Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
1.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 65(5): 375, 2016 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27968760

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Many patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are admitted to emergency departments (EDs) of centres without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities. The 2012 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend transfer to a PCI centre with a "door in - door out" (DI-DO) time≤30min. PURPOSE: To report DI-DO times in a registry of patients with acute STEMI. METHODS: The RESeau des Urgences CORonarienne (RESUCOR) is a permanent registry of patients admitted with acute STEMI in 16 hospitals in the north French Alps since 2002. In patients admitted to a non-PCI centre, the DI-DO times were split into "diagnostic time" (from admission to transfer decision) and "logistical time" (from transfer decision to discharge). RESULTS: Of 2081 patients included in the registry from 2012 to 2014, 493 were admitted directly into an ED (254 PCI centre and 239 non-PCI centre). Of those admitted into an ED of a non-PCI centre, 228 were immediately transferred to a PCI centre (76 treated with thrombolysis and 132 with primary PCI). The proportions of patients with DI-DO≤30min and median (interquartile range [IQR]) DI-DO times are reported in the Table 1. Median (IQR) DIDO times were 90.5 (69-118) min for patients treated with thrombolysis and 88 (62-147) min for primary PCI. CONCLUSIONS: DI-DO times were longer than recommended. Efforts to decrease these delays are required. Transfer with a non-PCI centre ambulance is preferable.


Sujet(s)
Angioplastie coronaire par ballonnet/statistiques et données numériques , Service hospitalier d'urgences/statistiques et données numériques , Admission du patient/statistiques et données numériques , Transfert de patient/statistiques et données numériques , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/diagnostic , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/épidémiologie , France , Adhésion aux directives , Accessibilité des services de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Humains , Enregistrements , Études ergonomiques
2.
Acute Card Care ; 13(2): 93-8, 2011 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21517672

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Fondaparinux has a favourable efficacy-safety profile but if major bleeding occurs, reversal of antithrombotic treatment is challenging. We present clinical and biological observations from patients treated with rFVIIa for bleeding under fondaparinux. METHODS: Fondaparinux-treated patients with bleeding (>10% haematocrit decrease) and cardiovascular collapse were eligible. Patients received a single 90 µg/kg bolus rFVIIa. Clinical success was defined as clinical bleeding control without thrombotic complication. A biological criterion of successful antagonization was defined as a >100% increase in peak thrombin generation (C(max)). RESULTS: 8 patients were treated (5 ACS, 3 VTE). Patients received aspirin and clopidogrel (n = 5), eptifibatide (n = 2), fluindione (n = 5). In addition to standard haemostatic methods, all patients received rFVIIa and transfusion. Clinical progression was favourable in 4, with bleeding clinically controlled in <6 h. 1 patient died. Biological success was observed in 4 patients with lowest baseline anti-Xa (0.67-0.92 U/L); ¾ had clinical success. In patients with baseline anti-Xa >1.0 U/L (1.14-1.62 U/L), increase in C(max) was low; ¾ had no clinical bleeding control. CONCLUSION: This series is the largest describing rFVIIa use to control bleeding in patients under fondaparinux. rVFIIa was considered efficient in 50%, suggesting inefficacy in the context of elevated anti-Xa.


Sujet(s)
Anticoagulants/effets indésirables , Facteur VIIa/usage thérapeutique , Hémorragie/induit chimiquement , Hémorragie/traitement médicamenteux , Polyosides/effets indésirables , Syndrome coronarien aigu/traitement médicamenteux , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Anticoagulants/usage thérapeutique , Transfusion sanguine , Facteur VIIa/effets indésirables , Femelle , Fondaparinux , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Polyosides/usage thérapeutique , Études prospectives , Protéines recombinantes/effets indésirables , Protéines recombinantes/usage thérapeutique , Résultat thérapeutique , Thromboembolisme veineux/traitement médicamenteux
3.
Diabet Med ; 23(12): 1370-6, 2006 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17116190

RÉSUMÉ

RATIONALE AND AIM: In patients with an acute myocardial infarction, admission hyperglycaemia (AH) is a major risk factor for mortality. However, the predictive value of AH, when the risk score and use of guidelines-recommended treatments are considered, is poorly documented. METHODS: The first fasting plasma glucose levels after admission, risk level, guidelines-recommended treatment use and 1-year mortality were recorded. Patients with first fasting glucose level after admission > 7.7 mmo/l were considered to have AH. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 404 with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were included. One hundred and seventy-five (24%) patients had pre-existing diabetes (diabetes group), 154 (21%) had AH (AH+ group) and the remainding 395 (55%) had neither diabetes nor AH (AH- group). The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score was lower in the AH- group, but the use of guidelines-recommended treatment was comparable in all groups. At 1 year, the mortality rate was higher in the AH+ group compared with the AH- group (18.8 vs. 6.1%, P < 0.01) and similar to that in the diabetes group (18.8 vs. 16.6%, P = NS). The relation between glycaemic status and mortality remained strong [AH+ vs. AH-, OR = 3.0 (1.5, 6.0) and diabetes vs. AH-, OR = 3.6 (1.7, 6.6)] after adjustment for the GRACE risk score [OR = 2.4 (1.8, 3.1) per 10% increase] and for treatment score [OR = 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) per 10% increase]. CONCLUSIONS: In patients without a history of diabetes, the presence of AH indicates an increased risk of 1-year mortality, similar to that of patients with diabetes, even when the risk score and use of guidelines-recommended treatment are controlled for.


Sujet(s)
Glycémie/analyse , Diabète de type 2/mortalité , Angiopathies diabétiques/mortalité , Hyperglycémie/diagnostic , Infarctus du myocarde/mortalité , Sujet âgé , Études de cohortes , Tests diagnostiques courants/normes , Femelle , Hospitalisation , Humains , Hyperglycémie/mortalité , Mâle , Valeur prédictive des tests
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...