Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 44
Filtrer
1.
J Virol Methods ; 322: 114831, 2023 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37838083

RÉSUMÉ

Vaccine-induced protection against tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is mediated by antibodies to the viral particle/envelope protein. The detection of non-structural protein 1 (NS1) specific antibodies has been suggested as a marker indicative of natural infections. However, recent work has shown that TBEV vaccines contain traces of NS1, and immunization of mice induced low amounts of NS1-specific antibodies. In this study, we investigated if vaccination induces TBEV NS1-specific antibodies in humans. Healthy army members (n = 898) were asked to fill in a questionnaire relating to flavivirus vaccination or infection, and blood samples were collected. In addition, samples of 71 suspected acute TBE cases were included. All samples were screened for the presence of TBEV NS1-specific IgG antibodies using an in-house developed ELISA. Antibodies were quantified as percent positivity in reference to a positive control. For qualitative evaluation, cut-off for positivity was defined based on the mean OD of the lower 95% of the vaccinated individuals + 3 SD. We found significantly higher NS1-specific IgG antibody titers (i.e., quantitative evaluation) in individuals having received 2, 3, or 4 or more vaccine doses than in non-vaccinated individuals. Similarly, the percentage of individuals with a positive test result (i.e., qualitative evaluation) was higher in individuals vaccinated against tick-borne encephalitis than in unvaccinated study participants. Although NS1-specific IgG titers remained at a relatively low level when compared to TBE patients, a clear distinction was not always possible. Establishing a clear cut-off point in detection systems is critical for NS1-specific antibodies to serve as a marker for distinguishing the immune response after vaccination and infection.


Sujet(s)
Virus de l'encéphalite à tiques (sous-groupe) , Encéphalites à tiques , Infections à flavivirus , Vaccins antiviraux , Humains , Anticorps antiviraux , Production d'anticorps , Encéphalites à tiques/prévention et contrôle , Immunoglobuline G , Vaccination
2.
Vaccine ; 39(19): 2643-2651, 2021 05 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858718

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: We assessed the 10-year efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of two doses of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV) or one dose of a monovalent varicella vaccine (V) in children from Czech Republic, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. METHODS: This was a phase IIIB follow-up of an observer-blind, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00226499). In phase A, healthy children aged 12-22 months from 10 European countries were randomized in a 3:3:1 ratio to receive two doses of MMRV (MMRV group), one dose of MMR followed by one dose of V (MMR + V group), or two doses of MMR (MMR; control group), 42 days apart. Vaccine efficacy (VE) against varicella (confirmed by viral DNA detection or epidemiological link and clinical assessment) was calculated with 95% confidence intervals using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Immunogenicity was assessed as seropositivity rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs). Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 3705 children were vaccinated (1590, MMRV group; 1586, MMR + V group; 529, MMR group). There were 663 confirmed varicella cases (47, MMRV group; 349, MMR + V group; 267, MMR group). VE ranged between 95.4% (Lithuania) and 97.4% (Slovakia) in the MMRV group and between 59.3% (Lithuania) and 74% (Slovakia) in the MMR + V group. At year 10, seropositivity rates were 99.5%-100% in the MMRV group, 98%-100% in the MMR + V group and 50%-100% in the MMR control group, and the anti-VZV antibody GMCs were comparable between MMRV and MMR + V groups. The occurrence of solicited and unsolicited AEs was similar across groups and no SAE was considered as vaccination-related. No new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that two doses of varicella zoster virus-containing vaccine provided better protection than one dose against varicella and induced antibody responses that persisted 10 years post-vaccination.


Sujet(s)
Rougeole , Oreillons , Rubéole , Anticorps antiviraux , Vaccin contre la varicelle/effets indésirables , Enfant , République tchèque , Europe , Études de suivi , Humains , Nourrisson , Vaccin contre la rougeole, les oreillons et la rubéole , Pologne , Roumanie , Rubéole/prévention et contrôle , Slovaquie , Vaccins combinés/effets indésirables
4.
Cent Eur J Public Health ; 27(2): 93-98, 2019 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31241282

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Chronic HCV infection is associated with cirrhosis of the liver, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver transplantation. HCV disease burden and the impact of new potent direct acting antivirals (DAAs) in the Czech Republic are unknown. METHODS: Using a modelling framework, HCV disease progression in the Czech Republic was predicted to 2030 under the current standard of care treatment structure. In addition, two strategies to reduce the future burden of HCV infection were modelled: an incremental increase in treatment annually and WHO targets. RESULTS: The number of viremic infected individuals in the Czech Republic is estimated to peak in 2026 (n = 55,130) and to decline by 0.5% by 2030 (n = 54,840). The number of individuals with compensated cirrhosis (n = 1,400), decompensated cirrhosis (n = 80), HCC (n = 70), and liver-related deaths (n = 60) is estimated to more than double by 2030. Through aggressive increases in diagnosis and treatment, HCV related mortality may decrease by 70% by 2030. CONCLUSIONS: Disease burden associated with chronic HCV infection is projected to peak in the Czech Republic in 30-40 years. Assuming that the current portion of DAAs used remains constant, a significant reduction in HCV disease burden is possible through increased diagnosis and treatment through 2030. This analysis provides evidence in order to facilitate the development of national strategies for HCV care and management in the Czech Republic.


Sujet(s)
Antiviraux/usage thérapeutique , Carcinome hépatocellulaire/épidémiologie , Coûts indirects de la maladie , Hépatite C chronique/traitement médicamenteux , Hépatite C chronique/épidémiologie , Cirrhose du foie/épidémiologie , Tumeurs du foie/épidémiologie , Adolescent , Adulte , Répartition par âge , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Antiviraux/économie , République tchèque , Hépatite C chronique/économie , Humains , Transplantation hépatique , Adulte d'âge moyen , Surveillance de la population , Prévalence , Résultat thérapeutique
5.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(12): 2865-2872, 2019.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216205

RÉSUMÉ

In two pivotal efficacy studies (ZOE-50; ZOE-70), the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) demonstrated >90% efficacy against herpes zoster (HZ).Adults aged ≥50 or ≥70 years (ZOE-50 [NCT01165177]; ZOE-70 [NCT01165229]) were randomized to receive 2 doses of RZV or placebo 2 months apart. Vaccine efficacy and safety were evaluated post-hoc in the pooled (ZOE-50/70) population according to the number and type of selected medical conditions present at enrollment.At enrollment, 82.3% of RZV and 82.7% of placebo recipients reported ≥1 of the 15 selected medical conditions. Efficacy against HZ ranged from 84.5% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 46.4-97.1) in participants with respiratory disorders to 97.0% (95%CI: 82.3-99.9) in those with coronary heart disease. Moreover, efficacy remained >90% irrespective of the number of selected medical conditions reported by a participant.As indicated by the similarity of the point estimates, this post-hoc analysis suggests that RZV efficacy remains high in all selected medical conditions, as well as with increasing number of medical conditions. No safety concern was identified by the type or number of medical conditions present at enrollment.


Sujet(s)
Vaccin contre le zona/administration et posologie , Vaccin contre le zona/immunologie , Zona/prévention et contrôle , Algie post-zona/prévention et contrôle , Efficacité du vaccin , Adjuvants immunologiques/administration et posologie , Sujet âgé , Maladie chronique , Comorbidité , Interprétation statistique de données , Femelle , Humains , Sujet immunodéprimé , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Algie post-zona/immunologie , Facteurs de risque , Vaccination , Vaccins synthétiques/immunologie
6.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 19(3): 287-297, 2019 03.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30765242

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The duration of protection provided by varicella vaccines is unclear. We assessed the 10-year vaccine efficacy of two doses of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (MMRV), one live attenuated varicella vaccine (V) dose given after one measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) dose (MMR + V), versus two MMR doses (control vaccine) for the prevention of confirmed varicella. METHODS: This was a phase 3b follow-up of an observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. In phase a, children aged 12-22 months (at first vaccination) from Czech Republic (Czechia), Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, and Sweden were randomly assigned by computer-generated randomisation list (3:3:1) to receive two doses of MMRV, one dose of MMR and one dose of varicella vaccine, or two doses of MMR, 42 days apart. Varicella cases were confirmed by detection of viral DNA, or epidemiological link and clinical assessment, by an independent data monitoring committee; disease severity was based on a modified Vázquez scale. Hazard ratios for MMRV and MMR + V versus MMR estimated in the per-protocol cohort using a Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to calculate vaccine efficacy and 95% CI. Serious adverse events were recorded throughout the study in all vaccinated children. Study objectives were secondary and descriptive. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00226499. FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2005, and May 10, 2006, 5803 children (mean age 14·2 months, SD 2·5) were vaccinated. The per-protocol cohort included 2279 children from the MMRV group, 2266 from the MMR + V group, and 744 from the MMR group. From baseline to a median follow-up of 9·8 years, 76 (3%) children in the MMRV group, 469 (21%) in the MMR + V group, and 352 (47%) in the MMR group had varicella. Vaccine efficacy against all varicella was 95·4% (95% CI 94·0-96·4) for MMRV and 67·2% (62·3-71·5) for MMR + V; vaccine efficacy against moderate or severe varicella was 99·1% (97·9-99·6) for MMRV and 89·5% (86·1-92·1) for MMR + V. During phase b, serious adverse events were reported by 290 (15%) of 1961 children in the MMRV group, 317 (16%) of 1978 in the MMR + V group, and 93 (15%) of 641 in the MMR group. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: The 10-years vaccine efficacy observed, suggests that a two-dose schedule of varicella vaccine provided optimum long-term protection for the prevention of varicella by offering individual protection against all severities of disease and leading to a potential reduction in transmission, as observed in the US experience with universal mass vaccination. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.


Sujet(s)
Vaccin contre la varicelle/immunologie , Varicelle/prévention et contrôle , Vaccin contre la varicelle/administration et posologie , Vaccin contre la varicelle/effets indésirables , Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments/épidémiologie , Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments/anatomopathologie , Europe , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Calendrier vaccinal , Nourrisson , Mâle , Méthode en simple aveugle , Résultat thérapeutique , Vaccins combinés/administration et posologie , Vaccins combinés/effets indésirables , Vaccins combinés/immunologie
7.
J Infect Dis ; 217(11): 1750-1760, 2018 05 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29529222

RÉSUMÉ

Background: The herpes zoster subunit vaccine (HZ/su), consisting of varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E (gE) and AS01B Adjuvant System, was highly efficacious in preventing herpes zoster in the ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 trials. We present immunogenicity results from those trials. Methods: Participants (ZOE-50: ≥50; ZOE-70: ≥70 years of age) received 2 doses of HZ/su or placebo, 2 months apart. Serum anti-gE antibodies and CD4 T cells expressing ≥2 of 4 activation markers assessed (CD42+) after stimulation with gE-peptides were measured in subcohorts for humoral (n = 3293) and cell-mediated (n = 466) immunogenicity. Results: After vaccination, 97.8% of HZ/su and 2.0% of placebo recipients showed a humoral response. Geometric mean anti-gE antibody concentrations increased 39.1-fold and 8.3-fold over baseline in HZ/su recipients at 1 and 36 months post-dose 2, respectively. A gE-specific CD42+ T-cell response was shown in 93.3% of HZ/su and 0% of placebo recipients. Median CD42+ T-cell frequencies increased 24.6-fold (1 month) and 7.9-fold (36 months) over baseline in HZ/su recipients and remained ≥5.6-fold above baseline in all age groups at 36 months. The proportion of CD4 T cells expressing all 4 activation markers increased over time in all age groups. Conclusions: Most HZ/su recipients developed robust immune responses persisting for 3 years following vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01165177; NCT01165229.


Sujet(s)
Vaccin contre le zona/immunologie , Zona/immunologie , Herpèsvirus humain de type 3/immunologie , Immunité cellulaire/immunologie , Immunité humorale/immunologie , Adjuvants immunologiques/pharmacologie , Sujet âgé , Anticorps antiviraux/immunologie , Lymphocytes T CD4+ , Femelle , Humains , Immunogénicité des vaccins/immunologie , Lipide A/analogues et dérivés , Lipide A/pharmacologie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Saponines/pharmacologie , Vaccination/méthodes , Vaccins sous-unitaires/immunologie , Protéines de l'enveloppe virale/immunologie
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 14(6): 1370-1377, 2018 06 03.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29461919

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: In adults aged ≥60 years, two doses of the herpes zoster subunit vaccine (HZ/su; 50 µg varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E [gE] and AS01B Adjuvant System) elicited humoral and cell-mediated immune responses persisting for at least six years. We assessed immunogenicity nine years post-initial vaccination. METHODS: This open extension study (NCT02735915) followed 70 participants who received two HZ/su doses in the initial trial (NCT00434577). Blood samples to assess the cellular (intracellular cytokine staining) and humoral (ELISA) immunity were taken at year nine post-initial vaccination. RESULTS: Participants' mean age at dose 1 was 72.3 years. The fold increases over pre-vaccination in the mean frequency of gE-specific CD4+ T-cells expressing ≥2 activation markers plateaued from year four post-dose 1 until year nine. Anti-gE antibody geometric mean concentrations plateaued and remained above pre-vaccination levels from year four onwards. Immunogenicity at year nine was similar across age strata (60-69, ≥70 years) and confirmed statistical prediction model results using data for up to year six. Further modeling using all data up to year nine predicted immune responses would remain above the pre-vaccination level up to year 15. CONCLUSION: In adults aged ≥60 years, HZ/su-induced immunogenicity remained above pre-vaccination levels for at least nine years post-initial vaccination. SUMMARY: After vaccination with HZ/su, both cell mediated and humoral immunity remained above pre-vaccination levels up to year 9 regardless of age group. Immune responses are predicted to remain above baseline up to 15 years post initial vaccination.


Sujet(s)
Anticorps antiviraux/sang , Vaccin contre le zona/immunologie , Herpèsvirus humain de type 3/immunologie , Lipide A/analogues et dérivés , Saponines/administration et posologie , Lymphocytes T/immunologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Études de cohortes , Cytokines/analyse , Études de suivi , Vaccin contre le zona/administration et posologie , Humains , Lipide A/administration et posologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Facteurs temps , Vaccins sous-unitaires/administration et posologie , Vaccins sous-unitaires/immunologie
9.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 14(4): 887-893, 2018 04 03.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206078

RÉSUMÉ

Mumps outbreaks, especially in adolescents and young adults, have been reported in the Czech Republic. The aim of the presented study was to determine the seroprevalence of specific IgG antibodies against mumps in the adult population of the Czech Republic. The study was designed as a multicenter serological survey of adults aged 18 years and over. Specific IgG antibodies against mumps were detected in blood samples using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A total of 1,911 serum samples were examined. The overall seropositivity reached 55.3%. In individual age groups, the highest seropositivity 63% (63.5-65.2%) was recorded in adults aged 40 years and over; the lowest seropositivity was found in adults aged 18-29 years (27.4%). The difference in seropositivity rate between the 18-29 years age group and the 40 years and over age groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Only the 18-29 years age group included both vaccinated and unvaccinated (born in the pre-vaccine era) individuals. In vaccinated individuals, seropositivity was reported in only 19.1% of persons; in unvaccinated individuals, seropositivity reached 48.2%. Our results demonstrate the long-term persistence of antibodies following natural infection and the decrease in seropositivity that occurs after vaccination over time. This immunity waning may account for the higher susceptibility of adolescents and young adults to mumps. Therefore, the current vaccination program in the Czech Republic could be considered as less effective. It will be modified with the shifting of the second dose of vaccine from two years of age to the preschool age.


Sujet(s)
Anticorps antiviraux/sang , Anticorps antiviraux/immunologie , Oreillons/immunologie , Oreillons/prévention et contrôle , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , République tchèque , Épidémies de maladies/prévention et contrôle , Femelle , Humains , Programmes de vaccination/méthodes , Mâle , Rougeole/immunologie , Rougeole/prévention et contrôle , Vaccin contre la rougeole, les oreillons et la rubéole/immunologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Oreillons/sang , Virus des oreillons/immunologie , Études séroépidémiologiques , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Vaccination/méthodes , Jeune adulte
10.
Vaccine ; 36(36): 5385-5390, 2018 08 28.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28602605

RÉSUMÉ

The challenge of assimilating millions of immigrants in the European region each year presents significant socioeconomic issues. Among them is the threat of vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) disease transmission within immigrant groups and the broader population given the permeability of nation state borders. A total of 3.8 million people immigrated to the European Union (EU) in 2014, among those were 1.6 million non-EU nationals. While vaccines have markedly reduced the transmission of disease, clusters of under-vaccinated individuals potentiate the rapid transmission of once-eradicated or controlled diseases. Immigrants pose a special challenge to host country public health vaccination programmes. Wars in their native countries may have interrupted vaccination programmes, documentation may be unavailable or unreliable, and refugees may present with health issues due to poor sanitation and food during transit. Further, immigrants are often reticent to access health care in the destination country, or may face financial or language barriers. Thus, preventive health care needs may go unaddressed and the first contact with a clinician is for an emergency. Equitable access to acute and preventive health care and services, including immunizations irrespective of individual's immigration status, should be a priority for European region countries. Ensuring appropriate and timely vaccination for immigrants could be accomplished with a universal European region immunization schedule. Priority should be given to highly communicable VPDs such as measles, mumps, rubella, pertussis, diphtheria, varicella and polio.


Sujet(s)
Union européenne/statistiques et données numériques , Vaccination/méthodes , Varicelle/prévention et contrôle , Émigrants et immigrants/statistiques et données numériques , Humains , Calendrier vaccinal , Rougeole/prévention et contrôle , Oreillons/prévention et contrôle , Santé publique/méthodes , Réfugiés/statistiques et données numériques , Rubéole/prévention et contrôle , Vaccins/usage thérapeutique , Coqueluche/prévention et contrôle
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE