order to improve adherence and control of the disease.

Índice de Mayo Endoscópico e Índice de Severidad Endoscópica de la Colitis Ulcerosa: ¿son igual de válidos? / No disponible

INTRODUCCIÓN: la endoscopia tiene un papel fundamental en el manejo de los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa (CU), ya que permite la visualización y evaluación de la gravedad de la enfermedad. No obstante, dicha evaluación no es siempre algo objetivo, por lo que se han desarrollado diferentes escalas que pretenden homogeneizar los hallazgos. Objetico: el objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la variabilidad interobservador entre el Índice de Mayo Endoscópico (IME) y el Índice de Severidad Endoscópica de la Colitis Ulcerosa (UCEIS), al analizar la gravedad de las lesiones endoscópicas en pacientes con CU. El objetivo secundario fue analizar si la preparación catártica afectaba al grado de concordancia entre los endoscopistas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se trata de un estudio observacional comparativo de una única cohorte a la cual se realiza una colonoscopia bajo guía de práctica clínica habitual a pacientes con CU y se estadifica según el IME y el UCEIS por tres endoscopistas expertos. Para valorar el grado de correlación interobservador se utilizaron el índice de Kappa para el IME y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase para el UCEIS. Se incluyeron 67 pacientes, con edad media de 51 años (DE ± 16,7) e índice de Mayo clínico medio de 3,07 (DE ± 2,54). RESULTADOS: el índice de Kappa ponderado entre los endoscopistas A y B para el IME fue de 0,8; entre el A y el C, de 0,52; y entre el B y el C, de 0,49. Para el UCEIS, el coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue del 0,922 entre los tres endoscopistas (IC 95 %: 0,832-0,959). Se encontró una mejor correlación interobservador cuando la preparación catártica era ≥ 8 según la escala de Boston. CONCLUSIÓN: existe, por tanto, una superior correlación entre los diferentes endoscopistas para el UCEIS que para el IME, por lo que debería ser considerado como el mejor índice a utilizar en la práctica clínica. Una buena preparación catártica es importante para mejorar la correlación interobservador

No disponible

Index of the Mayo Endoscopy and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity: are they equally valid?

INTRODUCTION: endoscopy plays an essential role in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), as it allows us to visualize and assess the severity of the disease. Different scores have been devised to standardize the findings because such assessments are not always objective. AIMS: the aim of this study was to assess the interobserver variability between the Index of Mayo Endoscopy (IME) and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity (UCEIS), analyzing the severity of the endoscopic lesions in patients with UC. The secondary aim was to analyze if the cathartic preparation affected the degree of concordance amongst the endoscopists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this was a single-cohort observational, comparative study in which a colonoscopy was performed in patients with UC, as the normal clinical practice. The results were classified according to the IME and the UCEIS by three endoscopic specialists. In order to assess the degree of interobserver correlation, the Kappa index for IME was used and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used for UCEIS. RESULTS: sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The average age was 51 (SD ± 16.7) and the average Mayo Clinic index was 3.07 (SD ± 2.54). The weighted Kappa index between endoscopists A and B for the IME was 0.8, 0.52 between A and C and 0.49 between B and C. The intraclass correlation coefficient for UCEIS was 0.922 between the three endoscopists (95 % CI: 0.832-0.959). A better interobserver correlation was found when the cathartic preparation was ≥ 8 based on the Boston Scale. CONCLUSIONS: there was a higher correlation between the different endoscopists for the UCEIS than for the IME. Thus, this should be considered to be the best index to use in the clinical practice. A good cleansing preparation is important to improve the interobserver correlation.

Cut-off ranges of infliximab serum levels in Crohn's disease in the clinical practice

INTRODUCTION: between 30 % and 40 % of patients treated with infliximab lose response during maintenance. Therapeutic drug monitoring could be used to optimize management in these situations. However, infliximab serum levels are not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine the cut-off range of infliximab serum levels in Crohn's disease patients in remission in the clinical practice. METHODS: an observational retrospective study was performed from 2016 to 2017. Patients were included with established Crohn's disease, who had been on a maintenance dose schedule of infliximab. Infliximab levels and antibodies to infliximab were measured at least twice in all patients, after induction and after six months of treatment. Clinical remission was defined as ≤ 4 using the Harvey-Bradshaw index. Cluster analysis was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: one hundred and five Crohn's disease patients were included in the study; 57.1 % were male with a mean age of 39 years (SD ± 12.9). The median (range) time of the disease was eleven years (7-15) and the median (range) time of follow-up was 32 months (22-38). Patients who achieved remission had infliximab serum levels between 4.26-8.26 ug/ml versus 0.06-1.43 ug/ml in patients who did not achieve remission after induction. Infliximab serum levels were 2.84-7.75 ug/ml and 0.05-2.69 ug/ml in patients who achieved remission versus those who did not achieve remission after six months of treatment. Overall, 4.26-8.26 ug/ml was found to be the best cut-off range for remission. CONCLUSIONS: in our clinical practice, serum levels of infliximab in Crohn's disease patients should be higher than 4 ug/ml to achieve clinical remission

No disponible

Cut-off ranges of infliximab serum levels in Crohn's disease in the clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: between 30 % and 40 % of patients treated with infliximab lose response during maintenance. Therapeutic drug monitoring could be used to optimize management in these situations. However, infliximab serum levels are not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine the cut-off range of infliximab serum levels in Crohn's disease patients in remission in the clinical practice. METHODS: an observational retrospective study was performed from 2016 to 2017. Patients were included with established Crohn's disease, who had been on a maintenance dose schedule of infliximab. Infliximab levels and antibodies to infliximab were measured at least twice in all patients, after induction and after six months of treatment. Clinical remission was defined as ≤ 4 using the Harvey-Bradshaw index. Cluster analysis was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: one hundred and five Crohn's disease patients were included in the study; 57.1 % were male with a mean age of 39 years (SD ± 12.9). The median (range) time of the disease was eleven years (7-15) and the median (range) time of follow-up was 32 months (22-38). Patients who achieved remission had infliximab serum levels between 4.26-8.26 ug/ml versus 0.06-1.43 ug/ml in patients who did not achieve remission after induction. Infliximab serum levels were 2.84-7.75 ug/ml and 0.05-2.69 ug/ml in patients who achieved remission versus those who did not achieve remission after six months of treatment. Overall, 4.26-8.26 ug/ml was found to be the best cut-off range for remission. CONCLUSIONS: in our clinical practice, serum levels of infliximab in Crohn's disease patients should be higher than 4 ug/ml to achieve clinical remission.

Vedolizumab response in inflammatory bowel disease. Two years of follow-up

BACKGROUND: vedolizumab is an alpha4Beta7 integrin antagonist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical response and remission rates with vezolizumab. METHODS: this was a retrospective study of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who received vedolizumab between 2016 and 2019. Response and remission rates were analyzed at three, six, 12, 18 and 24 months after induction. RESULTS: fifty-five patients were included. Clinical remission rates in CD and UC at three, six, 12, 18 and 24 months were 19.35 %, 26.67 %, 30.43 %, 30 %, 38.89 and 29.17 %, 26.09 %, 19.05 %, 26.67 % and 20 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: vedolizumab is effective for induction and maintenance of clinical remission, both in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

No disponible

Vedolizumab response in inflammatory bowel disease. Two years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: vedolizumab is an α4ß7 integrin antagonist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical response and remission rates with vedolizumab. METHODS: this was a retrospective study of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who received vedolizumab between 2016 and 2019. Response and remission rates were analyzed at three, six, 12, 18 and 24 months after induction. RESULTS: fifty-five patients were included. Clinical remission rates in CD and UC at three, six, 12, 18 and 24 months were 19.35 %, 26.67 %, 30.43 %, 30 %, 38.89 % and 29.17 %, 26.09 %, 19.05 %, 26.67 % and 20 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: vedolizumab is effective for induction and maintenance of clinical remission, both in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Erythema Nodosum: As an Extraintestinal Manifestation or Complication in Ulcerative Colitis?

In our case, we want to highlight the importance of screening for opportunistic infectious diseases in these immunosuppressed patients. We present the case of an erythema nodosum triggered by reactivation of Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) in a patient with ulcerative colitis.