Induction chemotherapy with the EXTREME regimen in frail patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5FU) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) is limited to fit patients. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the use of the EXTREME regimen (platinum-based therapy, 5FU, cetuximab) as IC in frail patients with LAHNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with unresectable LAHNSCC treated with the EXTREME regimen, with or without 5FU as IC, from two French centers from 2008 to 2015. We assessed the rate of completed sequence defined as at least two cycles of IC and definitive radiation therapy. RESULTS: We included 34 patients with a median age of 56 years [44-70]. The primary site of tumor development was the oropharynx (67%, n=23, all HPV negative), hypopharynx (21%, n=7) and the oral cavity (12%, n=4). At inclusion, patients presented: T4 76, 5% (n=26), N2c 41% (n=14), N3 26% (n=9), stage disease IVa 62% (n=21), IVb 38% (n=13), ECOG PS2 38% (n=13), decreased weight (10% in one month or 15% in 6 months) 74% (n=25). The sequence was achieved for 76% (n=26) of patients and 80% (n=27) presented a clinical response after the chemotherapy course with notably increased weight (40%, n=11) or general status (75%, n=26). Median PFS and OS were 5.7 and 15.5 months, respectively. Disease progression at 3 months was significantly associated with decreased median overall survival (13.6 versus 21.9 months, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report the use of the EXTREME regimen as induction chemotherapy, and although this IC was used in a very frail population, the majority completed the sequence with significant clinical benefit.

Traitement focal et traitement systémique dans la prise en charge du cancer du rein métastatique : une question de complémentarité.

FOCAL TREATMENT AND SYSTEMIC THERAPY IN METASTATIC KIDNEY CANCER: COMPLEMENTARY APPROACHES: To treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma, therapies used are with an oral intake, for the vast majority, and have many side effects that may compromise observance. Strategies of drug holiday have been studied and, in case of an indolent and oligometastatic tumor, studies have shown that active surveillance is possible to delay the introduction of systemic treatment, without compromising the patient survival. A multimodal approach combining systemic and focal treatments can be done with several objectives: to delay even more introduction of systemic treatment by focally treating metastases, to allow drug holiday after partial response to medical treatment by local control of persistent metastases, and to permit drug continuation even in case of dissociated response to systemic therapy, by focal treatment of metastasis(es) in progression. Technics that can be used for focal treatment are metastasectomy, radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, and stereotactic radiotherapy. In literature, studies that evaluated this approach are for almost retrospective studies, but they have reported interesting results in terms of local control and low morbidity. In the era of checkpoint's inhibitors, it seems important to make prospective collections of data to validate these practices. In any case, and because international recommendations about multimodal approach are poor, discussions between the different actors of the patient care are essential to find the most beneficial treatment for him.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and elderly people: A review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including targeting programmed cell death 1, programmed cell death ligand 1, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 pathways, are a new type of cancer treatment. This approach of targeting the immune system has demonstrated dramatic efficacy for several cancers, and various drugs have been approved by health authorities and are used in clinical practice. Elderly patients (≥65 years) represent most of the cancers diagnosed and deaths by age group, with an increase expected over the next decade. However, this subgroup of patients is under-represented in clinical trials. Ageing is also associated with a decrease in the effectiveness of the immune system and in alterations to it. Few specific trials have been carried out for immunotherapy in elderly people, with most patients considered to be fit. In this review, we discuss the impact of ageing and immunosenescence on immune system functions, and we assess the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients, principally from the data of pivotal clinical trials with subgroup analysis. Tolerance in elderly patients seems similar to younger people, but efficacy seems different between younger and elderly patients according to the type of cancer, some showing no difference and others less efficacy in the elderly subgroup. However, the numbers in elderly groups are small and more investigation is needed, with specific clinical trials for elderly cancer patients.

[Cabozantinib: Mechanism of action, efficacy and indications]. / Cabozantinib : modalités d'action, efficacité et indications.

Cabozantinib is an oral multiple tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor (ITK): VEGFR2, c-MET and RET. Inhibition of VEGFR and c-MET decrease resistance of VEGFR inhibitor via c-MET axis. Cabozantinib improve progression-free survival (PFS) in progressive metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC): 4 months in the placebo group and 11.2 months in the cabozantinib group (P<0.001) in all patient subgroups including those with or without prior ITK and RET mutation status. Cabozantinib increased overall survival (OS) compared with everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who progressed after previous VEGFR ITK treatment: 21.4 months in cabozantinib group and 16.5 months in everolimus group (P<0.0003). Cabozantinib obtained the AMM for the treatment of progressive metastatic MTC and advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cabozantinib is a new option in the treatment of MTC by inclusion in therapeutic trials (no payment in this indication) and advanced renal cell carcinoma (hospital delivery). Its tolerance is similar to anti-angiogenic therapies and justifies an optimal management of the secondary effect.