RÉSUMÉ
Background: We tested the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in individuals with and without previous infection that received different vaccination strategies. Methods: We recruited 203 volunteers. Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection during the six months preceding vaccination received one dose (group 1), the others received two (group 2). After 3 months, 98 subjects received a booster dose. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD IgG were tested in all subjects before vaccination (T0), and at 15 (T15), 90 (T90), 180 (T180) and 360 (T360) days after second or single dose; additionally, in group 2, IgG were tested 10 days after the vaccination (T10). Results: The difference of IgG concentration between the groups was statistically significant (p<0.05) at T0, T15 and T90, but not at T180 (p=0.713) and T360 (p=0.069). At T0 and T90 the antibody titre was higher in group 1, but it dropped in all volunteers 90 days after vaccination. Most of infections after vaccination occurred between T90 and T180. Conclusions: Antibody titre is significantly associated with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Probability of contracting the infection increases after three months from primary vaccination, even among who had a previous infection, confirming the efficacy of vaccination as a preventive measure against SARS-CoV-2 infections and the need of booster administrations.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Antidepressant medication and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) are both recommended interventions in depression treatment guidelines based on literature reviews and meta-analyses. However, 'conventional' meta-analyses comparing their efficacy are limited by their reliance on reported study-level information and a narrow focus on depression outcome measures assessed at treatment completion. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis, considered the gold standard in evidence synthesis, can improve the quality of the analyses when compared with conventional meta-analysis. AIMS: We describe the protocol for a systematic review and IPD meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of antidepressants and IPT for adult acute-phase depression across a range of outcome measures, including depressive symptom severity as well as functioning and well-being, at both post-treatment and follow-up (PROSPERO: CRD42020219891). METHOD: We will conduct a systematic literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify randomised clinical trials comparing antidepressants and IPT in the acute-phase treatment of adults with depression. We will invite the authors of these studies to share the participant-level data of their trials. One-stage IPD meta-analyses will be conducted using mixed-effects models to assess treatment effects at post-treatment and follow-up for all outcome measures that are assessed in at least two studies. CONCLUSIONS: This will be the first IPD meta-analysis examining antidepressants versus IPT efficacy. This study has the potential to enhance our knowledge of depression treatment by comparing the short- and long-term effects of two widely used interventions across a range of outcome measures using state-of-the-art statistical techniques.
