RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Recurrent cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease, with limited treatment options available when disease progression occurs after first-line combination therapy. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, multinational, open-label trial of tisotumab vedotin as second- or third-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive tisotumab vedotin monotherapy (2.0 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 502 patients underwent randomization (253 were assigned to the tisotumab vedotin group and 249 to the chemotherapy group); the groups were similar with respect to demographic and disease characteristics. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the tisotumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (11.5 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9.8 to 14.9] vs. 9.5 months [95% CI, 7.9 to 10.7]), results that represented a 30% lower risk of death with tisotumab vedotin than with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.89; two-sided P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 4.4) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; two-sided P<0.001). The confirmed objective response rate was 17.8% in the tisotumab vedotin group and 5.2% in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.6; two-sided P<0.001). A total of 98.4% of patients in the tisotumab vedotin group and 99.2% in the chemotherapy group had at least one adverse event that occurred during the treatment period (defined as the period from day 1 of dose 1 until 30 days after the last dose); grade 3 or greater events occurred in 52.0% and 62.3%, respectively. A total of 14.8% of patients stopped tisotumab vedotin treatment because of toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent cervical cancer, second- or third-line treatment with tisotumab vedotin resulted in significantly greater efficacy than chemotherapy. (Funded by Genmab and Seagen [acquired by Pfizer]; innovaTV 301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04697628.).
Sujet(s)
Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique , Récidive tumorale locale , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus , Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/mortalité , Adulte d'âge moyen , Récidive tumorale locale/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/effets indésirables , Estimation de Kaplan-Meier , Anticorps monoclonaux/usage thérapeutique , Anticorps monoclonaux/effets indésirables , Anticorps monoclonaux/administration et posologie , Analyse de survie , Survie sans progression , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plusRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: To compare giredestrant and physician's choice of endocrine monotherapy (PCET) for estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (BC) in the phase II acelERA BC study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04576455). METHODS: Post-/pre-/perimenopausal women, or men, age 18 years or older with measurable disease/evaluable bone lesions, whose disease progressed after 1-2 lines of systemic therapy (≤1 targeted, ≤1 chemotherapy regimen, prior fulvestrant allowed) were randomly assigned 1:1 to giredestrant (30 mg oral once daily) or fulvestrant/aromatase inhibitor per local guidelines (+luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist in pre-/perimenopausal women, and men) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Stratification was by visceral versus nonvisceral disease, prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and prior fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS). RESULTS: At clinical cutoff (February 18, 2022; median follow-up: 7.9 months; N = 303), the INV-PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.10; P = .1757). In the prespecified secondary end point analysis of INV-PFS by ESR1 mutation (m) status in circulating tumor DNA-evaluable patients (n = 232), the HR in patients with a detectable ESR1m (n = 90) was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.35 to 1.03) versus 0.88 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.42) in patients with no ESR1m detected (n = 142). Related grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were balanced across arms. CONCLUSION: Although the acelERA BC study did not reach statistical significance for its primary INV-PFS end point, there was a consistent treatment effect with giredestrant across most key subgroups and a trend toward favorable benefit among patients with ESR1-mutated tumors. Giredestrant was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to PCET and consistent with known endocrine therapy risks. Overall, these data support the continued investigation of giredestrant in other studies.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein , Fulvestrant , Récepteur ErbB-2 , Récepteurs des oestrogènes , Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs du sein/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs du sein/génétique , Tumeurs du sein/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du sein/mortalité , Adulte d'âge moyen , Récepteur ErbB-2/métabolisme , Récepteurs des oestrogènes/métabolisme , Récepteurs des oestrogènes/analyse , Sujet âgé , Adulte , Fulvestrant/usage thérapeutique , Mâle , Inhibiteurs de l'aromatase/usage thérapeutique , Inhibiteurs de l'aromatase/effets indésirables , Antinéoplasiques hormonaux/usage thérapeutique , Survie sans progression , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/effets indésirablesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have shown efficacy in gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer. We compared the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with placebo plus chemotherapy in participants with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: KEYNOTE-859 is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial, done at 207 medical centres across 33 countries. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older with previously untreated histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pembrolizumab or placebo 200 mg, administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. All participants received investigator's choice of fluorouracil (intravenous, 800 mg/m2 per day) administered continuously on days 1-5 of each 3-week cycle plus cisplatin (intravenous, 80 mg/m2) administered on day 1 of each 3-week cycle or capecitabine (oral, 1000 mg/m2) administered twice daily on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle plus oxaliplatin (intravenous, 130 mg/m2) administered on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Randomisation was done using a central interactive voice-response system and stratified by geographical region, PD-L1 status, and chemotherapy in permuted block sizes of four. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, and the populations with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 1 or higher, and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or higher. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population, which included all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here, we report the results of the interim analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03675737, and recruitment is complete. FINDINGS: Between Nov 8, 2018, and June 11, 2021, 1579 (66%) of 2409 screened participants were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembrolizumab group; n=790) or placebo plus chemotherapy (placebo group; n=789). Most participants were male (527 [67%] of 790 participants in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group; 544 [69%] of 789 participants in the placebo plus chemotherapy group) and White (426 [54%]; 435 [55%]). Median follow-up at the data cutoff was 31·0 months (IQR 23·0-38·3). Median overall survival was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group in the ITT population (12·9 months [95% CI 11·9-14·0] vs 11·5 months [10·6-12·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·70-0·87]; p<0·0001), in participants with a PD-L1 CPS of 1 or higher (13·0 months [11·6-14·2] vs 11·4 months [10·5-12·0]; 0·74 [0·65-0·84]; p<0·0001), and in participants with a PD-L1 CPS of 10 or higher (15·7 months [13·8-19·3] vs 11·8 months [10·3-12·7]; 0·65 [0·53-0·79]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events of any cause were anaemia (95 [12%] of 785 participants in the pembrolizumab group vs 76 [10%] of 787 participants in the placebo group) and decreased neutrophil count (77 [10%] vs 64 [8%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 184 (23%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 146 (19%) participants in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in eight (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 16 (2%) participants in the placebo group. No new safety signals were identified. INTERPRETATION: Participants in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group had a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival with manageable toxicity compared with participants in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Therefore, pembrolizumab with chemotherapy might be a first-line treatment option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma. FUNDING: Merck Sharp and Dohme.
Sujet(s)
Adénocarcinome , Tumeurs de l'estomac , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Tumeurs de l'estomac/anatomopathologie , Antigène CD274 , Anticorps monoclonaux humanisés , Adénocarcinome/traitement médicamenteux , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/effets indésirables , Méthode en double aveugleRÉSUMÉ
Patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) have a poor prognosis, and their management represents a substantial unmet medical need. Preclinical data and results from a phase Ib trial demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of the α-specific phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor alpelisib plus the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in platinum-resistant, non-BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer. Here, we describe the study design and rationale for the phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized, active-controlled EPIK-O/ENGOT-OV61 trial investigating alpelisib in combination with olaparib compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory HGSOC with no germline BRCA mutation. Progression-free survival (blinded independent review committee) is the primary end point. Overall survival is a key secondary end point. Clinical Trial Registration:: NCT04729387 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs de l'ovaire , Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/génétique , Récidive tumorale locale/traitement médicamenteux , Phtalazines/effets indésirables , Essais cliniques de phase III comme sujet , Études multicentriques comme sujetRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced fatigue (CIF) is a frequent symptom that impairs patient functioning and quality of life. We aimed to evaluate whether systemic chemotherapy can induce a specific gene expression profile in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) of patients with locoregional breast cancer (LRBC) who develop CIF. METHODS: PBMNC were collected from 3 patients who developed CIF before and after their initial cycle of chemotherapy, and RNA-seq was performed in an Ion Torrent™ System. A total of 12.345 transcripts were sequenced, of which 26 were selected out of 71 that had significantly different expression before and after chemotherapy. The RNA-seq results were validated by RT-qPCR in a different group of 28 patients with LRBC who developed CIF after their first cycle of chemotherapy and in six patients who also received chemotherapy but did not develop CIF (controls). We assessed CIF according the BFI and Chalder Questionnaires. RESULTS: We observed a significant increase in expression of DUSP18 and RHOBTB1 and decreased expression of NCAN and RAET1G in patients who developed CIF after chemotherapy. Control patients only exhibited a significant decrease in NCAN expression. CONCLUSION: CIF induces specific changes in gene expression in the PBMNC of LRBC patients. Some of these changes, such as downregulation of NCAN expression, may reflect direct effects of chemotherapy since they are also observed in the controls. Furthermore, CIF may involve downregulation of skeletal muscle genes (RHOBT1, DUSP18) and immune systems (RAETG1), whereas NCAN downregulation may underlie the adverse cognitive effects of chemotherapy.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein/complications , Tumeurs du sein/génétique , Fatigue/induit chimiquement , Expression des gènes/génétique , Chimiothérapie d'induction/effets indésirables , Agranulocytes/métabolisme , Qualité de vie/psychologie , Tumeurs du sein/anatomopathologie , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyenRÉSUMÉ
Importance: Cotargeting the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway and estrogen receptor may prevent or delay endocrine resistance in patients receiving first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Objective: To investigate the combination of everolimus plus endocrine therapy in first-line and second-line treatment settings for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In the multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 BOLERO-4 (Breast Cancer Trials of Oral Everolimus) clinical trial, 245 patients were screened for eligibility; 202 were enrolled between March 7, 2013, and December 17, 2014. A median follow-up of 29.5 months had been achieved by the data cutoff date (December 17, 2016). Interventions: Patients received first-line treatment with everolimus, 10 mg/d, plus letrozole, 2.5 mg/d. Second-line treatment with everolimus, 10 mg/d, plus exemestane, 25 mg/d, was offered at the investigator's discretion upon initial disease progression. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the first-line setting per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.0. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication and at least 1 postbaseline safety assessment. Results: A total of 202 women treated in the first-line setting had a median age of 64.0 years (interquartile range, 58.0-70.0 years) with metastatic (194 [96.0%]) or locally advanced (8 [4.0%]) breast cancer. Median progression-free survival was 22.0 months (95% CI, 18.1-25.1 months) with everolimus and letrozole. Median overall survival was not reached; 24-month estimated overall survival rate was 78.7% (95% CI, 72.1%-83.9%). Fifty patients started second-line treatment; median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI, 1.9-7.4 months). No new safety signals were observed. In the first-line setting, the most common all-grade adverse event was stomatitis (139 [68.8%]); the most common grade 3 to 4 adverse event was anemia (21 [10.4%]). In the second-line setting, the most common adverse events were stomatitis and decreased weight (10 [20.0%] each); the most common grade 3 to 4 adverse event was hypertension (5 [10.0%]). There were 50 (24.8%) deaths overall during the study; 40 were due to study indication (breast cancer). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this trial add to the existing body of evidence suggesting that everolimus plus endocrine therapy is a good first-line treatment option for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01698918.
Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques/usage thérapeutique , Tumeurs du sein/traitement médicamenteux , Évérolimus/usage thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , Antinéoplasiques/pharmacologie , Tumeurs du sein/anatomopathologie , Évérolimus/pharmacologie , Femelle , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Post-ménopauseRÉSUMÉ
Fatigue is frequent among oncologic patients. Unpurified Paullinia cupana dry extract showed encouraging results for chemotherapy-induced fatigue in our previous studies. We report two randomized, double-blind studies with a standardized dry purified Paullinia cupana extract named PC-18. For both studies, we recruited early breast cancer patients who had an increase in their fatigue scores after their first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy. In the first study, we compared an oral dose of 37.5 mg of PC-18 twice daily with placebo. In the second study, we examined PC-18 at either 7.5 or 12.5 mg orally twice daily versus placebo. In both studies, PC-18 was not superior to placebo as assessed by both Chalder and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) fatigue questionnaires, probably reflecting unexpectedly good placebo antifatigue activity. Since all capsules employed in both studies contained about 100 mg of magnesium silicate as an excipient, we retrospectively evaluated frozen serum samples from the second study and found a significant increase in magnesium levels after patients received placebo. By multivariate analysis, higher prerandomization magnesium levels and higher BFI scores together with the use of a 12.5 mg dose of PC-18 all correlated significantly with higher posttreatment BFI scores. We observed no significant toxicities in any of the trials. We conclude that the absence of differences between PC-18 and placebo may be due to the unexpectedly high antifatigue activity of the placebo in these studies. Further studies evaluating the role of magnesium supplementation for chemotherapy-induced fatigue are needed.
Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Fatigue/traitement médicamenteux , Paullinia , Phytothérapie , Extraits de plantes/usage thérapeutique , Tumeurs du sein/traitement médicamenteux , Méthode en double aveugle , Fatigue/induit chimiquement , Femelle , Humains , Magnésium/administration et posologie , Magnésium/sang , Adulte d'âge moyen , Placebo , Graines/composition chimique , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Cancer chemotherapy can induce fatigue in about 20% to 30% of patients. So far, there is very little information as to the predictors of chemotherapy-induced fatigue (CIF). We evaluated potential predictors of CIF in a sample of patients with cancer with several types of solid tumors scheduled to receive chemotherapy according to institutional protocols. METHODS: Before their first and second chemotherapy cycles, patients answered to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Chalder, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Stress thermometer, and HADS questionnaires as well as provided blood samples for inflammatory markers. RESULTS: We evaluated 52 patients, 37 (71%) were female and mean age was 53 years. The most common tumors were breast cancer 21 (40%) and gastrointestinal tumors 12 (23%). Although 14 (25.2%) patients had an increase in their fatigue BFI scores equal or above 3 points from baseline, we observed no significant overall differences between BFI scores before and after chemotherapy. The only 2 factors associated with an increase of 3 points in the BFI scores after chemotherapy were race and higher baseline BFI levels. By multivariate analysis, overall BFI and Chalder scores after chemotherapy also correlated significantly with their respective baseline scores before treatment. HADS scores before treatment correlated with overall BFI scores postchemotherapy, whereas MNA scores before chemotherapy and female sex correlated with higher Chalder scores after treatment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that fatigue induced by chemotherapy is common and consistently associated with higher fatigue scores before treatment. Screening for fatigue before chemotherapy may help to identify patients who are prone to develop CIF.
Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Fatigue/induit chimiquement , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Antinéoplasiques/usage thérapeutique , Marqueurs biologiques , Fatigue/sang , Fatigue/psychologie , Femelle , Humains , Médiateurs de l'inflammation/sang , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Stadification tumorale , Tumeurs/psychologie , État nutritionnel , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Stress psychologique/psychologieRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, nonsteroidal, reversible, selective 17,20-lyase inhibitor. This study examined orteronel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our study, 1,099 men were randomly assigned in a 2:1 schedule to receive orteronel 400 mg plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily or placebo plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, stratified by region (Europe, North America [NA], and non-Europe/NA) and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form worst pain score. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS], ≥ 50% decrease of prostate-specific antigen [PSA50], and pain response at 12 weeks) were to undergo statistical testing only if the primary end point analysis was significant. RESULTS: The study was unblinded after crossing a prespecified OS futility boundary. The median OS was 17.0 months versus 15.2 months with orteronel-prednisone versus placebo-prednisone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.886; 95% CI, 0.739 to 1.062; P = .190). Improved rPFS was observed with orteronel-prednisone (median, 8.3 v 5.7 months; HR, 0.760; 95% CI, 0.653 to 0.885; P < .001). Orteronel-prednisone showed advantages over placebo-prednisone in PSA50 rate (25% v 10%, P < .001) and time to PSA progression (median, 5.5 v 2.9 months, P < .001) but not pain response rate (12% v 9%; P = .128). Adverse events (all grades) were generally more frequent with orteronel-prednisone, including nausea (42% v 26%), vomiting (36% v 17%), fatigue (29% v 23%), and increased amylase (14% v 2%). CONCLUSION: Our study did not meet the primary end point of OS. Longer rPFS and a higher PSA50 rate with orteronel-prednisone indicate antitumor activity.
Sujet(s)
Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Marqueurs biologiques tumoraux/sang , Antigène spécifique de la prostate/sang , Tumeurs prostatiques résistantes à la castration/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Évolution de la maladie , Survie sans rechute , Docetaxel , Méthode en double aveugle , Calendrier d'administration des médicaments , Europe , Humains , Imidazoles/administration et posologie , Imidazoles/effets indésirables , Estimation de Kaplan-Meier , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Naphtalènes/administration et posologie , Naphtalènes/effets indésirables , Grading des tumeurs , Amérique du Nord , Odds ratio , Mesure de la douleur , Prednisone/administration et posologie , Tumeurs prostatiques résistantes à la castration/sang , Tumeurs prostatiques résistantes à la castration/anatomopathologie , Taxoïdes/administration et posologie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a distressing chemotherapy-induced symptom that may adversely impact the quality of life of cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the Pubmed, Bireme, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trials that were published in English and that evaluated the combination of adjunctive non-neurokinin 1 (NK1) antagonist drugs (i.e., neuroleptics, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, and cannabinoids) with 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) antagonists for adult cancer patients who were scheduled to receive moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. We employed the Review Manager (RevMan) Computer program Version 5.2 for statistical calculations. RESULTS: We included 13 studies with a total of 1,669 patients. We observed a higher complete protection for acute CINV with adjunctive medications (risk ratio (RR) = 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-1.01; p = 0.05; I2 = 47%), which was not the case for the delayed period (RR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.73-1.10, p = 0.29, I2 = 15%). We also observed that these adjunctive medications significantly increased the complete control of nausea (RR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.55-0.95; p = 0.02, I2 = 83%) and vomiting (RR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.50-0.75; p < 0.00001; I2 = 60%). There was no subgroup analysis evidence of the superiority of any single group of adjunctive medications. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that adjunctive non-NK1 antagonist medications may be useful for CINV control. Prospective randomized studies incorporating these low-cost medications into new regimens combining 5-HT3 and NK1 antagonists may be warranted.
Sujet(s)
Antiémétiques/usage thérapeutique , Nausée/traitement médicamenteux , Antagonistes du récepteur de la neurokinine-1/usage thérapeutique , Antagonistes des récepteurs 5-HT3 de la sérotonine/usage thérapeutique , Vomissement/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Antinéoplasiques/usage thérapeutique , Benzodiazépines/usage thérapeutique , Association de médicaments , Humains , Chimiothérapie d'induction/effets indésirables , Nausée/induit chimiquement , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Odds ratio , Qualité de vie , Récepteur de la neurokinine 1/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Vomissement/induit chimiquementRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Cat's claw (Uncaria tomentosa) is a native Amazon plant that exhibits anti-inflammatory and antitumor properties. We wanted to assess its activity for symptom management of terminal cancer patients. METHODS: This prospective phase II study assessed the effects of a 100-mg dose of a dry extract of U. tomentosa three times per day in patients with advanced solid tumors who had no further therapeutic options and a life expectancy of at least 2 months. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue questionnaires were used to assess the participants' quality of life, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was used to assess anxiety and depression, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was used to assess sleep quality. In addition, several biochemical and inflammatory parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-one volunteers were recruited. Their median age was 64 (range, 33-85) years, and 47% of patients were female. More than 65% of patients had scores on the Karnofsky Performance Scale of 80% or less. Treatment improved the patients' overall quality of life (p=0.0411) and social functioning (p=0.0341), as assessed by the EORTC QLQ C-30, and reduced fatigue (p=0.0496) according to the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire. None of the biochemical or inflammatory parameters assessed (interleukin-1 and -6, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-α, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and α-1-acid glycoprotein) changed significantly. No tumor response was detected according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; however, the disease stabilized for more than 8 months in four participants. The medication was well tolerated by most patients. CONCLUSION: Use of cat's claw might be beneficial in patients with advanced cancer by improving their quality of life and reducing fatigue. The mechanism of action does not seem to be related to the anti-inflammatory properties of this plant.
Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques/usage thérapeutique , Griffe de chat/composition chimique , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Extraits de plantes/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Phytothérapie , Extraits de plantes/effets indésirables , Qualité de vieRÉSUMÉ
O linfoma não Hodgkin de células T periféricas possui um subtipo denominado linfoma anaplásico de células grandes (LACG) que pode apresentar-se sob duas formas variantes que distinguem entre si na apresentação clínica e prognóstico. O artigo a seguir relata o caso de um paciente que teve o diagnóstico desta neoplasia após trauma no pé sofrido por acidente de moto. Relatos de casos publicados previamente na literatura descrevem a associação do surgimento desta entidade em partes do corpo que sofreram traumas locais de origens diversas, sugerindo uma relação direta entre eles através no influxo de células T na carcinogênese desta neoplasia linfoproliferativa.
RÉSUMÉ
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Nausea and vomiting are major inconveniences for patients undergoing chemotherapy. Despite standard preventive treatment, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) still occurs in approximately 50% of these patients. In an attempt to optimize this treatment, we evaluated the possible effects of carbamazepine for prevention of CINV. DESIGN AND LOCATION: Prospective nonrandomized open-label phase II study carried out at a Brazilian public oncology service. METHODS: Patients allocated for their first cycle of highly emetogenic chemotherapy were continuously recruited. In addition to standard antiemetic protocol that was made available, they received carbamazepine orally, with staggered doses, from the third day before until the fifth day after chemotherapy. Considering the sparseness of evidence about the efficacy of anticonvulsants for CINV prevention, we used Simon's two-stage design, in which 43 patients should be included unless overall complete prevention was not achieved in 9 out of the first 15 entries. The Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire was used to measure the impact on quality of life. RESULTS: None of the ten patients (0%) presented overall complete prevention. In three cases, carbamazepine therapy was withdrawn because of somnolence and vomiting before chemotherapy. Seven were able to take the medication for the entire period and none were responsive, so the study was closed. There was no impact on the patients' quality of life. CONCLUSION: Carbamazepine was not effective for prevention of CINV and also had a deleterious side-effect profile in this population.
Sujet(s)
Antiémétiques/usage thérapeutique , Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Carbamazépine/usage thérapeutique , Nausée/prévention et contrôle , Vomissement/prévention et contrôle , Antiémétiques/effets indésirables , Carbamazépine/effets indésirables , Femelle , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Nausée/induit chimiquement , Nausée/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Projets pilotes , Études prospectives , Qualité de vie , Troubles de la veille et du sommeil/induit chimiquement , Vomissement/induit chimiquement , Vomissement/traitement médicamenteuxRÉSUMÉ
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Nausea and vomiting are major inconveniences for patients undergoing chemotherapy. Despite standard preventive treatment, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) still occurs in approximately 50% of these patients. In an attempt to optimize this treatment, we evaluated the possible effects of carbamazepine for prevention of CINV. DESIGN AND LOCATION: Prospective nonrandomized open-label phase II study carried out at a Brazilian public oncology service. METHODS: Patients allocated for their first cycle of highly emetogenic chemotherapy were continuously recruited. In addition to standard antiemetic protocol that was made available, they received carbamazepine orally, with staggered doses, from the third day before until the fifth day after chemotherapy. Considering the sparseness of evidence about the efficacy of anticonvulsants for CINV prevention, we used Simon's two-stage design, in which 43 patients should be included unless overall complete prevention was not achieved in 9 out of the first 15 entries. The Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire was used to measure the impact on quality of life. RESULTS: None of the ten patients (0%) presented overall complete prevention. In three cases, carbamazepine therapy was withdrawn because of somnolence and vomiting before chemotherapy. Seven were able to take the medication for the entire period and none were responsive, so the study was closed. There was no impact on the patients' quality of life. CONCLUSION: Carbamazepine was not effective for prevention of CINV and also had a deleterious side-effect profile in this population. .
CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Náusea e vômito são inconvenientes importantes para pacientes submetidos a quimioterapia. A despeito do tratamento preventivo padrão, náuseas e vômitos induzidos por quimioterapia (NVIQ) ocorrem em aproximadamente 50% dos pacientes. Na tentativa de otimizar este tratamento, avaliamos os possíveis efeitos da carbamazepina na prevenção de náuseas e vômitos induzidos por quimioterapia. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo fase II, prospectivo, não randomizado, aberto, realizado em um serviço público brasileiro de oncologia. MÉTODOS: Recrutaram-se continuamente pacientes alocados para o primeiro ciclo de quimioterapia altamente emetogênica. Além do protocolo anti-emético padrão disponibilizado, os pacientes receberam carbamazepina, por via oral, em doses escalonadas, a partir do terceiro dia anterior até o quinto dia após a quimioterapia. Dada a escassa evidência de eficácia dos anticonvulsivantes na prevenção de NVIQ, adotamos o desenho de Simon em duas fases, que deveria incluir 43 pacientes a não ser que prevenção completa global não fosse alcançada em 9 dos primeiros 15 participantes. O questionário "Functional Living Index-Emesis" foi usado para avaliar o impacto na qualidade da vida. RESULTADOS: Nenhum dos 10 pacientes (0%) apresentou prevenção completa global. Três tiveram a carbamazepina suspensa por sonolência e vômito antes da quimioterapia. Sete foram capazes de tomar a medicação por todo o período proposto e nenhum obteve resposta, sendo então interrompido o estudo. Não houve impacto na qualidade da vida. CONCLUSÃO: Carbamazepina não foi efetiva para prevenção de NVIQ e apresentou perfil deletério de efeitos adversos nesta população. .
Sujet(s)
Femelle , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Antiémétiques/usage thérapeutique , Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Carbamazépine/usage thérapeutique , Nausée/prévention et contrôle , Vomissement/prévention et contrôle , Antiémétiques/effets indésirables , Carbamazépine/effets indésirables , Nausée/induit chimiquement , Nausée/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Projets pilotes , Études prospectives , Qualité de vie , Troubles de la veille et du sommeil/induit chimiquement , Vomissement/induit chimiquement , Vomissement/traitement médicamenteuxRÉSUMÉ
Em adultos os carcinomas tímicos representam cerca de 20% das neoplasias mediastinais. A maioria dos pacientes tem entre 40 e 60 anos de idade e há ligeira predominância do sexo masculino. Em função da raridade da doença não há ensaios clínicos randomizados realizados para orientar a escolha do tratamento na doença metastática refratária ou recorrente. Alguns regimes de segunda linha têm sido usados, a maioria baseada em cisplatina. Como linhas alternativas as opções são pemetrexed, 5-flourouracil associado a leucovorin, gemcitabina, capecitabina e paclitaxel, todas com taxas de resposta pequenas. Relatamos neste artigo um caso de carcinoma tímico tratado com pemetrexed e octreotide com resposta prolongada ao tratamento.
RÉSUMÉ
Introdução: O meduloblastoma é uma neoplasia rara em adultos, representa 1% do total dos tumores intracranianos e 6% dos tumores de fossa posterior. A principal modalidade de tratamento é a ressecção cirúrgica. Relato do caso: Paciente de 23 anos, sexo feminino, com lesão expansiva em hemisfério cerebelar D, submetida a ressecção completa da lesão cerebelar e derivação ventrículo-peritoneal. Análises anatomopatológica e imuno-histoquímica confirmaram o diagnóstico de meduloblastoma, estádio clínico IIB. O tratamento foi realizado com radioterapia de encéfalo e neuroeixo e quimioterapia adjuvante, segundo o regime preconizado pelo Children Oncology Group. Conclusão: Apesar de uma neoplasia rara em adultos, a quimioterapia adjuvante baseada no Children Oncology Group é factível.
RÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Paullinia cupana (guaraná) is an Amazonian plant that has been previously shown to be effective in treating chemotherapy-related fatigue (CRF) in patients with breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a purified dry extract of P. cupana (PC-18) in patients with various solid tumors treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: We included 40 patients with solid tumors who showed increases in their Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) questionnaire scores after 1 week of systemic chemotherapy. PC-18 was administered at 37.5 mg by mouth two times per day (PO bid), starting after 1 week of chemotherapy, for 3 weeks (induction phase). Patients who had an improvement in or stabilization of their BFI scores were randomized to receive either PC-18 at the same dose or placebo for the following 3 weeks (maintenance phase). RESULTS: After PC-18 treatment, the BFI fatigue scores improved or stabilized in 36 out of the 40 patients (mean BFI score difference = 2.503; 95% confidence interval: 1.716-3.375, p = .0002). Three weeks after randomization (16 patients on PC-18 and 17 on placebo), we observed no significant differences in the BFI, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores between patients randomized to PC-18 versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the PC-18 extract may be effective for the treatment of CRF in patients with a variety of solid tumors. A conditioning effect, which was observed in patients who had a beneficial effect of PC-18 on CRF, may explain the better than expected fatigue scores of the placebo-treated patients.
Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Fatigue/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs , Paullinia , Phytothérapie , Extraits de plantes/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Fatigue/induit chimiquement , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs/traitement médicamenteux , Extraits de plantes/pharmacologie , Qualité de vie , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Oxaliplatin is one of the chemotherapy regimens most used for treating colorectal cancer. One of the main limitations to its use is induction of peripheral neuropathy. Previous studies have shown that vitamin E can reduce the incidence of peripheral neuropathy by 50%. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of vitamin E for prevention of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. DESIGN AND SETTING Prospective, phase II, randomized pilot study developed at a university hospital in the Greater ABC region. METHODS Patients were randomized five days before starting oxaliplatin treatment, to receive either vitamin E or placebo until the end of the chemotherapy regimen. The outcome was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3, and specific gradation scales for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Patients with colorectal and gastric cancer who had been scheduled to receive oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were included. Both groups received calcium and magnesium supplementation before and after oxaliplatin infusions. RESULTS Eighteen patients were randomized to the vitamin E group and 16 to the placebo group. Cumulative incidence of 83% with peripheral neuropathy grades 1/2 was observed in the vitamin E group, versus 68% in the placebo group (P = 0.45). A trend towards more diarrhea was observed among patients who received vitamin E (55.6% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.06). There were no other significant differences in toxicity between the groups. CONCLUSIONS No significant decrease in the incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy was demonstrated through vitamin E use.
Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Tumeurs colorectales/traitement médicamenteux , Composés organiques du platine/effets indésirables , Neuropathies périphériques/prévention et contrôle , Vitamine E/usage thérapeutique , Vitamines/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Oxaliplatine , Neuropathies périphériques/induit chimiquement , Projets pilotes , Études prospectivesRÉSUMÉ
Oxaliplatin is one of the chemotherapy regimens most used for treating colorectal cancer. One of the main limitations to its use is induction of peripheral neuropathy. Previous studies have shown that vitamin E can reduce the incidence of peripheral neuropathy by 50%. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of vitamin E for prevention of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Prospective, phase II, randomized pilot study developed at a university hospital in the Greater ABC region. Patients were randomized five days before starting oxaliplatin treatment, to receive either vitamin E or placebo until the end of the chemotherapy regimen. The outcome was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3, and specific gradation scales for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Patients with colorectal and gastric cancer who had been scheduled to receive oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were included. Both groups received calcium and magnesium supplementation before and after oxaliplatin infusions. Eighteen patients were randomized to the vitamin E group and 16 to the placebo group. Cumulative incidence of 83% with peripheral neuropathy grades 1/2 was observed in the vitamin E group, versus 68% in the placebo group (P = 0.45). A trend towards more diarrhea was observed among patients who received vitamin E (55.6% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.06). There were no other significant differences in toxicity between the groups. No significant decrease in the incidence of acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy was demonstrated through vitamin E use.
A oxaliplatina é um dos quimioterápicos mais utilizados no tratamento do câncer colorretal, sendo a indução da neuropatia periférica (NP) uma das principais limitações para o seu uso. Trabalhos anteriores demonstraram que a vitamina E poderia reduzir a incidência dessa neuropatia em 50%. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a efetividade da vitamina E na prevenção da NP induzida pela oxaliplatina. Estudo piloto prospectivo e randomizado de fase II desenvolvido em hospital universitário do Grande ABC. Os pacientes foram randomizados para receber vitamina E ou placebo por cinco dias antes do início do tratamento com oxaliplatina e até o término do regime quimioterápico. O desfecho foi avaliado através dos Critérios Comuns de Toxicidade do Câncer versão 3 (CTCAE) e escalas específicas de gradação da NP induzida por oxaliplatina. Foram incluídos pacientes com câncer colorretal e gástrico programado para receber quimioterapia baseada em oxaliplatina. Ambos os grupos receberam suplementação de cálcio e magnésio antes e depois das infusões de oxaliplatina. Dezoito pacientes foram randomizados para grupo da vitamina E e 16 para o grupo placebo. Observou-se incidência cumulativa de 83% das classes I/II de neuropatia periférica no grupo da vitamina E, contra 68% no grupo placebo (P = 0,45). Observou-se maior tendência à diarreia em pacientes que receberam vitamina E (55,6% versus 18,8%, P = 0,06). Não houve outras diferenças significativas quanto às toxicidades entre os grupos. ...Sujet(s)
Adulte
, Sujet âgé
, Femelle
, Humains
, Mâle
, Adulte d'âge moyen
, Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables
, Tumeurs colorectales/traitement médicamenteux
, Composés organiques du platine/effets indésirables
, Neuropathies périphériques/prévention et contrôle
, Vitamine E/usage thérapeutique
, Vitamines/usage thérapeutique
, Neuropathies périphériques/induit chimiquement
, Projets pilotes
, Études prospectives