Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Are Correlated With Tibial Shaft Fracture Nonunion Following Intramedullary Nailing.

OBJECTIVES: To assess trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) in surgically treated tibial shaft fracture patients progressing to union versus nonunion. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with operatively treated tibial shaft fractures (AO/OTA 42-A, B, C) using an intramedullary nail. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: PROMIS PF and PI were compared between patients progressing to union and patients requiring nonunion repair. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (196 union, 38 nonunion) were included consisting 144 men and 90 women. The mean age of included patients was 40.8 years. A significant difference in mean PROMIS PF between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1-3 months ( P = 0.005), 3-6 months ( P < 0.001), 6-9 months ( P = 0.003), and 6-12 months ( P = 0.018). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit decrease in PROMIS PF was significant at 3-6 months (OR 1.07, P = 0.028) and 6-9 months (OR 1.17, P = 0.015). A significant difference in mean PROMIS PI between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1-3 months ( P = 0.001), 3-6 months ( P = 0.005), and 6-9 months ( P = 0.005). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit increase in PROMIS PI was significant at 1-3 months (OR 1.11, P = 0.005), 3-6 months (OR 1.10, P = 0.011), and 6-9 months (OR 1.23, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Poorly trending PROMIS PF and PI in the clinical setting is a factor that can be used to evaluate progression to nonunion following tibial shaft repair where imaging studies may lag behind. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in isolated and polytraumatic pelvis and acetabular fractures.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported minimal clinically important differences (MCID) provide a standard to compare clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to calculate the MCID of PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Anxiety (AX), and Depression (DEP) scores in patients with pelvis and/or acetabular fractures. METHODS: All patients with operatively treated pelvic and/or acetabular fractures were identified. Patients were categorized as either only pelvis and/or acetabular fractures (PA) or polytrauma (PT). PROMIS PF, PI, AX, and DEP scores were evaluated at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month intervals. Distribution-based MCID and anchor-based MCID were calculated for the overall cohort, PA, and PT groups. RESULTS: The overall distribution-based MCIDs were PF (5.19), PI (3.97), AX (4.33), and DEP (4.41). The overall anchor-based MCIDs were PF (7.18), PI (8.03), AX (5.85), DEP (5.00). The percentage of patients achieving MCID for AX was 39.8-54% at 3 months and 32.7-56% at 12 months. The percentage of patients achieving MCID for DEP was 35.7-39.3% at 3 months and 32.1-35.7% at 12 months. The PT group had worse PROMIS PF scores than the PA group at all time points [post-operative, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month scores, (28.3 (6.3) vs. 26.8 (6.8) P = 0.016), (38.1 (9.2) vs. 35.0 (8.7) P = 0.037), (42.8 (8.2) vs. 39 (9.6) P = 0.015), (46.2 (9.7) vs. 41.2 (9.7) P = 0.011)]. CONCLUSION: An overall MCID for PROMIS PF was 5.19-7.18, PROMIS PI 3.97-8.03, PROMIS AX of 4.33-5.85, and PROMIS DEP of 4.41-5.00. The PT group had worse PROMIS PF at all time points. The percentage of patients achieving MCID for AX and DEP plateaued at 3 months post-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.