Two aspects of feed-forward control of action stability: effects of action speed and unexpected events.

We explored two types of anticipatory synergy adjustments (ASA) during accurate four-finger total force production task. The first type is a change in the index of force-stabilizing synergy during a steady state when a person is expecting a signal to produce a quick force change, which is seen even when the signal does not come (steady-state ASA). The other type is the drop in in the synergy index prior to a planned force change starting at a known time (transient ASA). The subjects performed a task of steady force production at 10% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) followed by a ramp to 20% MVC over 1 s, 3 s, and as a step function (0 s). In another task, in 50% of the trials during the steady-state phase, an unexpected signal could come requiring a quick force pulse to 20% MVC (0-surprise). Inter-trial variance in the finger force space was used to quantify the index of force-stabilizing synergy within the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis. We observed significantly lower synergy index values during the steady state in the 0-ramp trials compared to the 1-ramp and 3-ramp trials. There was also larger transient ASA during the 0-ramp trials. In the 0-surprise condition, the synergy index was significantly higher compared to the 0-ramp condition whereas the transient ASA was significantly larger. The finding of transient ASA scaling is of importance for clinical studies, which commonly involve populations with slower actions, which can by itself be associated with smaller ASAs. The participants varied the sharing pattern of total force across the fingers more in the task with "surprises". This was coupled to more attention to precision of performance, i.e., inter-trial deviations from the target as reflected in smaller variance affecting total force, possibly reflecting higher concentration on the task, which the participants perceived as more challenging compared to a similar task without surprise targets.

Two classes of action-stabilizing synergies reflecting spinal and supraspinal circuitry.

We explored force-stabilizing synergies during accurate four-finger constant force production tasks in spaces of finger modes (commands to fingers computed to account for the finger interdependence) and of motor unit (MU) firing frequencies. The main specific hypothesis was that the multifinger synergies would disappear during unintentional force drifts without visual feedback on the force magnitude, whereas MU-based synergies would be robust to such drifts. Healthy participants performed four-finger accurate cyclical force production trials followed by trials of constant force production. Individual MUs were identified in the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Principal component analysis was applied to motor unit frequencies to identify robust MU groups (MU-modes) with parallel scaling of the firing frequencies in FDS, in EDC, and the combined MUs of FDS + EDC. The framework of the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis was used to quantify force-stabilizing synergies when visual feedback on the force magnitude was available and 15 s after turning the visual feedback off. Removing visual feedback led to a force drift toward lower magnitudes, accompanied by the disappearance of multifinger synergies. In contrast, MU-mode synergies were minimally affected by removing visual feedback off and continued to be robust for the FDS and for the EDC, while being absent for the (FDS + EDC) analysis. We interpret the findings within the theory of hierarchical control of action with spatial referent coordinates. The qualitatively different behavior of the multifinger and MU-mode-based synergies likely reflects the difference in the involved neural circuitry, supraspinal for the former and spinal for the latter.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Two types of synergies, in the space of commands to individual fingers and in the space of motor unit groups, show qualitatively different behaviors during accurate multifinger force-production tasks. After removing visual feedback, finger force synergies disappear, whereas motor unit-based synergies persist. These results point at different neural circuitry involved in these two basic classes of synergies: supraspinal for multieffector synergies, and spinal for motor unit-based synergies.