RÉSUMÉ
The development of 3D printing technology has brought new risks and challenges to stamp impression identification. To prevent potential risks, a total of 45 stamps were printed using three types of 3D printers: fused deposition molding (FDM) printer, stereo lithography (SLA) printer, and liquid crystal display (LCD)-based SLA 3D printer, including 6 stamps replicated using LCD-based SLA 3D printer. A preliminary study was conducted on the printed stamps and stamped impressions, and the results showed that stamp are influenced by various factors such as printer type, printing material, the technology level of the producer, mold parameters such as font, size, printing parameters, slicing direction, and polishing process, etc., resulting in significant differences in characteristics. However, there are some obviously common characteristics such as missing of strokes, exposure of white and mottled phenomenon in the impression stamped by the 3D produced stamp. The impression of stamp replicated with an LCD 3D printer can be easily identified since it is difficult to achieve consistency with the real impression in detail characteristics.