Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
BMJ Open ; 9(4): e022981, 2019 05 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31048420

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect, on birth weight and birth weight centile, of use of the PrenaBelt, a maternal positional therapy device, during sleep in the home setting throughout the third trimester of pregnancy. DESIGN: A double-blind, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Conducted from September 2015 to May 2016, at a single, tertiary-level centre in Accra, Ghana. PARTICIPANTS: Two-hundred participants entered the study. One-hundred-eighty-one participants completed the study. Participants were women, 18 to 35 years of age, with low-risk, singleton, pregnancies in their third-trimester, with body mass index <35 kg/m2 at the first antenatal appointment for the index pregnancy and without known foetal abnormalities, pregnancy complications or medical conditions complicating sleep. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised by computer-generated, one-to-one, simple randomisation to receive either the PrenaBelt or sham-PrenaBelt. Participants were instructed to wear their assigned device to sleep every night for the remainder of their pregnancy (approximately 12 weeks in total) and were provided a sleep diary to track their use. Allocation concealment was by unmarked, security-tinted, sealed envelopes. Participants and the outcomes assessor were blinded to allocation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were birth weight and birth weight centile. Secondary outcomes included adherence to using the assigned device nightly, sleeping position, pregnancy outcomes and feedback from participants and maternity personnel. RESULTS: One-hundred-sixty-seven participants were included in the primary analysis. The adherence to using the assigned device nightly was 56%. The mean ±SD birth weight in the PrenaBelt group (n=83) was 3191g±483 and in the sham-PrenaBelt group (n=84) was 3081g±484 (difference 110 g, 95% CI -38 to 258, p=0.14). The median (IQR) customised birth weight centile in the PrenaBelt group was 43% (18 to 67) and in the sham-PrenaBelt group was 31% (14 to 58) (difference 7%, 95% CI -2 to 17, p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The PrenaBelt did not have a statistically significant effect on birth weight or birth weight centile in comparison to the sham-PrenaBelt. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02379728.


Sujet(s)
Équipement et fournitures , Complications de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Troisième trimestre de grossesse , Sommeil , Décubitus dorsal , Adulte , Poids de naissance , Indice de masse corporelle , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Âge gestationnel , Ghana , Humains , Modèles linéaires , Analyse multifactorielle , Grossesse , Complications de la grossesse/étiologie , Issue de la grossesse
2.
BMJ Open ; 8(8): e020256, 2018 08 29.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30158217

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the percentage of time spent supine during sleep in the third trimester of pregnancy could be reduced using a positional therapy device (PrenaBelt) compared with a sham device. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, cross-over pilot trial. SETTING: Conducted between March 2016 and January 2017, at a single, tertiary-level centre in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 23 participants entered the study. 20 participants completed the study. Participants were low-risk, singleton, third-trimester pregnant women aged 18 years and older with body mass index <35 kg/m2 at the first antenatal appointment for the index pregnancy and without known fetal abnormalities, pregnancy complications or medical conditions complicating sleep. INTERVENTIONS: A two-night, polysomnography study in a sleep laboratory. Participants were randomised by computer-generated, one-to-one, simple randomisation to receive either a PrenaBelt or a sham-PrenaBelt on the first night and were crossed over to the alternate device on the second night. Allocation concealment was by unmarked, security-tinted, sealed envelopes. Participants, the recruiter and personnel involved in setting up, conducting, scoring and interpreting the polysomnogram were blinded to allocation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent supine during sleep. Secondary outcomes included maternal sleep architecture, respiration, self-reported sleep position and feedback. RESULTS: The median percentage of sleep time supine was reduced from 16.4% on the sham night to 3.5% on the PrenaBelt night (pseudomedian=5.8, p=0.03). We were unable to demonstrate differences in sleep architecture or respiration. Participants underestimated the time they spent sleeping supine by 7.0%, and six (30%) participants indicated they would make changes to the PrenaBelt. There were no harms in this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the percentage of sleep time supine during late pregnancy can be significantly reduced via positional therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02377817; Results.


Sujet(s)
Équipement et fournitures , Complications de la grossesse/prévention et contrôle , Troisième trimestre de grossesse , Sommeil , Décubitus dorsal , Adolescent , Adulte , Canada , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Âge gestationnel , Humains , Nourrisson à faible poids de naissance , Nouveau-né , Projets pilotes , Polysomnographie , Posture , Grossesse , Complications de la grossesse/étiologie , Respiration , Autorapport , Syndrome d'apnées obstructives du sommeil , Mortinatalité
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE