Estimation and consequences of direct-maternal genetic and environmental covariances in models for genetic evaluation in broilers.

BACKGROUND: Maternal effects influence juvenile traits such as body weight and early growth in broilers. Ignoring significant maternal effects leads to reduced accuracy and inflated predicted breeding values. Including genetic and environmental direct-maternal covariances into prediction models in broilers can increase the accuracy and limit inflation of predicted breeding values better than simply adding maternal effects to the model. To test this hypothesis, we applied a model accounting for direct-maternal genetic covariance and direct-maternal environmental covariance to estimate breeding values. RESULTS: This model, and simplified versions of it, were tested using simulated broiler populations and then was applied to a large broiler population for validation. The real population analyzed consisted of a commercial line of broilers, for which body weight at a common slaughter age was recorded for 41 selection rounds. The direct-maternal genetic covariance was negative whereas the direct-maternal environmental covariance was positive. Simulated populations were created to mimic the real population. The predictive ability of the models was assessed by cross-validation, where the validation birds were all from the last five selection rounds. Accuracy of prediction was defined as the correlation between the predicted breeding values estimated without the phenotypic records of the validation population and a predictor. The predictors were the breeding values estimated using all the phenotypic information and the phenotypes corrected for the fixed effects, and for the simulated data, the true breeding values. In the real data, adding the environmental covariance, with or without also adding the genetic covariance, increased the accuracy, or reduced deflation of breeding values compared with a model not including dam-offspring covariance. Nevertheless, in the simulated data, reduction in the inflation of breeding values was possible and was associated with a gain in accuracy of up to 6% compared with a model not including both forms of direct-maternal covariance. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, we propose a simple approach to estimate the environmental direct-maternal covariance using standard software for REML analysis. The genetic covariance between dam and offspring was negative whereas the corresponding environmental covariance was positive. Considering both covariances in models for genetic evaluation increased the accuracy of predicted breeding values.

Effective Selection for Lower Mortality in Organic Pigs through Selection for Total Number Born and Number of Dead Piglets.

Selection for the number of living pigs on day 11 (L11) aims to reduce piglet mortality and increase litter size simultaneously. This approach could be sub-optimal, especially for organic pig breeding. This study evaluated the effect of selecting for a trait by separating it into two traits. Genetic parameters for L11, the total number born (TNB), and the number of dead piglets at day 11 (D11) were estimated using data obtained from an organic pig population in Denmark. Based on these estimates, two alternative breeding schemes were simulated. Specifically, selection was made using: (1) a breeding goal with L11 only versus (2) a breeding goal with TNB and D11. Different weightings for TNB and D11 were tested. The simulations showed that selection using the first breeding scheme (L11) produced lower annual genetic gain (0.201) compared to the second (TNB and D11; 0.207). A sensitivity analysis showed that the second scheme performed better because it exploited differences in heritability, and accounted for genetic correlations between the two traits. When the second breeding scheme placed more emphasis on D11, D11 declined, whereas genetic gain for L11 remained high (0.190). In conclusion, selection for L11 could be optimized by separating it into two correlated traits with different heritability, reducing piglet mortality and enhancing L11.

Genetic variation in piglet mortality in outdoor organic production systems.

Piglet mortality from farrowing to weaning is a major concern, especially in outdoor organic production systems. This issue might impair animal welfare and generate economic losses for the farmer. In particular, it is difficult to apply management tools that are commonly used for indoor pig production systems to organic or outdoor production systems. Genetics and breeding approaches might be used to improve piglet survival. However, knowledge remains limited on the genetic background underlying survival traits in organic pigs that are born and reared outdoors. Here, we investigated the mortality of piglets from farrowing to weaning in an outdoor organic pig population and suggested genetic strategies to reduce piglet mortality in this production system. The experiment included mortality records of piglets from farrowing to weaning (around 69 days of age). Pedigree-based threshold models were used to analyse the mortality traits of piglets at 0-3 days of age, 4-11 days, and 12 days to weaning. Stillborn piglets were included in the group of piglets that died at 0-3 days of age. We found that the mortality rate from farrowing to weaning was, on average, 19.2%. However, most piglet deaths (79.1%) occurred at 0-11 days of age. As the age of piglets increased, the direct heritability of piglet mortality rose from 0 to 0.04, whereas maternal heritability decreased from 0.03 to a non-significant value. Piglets with higher BW had a lower mortality rate. However, the genetic correlations between maternal effects on piglet mortality and piglet BW were not significant; thus, selection for piglets with higher BW at around 10 days of age, through improving maternal genetics, would not reduce piglet mortality. Piglet mortality increased from sows with increasing number of parities. Crossbreeding also reduced piglet mortality. In conclusion, selection focusing on sow genotype, the use of younger sows, and crossbreeding could contribute to maintain piglet mortality at lower levels in outdoor organic pig production systems.

The Effect of Using Organic or Conventional Sires on Genetic Gain in Organic Pigs: A Simulation Study.

Current organic pig-breeding programs use pigs from conventional breeding populations. However, there are considerable differences between conventional and organic production systems. This simulation study aims to evaluate how the organic pig sector could benefit from having an independent breeding program. Two organic pig-breeding programs were simulated: one used sires from a conventional breeding population (conventional sires), and the other used sires from an organic breeding population (organic sires). For maintaining the breeding population, the conventional population used a conventional breeding goal, whereas the organic population used an organic breeding goal. Four breeding goals were simulated: one conventional breeding goal, and three organic breeding goals. When conventional sires were used, genetic gain in the organic population followed the conventional breeding goal, even when an organic breeding goal was used to select conventional sires. When organic sires were used, genetic gain followed the organic breeding goal. From an economic point of view, using conventional sires for breeding organic pigs is best, but only if there are no genotype-by-environment interactions. However, these results show that from a biological standpoint, using conventional sires biologically adapts organic pigs for a conventional production system.

Accounting for genetic architecture for body weight improves accuracy of predicting breeding values in a commercial line of broilers.

BLUP (best linear unbiased prediction) is the standard for predicting breeding values, where different assumptions can be made on variance-covariance structure, which may influence predictive ability. Herein, we compare accuracy of prediction of four derived-BLUP models: (a) a pedigree relationship matrix (PBLUP), (b) a genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP), (c) a weighted genomic relationship matrix (WGBLUP) and (d) a relationship matrix based on genomic features that consisted of only a subset of SNP selected on a priori information (GFBLUP). We phenotyped a commercial population of broilers for body weight (BW) in five successive weeks and genotyped them using a 50k SNP array. We compared predictive ability of univariate models using conservative cross-validation method, where each full-sib group was divided into two folds. Results from cross-validation showed, with WGBLUP model, a gain in accuracy from 2% to 7% compared with GBLUP model. Splitting the additive genetic matrix into two matrices, based on significance level of SNP (Gf : estimated with only set of SNP selected on significance level, Gr : estimated with the remaining SNP), led to a gain in accuracy from 1% to 70%, depending on the proportion of SNP used to define Gf . Thus, information from GWAS in models improves predictive ability of breeding values for BW in broilers. Increasing the power of detection of SNP effects, by acquiring more data or improving methods for GWAS, will help improve predictive ability.

Optimized grouping to increase accuracy of prediction of breeding values based on group records in genomic selection breeding programs.

BACKGROUND: Phenotypic records of group means or group sums are a good alternative to individual records for some difficult to measure, but economically important traits such as feed efficiency or egg production. Accuracy of predicted breeding values based on group records increases with increasing relationships between group members. The classical way to form groups with more closely-related animals is based on pedigree information. When genotyping information is available before phenotyping, its use to form groups may further increase the accuracy of prediction from group records. This study analyzed two grouping methods based on genomic information: (1) unsupervised clustering implemented in the STRUCTURE software and (2) supervised clustering that models genomic relationships. RESULTS: Using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models, estimates of the genetic variance based on group records were consistent with those based on individual records. When genomic information was available to constitute the groups, genomic relationship coefficients between group members were higher than when random grouping of paternal half-sibs and of full-sibs was applied. Grouping methods that are based on genomic information resulted in higher accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) prediction compared to random grouping. The increase was ~ 1.5% for full-sibs and ~ 11.5% for paternal half-sibs. In addition, grouping methods that are based on genomic information led to lower coancestry coefficients between the top animals ranked by GEBV. Of the two proposed methods, supervised clustering was superior in terms of accuracy, computation requirements and applicability. By adding surplus genotyped offspring (more genotyped offspring than required to fill the groups), the advantage of supervised clustering increased by up to 4.5% compared to random grouping of full-sibs, and by 14.7% compared to random grouping of paternal half-sibs. This advantage also increased with increasing family sizes or decreasing genome sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of genotyping information for grouping animals increases the accuracy of selection when phenotypic group records are used in genomic selection breeding programs.

Correction to: Use of genomic information to exploit genotype-by-environment interactions for body weight of broiler chicken in bio-secure and production environments.

After publication of this work [1], we noticed that there was an error: the formula to calculate the standard error of the estimated correlation.

Use of genomic information to exploit genotype-by-environment interactions for body weight of broiler chicken in bio-secure and production environments.

BACKGROUND: The increase in accuracy of prediction by using genomic information has been well-documented. However, benefits of the use of genomic information and methodology for genetic evaluations are missing when genotype-by-environment interactions (G × E) exist between bio-secure breeding (B) environments and commercial production (C) environments. In this study, we explored (1) G × E interactions for broiler body weight (BW) at weeks 5 and 6, and (2) the benefits of using genomic information for prediction of BW traits when selection candidates were raised and tested in a B environment and close relatives were tested in a C environment. METHODS: A pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) multivariate model was used to estimate variance components and predict breeding values (EBV) of BW traits at weeks 5 and 6 measured in B and C environments. A single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) model that combined pedigree and genomic information was used to predict EBV. Cross-validations were based on correlation, mean difference and regression slope statistics for EBV that were estimated from full and reduced datasets. These statistics are indicators of population accuracy, bias and dispersion of prediction for EBV of traits measured in B and C environments. Validation animals were genotyped and non-genotyped birds in the B environment only. RESULTS: Several indications of G × E interactions due to environmental differences were found for BW traits including significant re-ranking, heterogeneous variances and different heritabilities for BW measured in environments B and C. The genetic correlations between BW traits measured in environments B and C ranged from 0.48 to 0.54. The use of combined pedigree and genomic information increased population accuracy of EBV, and reduced bias of EBV prediction for genotyped birds compared to the use of pedigree information only. A slight increase in accuracy of EBV was also observed for non-genotyped birds, but the bias of EBV prediction increased for non-genotyped birds. CONCLUSIONS: The G × E interaction was strong for BW traits of broilers measured in environments B and C. The use of combined pedigree and genomic information increased population accuracy of EBV substantially for genotyped birds in the B environment compared to the use of pedigree information only.

Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.

BACKGROUND: A breeding program for commercial broiler chicken that is carried out under strict biosecure conditions can show reduced genetic gain due to genotype by environment interactions (G × E) between bio-secure (B) and commercial production (C) environments. Accuracy of phenotype-based best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values of selection candidates using sib-testing in C is low. Genomic prediction based on dense genetic markers may improve accuracy of selection. Stochastic simulation was used to explore the benefits of genomic selection in breeding schemes for broiler chicken that include birds in both B and C for assessment of phenotype. RESULTS: When genetic correlations ([Formula: see text]) between traits measured in B and C were equal to 0.5 and 0.7, breeding schemes with 15, 30 and 45% of birds assessed in C resulted in higher genetic gain for performance in C compared to those without birds in C. The optimal proportion of birds phenotyped in C for genetic gain was 30%. When the proportion of birds in C was optimal and genotyping effort was limited, allocating 30% of the genotyping effort to birds in C was also the optimal genotyping strategy for genetic gain. When [Formula: see text] was equal to 0.9, genetic gain for performance in C was not improved with birds in C compared to schemes without birds in C. Increasing the heritability of traits assessed in C increased genetic gain significantly. Rates of inbreeding decreased when the proportion of birds in C increased because of a lower selection intensity among birds retained in B and a reduction in the probability of co-selecting close relatives. CONCLUSIONS: If G × E interactions ([Formula: see text] of 0.5 and 0.7) are strong, a genomic selection scheme in which 30% of the birds hatched are phenotyped in C has larger genetic gain for performance in C compared to phenotyping all birds in B. Rates of inbreeding decreased as the proportion of birds moved to C increased from 15 to 45%.