Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrer
1.
Schizophr Res ; 270: 339-348, 2024 Jul 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968805

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Suicidal ideation is common among individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP), with prevalence estimates up to 56.5 %. Despite its high prevalence, relatively little is known about how sociodemographic, clinical and/or developmental characteristics contribute to the experience of suicidal ideation in individuals with FEP. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study (FEP n = 551 and controls n = 857), univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to study the associations of sociodemographic, clinical, and developmental factors with suicidal ideation in individuals with FEP as well as controls. Suicidal ideation was assessed using the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE). In addition, multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted based on a stepwise approach. RESULTS: In FEP, only depressive symptoms remained significantly associated with suicidal ideation when all correlates were integrated into one model. In the multivariate model in controls, depressive symptoms, positive symptoms, and traumatic childhood experiences were significantly associated with suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that depressive symptoms are an important factor relating to suicidal ideation in individuals with FEP, over and above other clinical, sociodemographic, and developmental factors. This underscores the relevance of screening for suicidal ideation in individuals with FEP, and highlights the need for a better understanding of the diagnostic uncertainty and course of mood symptoms in early psychosis. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional study design, self-reported questionnaires.

2.
Trials ; 25(1): 104, 2024 Feb 03.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308317

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Neuroimaging studies suggest an association between apathy after deep brain stimulation (DBS) and stimulation of the ventral part of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) due to the associative fibers connected to the non-motor limbic circuits that are involved in emotion regulation and motivation. We have previously described three patients with severe apathy that could be fully treated after switching stimulation from a ventral electrode contact point to a more dorsal contact point. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether more dorsal stimulation of the STN decreases apathy compared to standard care in a multicenter randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. METHODS: We will include 26 patients with a Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS) score of 14 or more after subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory Parkinson's disease. This is a multicenter trial conducted in two teaching hospitals and one university medical center in the Netherlands after at least 3 months of STN DBS. Our intervention will consist of 1 month of unilateral dorsal STN stimulation compared to treatment as usual. The primary outcome is a change in SAS score following 1 month of DBS on the original contact compared to the SAS score following 1 month of DBS on the more dorsal contact. Secondary outcomes are symptom changes on the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part III, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, 39-item Parkinson's disease questionnaire, Parkinson's disease impulsive-compulsive disorders questionnaire, changes in levodopa-equivalent daily dosage, apathy rated by the caregiver, and burden and quality of life of the caregiver. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NL8279. Registered on January 10, 2020.


Sujet(s)
Apathie , Stimulation cérébrale profonde , Maladie de Parkinson , Noyau subthalamique , Humains , Maladie de Parkinson/thérapie , Maladie de Parkinson/psychologie , Études croisées , Stimulation cérébrale profonde/effets indésirables , Stimulation cérébrale profonde/méthodes , Qualité de vie , Résultat thérapeutique , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Études multicentriques comme sujet
3.
Mol Psychiatry ; 28(11): 4585-4593, 2023 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37730844

RÉSUMÉ

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Effects on cognitive functioning are unclear since they have been studied in small samples. We aim to estimate the impact of DBS on cognitive functioning in TRD with a systematic review and meta-analyses. After systematically searching PubMed we included 10 studies which compared standardized neuropsychological tests before and after DBS or between active and sham DBS in TRD. Different random-effects meta-analyses were done for different cognitive (sub-)domains and for different follow-up time windows (<6 months, 6-18 months, and >18 months). We found no significant differences in cognitive functioning up to 6 months of DBS. After 6-18 months of DBS small to moderate improvements were found in verbal memory (Hedge's g = 0.22, 95% CI = [0.01-0.43], p = 0.04), visual memory (Hedge's g = 0.37, 95% CI = [0.03-0.71], p = 0.04), attention/psychomotor speed (Hedge's g = 0.26, 95% CI = [0.02-0.50], p = 0.04) and executive functioning (Hedge's g = 0.37, 95% CI = [0.15-0.59], p = 0.001). Not enough studies could be retrieved for a meta-analysis of effects after >18 months of DBS or for the comparison of active and sham DBS. Qualitatively, generally no differences in cognitive functioning between active and sham DBS were found. No cognitive decline was found in this meta-analysis up to 18 months of DBS in patients with TRD. Results even suggest small positive effects of DBS on cognitive functioning in TRD, although this should be interpreted with caution due to lack of controlled data.


Sujet(s)
Dysfonctionnement cognitif , Stimulation cérébrale profonde , Dépression , Humains , Cognition , Dysfonctionnement cognitif/thérapie , Stimulation cérébrale profonde/méthodes , Dépression/thérapie , Fonction exécutive
4.
Brain Stimul ; 16(5): 1289-1291, 2023.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37619890

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Apathy is reported after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) and associated with a decreased quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Recent studies hypothesized that the location of active DBS contact point relative to the STN subdivisions (motor, associative and limbic) could be related to an increase of apathy. METHODS: 22 PD-patients that underwent STN DBS between January 2019 and February 2020 were divided in an apathy and non-apathy group using the change in the Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS) after six months of DBS. For both groups the location of DBS electrodes was determined based on 7T MRI subthalamic network analysis, enabling visualization of the subdivisions and their projections relative to the active contact point. MDS-UPDRS III scores were included to evaluate DBS effect. RESULTS: In six patients a post-DBS increase in apathy score was assessed, versus 16 non-apathy patients. Network analysis showed that active contacts in apathy patients were more often positioned in or close to the area within the STN with high density of surrounding projections to associative cortex areas than in non-apathy patients; 63% apathy versus 42% (P = 0.02). The density of surrounding motor projections was lower in the group with increased apathy (18%) than in the group without increased apathy (38%, P = 0.01). Motor UPDRS improvement for the apathy group was 39% and for the non-apathy group 58% (n.s.) CONCLUSION: This new approach in patient-specific subthalamic 7T MRI network analysis visualized an anatomical connectivity substrate for apathy in DBS, with active electrode contacts predominantly in the associative STN.


Sujet(s)
Apathie , Stimulation cérébrale profonde , Maladie de Parkinson , Humains , Maladie de Parkinson/imagerie diagnostique , Maladie de Parkinson/thérapie , Stimulation cérébrale profonde/effets indésirables , Qualité de vie , Résultat thérapeutique , Imagerie par résonance magnétique
6.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 61(1): 16-21, 2019.
Article de Néerlandais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640402

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Of all depressive disorders, 20% has a persistent course. For persistent depressive patients, electroconvulsive therapy (ect) is recommended for this patient population, since it is the most potent treatment for depression. The Dutch depression guideline advises the use of ect for persistent depressive disorder at approximately 12 months after inadequate efficacy of psychotherapy and/or pharmacological treatment.
AIM: To quantify the use of electroconvulsive therapy in persistent depressive patients in the Netherlands.
METHOD: Quantitative research using the Dutch registration system (diagnosis-treatment-combination; dbc) information system (dis) of the Dutch Healthcare Authority (nza).
RESULTS: Of the patients within the dbc system (in 2014) with the main diagnosis of unipolar depression, 23,597 (26%) were registered for more than two years and could be classified as having a persistent depressive episode. Of these latter patients, only 278 (1.2%) received ect.
CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, only 1.2% of patients with a persistent depression received ect, whereas this treatment could have been considered for 26% of this group. The low application rate might be caused by professionals' inadequate knowledge about ect and the premature use of the handicap model.


Sujet(s)
Trouble dépressif majeur/thérapie , Électroconvulsivothérapie/méthodes , Électroconvulsivothérapie/statistiques et données numériques , Utilisation des procédures et des techniques , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Pays-Bas , Résultat thérapeutique
8.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 73(1): 227-31, 2015 Oct.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26164267

RÉSUMÉ

Net Gain Analysis (NGA) is proposed as an alternative to Responders Analysis (RA) as a more comprehensive method to tap clinical relevance of the effect of treatment. NGA is the group difference in responders minus the group difference in deteriorators; while RA is the group difference in responders. We examined the performance of these two methods in a dataset consisting of individual patient data from 10 randomized controlled trials (N = 2666) of five different antipsychotics in patients with acute mania by comparing the rank ordering of the five compounds according to both systems (NGA and RA). The rank order did not differ between the 2 systems but the inferiority of one compound was revealed more evidently by the NGA in comparison to the RA.


Sujet(s)
Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Trouble bipolaire/traitement médicamenteux , Adulte , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Humains , Mâle
9.
J Psychopharmacol ; 29(8): 923-32, 2015 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26038109

RÉSUMÉ

Given globalization trends in the conduct of clinical trials, the external validity of trial results across geographic regions is questioned. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of treatment in acute mania in bipolar disorder across regions and to explain potential differences by differences in patient characteristics. We performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 registration studies for the indication acute manic episode of bipolar disorder. Patients (n = 3207) were classified into one of three geographic regions: Europe (n = 981), USA (n = 1270), and other regions (n = 956). Primary outcome measures were mean symptom change score on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) from baseline to endpoint and responder status (50% improvement form baseline). Effect sizes were significantly smaller in the USA (g = 0.203, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.062-0.344; odds ratio (OR) 1.406, 95% CI 0.998-1.980) than in Europe (g = 0.476, 95% CI 0.200-0.672; OR 2.380, 95% CI 1.682-3.368) or other regions (g = 0.533, 95% CI 0.399-0.667; OR 2.300, 95% CI 1.800-2.941). Regional differences in age, gender, initial severity, body mass index, placebo response, discontinuation rate, and type of compound could not explain the geographic differences in effect. Less severe symptoms at baseline in the US patients did explain some of the difference in responder status between patients in Europe and the USA. These findings suggest that the results of studies involving patients with acute mania cannot be extrapolated across geographic regions. Similar findings have been identified in schizophrenia, contraceptive, and in cardiovascular trials. Therefore, this finding may indicate a more general problem regarding the generalizability of pharmacological trials over geographic regions.


Sujet(s)
Trouble bipolaire/traitement médicamenteux , Essais cliniques comme sujet/statistiques et données numériques , /statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Afrique , Asie , Australie , Europe , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Nouvelle-Zélande , Amérique du Sud , États-Unis
10.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 25(7): 1018-26, 2015 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25907248

RÉSUMÉ

We examined the role of placebo response in acute mania trials. Specifically, whether placebo response: (1) predicts treatment effect, (2) can be predicted by patient and study characteristics, and (3) can be predicted by a parsimonious model. We performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data from 10 registration studies (n=1019) for the indication acute manic episode of bipolar disorder. We assessed the effect of 14 determinants on placebo response. Primary outcome measures were mean symptom change score (MCS) on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and response rate (RR), defined as ≥ 50% YMRS symptom improvement from baseline to endpoint. The overall placebo response was 8.5 points improvement on the YMRS (=27.9%) with a RR of 32.8%. Placebo response was significantly associated with the overall treatment response. Five determinants significantly (p<0.05) predicted the placebo response. The multivariate prediction model, which consisted of baseline severity, psychotic features at baseline, number of geographic regions, and region, explained 10.4% and 5.5% of the variance in MSC and RR, respectively. Our findings showed that the placebo response in efficacy trials of antipsychotics for acute mania is substantial and an important determinant of treatment effect. Placebo response is influenced by patient characteristics (illness severity and presence of psychotic features) and by study characteristics (study year, number of geographic regions and region). However, the prediction model could only explain the placebo response to a limited extent. Therefore, limiting trials to certain patients in certain geographic regions seems not a viable strategy to improve assay sensitivity.


Sujet(s)
Neuroleptiques/usage thérapeutique , Trouble bipolaire/traitement médicamenteux , Effet placebo , Adulte , Bases de données factuelles/statistiques et données numériques , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , , Valeur prédictive des tests , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...