RÉSUMÉ
Removal of chest drains is a painful procedure and distresses patients, parents and nurses. To identify problems and improve management we developed a concerted approach to both assessment and treatment using audit. An initial prospective audit of post-op cardiac children undergoing chest drain +/- pacing wire removal was undertaken. A clinical tool was developed, to assess children before procedures and provide a treatment plan aimed at reducing pain and distress. The tool incorporated the intensity of the procedure, the child's usual response to procedures and previous experience. The treatment protocol included drug and non-drug therapies. The initial audit of 91 children confirmed that pain and distress were problems. It highlighted inconsistencies in management as a common feature. Following introduction of the LAPPS tool and treatment protocol, a second audit of 72 children was undertaken. Although only 46 per cent of pathways were satisfactorily completed, the percentage of patients described as 'inconsolable, screaming and withdrawn' reduced from 29 per cent to 9 per cent. Introduction of the LAPPS assessment tool and treatment protocol reduced pain and distress during removal of chest drains. Research is needed to test the psychometrics of the tool and the effectiveness of the treatment protocol prior to wider use.
Sujet(s)
Mesure de la douleur/instrumentation , Analgésiques/administration et posologie , Drains thoraciques , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Ablation de dispositif/effets indésirables , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Humains , Nourrisson , Audit médical , Gestion de la douleur/méthodes , Études prospectivesSujet(s)
Baclofène/usage thérapeutique , Agonistes GABA/usage thérapeutique , Luxation de la hanche/complications , Bloc nerveux/méthodes , Douleur rebelle/traitement médicamenteux , Baclofène/administration et posologie , Cathétérisme/méthodes , Enfant , Maladie chronique , Tolérance aux médicaments , Femelle , Nerf fémoral/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Agonistes GABA/administration et posologie , Humains , Pompes à perfusion implantables , Myosite ossifiante/complications , Anomalies du tube neural/complications , Nerf ischiatique/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Maladies de la moelle épinière/complications , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
We describe a case series of five adolescents who were managed with lidocaine 5% patches for chronic localized neuropathic pain from a variety of causes with minimal adverse effects. Treatment was effective in four of five patients with only one patient complaining of minimal pain relief. 5% Lidocaine patches have been used for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in adults and we have found this to be effective in management of localized neuropathic pain in children and adolescents.
Sujet(s)
Anesthésiques locaux/administration et posologie , Lidocaïne/administration et posologie , Névralgie/traitement médicamenteux , Administration par voie cutanée , Adolescent , Enfant , Maladie chronique , Cicatrice/complications , Cicatrice/physiopathologie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Névralgie/étiologie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
This study examined whether an effective continuous femoral nerve block could be inserted by emergency department staff for pain relief in children presenting with a fractured femur.
Sujet(s)
Fractures du fémur/complications , Bloc nerveux/méthodes , Gestion de la douleur , Adolescent , Analgésiques morphiniques , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Femelle , Nerf fémoral , Humains , Nourrisson , Mâle , Morphine , Douleur/étiologieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the assessment and management of children's pain, children with profound special needs are especially vulnerable to poor pain management. Their underpinning condition often severely compromises their ability to express pain through the usual verbal and behavioural routes. The lack of any appropriate framework for assessment results in a suboptimum and inaccurate approach to an important aspect of their care. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to explore the ways in which parents of children with profound special needs assess and manage their children's pain. METHODS: Qualitative case study design underpinned the study using guided interviews with the 15 parents/carers (of 12 children aged 5-16 years with profound special needs). ETHICAL APPROVAL: Ethics Committee approval was gained. FINDINGS: A number of themes emerged from the data including learning to live with pain, dealing with uncertainty, expression of pain and making decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Parents felt that their child had learned to live with significant levels of chronic and acute pain. Assessment of pain was an uncertain and complex process requiring parents to draw on skills and knowledge developed over a number of years. Parents used different strategies for both the assessment and management of pain based on an intimate knowledge of their child's usual nonpain state. Even with a limited repertoire of behaviours available to them, children were able to express pain. Parents often felt isolated in relation to pain management and under-used as a resource by health professionals.