Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 187
Filtrer
1.
J Econ Entomol ; 109(6): 2463-2471, 2016 Dec 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27694183

RÉSUMÉ

The zoophytophagous mullein bug, Campylomma verbasci (Meyer-Dür) (Hemiptera: Miridae), is a beneficial predator of mites and aphids, but also a pest causing damage when it feeds on apples. The aim of this study was to evaluate three different parameters of phytophagy of the mullein bug both in laboratory (phytophagous behavior) and field (fruit damage) tests: 1) apple cultivar, 2) fruit size, and 3) nymphal instar. In the laboratory, nymphs were observed individually for 15 min in Petri dishes containing agar gel and an apple fruitlet to evaluate feeding punctures of four apple cultivars, four fruit sizes, and five nymphal instars. In the orchard, nymphs were caged at bloom in sleeve cages to evaluate damage on the developing fruit of seven apple cultivars and three nymphal instars on 'Red Delicious'. The feeding punctures in the laboratory were higher on 'Red Delicious' than on 'Honeycrisp'; fruit damage in the orchard did not differ among cultivars at mid-season, but was higher on 'Red Delicious' than on 'Lobo' and 'Marshall McIntosh' at harvest. The number of feeding punctures in the laboratory was higher on 7-9 mm than on 18-20 mm size fruit for 'Red Delicious', but not for 'Honeycrisp'. The number of feeding punctures in the laboratory made by the fifth nymphal instar was higher than those made by younger nymphs, but fruit damage in the orchard did not differ among nymphal instars. Our results will help to elaborate a management chart for this insect by minimizing risks and promoting its use for biocontrol. RÉSUMÉ: .La punaise de la molène, Campylomma verbasci (Meyer-Dür) (Hemiptera: Miridae), est un prédateur bénéfique zoophytophage des acariens et pucerons dans les vergers, mais également un ravageur causant des dommages lorsqu'il se nourrit sur les pommes. Le but de cette étude était d'évaluer trois paramètres différents sur la phytophagie de la punaise de la molène, à la fois en laboratoire (comportement phytophage) et sur le terrain (dommages aux fruits) : 1) les cultivars de pommes, 2) la taille des fruits, et 3) les stades larvaires. En laboratoire, les larves étaient observées individuellement pendant 15 min dans des boites de Petri contenant un gel d'agar et une jeune pomme afin de déterminer les piqûres de nutrition sur quatre cultivars de pommes, quatre tailles de fruit et cinq stades larvaires différents. En verger, des larves ont été encagées à la floraison dans des manchons en mousseline afin d'évaluer les dommages sur les fruits en développement. Les essais ont été effectués sur sept cultivars de pommes ainsi qu'avec trois stades larvaires sur le cultivar "Délicieuse rouge". Les piqûres de nutrition en laboratoire étaient plus nombreuses sur "Délicieuse rouge" que sur "Honeycrisp"; les dommages aux fruits en verger ne différaient pas entre les cultivars à mi-saison, mais étaient plus nombreux sur "Délicieuse rouge" que sur "Lobo" et "Marshall McIntosh" à la récolte. Les piqûres de nutrition en laboratoire étaient plus nombreuses pour la taille de fruit 7-9 mm que 18-20 mm sur "Délicieuse rouge", mais pas sur "Honeycrisp". Le nombre de piqûres de nutrition (en laboratoire) faites par les larves de stade 5 étaient plus nombreuses que celles faites par les larves plus jeunes, mais les dommages aux fruits (en verger) ne différaient pas entre les stades larvaires. Ces résultats vont aider à élaborer une charte de gestion de cet insecte en minimisant les risques et en favorisant son rôle d'agent de lutte biologique.


Sujet(s)
Herbivorie , Heteroptera/physiologie , Malus/physiologie , Animaux , Comportement alimentaire , Heteroptera/croissance et développement , Nymphe/croissance et développement , Nymphe/physiologie
2.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29468863

RÉSUMÉ

Benzodiazepine hypnotics bear a higher risk of high dose dependence than benzodiazepine anxiolytics, according to a recent study in Luxemburg. This article summarizes the main indications of these molecules and the current treatment recommendations. It provides an overview of public health actions of the past and the future to reduce their excessive consumption.


Sujet(s)
Anxiété/traitement médicamenteux , Benzodiazépines/usage thérapeutique , Troubles de l'endormissement et du maintien du sommeil/traitement médicamenteux , Humains , Guides de bonnes pratiques cliniques comme sujet
3.
Encephale ; 36(5): 417-24, 2010 Oct.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21035632

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: This article proposes a review of atypical multicentre studies for drug-induced movement disorders (and related psychiatric symptoms) and supersensitivity psychosis. A well-conducted antipsychotic treatment consists of regular attempts to reduce the dose by finding the minimal therapeutic dose. To achieve optimal antipsychotic treatment, it is important to distinguish psychiatric symptoms associated with drug-induced movement disorder(s) (DIMD) or supersensitivity psychosis from true relapse. LITERATURE FINDINGS: Persistent DIMD have been found to be a predictor of supersensitivity psychosis or tardive dyskinesia (DT). DIMD-associated psychiatric symptoms can be classified into three types: directly induced by DIMD; resulting from confounding DIMD with psychiatric symptoms; and supersensitivity symptoms associated with DIMD. Without this distinction, the beneficial effects of antipsychotics are masked by emergent DIMD psychiatric symptoms (as was confounded in the CATIE study). DISCUSSION: A constant decline in the prevalence of TD (hyperkinetic, involuntary and purposeless movement disorder) has been observed since the introduction of atypical antipsychotics. The neurotoxic effects of classical antipsychotics are well documented and their discontinuation is required. However, the risk of TD still exits with atypical antipsychotics and continued surveillance of emerging cases is very important for clinicians. Moreover, a regular evaluation of DIMD and associated psychiatric symptoms is crucial. It is important to underline the fact that DIMD persists with antipsychotics, with significantly higher total PANSS scores than in patients without DIMD. CONCLUSION: Supersensitivity psychosis is a drug-induced psychotic relapse (6 weeks following the decrease or withdrawal of an antipsychotic). Discontinuation syndromes can produce psychiatric symptoms (and be confounded with true relapse), but can be improved more quickly after reintroduction of treatment. Interestingly, various data suggest that lower doses of antipsychotics could prevent such symptoms. Anticonvulsants can be efficient adjuvants in the treatment of psychosis. In the United States, many patients received valproate or gabapentin treatment. These adjuvants, by antikindling effect, can facilitate minimal maintenance drug treatment and be efficient for anxiety. Resistant schizophrenia can be related to supersensitivity psychosis; gabapentin and lamotrigine are effective in this case.


Sujet(s)
Anticonvulsivants/effets indésirables , Neuroleptiques/effets indésirables , Dyskinésie due aux médicaments/diagnostic , Maladie iatrogène , Psychoses toxiques/diagnostic , Troubles psychotiques/traitement médicamenteux , Anticonvulsivants/usage thérapeutique , Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Association de médicaments , Dyskinésie due aux médicaments/psychologie , Humains , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie , Psychoses toxiques/psychologie , Troubles psychotiques/diagnostic , Troubles psychotiques/psychologie , Facteurs de risque
5.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 17(6): 319-22, 2002 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12409687

RÉSUMÉ

The antidepressant mirtazapine antagonizes central presynaptic alpha2-adrenergic auto- and heteroreceptors resulting in increased central norepinephrine and serotonin activity. Histamine H2 receptors are also antagonized, as are postsynaptic serotonin 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors, leading to serotonergic activity primarily via 5-HT1A receptors. Based on the case report of a patient who developed mania with higher than recommended dosage of mirtazapine, we review the literature on the atypical nature of manic symptoms with mirtazapine. Eight subjects, including those in our study, were identified as having developed mirtazapine-induced mania with atypical features, consisting of dysphoria, irritability, insomnia, psychomotor agitation and abnormal gait. Predisposing features may have included the presence of underlying brain dysfunction and certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-mirtazapine combinations. Dysphoric mania with atypical features may be induced by mirtazapine, providing support for a common hypothesis such as 'central norepinephrine hyperactivity' as the basis for development of mania with mirtazapine.


Sujet(s)
Antidépresseurs de seconde génération/effets indésirables , Trouble bipolaire/induit chimiquement , Miansérine/effets indésirables , Norépinéphrine/pharmacologie , Adulte , Antidépresseurs de seconde génération/administration et posologie , Antidépresseurs de seconde génération/usage thérapeutique , Trouble dépressif/traitement médicamenteux , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Femelle , Humains , Miansérine/administration et posologie , Miansérine/analogues et dérivés , Miansérine/usage thérapeutique , Mirtazapine , Facteurs de risque , Inbiteurs sélectifs de la recapture de la sérotonine/usage thérapeutique , Syndrome
6.
Pest Manag Sci ; 57(11): 1007-10, 2001 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11721516

RÉSUMÉ

Hyaliodes vitripennis (Say) is a univoltine indigenous predacious mirid. It has been reported in several orchards where IPM programmes are used. It is a generalist, and feeds on phytophagous mites in addition to other arthropods. In Quebec, a foliar application of imidacloprid, deltamethrin or lambda-cyhalothrin is used at least once per season to manage arthropod pests such as leafhoppers and leaf-eating caterpillars. Meanwhile, several applications of metiram, flusilazole, myclobutanil and mancozeb are made to control apple scab [Venturia inaequalis (Cooke) Winter]. In laboratory trials, comparison of lethal concentrations of the three insecticides against H vitripennis nymphs and adults showed no significant difference. However, when lethal concentrations were compared between two growth stages for each insecticide, a significant difference was noted between adults and nymphs treated with lambda-cyhalothrin, adults being more susceptible than nymphs. No such difference could be detected for imidacloprid or deltamethrin. When LC50 values were compared with the manufacturer's label rates, deltamethrin and imidacloprid were toxic to the nymphs and adults, and lambda-cyhalothrin was slightly toxic to the nymphs and moderately toxic to the adults. Among the fungicides evaluated in the laboratory, myclobutanil showed moderate toxicity to adults at the manufacturer's label rate. The remaining fungicides had no toxic effects to adults or nymphs, even at four times the manufacturer's label rate.


Sujet(s)
Polluants environnementaux/toxicité , Fongicides industriels/toxicité , Hemiptera/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Insecticides/toxicité , Malus/parasitologie , Facteurs âges , Animaux , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Hemiptera/croissance et développement , Dose létale 50 , Saisons , Tests de toxicité
9.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 20(4): 467-71, 2000 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10917408

RÉSUMÉ

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in relieving the symptoms of panic disorder. One hundred three patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with either gabapentin (dosed flexibly between 600 and 3,600 mg/day) or placebo for 8 weeks. No overall drug/placebo difference was observed in scores on the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) (p = 0.606). A post hoc analysis was used to evaluate the more severely ill patients as defined by the primary outcome measure (PAS score > or = 20). In this population, the gabapentin-treated patients showed significant improvement in the PAS change score (p = 0.04). In patients with a PAS score of 20 or greater, women showed a greater response than men regardless of treatment. Adverse events were consistent with the known side effect profile of gabapentin and included somnolence, headache, and dizziness. One patient experienced a serious adverse event during the study. No deaths were reported. The results of this study suggest that gabapentin may have anxiolytic effects in more severely ill patients with panic disorder.


Sujet(s)
Acétates/usage thérapeutique , Amines , Anxiolytiques/usage thérapeutique , Acides cyclohexanecarboxyliques , Trouble panique/traitement médicamenteux , Acide gamma-amino-butyrique , Acétates/effets indésirables , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Agoraphobie/traitement médicamenteux , Agoraphobie/psychologie , Anxiolytiques/effets indésirables , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Gabapentine , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Trouble panique/psychologie , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie , Caractères sexuels
11.
J Environ Sci Health B ; 35(2): 143-55, 2000 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10736765

RÉSUMÉ

Azinphos-methyl, carbaryl, dimethoate, phosmet and phosalone were used in apple orchards to manage apple aphid, apple maggot, woolly apple aphid and leaf eating caterpillars. Among the five insecticides evaluated, dimethoate, carbaryl and azinphosmethyl were the most toxic to the nymphs and adults of Hyaliodes vitripennis (Say) from two regions. Phosalone was the least toxic. Nymphs were more resistant than the adults. While the LC50 for dimethoate was 130 ppm for nymphs, it was 3 ppm for adults from St. Jean-Baptiste-de-Rouville. There were also significant differences in the level of resistance between the two regions where the H. vitripennis were collected. At St. Alexandre the LC50 for phosalone on nymphs was 19,250 ppm whereas, at St. Jean-Baptiste-de-Rouville it was 160,000 ppm.


Sujet(s)
Hemiptera , Insecticides/toxicité , Agriculture , Animaux , Polluants environnementaux/toxicité , Fruit , Larve , Dose létale 50
12.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 20(1): 28-34, 2000 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10653205

RÉSUMÉ

The efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine, a unique selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, were compared with those of placebo in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind study of hospitalized patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Fifty-two patients (25 in the placebo group, 27 in the reboxetine group) were included in the efficacy analysis. Sixteen (64%) of those in the placebo group and four (15%) in the reboxetine group were withdrawn during the study because of lack of efficacy. Improvement in the mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score at last assessment was significantly greater in the reboxetine group than in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the response rate to treatment, defined as > or =50% reduction in HAM-D total score, was 74% for patients who received reboxetine compared with 20% for those who received placebo (p < 0.001). A significantly greater response with reboxetine than with placebo was seen as early as day 10 of treatment (p = 0.006). The therapeutic efficacy of reboxetine was substantiated by improvement in mean scores on the Zung Self-Rating Scale and on the Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness and Global Improvement scales. Reboxetine was well tolerated, and only one patient in each group withdrew because of adverse events. Dry mouth, insomnia, blurred vision, sweating, and constipation were recorded more frequently in the reboxetine group than in the placebo group. There was a tendency toward orthostatic changes in the systolic blood pressure, but this was not clinically significant. This study demonstrated that reboxetine is significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe major depressive disorder and is well tolerated.


Sujet(s)
Affect/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Antidépresseurs/usage thérapeutique , Trouble dépressif majeur/traitement médicamenteux , Morpholines/usage thérapeutique , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Analyse de variance , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Placebo , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie , Réboxétine
15.
Can J Clin Pharmacol ; 6(2): 69-83, 1999.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10519733

RÉSUMÉ

Principles of benzodiazepine selection are outlined for various psychiatric indications and diverse populations (the elderly, and drug and alcohol abusers). Benzodiazepines are still among the most commonly used classes of medications, and they differ in their pharmacodynamic properties. They have varied uses as monotherapy or as adjunctive medication because of their efficacy in the treatment of conditions involving a dysfunction of the GABAergic system or where neuronal inhibition is required. In multiple therapy, benzodiazepines augment the efficacy of other drugs such as lithium in mania, antipsychotics in psychotic agitation and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in panic disorder. Benzodiazepines can produce dependence and tolerance in most patients; predisposed individuals are at greater risk. Short- and intermediate-beta half-life compounds carry a greater risk of rebound and withdrawal reactions, and drug dependence than long acting agents. Adverse effects include sedation, psychomotor and cognitive impairment, memory loss, potentiation of other central nervous system depressants and treatment-emergent depression. Drug potency and beta elimination half-life are reviewed and compared as pharmacokinetic variables.


Sujet(s)
Anxiolytiques/usage thérapeutique , Syndrome de sevrage/psychologie , Troubles liés à une substance/psychologie , Sujet âgé , Anxiolytiques/effets indésirables , Anxiolytiques/pharmacocinétique , Benzodiazépines , Humains
16.
Schizophr Res ; 38(2-3): 101-22, 1999 Aug 17.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10463458

RÉSUMÉ

The authors present a new rating scale for the psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia and related psychoses. The scale links specific symptoms of psychopathology to dysfunction and overactivity of dopaminergic mechanisms underlying the processes of reward and selective attention. The Rating Scale for Psychotic Symptoms (RSPS) is a 44-item rating instrument with a seven-point severity scale for each item. Psychotic symptoms are classified into three groups: Pathological amplification of mental images (perception symptoms) (subscale 1), Distraction symptoms (including catatonia and passivity experiences) (subscale 2), and Delusions (subscale 3). A dimensional, rather than a categorical, conceptualization of psychosis is assumed. Rating is accomplished through a manual and a semi-structured interview (SSCI-RSPS). In this first of two papers, general issues about the construction of the scale and the derivation of symptom groups are discussed. Dopamine-mediated modification of cortico-striatal synapses is seen as being of critical importance in all three groups of symptoms. In this first paper, we present subscale I (perception symptoms), which includes both amplified perceptual images (illusions) and hallucinations. A total of seven illusions and 11 hallucinations are rated as individual items.


Sujet(s)
Tests neuropsychologiques , Troubles de la perception , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie , Psychométrie/méthodes , Troubles psychotiques , Symptômes comportementaux/classification , Symptômes comportementaux/diagnostic , Symptômes comportementaux/physiopathologie , Encéphale/physiopathologie , Cortex cérébral/physiologie , Corps strié/physiologie , Dopamine/physiologie , Humains , Entretien psychologique/méthodes , Modèles psychologiques , Voies nerveuses/physiologie , Troubles de la perception/classification , Troubles de la perception/diagnostic , Troubles de la perception/physiopathologie , Distorsion perceptive/physiologie , Troubles psychotiques/classification , Troubles psychotiques/diagnostic , Troubles psychotiques/physiopathologie
17.
Schizophr Res ; 38(2-3): 123-50, 1999 Aug 17.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10463459

RÉSUMÉ

In the second paper on the Rating Scale for Psychotic Symptoms (RSPS), distraction symptoms (Subscale 2) and delusions (Subscale 3) are described. Subscale 2 includes distraction symptoms, which arise from one of two mechanisms: the symptom may arise either by loss of attentional focus (LAF) due to a competing channel of information, or by the intrusion of the competing channel into the focus of attention [attentional intrusions (AI)]. The symptom classes resulting from loss of attentional focus (LAF) include motor catatonia, negativism, and thought blocking; the attentional intrusions (AI) symptoms rated include three types of passivity experiences (Schneiderian symptoms): (1) thought insertion, (2) movements or action controlled, and (3) speech controlled by an external force. Subscale 3, consisting of delusions, is organized on the basis of content identification. Nineteen types of delusions are rated. Each item of delusional content is rated along three axes (active elaboration, persistence and active extinction) and complexity, and optionally if primary or mixed (i.e. primary with secondary elaborations). The last section of the paper includes the semi-structured interview (SCI-RSPS) for each of the items, as well as guidelines for practical application of the interview.


Sujet(s)
Troubles de la cognition , Délires , Entretien psychologique/méthodes , Tests neuropsychologiques , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie , Troubles psychotiques , Association , Attention/physiologie , Cortex cérébral , Troubles de la cognition/classification , Troubles de la cognition/diagnostic , Troubles de la cognition/physiopathologie , Corps strié , Délires/classification , Délires/diagnostic , Délires/physiopathologie , Dopamine/physiologie , Extinction (psychologie)/physiologie , Peur/physiologie , Humains , Inhibition psychologique , Voies nerveuses/physiologie , Masquage perceptif/physiologie , Troubles psychotiques/classification , Troubles psychotiques/diagnostic , Troubles psychotiques/physiopathologie , Récompense , Volition/physiologie
18.
J Affect Disord ; 54(1-2): 39-48, 1999 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10403145

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested clinical differences among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In a 12-week randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial, the antidepressant and anxiolytic efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors paroxetine and fluoxetine was compared in patients with moderate to severe depression. METHODS: A total of 203 patients were randomized to fixed doses (20 mg/day) of paroxetine or fluoxetine for the first six weeks of therapy. From week 7-12, dosing could be adjusted biweekly, as required (paroxetine 20-50 mg/day, and fluoxetine 20-80 mg/day). The mean prescribed doses were paroxetine 25.5 mg/day (range 20.0-40.2 mg/day), and fluoxetine 27.5 mg/day (range 20.0-59.5 mg/day). Emergence of motor nervousness or restlessness was assessed using the ESRS scale for akathisia. RESULTS: Both active treatments demonstrated comparable antidepressant efficacy (HAM-D, CGI). Anxiolytic activity of the two drugs (COVI, STAI, HAM-D) was also comparable. However, paroxetine was found to be superior to fluoxetine on two subscore measures at week 1 of therapy (HAM-D Agitation item, p < 0.05; Psychic Anxiety item, p < 0.05), with no differences detected after week 2. The overall incidence of adverse effects was comparable in the two treatment groups. Constipation, dyspepsia, tremor, sweating and abnormal ejaculation were more common in paroxetine-treated subjects, whereas nausea and nervousness were more frequent in fluoxetine-treated patients. Weight loss was more common in the fluoxetine versus paroxetine group (11.88% versus 2.94%, respectively). ESRS scores for akathisia were low throughout the study and showed little change. LIMITATIONS: Differences observed between the two drugs in antianxiety effects were limited to two measures of anxiety among several others. DISCUSSION: The data indicate that paroxetine and fluoxetine have comparable antidepressant and anxiolytic efficacy. Paroxetine appears to produce an earlier improvement in agitation and psychic anxiety symptoms compared with fluoxetine.


Sujet(s)
Trouble dépressif majeur/traitement médicamenteux , Trouble dépressif majeur/psychologie , Fluoxétine/effets indésirables , Paroxétine/effets indésirables , Inbiteurs sélectifs de la recapture de la sérotonine/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Anxiété/induit chimiquement , Trouble dépressif majeur/diagnostic , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie , Indice de gravité de la maladie , Résultat thérapeutique
20.
Cell Mol Neurobiol ; 19(4): 533-52, 1999 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10379424

RÉSUMÉ

1. The benzodiazepines are among the most frequently prescribed of all drugs and have been used for their anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, and sedative/hypnotic properties. Since absorption rates, volumes of distribution, and elimination rates differ greatly among the benzodiazepine derivatives, each benzodiazepine has a unique plasma concentration curve. Although the time to peak plasma levels provides a rough guide, it is not equivalent to the time to clinical onset of effect. The importance of alpha and beta half-lives in the actions of benzodiazepines is discussed. 2. The role of cytochrome P450 isozymes in the metabolism of benzodiazepines and in potential pharmacokinetic interactions between the benzodiazepines and other coadministered drugs is discussed. 3. Buspirone, an anxiolytic with minimal sedative effects, undergoes extensive metabolism, with hydroxylation and dealkylation being the major pathways. Pharmacokinetic interactions of buspirone with other coadministered drugs seem to be minimal. 4. Zopiclone and zolpidem are used primarily as hypnotics. Both are extensively metabolized; N-demethylation, N-oxidation, and decarboxylation of zopiclone occur, and zolpidem undergoes oxidation of methyl groups and hydroxylation of a position on the imidazolepyridine ring system. Zopiclone has a chiral centre, and demonstrates stereoselective pharmacokinetics. Metabolic drug-drug interactions have been reported with zopiclone and erythromycin, trimipramine, and carbamazepine. Reports to date indicate minimal interactions of zolpidem with coadministered drugs; however, it has been reported to affect the Cmax and clearance of chlorpromazepine and to decrease metabolism of the antiviral agent ritonavin. Since CYP3A4 has been reported to play an important role in metabolism of zolpidem, possible interactions with drugs which are substrates and/or inhibitors of that CYP isozyme should be considered.


Sujet(s)
Anxiolytiques/sang , Benzodiazépines/sang , Hypnotiques et sédatifs/métabolisme , Pipérazines/métabolisme , Pyridines/métabolisme , Anxiolytiques/administration et posologie , Anxiolytiques/pharmacocinétique , Anxiété/traitement médicamenteux , Anxiété/métabolisme , Composés azabicycliques , Benzodiazépines/administration et posologie , Benzodiazépines/pharmacocinétique , Buspirone/administration et posologie , Buspirone/métabolisme , Buspirone/pharmacocinétique , Cytochrome P-450 enzyme system/métabolisme , Interactions médicamenteuses , Humains , Hypnotiques et sédatifs/administration et posologie , Hypnotiques et sédatifs/pharmacocinétique , Pipérazines/administration et posologie , Pipérazines/pharmacocinétique , Pyridines/administration et posologie , Pyridines/pharmacocinétique , Zolpidem
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE