RÉSUMÉ
Purpose: Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FLHCC) is a rare primary liver malignancy often diagnosed at advanced stages. While there are limited data on the efficacy of specific agents, we aim to report outcomes of patients treated with systemic therapies and explore prognostic factors. Patients and Methods: Medical records of patients treated between 2010 and 2022 were reviewed. Treatments were defined after multidisciplinary assessment. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline demographics. Time-to-event outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, compared by log-rank and adjusted by a regression model. Radiomic features (including size, shape, and texture) of the primary lesion were extracted and dimensionality reduced. An unsupervised Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering was performed, and survival was compared between clusters. Results: We identified 23 patients: 12 males, with a median age of 23.6 years. At diagnosis, 82.6% had metastases, most frequently to the lungs (39.1%), lymph nodes (39.1%), and peritoneum (21.7%). Patients received a median of three lines (1-8) of treatment, including different regimens. Sorafenib (39.1%), capecitabine (30.4%), and capecitabine/interferon (13%) were the most used first-line regimens. The median time-to-failure was 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.2-8.7). Capecitabine + interferon (42.1%) and platinum combinations (39.1%) were the most used second-line regimens, with a time-to-failure of 3.5 months (95% CI: 1.5-11.6). Median overall survival was 26.7 months (95% CI: 15.1-40.4). A high baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with worse survival (p=0.02). Radiomic features identified three clusters, with one cluster (n=6) having better survival (40.4 vs 22.6 months, p=0.039). Tumor sphericity in the arterial phase was the most relevant characteristic associated with a better prognosis (accuracy=0.93). Conclusion: FLHCC has unique features compared to conventional HCC, including young onset, gender balance, and absence of hepatopathy. Systemic therapies can provide encouraging survival, but lack of uniformity precludes defining a preferable regimen. Radiomics and NLR were suggested to correlate with prognosis and warrant further validation.
RÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: To report preliminary outcomes of high dose image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) in the treatment of chordomas of the sacrum, mobile spine and skull base. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of chordoma patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT) in a single tertiary cancer center. Initial treatment was categorized as (A) Adjuvant or definitive high-dose RT (78 Gy/39fx or 24 Gy/1fx) vs (B) surgery-only or low dose RT. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of local failure. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were treated from 2010 through 2020. Median age was 55 years, tumor location was 64% sacrum, 13% lumbar, 16% cervical and 6% clivus. Median tumor volume was 148 cc (8.3 cm in largest diameter), 42% of patients received curative-intent surgery and 65% received primary RT (adjuvant or definitive). 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 48% in group A vs 83% in group B (p = 0.041). Tumor size > 330 cc was associated with local failure (SHR 2.2, 95% CI 1.12 to 7.45; p = 0.028). Eight patients developed distant metastases, with a median metastases-free survival of 56.1 months. 5-year survival for patients that received high dose RT was 72% vs 76% in patients that received no or low dose RT (p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests high-dose photon IG-IMRT improves local control in the initial management of chordomas. Health systems should promote reference centers with clinical expertise and technical capabilities to improve outcomes for this complex disease.
Sujet(s)
Chordome , Radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité , Chordome/imagerie diagnostique , Chordome/anatomopathologie , Chordome/radiothérapie , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité/effets indésirables , Études rétrospectives , Sacrum/anatomopathologie , Base du crâne , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil. SBRT is an evolving treatment in HCC patients not candidates to other local therapies. Its adoption in clinical practice has been heterogeneous, with lack of data on its generalizability in the Brazilian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study involving HCC patients after failure or ineligibility for transarterial chemoembolization. Patients received SBRT 30 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions using an isotoxic prescription approach. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT02221778. RESULTS: From Nov 2014 through Aug 2019, 26 patients received SBRT with 40 Gy median dose. Underlying liver disease was hepatitis C, hepatitis B and alcohol-related in, respectively, 50%, 23% and 19% of patients. Median lesion size was 3.8 cm (range, 1.5-10 cm), and 46% had multiple lesions. Thirty-two percent had tumor vascular thrombosis; median pretreatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was 171.7 ng/mL (range, 4.2-5,494 ng/mL). 1y-local progression-free survival (PFS) was 86% (95% CI: 61% to 95%), with higher local control in doses ≥ 45Gy (p = 0.037; HR = 0.12). 1y-liver PFS, distant PFS and OS were, respectively, 52%, 77% and 79%. Objective response was seen in 89% of patients, with 3 months post-SBRT median AFP of 12 ng/mL (2.4-637 ng/mL). There were no grade 3 or 4 clinical toxicities. Grade 3 or 4 laboratory toxicities occurred in 27% of patients. CONCLUSION: SBRT is feasible and safe in patients unresponsive or ineligible for TACE in Brazil. Our study suggests doses ≥ 45 Gy yields better local control.
Sujet(s)
Établissements de cancérologie/organisation et administration , Infections à coronavirus/prévention et contrôle , Planification des mesures d'urgence en cas de catastrophe/organisation et administration , Pandémies/prévention et contrôle , Pneumopathie virale/prévention et contrôle , Centres de soins tertiaires/organisation et administration , Brésil/épidémiologie , COVID-19 , Formulaires de consentement/législation et jurisprudence , Infections à coronavirus/épidémiologie , Personnel de santé/organisation et administration , Humains , Pneumopathie virale/épidémiologieSujet(s)
Humains , Pneumopathie virale/prévention et contrôle , Établissements de cancérologie/organisation et administration , Infections à coronavirus/prévention et contrôle , Planification des mesures d'urgence en cas de catastrophe/organisation et administration , Pandémies/prévention et contrôle , Centres de soins tertiaires/organisation et administration , Pneumopathie virale/épidémiologie , Brésil/épidémiologie , Personnel de santé/organisation et administration , Infections à coronavirus/épidémiologie , Formulaires de consentement/législation et jurisprudence , COVID-19RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low-and-middle-income countries have resource constraints and waiting lists for radiotherapy (RT). In this context, we sought to determine the survival of inpatients evaluated for palliative RT in a large referral cancer center in Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From November 2014 through December 2015, we enrolled 333 inpatients with palliative RT evaluation requests in this prospective observational study. We applied Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) and Survival Prediction Score using Number of Risk Factors (NRF). Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were survival by PPI and NRF. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02312791). RESULTS: Median survival (MS) for the entire cohort was 73â¯days. PPI ≤2 had MS of 120â¯days; PPI 2.5-4 had MS of 55â¯days (HR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.07-3.16); PPI >4 had MS of 39â¯days (HR 3.45; 95% CI, 2.07-5.74) (pâ¯<â¯.0001). NRF 0-1 had MS of 129â¯days; NRF 2 had MS of 73â¯days (HR 1.74; 95% CI 0.89-3.38); NRF 3 had MS of 40â¯days (HR 2.95; 95% CI, 1.50-5.78) (pâ¯<â¯.0001). CONCLUSION: Inpatients with palliative RT requests seem to have an overall poor survival. PPI and NRF can define subgroups with different prognosis. This could help hospitals and healthcare systems to standardize criteria for prioritization and contribute for fairness.