RÉSUMÉ
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although a prolonged heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcI) is associated with an increased risk of mortality in the general population, its prognostic value in surgical patients remains unclear. We aimed to examine whether preoperative QTcI prolongation predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. DESIGN: The study was a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX network database. SETTING: Operating room. INTERVENTION: Assessment and categorization of preoperative QTcI. PATIENTS: Data of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent non-cardiac surgery between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were categorized into four groups based on preoperative QTcI: long (500-600 ms), borderline (460-500 ms), high-normal (420-460 ms) and control (370-420 ms) groups. The groups were compared using a propensity score-matched analysis. The primary outcome was the all-cause 90-day mortality risk. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risks of postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (Af), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), emergency visits, hospital readmissions, and pneumonia. RESULTS: In total, data on 519,929 patients were collected in this study. Pairwise comparisons showed that all QTcI prolongation groups demonstrated a heightened incidence of postoperative mortality, arrhythmias, and other complications compared to the control group. Patients with a long QTcI had a 3-fold higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.124, p < 0.001), Af (HR = 3.059, p < 0.001), and VAs (HR = 3.617, p < 0.001) than controls. The risks of emergency visits (HR = 1.287, p < 0.001), hospital readmissions (HR = 1.591, p < 0.001), and pneumonia (HR = 1.672, p < 0.001) were also higher in the long QTcI group than in the control group. A dose-dependent response was evident between QTcI and mortality as well as arrhythmia risk. CONCLUSION: Preoperative QTcI screening effectively risk-stratifies elderly surgical patients, with a QTcI≥500 ms being strongly predictive of short-term postoperative mortality and other complications. Incorporating QTcI assessment into the preoperative evaluation may guide perioperative monitoring and management.
Sujet(s)
Clopidogrel , Procédures endovasculaires , Anévrysme intracrânien , Anévrysme intracrânien/chirurgie , Anévrysme intracrânien/thérapie , Humains , Clopidogrel/usage thérapeutique , Procédures endovasculaires/méthodes , Antiagrégants plaquettaires/usage thérapeutique , Méta-analyse comme sujet , Revues systématiques comme sujetRÉSUMÉ
This meta-analysis investigated the effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate on the postoperative recovery quality, as assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR) questionnaire, in adult surgical patients. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 622 patients were included. Compared with the placebo, magnesium sulfate significantly improved the global QoR score on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.78; p < 0.00001). It also enhanced specific QoR dimensions, with substantial effects on pain (SMD: 1, p < 0.00001) and physical comfort (SMD: 0.85, p < 0.0001), a moderate effect on emotional state (SMD: 0.65, p = 0.002), and small improvements in physical independence (SMD: 0.43, p < 0.00001) and psychological support (SMD: 0.37, p < 0.0001). In addition, magnesium sulfate reduced the intraoperative opioid consumption (SMD: -0.66, p < 0.0001), postoperative pain severity, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio: 0.48, p = 0.008). The extubation times were unaffected, whereas the post-anesthesia care unit stay was slightly prolonged. These findings highlight the potential of magnesium sulfate as a valuable adjunct for multimodal analgesia and enhanced recovery. Future studies should aim to elucidate the optimal dosing strategies, timing of administration, and specific surgical populations that may derive maximum benefits.
Sujet(s)
Sulfate de magnésium , Douleur postopératoire , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Sulfate de magnésium/administration et posologie , Humains , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Perfusions veineuses , Période postopératoire , Vomissements et nausées postopératoires , Adulte , Femelle , Enquêtes et questionnairesSujet(s)
Procédures endovasculaires , Accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique , Antiagrégants plaquettaires , Humains , Accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique/traitement médicamenteux , Procédures endovasculaires/méthodes , Antiagrégants plaquettaires/usage thérapeutique , Résultat thérapeutique , Méta-analyse comme sujetSujet(s)
Anesthésie générale , Sédation consciente , Procédures endovasculaires , Accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Humains , Sédation consciente/méthodes , Procédures endovasculaires/méthodes , Accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique/chirurgie , Accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique/thérapie , Anesthésie générale/méthodes , Méta-analyse comme sujet , Accident vasculaire cérébral/chirurgie , Accident vasculaire cérébral/thérapieRÉSUMÉ
Background: Dementia is a gradual and ongoing cognitive decline due to damage to nerve cells in the brain. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the potential relationship between regional anesthesia (RA) and the risk of dementia. Methods: Electronic databases including Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating the association between RA and dementia risk from inception to March 2022. The primary outcome was the risk of dementia in patients who underwent RA (RA group) and those who received general anesthesia (GA group). Secondary outcomes included identifying other potential risk factors for dementia and comparing dementia risk between individuals receiving RA and those not receiving surgery/anesthesia (placebo group). Results: Eight cohort studies published between 2014 and 2023 were included in this analysis. A meta-analysis of the available data demonstrated no differences in baseline characteristics and morbidities (i.e., age, male proportion, hypertension, diabetes, depression, and severe comorbidities) between the RA and GA groups (all p > 0.05). Initial analysis revealed that the risk of dementia was higher in the GA group than in the RA group (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.29-2.55, p = 0.007, I 2 = 99%, five studies). However, when a study featuring a relatively younger population was excluded from the sensitivity analysis, the results showed a similar risk of dementia (HR, 1.17; p = 0.13) between the GA and RA groups. The pooled results revealed no difference in dementia risk between the RA and placebo groups (HR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.69-2.07, p = 0.52, I 2 = 68%, three studies). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the evidence was not stable, suggesting that limited datasets precluded strong conclusions on this outcome. Anxiety, stroke history, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes are potential predictors of dementia. Conclusion: Our results emphasize that, while RA could be protective against dementia risk compared to GA, the association between the type of anesthesia and dementia risk might vary among different age groups. Owing to the significant prevalence of dementia among older people and their surgical needs, further investigations are warranted to clarify the association between dementia risk and regional anesthesia.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023411324.