Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
1.
Anaesthesia ; 77(2): 185-195, 2022 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34333761

RÉSUMÉ

We implemented the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist at Auckland City Hospital from November 2007. We hypothesised that the checklist would reduce postoperative mortality and increase days alive and out of hospital, both measured to 90 postoperative days. We compared outcomes for cohorts who had surgery during 18-month periods before vs. after checklist implementation. We also analysed outcomes during 9 years that included these periods (July 2004-December 2013). We analysed 9475 patients in the 18-month period before the checklist and 10,589 afterwards. We analysed 57,577 patients who had surgery from 2004 to 2013. Mean number of days alive and out of hospital (95%CI) in the cohort after checklist implementation was 1.0 (0.4-1.6) days longer than in the cohort preceding implementation, p < 0.001. Ninety-day mortality was 395/9475 (4%) and 362/10,589 (3%) in the cohorts before and after checklist implementation, multivariable odds ratio (95%CI) 0.93 (0.80-1.09), p = 0.4. The cohort changes in these outcomes were indistinguishable from longer-term trends in mortality and days alive and out of hospital observed during 9 years, as determined by Bayesian changepoint analysis. Postoperative mortality to 90 days was 228/5686 (4.0%) for Maori and 2047/51,921 (3.9%) for non-Maori, multivariable odds ratio (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73-0.99), p = 0.04. Maori spent on average (95%CI) 1.1 (0.5-1.7) fewer days alive and out of hospital than non-Maori, p < 0.001. In conclusion, our patients experienced improving postoperative outcomes from 2004 to 2013, including the periods before and after implementation of the surgical checklist. Maori patients had worse outcomes than non-Maori.


Sujet(s)
Liste de contrôle/tendances , Audit médical/tendances , Sortie du patient/tendances , Sécurité des patients , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Organisation mondiale de la santé , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Liste de contrôle/méthodes , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Audit médical/méthodes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Complications postopératoires/diagnostic , Études rétrospectives , Jeune adulte
2.
Anaesthesia ; 63(12): 1349-57, 2008 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19032305

RÉSUMÉ

SUMMARY: It is notoriously difficult to obtain evidence from clinical randomised controlled trials for safety innovations in healthcare. We have developed a research design using simulation for the evaluation of safety initiatives in anaesthesia. We used a standard and a modified scenario in a human-patient simulator, involving a potentially life-threatening problem requiring prompt attention--either a cardiac arrest or a failure in oxygen supply. The modified scenarios involved distractions such as loud music, a demanding and uncooperative surgeon, telephone calls and frequent questions from a medical student. Twenty anaesthetics were administered by 10 anaesthetists. A mean (SD) of 11.3 (2.8) errors per anaesthetic were identified in the oxygen failure scenarios, compared with 8.0 (3.4) in the cardiac arrest scenarios (ANOVA: p = 0.04). The difference between the combined standard scenarios and the combined modified scenarios was not significant. The mean rate of errors overall was 9.7 per simulation, with a pooled SD of 4.46, so in future studies 21 subjects would provide 80% statistical power to show a reduction in error rate of 30% from baseline with p

Sujet(s)
Anesthésie/normes , Simulation numérique , Gestion de la sécurité/méthodes , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Anesthésie/effets indésirables , Anesthésiologie/instrumentation , Compétence clinique , Panne d'appareillage , Femelle , Arrêt cardiaque/thérapie , Humains , Mâle , Erreurs médicales/prévention et contrôle , Nouvelle-Zélande , Oxygénothérapie/instrumentation , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet/méthodes , Plan de recherche
3.
Anaesthesia ; 62(11): 1114-20, 2007 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17924891

RÉSUMÉ

In a prospective, observational trial, we investigated the influence of time of day on the duration of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) elicited by rocuronium. Forty-nine patients scheduled for surgery between 08:00 and 02:00 were enrolled after giving written informed consent. Time to neuromuscular recovery was measured following three doses: (1) a fat-free-mass (FFM) related induction dose (0.6 mg x kg(-1): n = 47); (2) a maintenance dose (20% of the induction dose: n = 42); and (3) a standard 10-mg dose (n = 35). The extent of NMB was dependent on the time of administration (p = 0.038 General Linear Model Analysis). The maximum effect of 50 min (95% CI 41-59 min) was elicited between 08:00 and 11:00 and the minimum duration of 29 min (95% CI 23-35 min) between 14:00 and 17:00 (p = 0.005). A similar pattern was observed for the maintenance dose. The duration of action of rocuronium is influenced by time of day and this effect is of potential clinical significance and practical relevance to research.


Sujet(s)
Androstanols/pharmacologie , Rythme circadien/physiologie , Jonction neuromusculaire/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Curarisants non dépolarisants/pharmacologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Androstanols/administration et posologie , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Blocage neuromusculaire , Jonction neuromusculaire/physiologie , Curarisants non dépolarisants/administration et posologie , Études prospectives , Rocuronium , Facteurs temps
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...