RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: This is an updated and expanded version of the original Cochrane review, first published in 2014. Postoperative oral intake is traditionally withheld after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery until the return of bowel function. The concern is that early oral intake will result in vomiting and severe paralytic ileus, with subsequent aspiration pneumonia, wound dehiscence, and anastomotic leakage. However, clinical studies suggest that there may be benefits from early postoperative oral intake. Currently, gynaecologic surgery can be performed through various routes: open abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, robotic, or a combination. In this version, we included women undergoing major gynaecologic surgery through all of these routes, either alone or in combination. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of early versus delayed (traditional) initiation of oral intake of food and fluids after major gynaecologic surgery. SEARCH METHODS: On 13 June 2023, we searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the citation lists of relevant publications, and two trial registries. We also contacted experts in the field for any additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of early versus delayed initiation of oral intake of food and fluids after major gynaecologic surgery, performed by abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. Early feeding was defined as oral intake of fluids or food within 24 hours post-surgery, regardless of the return of bowel function. Delayed feeding was defined as oral intake after 24 hours post-surgery, and only after signs of postoperative ileus resolution. Primary outcomes were: postoperative ileus, nausea, vomiting, cramping, abdominal pain, bloating, abdominal distension, need for postoperative nasogastric tube, time to the presence of bowel sounds, time to the first passage of flatus, time to the first passage of stool, time to the start of a regular diet, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were: infectious complications, wound complications, deep venous thrombosis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, satisfaction, and quality of life. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous data. We examined continuous data using the mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI. We tested for heterogeneity between the results of different studies using a forest plot of the meta-analysis, the statistical tests of homogeneity of 2 x 2 tables, and the I² value. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs), randomising 902 women. We are uncertain whether early feeding compared to delayed feeding has an effect on postoperative ileus (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.16; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 418 women; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether early feeding affects nausea or vomiting, or both (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.33; I² = 67%; random-effects model; 6 studies, 742 women; very low-certainty evidence); nausea (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.51 to 3.03; I² = 74%; 3 studies, 453 women; low-certainty evidence); vomiting (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.32; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 559 women; low-certainty evidence), abdominal distension (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.31; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 559 women; low-certainty evidence); need for postoperative nasogastric tube placement (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.55; 3 studies, 453 women; low-certainty evidence); or time to the presence of bowel sounds (MD -0.20 days, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.06; I² = 71%; random-effects model; 3 studies, 477 women; low-certainty evidence). There is probably no difference between the two feeding protocols for the onset of flatus (MD -0.11 days, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.02; I² = 9%; 5 studies, 702 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Early feeding probably results in a slight reduction in the time to the first passage of stool (MD -0.18 days, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.04; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 507 women; moderate-certainty evidence), and may lead to a slightly sooner resumption of a solid diet (MD -1.10 days, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.41; I² = 97%; random-effects model; 3 studies, 420 women; low-certainty evidence). Hospital stay may be slightly shorter in the early feeding group (MD -0.66 days, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.15; I² = 77%; random-effects model; 5 studies, 603 women; low-certainty evidence). The effect of the two feeding protocols on febrile morbidity is uncertain (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.22; I² = 47%; 3 studies, 453 women; low-certainty evidence). However, infectious complications are probably less common in women with early feeding (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.73; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 183 women; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be no difference between the two feeding protocols for wound complications (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.35; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 474 women; low-certainty evidence), or pneumonia (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.73; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 434 women; low-certainty evidence). Two studies measured participant satisfaction and quality of life. One study found satisfaction was probably higher in the early feeding group, while the other study found no difference. Neither study found a significant difference between the groups for quality of life (P > 0.05). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Despite some uncertainty, there is no evidence to indicate harmful effects of early feeding following major gynaecologic surgery, measured as postoperative ileus, nausea, vomiting, or abdominal distension. The potential benefits of early feeding include a slightly faster initiation of bowel movements, a slightly sooner resumption of a solid diet, a slightly shorter hospital stay, a lower rate of infectious complications, and a higher level of satisfaction.
Sujet(s)
Procédures de chirurgie gynécologique , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Humains , Femelle , Facteurs temps , Procédures de chirurgie gynécologique/effets indésirables , Complications postopératoires/étiologie , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Durée du séjour , Biais (épidémiologie) , Soins postopératoires/méthodes , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires/étiologie , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires/épidémiologie , Consommation alimentaire , Nutrition entérale/méthodes , Pseudo-obstruction intestinale/étiologie , Consommation de boissonRÉSUMÉ
Background: Chewing gum, considered a form of sham feeding, has been shown to improve intestinal motor and secretory function in various types of abdominal surgery. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the effects of postoperative gum chewing on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature review of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Embase, and a reference list of relevant studies from the inception to 11 March 2024, comparing postoperative gum chewing versus no gum chewing following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery regardless of indications and setting without language restriction. The primary outcome was the time to the presence of bowel sounds and the time to the first passage of flatus. Cochrane's risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. Results: Nine RCTs with a total of 1011 patients were included. Overall, three studies were categorized as having a low risk of bias, three had some concerns, and three exhibited a high risk of bias. The time to the presence of bowel sounds (mean difference [MD] -2.66 h, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.68 to -1.64, p < 0.00001) and time to the first passage of flatus (MD -4.20 h, 95% CI -5.79 to -2.61, p < 0.00001) was significantly shorter in the gum-chewing group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups with regard to the time to the first defecation (MD -6.52 h, 95% CI -15.70 to 2.66, p = 0.16), time to the first postoperative mobilization (MD 24.05 min, 95% CI -38.16 to 86.26, p = 0.45), postoperative ileus (MD 0.68, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.19, p = 0.17), and length of hospital stay (MD -0.05 day, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.04, p = 0.28). Conclusions: Gum chewing following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery appears to promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, as evidenced by a reduced time to the presence of bowel sounds and the first passage of flatus.
RÉSUMÉ
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine spray in reducing the pain during colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy (CDB). Methods: From December 2017 to February 2019, 312 women undergoing CDBs were enrolled. The participants were randomized to three groups: group 1 (lidocaine spray), in which lidocaine spray was applied thoroughly to the cervix; group 2 (placebo), in which normal saline was applied thoroughly to the cervix; and group 3 (control), in which no anesthetic agent was applied to the cervix. Each woman completed a 10 cm visual analog scale to classify the subjective pain experience at three time points: baseline, immediately after biopsy, and 10 min after the procedure. The primary outcome of this study was the biopsy pain score. Results: The 312 enrolled women were randomly assigned to the three groups, amounting to 104 women per group. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the participants in all groups were comparable. The baseline, the biopsy, and the post-procedure pain scores were comparable among the three groups. There was a significant increase in the pain score from baseline to biopsy and from baseline to post-procedure in each group. The pain-score changes from baseline to biopsy in the lidocaine spray group significantly decreased when compared with the normal saline group (<0.001), and tended to decrease, though not significantly (p = 0.06), when compared with the control group. No complication with the intervention was observed. Conclusions: The application of lidocaine spray to the cervix has the benefit of reducing the pain associated with CDBs by a small amount. However, the intervention is safe and may be considered in nulliparous and/or overly anxious women undergoing the procedure.
Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques locaux , Colposcopie , Lidocaïne , Mesure de la douleur , Humains , Femelle , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Colposcopie/méthodes , Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Anesthésiques locaux/usage thérapeutique , Mesure de la douleur/méthodes , Biopsie/méthodes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Col de l'utérus/anatomopathologie , Col de l'utérus/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Gestion de la douleur/méthodes , Gestion de la douleur/normes , Douleur/prévention et contrôle , Douleur/traitement médicamenteux , Douleur/étiologie , Douleur liée aux interventions/prévention et contrôle , Douleur liée aux interventions/étiologieRÉSUMÉ
Metabolic alterations play an essential role in ovarian carcinogenesis. The flexibility of mitochondrial functions facilitates cellular adaptation to the tough environment associated with carcinogenesis. An understanding of the differences in mitochondrial functions in normal ovaries and cancers could provide a basis for further exploration of future mitochondria-based screening, diagnosis, prognostic prediction, and targeted therapy for epithelial ovarian cancers. The main objective of this study was to assess mitochondrial function profiles measured from PBMCs and ovarian tissues of epithelial ovarian cancers in comparison with normal ovaries. A total of 36 patients were recruited for the study, all of whom underwent primary surgical treatment for malignant epithelial ovarian neoplasm. Of these, 20 patients were in the early stage and 16 patients were in the advanced stage. Additionally, 21 patients who had pelvic surgery for benign gynecologic conditions, with normal ovaries incidentally removed, were recruited as controls. At the time of surgery, a blood sample was collected from each participant for PBMC isolation, and ovarian tissue was retained for molecular studies. These studies included the examination of oxidative stress, mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial respiration, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) changes, and mitochondrial swelling. Clinical and histopathological data were also collected and compared between different stages of epithelial ovarian cancers: early-stage (group 1), advanced-stage (group 2), and normal ovaries (group 3). The levels of cellular oxidative stress, mitochondrial mass, and mitochondrial biogenesis in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of participants with ovarian cancer were significantly lower than those of the control group. However, the mitochondrial respiratory parameters measured from the PBMCs were similar across all three groups. Furthermore, mitochondrial membrane depolarization and mitochondrial swelling were observed in ovarian tissues of both early-stage and advanced-stage cancer groups. We demonstrated the dynamic nature of mitochondrial ROS production, biogenesis, and respiratory function in response to epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis. The flexibility of mitochondrial functions under diverse conditions may make it a challenging therapeutic target for ovarian cancer.
Sujet(s)
Carcinomes , Tumeurs de l'ovaire , Humains , Femelle , Carcinome épithélial de l'ovaire/anatomopathologie , Agranulocytes/métabolisme , Espèces réactives de l'oxygène/métabolisme , Mitochondries/métabolisme , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/anatomopathologie , Carcinomes/anatomopathologie , Carcinogenèse/anatomopathologieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel machine learning-based preoperative prediction model for pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) in early-stage cervical cancer by combining the clinical findings and preoperative computerized tomography (CT) of the whole abdomen and pelvis. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2-IIA1 squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix who had primary radical surgery with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2020, were included. Seven supervised machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and category boosting, were used to evaluate the risk of PLNM. RESULTS: PLNM was found in 199 (23.9%) of 832 patients included. Younger age, larger tumor size, higher stage, no prior conization, tumor appearance, adenosquamous histology, and vaginal metastasis as well as the CT findings of larger tumor size, parametrial metastasis, pelvic lymph node enlargement, and vaginal metastasis, were significantly associated with PLNM. The models' predictive performance, including accuracy (89.1%-90.6%), area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (86.9%-91.0%), sensitivity (77.4%-82.4%), specificity (92.1%-94.3%), positive predictive value (77.0%-81.7%), and negative predictive value (93.0%-94.4%), appeared satisfactory and comparable among all the algorithms. After optimizing the model's decision threshold to enhance the sensitivity to at least 95%, the 'highly sensitive' model was obtained with a 2.5%-4.4% false-negative rate of PLNM prediction. CONCLUSION: We developed prediction models for PLNM in early-stage cervical cancer with promising prediction performance in our setting. Further external validation in other populations is needed with potential clinical applications.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du col de l'utérus , Humains , Femelle , Métastase lymphatique/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/anatomopathologie , Col de l'utérus/anatomopathologie , Études rétrospectives , Noeuds lymphatiques/anatomopathologie , Lymphadénectomie , Apprentissage machine , Pelvis/anatomopathologie , Abdomen , Stadification tumoraleRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To compare survival outcomes, posttreatment complications, and quality of life (QoL) of early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors between those who received adjuvant pelvic radiation and those without adjuvant treatment. METHODS: Stages IB-IIA cervical cancer patients classified as having intermediate-risk following primary radical surgery were included. After propensity score weighted adjustment, all baseline demographic and pathological characteristics of 108 women who received adjuvant radiation and 111 women who had no adjuvant treatment were compared. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included treatment-related complications and QoL. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 76.1 months in the adjuvant radiation group and 95.4 months in the observation group. The 5-year PFS (91.6% in the adjuvant radiation group and 88.4% in the observation group, p=0.42) and OS (90.1% in the adjuvant radiation group and 93.5% in the observation group, p=0.36) were not significantly different between the groups. There was no significant association between adjuvant treatment and overall recurrence/death in the Cox proportional hazard model. However, a substantial reduction in pelvic recurrence was observed in participants with adjuvant radiation (hazard ratio=0.15; 95% confidence interval=0.03-0.71). Grade 3/4 treatment-related morbidities and QoL scores were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiation was associated with a lower risk of pelvic recurrence. However, its significant benefit in reducing overall recurrence and improving survival in early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors could not be demonstrated.
Sujet(s)
Qualité de vie , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus , Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/radiothérapie , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/chirurgie , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/traitement médicamenteux , Score de propension , Stadification tumorale , Radiothérapie adjuvante/effets indésirables , Hystérectomie , Traitement médicamenteux adjuvant , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no reliable method to predict the result of the primary cytoreduction to decide whether to go on primary cytoreductive surgery or receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to identify candidate predicting factors from clinical data, serum biomarkers, CT/MRI imaging, and minilaparotomy for suboptimal cytoreduction in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Women who were clinically suspicious of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery were recruited. Clinical data, abdominopelvic CT/MRI, and serum biomarkers, including CA125, HE4, and Cyfra21-1, were collected preoperatively. At the start of the surgery, a minilaparotomy incision was made, the peritoneal cavity was assessed, and the operating surgeons gave the impression of whether the optimal cytoreductive surgery would be attainable. Subsequently, the incision was extended as necessary, and the standard cytoreductive surgery was attempted. After the procedure completion, the surgical outcome (optimal vs. suboptimal cytoreduction) and other operative outcomes were recorded. The association between the potential predicting factors and the surgical outcome was examined. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in this pilot study. Twelve patients were diagnosed with primary ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, while two had ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer. The optimal cytoreduction was achieved in eight women. After minilaparotomy, the surgeons could predict suboptimal surgery correctly in five out of six cases (OR: 24.12, 95%CI: 2.34-Inf., p<0.01). Moreover, no patient with the finding of rectosigmoid invasion from CT had optimal surgery (OR: 12.96, 95%CI: 1.26-Inf., p=0.03). Lastly, increased serum cyfra21-1(>8 ng/mL) and HE4 (>83 pmol/L) were significantly associated with suboptimal cytoreduction, with OR: 35.00, 95%CI: 1.74-702.99, p=0.02 and OR: 15.00, 95%CI: 1.03-218.30, p=0.05, respectively. CONCLUSION: The finding of rectosigmoid invasion from abdominal CT, increased serum cyfra21-1 and HE4, and the initial minilaparotomy impression were potentially associated with suboptimal cytoreduction.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs de l'ovaire , Humains , Femelle , Carcinome épithélial de l'ovaire/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/anatomopathologie , Interventions chirurgicales de cytoréduction/méthodes , Projets pilotes , Laparotomie , Antigènes CA-125RÉSUMÉ
AIM: To examine the association between clinicopathological factors and survival in advanced epithelial ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers patients who had primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and those that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Women who had CRS or NAC between 2008-2017 were included. Association between clinical characteristics, pretreatment imaging, serum markers, surgical and pathological factors, and disease recurrence/progression/death was examined in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and three women were recruited in this study (CRS 128 women and NAC 75 women). Median overall survival was 33.7 months for the CRS group and 27.9 months for the NAC group (p=0.04). Median progression-free survival was 14.9 months in the CRS group and 12.1 months in the NAC group (p=0.04). For the CRS group, factors independently associated with increased risk of death included primary peritoneal carcinoma (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 6.94), stable disease/progression at treatment completion (aHR 5.97), and initial tumor size of more than 12 cm (aHR 1.87). For the NAC group, stable disease/progression after complete treatment (aHR 6.45) and pre-treatment platelet to lymphocyte ratio of more than 310 (aHR 2.20) were significantly associated with an increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: NAC appeared to be a good alternative treatment for stage III/IV tubo-ovarian carcinoma. The worse survival outcome associated with primary peritoneal carcinoma and large initial tumor size in the patients who received CRS suggested that NAC could be an attractive option for those with these characteristics.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs de l'appareil génital mâle , Tumeurs de l'ovaire , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Carcinome épithélial de l'ovaire/traitement médicamenteux , Interventions chirurgicales de cytoréduction , Traitement néoadjuvant , Pronostic , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
Image quality control is a critical element in the process of data collection and cleaning. Both manual and automated analyses alike are adversely impacted by bad quality data. There are several factors that can degrade image quality and, correspondingly, there are many approaches to mitigate their negative impact. In this paper, we address image quality control toward our goal of improving the performance of automated visual evaluation (AVE) for cervical precancer screening. Specifically, we report efforts made toward classifying images into four quality categories ("unusable", "unsatisfactory", "limited", and "evaluable") and improving the quality classification performance by automatically identifying mislabeled and overly ambiguous images. The proposed new deep learning ensemble framework is an integration of several networks that consists of three main components: cervix detection, mislabel identification, and quality classification. We evaluated our method using a large dataset that comprises 87,420 images obtained from 14,183 patients through several cervical cancer studies conducted by different providers using different imaging devices in different geographic regions worldwide. The proposed ensemble approach achieved higher performance than the baseline approaches.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of applying the recommended enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compared with our usual care in women with gynecologic malignancy undergoing elective laparotomy. METHODS: From June 2020 to May 2021, 93 women with gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrium, and ovary) undergoing elective laparotomy at our institution were randomly assigned into an intervention group (ERAS protocol, 46 women) or control group (usual care, 47 women). For the intervention group, each woman was brought through the pre-specified ERAS protocol starting from preoperative counseling to postoperative management. For the control group, participants underwent routine standard care. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and postoperative pain. RESULTS: The intervention group demonstrated shorter hospital stay by 20 h (47.48 h vs 67.17 h, P = 0.02) with lower postoperative pain score at postoperative day 0 (1.58 vs 4.00, P < 0.01) and day 1 (1.00 vs 2.67, P < 0.01) while having decreased opioid consumption (P < 0.01). The intervention group also had faster recovery of gastrointestinal function. Overall, good compliance to most of the ERAS pathway domains was obtained. CONCLUSION: The ERAS protocol demonstrates benefits on shortening hospital stay, reducing pain, and bowel function recovery without increasing complications in our population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The present study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04201626) on December 3, 2019. Initial participant enrollment began on June 1, 2020. Access through URL of the registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04201626?cond=ERAS&cntry=TH&draw=2&rank=3.
Sujet(s)
Récupération améliorée après chirurgie , Tumeurs de l'appareil génital féminin , Analgésiques morphiniques , Femelle , Tumeurs de l'appareil génital féminin/chirurgie , Procédures de chirurgie gynécologique/méthodes , Humains , Durée du séjour , Douleur postopératoire/épidémiologie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
Background and Objective: To investigate the efficacy of listening to music on pain reduction during colposcopy-directed cervical biopsy (CDB). Materials and Methods: From June 2020 to November 2021, 240 women undergoing CDB were enrolled. The participants were randomized into three groups: Group 1, colposcopic examination while wearing headphones and listening to music; Group 2, colposcopy while wearing headphones but not listening to music; Group 3 (control group), colposcopy while neither listening to music nor wearing headphones. All participating women completed a 10 cm visual analog scale for subjective pain at three time points: baseline, immediately after cervical biopsy, and 15 min after the procedure. The primary endpoint was the biopsy pain score. Result: Of the 240 women, a sample size of 80 was randomly assigned per group. The clinical-pathological and procedure-related characteristics of the participants in all groups were similar. The mean baseline pain score between each group was not significantly different (2.83 in the music group, 2.54 in group 2, and 2.94 in the control group, p = 0.47). There were no significant differences between each group in terms of mean biopsy pain score (4.21 in the music group, 4.24 in group 2, and 4.30 in the control group, p = 0.98). The differences in changes between the baseline pain score and the biopsy pain score were not statistically significant (1.39 in the music group, 1.70 in group 2, and 1.36 in the control group, p = 0.69). In the multiple comparison analysis, the differences in changes between the biopsy pain score and the baseline pain score between each group were also not statistically significant. There were no complications with the intervention observed. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was no beneficial effect of listening to music on pain reduction during colposcopy-directed cervical biopsies.
Sujet(s)
Musique , Biopsie/effets indésirables , Colposcopie/effets indésirables , Femelle , Humains , Musicothérapie , Douleur/étiologie , Douleur/prévention et contrôleRÉSUMÉ
This study compared the quality of life (QoL) of 265 stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery alone (group 1: 137 patients) versus those who underwent primary radical surgery followed by radiotherapy (group 2: 128 patients) and identified clinical characteristics that predict the poor quality of life. All participants completed quality of life questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30 and CMU cervical cancer QoL. For the EORTC QLQ-C30, the study groups were comparable regarding global health status/QoL scale and summary scores. Group 1 participants had better scores on the physical functioning domain and some symptom scales/items. For the CMU Cervical Cancer QoL, group 1 participants had better scores on gastrointestinal, lymphatic, and sexual/hormonal domains. In multivariable analysis, adjuvant radiation was consistently associated with poor quality of life in most domains. In general, early-stage cervical cancer survivors had a satisfactory quality of life. The clinical significance of the quality of life score differences between the study groups remains debateable.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? For women with early cervical cancer, surgery is the main treatment providing not only a good chance for a cure by total removal of the cancer but also an opportunity to preserve the hormone-producing function of the ovary as well as the flexibility of the vagina. However, radiation treatment may be indicated after surgery in some patients depending on the findings from surgery. Because of the concern about increased complications and decreased long-term quality of life following the combined treatments, some may elect to avoid surgery and receive radiation alone in the first place. In this study, we compared the quality of life of women who had surgery alone to those who had surgery followed by radiation. This information is currently lacking in the medical literature.What do the results of this study add? We found that, in general, women with early cervical cancer had a satisfactory quality of life. For a patient who is surgically fit and chooses to receive primary surgery, if radiation is subsequently required, she could still expect the acceptable long-term quality of life-although slightly less satisfactory than receiving surgery alone but not inferior to those who receive primary radiation treatment.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings will be useful for pre-treatment counselling and posttreatment supportive care. The information regarding disease-related and treatment-induced morbidity should be thoroughly discussed with the patients before and after treatment. Also, the use of questionnaires examining general well-being together with a cancer-specific quality of life is recommended for the systematic evaluation of cancer survivors.
Sujet(s)
Survivants du cancer , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus , Femelle , Humains , Qualité de vie , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Survivants , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/radiothérapie , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Possible beneficial effects of neurofeedback in improving ADHD functional outcomes have been increasingly reported. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the relationship between neurofeedback and executive functioning in children with ADHD. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting the effects of neurofeedback on executive functioning, including response inhibition, sustained attention, and working memory, assessed by neuropsychological tests. Only randomized controlled studies of children aged 5 to 18 years were included using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. The effects of neurofeedback were not found on three domains of executive functions. A meta-regression analysis revealed a trend of numbers of neurofeedback sessions positively associated with response inhibition (p = .06). CONCLUSION: Results did not show the benefits of neurofeedback on executive functions assessed by neuropsychological tests. Future studies should focus on standard neurofeedback protocols, the intensity of intervention, and neuropsychological outcomes.
Sujet(s)
Trouble déficitaire de l'attention avec hyperactivité , Rétroaction neurologique , Attention , Trouble déficitaire de l'attention avec hyperactivité/psychologie , Enfant , Fonction exécutive/physiologie , Humains , Mémoire à court terme , Rétroaction neurologique/méthodesRÉSUMÉ
We compared the quality of life (QoL) of women with early versus advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and examined predicting factors for the poor QoL. We classified 157 participants into 108 with early disease (stage I-II) and 49 with advanced disease (stage III-IV). They completed two questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30 and Chiang Mai University (CMU) ovarian cancer QoL. For EORTC QLQ-C30, the study groups were comparable regarding global health status/QoL, functional scales, and summary scores. The advanced group had worse scores on symptom scales specifically appetite loss and constipation. For CMU Ovarian Cancer QoL, the advanced group had worse scores only in the gastrointestinal domain but not in urinary, lymphatic, and sexual/hormonal domains. These findings remained mostly unchanged after excluding those with recurrence. In multivariable analysis, currently receiving treatment was consistently associated with worse QoL scores. The advanced stage had more adverse impact only on the gastrointestinal domains of QoL, mainly during periods of receiving chemotherapy.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Survival outcome for women with epithelial ovarian cancer varies depending mainly on stage. Those who survive advanced stage disease could expect long-term disease and treatment-related morbidities that significantly affected QoL. However, there has been very limited information regarding QoL of women who have the early disease in comparison to those with more advanced disease especially in the context of Asian culture.What do the results of this study add? Apart from the higher prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms reported by the patients with advanced disease, the general well-being and other symptom-specific domains of QoL were comparable between women with early and advanced diseases. Receiving treatment is a consistent predictor for poor QoL.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In comparison to early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer, the advanced stage had more adverse impact only on the gastrointestinal domains of QoL, mainly during periods of receiving chemotherapy. This information will be useful for patient counselling. Future research should examine the underlying causes of this finding.
Sujet(s)
Carcinome épithélial de l'ovaire/psychologie , Stadification tumorale/psychologie , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/psychologie , Qualité de vie , Adulte , Carcinome épithélial de l'ovaire/diagnostic , Carcinome épithélial de l'ovaire/anatomopathologie , Auto-évaluation diagnostique , Dépistage précoce du cancer , Femelle , État fonctionnel , État de santé , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/diagnostic , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/anatomopathologie , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Évaluation des symptômesRÉSUMÉ
Transgender people may choose to affirm their gender identity with gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and/or gender-affirming surgery (GAS). The effects of GAHT and GAS on sexual health in transgender people have not been well elucidated. This systematic review aimed to appraise the current scientific literature regarding sexual desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, and satisfaction in transmen and transwomen before, during, and after gender transition. Overall, sexual dysfunction is common in both transmen and transwomen. GAHT and GAS may help to improve sexual satisfaction. More studies that focus on sexual health in the transgender population are urgently needed.
Sujet(s)
Procédures de changement de sexe , Troubles sexuels d'origine physiologique/étiologie , Transsexualisme/complications , Transsexualisme/thérapie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Guides de bonnes pratiques cliniques comme sujetRÉSUMÉ
Cancer cells usually show adaptations to their metabolism that facilitate their growth, invasiveness, and metastasis. Therefore, reprogramming the energy metabolism is one of the current key foci of cancer research and treatment. Although aerobic glycolysis-the Warburg effect-has been thought to be the dominant energy metabolism in cancer, recent data indicate a different possibility, specifically that oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is the more likely form of energy metabolism in some cancer cells. Due to the heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancer, there are different metabolic preferences among cell types, study types (in vivo/in vitro), and invasiveness. Current knowledge acknowledges glycolysis to be the main energy provider in ovarian cancer growth, invasion, migration, and viability, so specific agents targeting the glycolysis or OXPHOS pathways have been used in previous studies to attenuate tumor progression and increase chemosensitization. However, chemoresistant cell lines exert various metabolic preferences. This review comprehensively summarizes the information from existing reports which could together provide an in-depth understanding and insights for the development of a novel targeted therapy which can be used as an adjunctive treatment to standard chemotherapy to decelerate tumor progression and decrease the epithelial ovarian cancer mortality rate.
RÉSUMÉ
Radical hysterectomy is a recommended treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. However, the procedure is associated with significant morbidities resulting from the removal of the parametrium. Parametrial cancer invasion (PMI) is found in a minority of patients but the efficient system used to predict it is lacking. In this study, we develop a novel machine learning (ML)-based predictive model based on a random forest model (called iPMI) for the practical identification of PMI in women. Data of 1112 stage IA-IIA cervical cancer patients who underwent primary surgery were collected and considered as the training dataset, while data from an independent cohort of 116 consecutive patients were used as the independent test dataset. Based on these datasets, iPMI-Econ was then developed by using basic clinicopathological data available prior to surgery, while iPMI-Power was also introduced by adding pelvic node metastasis and uterine corpus invasion to the iPMI-Econ. Both 10-fold cross-validations and independent test results showed that iPMI-Power outperformed other well-known ML classifiers (e.g., logistic regression, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, multi-layer perceptron, naive Bayes, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting). Upon comparison, it was found that iPMI-Power was effective and had a superior performance to other well-known ML classifiers in predicting PMI. It is anticipated that the proposed iPMI may serve as a cost-effective and rapid approach to guide important clinical decision-making.
RÉSUMÉ
Background and Objectives: Clinicians have been using elastic abdominal binder for stabilizing incision site after major abdominal surgery. However, the benefits of that practice have never been formally assessed. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the use of elastic abdominal binder on postoperative pain and recovery of gynecologic cancer patients. Materials and Methods: One-hundred and nine women diagnosed with cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer, who underwent open abdominal surgery were assigned randomly into two groups: intervention (56 patients) and control (53 patients). The women in the intervention group applied abdominal binder from postoperative day 1. For the control group, the women did not wear the binder or similar devices. The primary outcomes were pain and functional recovery. Subgroup analysis on participants age ≥ 50 was also performed. Results: For the entire study cohort, the baseline, postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 2 pain scores in the intervention group were significantly lower than the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the groups for postoperative day 3 pain score and for the change in pain scores from the baseline value. Of note, the age ≥ 50 subgroup represented a more balanced cohort with comparable baseline pain scores between the study groups. For this population, the pain scores for postoperative day 1-3 were significantly lower in the intervention group. The intervention group had a longer six-minute walking distance on postoperative day 3 with a trend toward a smaller difference in the day 3 distance from the baseline. Conclusions: The potential benefits of abdominal binder use in reducing postoperative pain and improving functional recovery after open gynecologic cancer surgery could be demonstrated only in those age ≥ 50.
Sujet(s)
Procédures de chirurgie gynécologique , Tumeurs , Abdomen/chirurgie , Femelle , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mesure de la douleur , Douleur postopératoire , Récupération fonctionnelleRÉSUMÉ
The standard chemotherapy regimens of ovarian cancer are platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) and bevacizumab (BEV). However, the effects of BEV alone or combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel on mitochondrial dynamics, mitochondrial function, mitophagy, apoptosis, inflammation and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in human ovarian cancer mitochondria and cells have not yet been investigated. Therefore, we aimed to test the hypothesis that 1) platinum-based chemotherapy and BEV equally damage isolated mitochondria from human ovarian cancers, and ovarian cancer cells through inducing mitochondrial dynamics dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, increased mitophagy and apoptosis, as well as altered inflammation and VEGF; and 2) combined therapies exert greater damage than monotherapy. Each isolated human ovarian cancer mitochondria (n = 16) or CaOV3 cells (n = 6) were treated with either platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin 10 µM and paclitaxel 5 µM), BEV (2 mg/mL) or combined platinum-based chemotherapy and BEV for 60 min or 24 h, respectively. Following the treatment, mitochondrial dynamics, mitochondrial function, mitophagy, apoptosis, cytotoxicity, inflammation and VEGF were determined. Platinum-based chemotherapy caused ovarian cancer mitochondria and cell damage through mitochondrial dysfunction, increased cell death with impairment of membrane integrity, and enhanced VEGF reduction, while BEV did not. BEV caused deterioration of ovarian cancer mitochondria and cells through mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis, but it had no effect on cell viability. Interestingly, combined platinum-based chemotherapy and BEV treatments had no addictive effects on all parameters except mitochondrial maximal respiration, when compared to monotherapy. Collectively, these findings suggest that platinum-based chemotherapy and BEV caused human ovarian cancer mitochondrial and cell damage through different mechanisms.