High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.

BACKGROUND: Large metaphyseal bone losses are commonly encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type 2 and 3 defects generally require some metaphyseal fixation or augmentation. This study evaluates the midterm results of Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metal™ (TM) cones in revision TKA addressing severe bone loss. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision TKA using metaphyseal cones and a varus-valgus constrained (VVC) implant from January 2010 to January 2018 at our institution were identified from a prospective research database. Pre-operative patient characteristics and operative data were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared with pre-operative values. Primary study aims were to evaluate outcomes, including complications and re-operations, radiographic assessment of cones osteointegration, and survivorship. RESULTS: A total of 101 knees (101 patients) underwent revision TKA with 139 metaphyseal cones (80 tibial, 59 femoral). AORI defect classification was assessed intraoperatively. All patients were available for a minimum of 2 years of clinical and radiographic follow up. Mean follow up was 7.5 years (range 3-11 years). All patients showed significant improvement of clinical outcomes. Fifteen knees required re-operation and nine required revision of the implants, most commonly for recurrent infection (six of nine revisions) with cones removal. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis show a survival rate of 93.9% at 2 years and a survival rate of 90.2% at 5 and 11 years. CONCLUSIONS: This large series illustrates the utility of porous metaphyseal cones in revision TKA with promising clinical and radiographic results and a high survival rate at mid-term follow up.

Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

PURPOSE: The alignment at the cervical spine has been considered a determinant of degeneration at the adjacent disc, but this issue in cervical disc replacement surgery is poorly explored and discussed in this patient population. The aim of this systematic review is to compare anterior cervical fusion and total disc replacement (TDR) in terms of preservation of the overall cervical alignment and complications. METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature was performed, together with the evaluation of the methodological quality of all the retrieved studies. RESULTS: In most of the retrieved studies, a tendency towards a more postoperative kyphotic alignment in TDR was reported. The reported mean complication rate was of 12.5 % (0-66.2 %). Complications associated with cervical prosthesis included heterotopic ossification, device migration, mechanical instability, failure, implant removal, reoperations and revision. CONCLUSIONS: Even though cervical disc arthroplasty leads to similar outcomes compared to arthrodesis in the middle term follow-up, no evidence of superiority of cervical TDR is available up to date. We understand that the overall cervical alignment after TDR tends towards the loss of lordosis, but only longer follow-up can determine its influence on the clinical results.