Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
1.
Ann Pharm Fr ; 81(1): 1-12, 2023 Jan.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35728629

RÉSUMÉ

Hormone therapy provides an excellent survival rate after cancer but has many side effects, including joint pain in one out of two women. This leads about 13 % of women to stop their treatment within the first 6 months, impacting on its effectiveness, survival and the risk of recurrence. In order to better manage pain and quality of life, physical activity is highly recommended. In this context, the present review proposes a state of the art on the effects of adapted physical activity, based on the works referenced in PubMed. These studies show that physical activity has proved its worth in the primary prevention of cancer and is being evaluated in secondary prevention, particularly in the reduction of adverse effects. Overall, there is a reduction in joint pain, an improvement in quality of life and fatigue. Physical activity also plays a role in tertiary prevention. Paradoxically, oncologists and educators often note a reduction in the practice of physical activity due to fear of the onset of pain. It seems necessary to reinforce communication with patients and health professionals and to recommend the practice of physical activity in an appropriate setting.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein , Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs du sein/traitement médicamenteux , Qualité de vie , Exercice physique , Hormones , Arthralgie/induit chimiquement , Arthralgie/traitement médicamenteux , Douleur/traitement médicamenteux , Douleur/étiologie
2.
Prog Urol ; 29(4): 235-245, 2019 Mar.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30685407

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and the management of the lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) in institutionalized handicapped adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive transversal observational study. Epidemiological study. RESULTS: In this study realized in 150 residents of 6 nursing homes for adult, the prevalence of LUTD in institutionalized handicapped adults was 88.67% (133/150). This prevalence was 91.36% (74/81) for women versus 85.51% (59/69) for men, (P=0.260); 93.33% (14/15) in medical housing units [foyer d'accueil médicalisé (FAM)] versus 88.15% (119/135) in specialized housing units [maison d'accueil spécialisé (MAS)], (P=1); 80% (52/65) for those who walked without technical support, 89.47% (17/19) for those who walked with technical support, 98.08% (51/52) for the wheelchair users who were not able to walk, and 92.86% (13/14) for those who were not able to walk or to use wheelchair, (P=0.004); 69.81% (37/53) for those who were able to signal the need to void versus 98.97% (96/97) for those who were not able, (P=0.0000003); 76.92% (50/60) for those who were able to realize the transfers independently, versus 97.65% (83/85) for those who were not able, (P=0.0002); 67.39% (31/46) for those who could dress and undress by themselves versus 98.08% (102/104) for those who could not, (P=0.0000002); 77.27% (17/22) for water intake>2L, 91.67% (55/60) between 1.5 and 2L, 87.5% (49/56) between 1 and 1.5L, and 100% (12/12) for water intake<1L, (P=0.170). The LUTD were more frequent in people with physical disability (OR=10.70[1.53-75.09], P=0.017), in those with mental disability (OR=5.85[1.39-24.67], P=0.016), and in those with urological comorbidity (OR=9.70[1.25-75.55], P=0.03). For the management of the LUTD, the prevalence of expert medical advice was 9.77%, 24.81% (33/133) for the further examination, 16.54% (22/133) for rehabilitation treatment, 6.77% (9/133) for drug treatment, 2.26% (3/133) for surgical treatment, and 82.71% (110/133) for medical device. CONCLUSION: In this study, the prevalence of LUTD in institutionalized handicapped adults was 88.67%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Sujet(s)
Personnes handicapées/statistiques et données numériques , Institutionnalisation , Déficience intellectuelle/épidémiologie , Symptômes de l'appareil urinaire inférieur/épidémiologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Symptômes de l'appareil urinaire inférieur/thérapie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Prévalence , Facteurs sexuels , Jeune adulte
3.
Prog Urol ; 28(4): 193-208, 2018 Mar.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29307482

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is characterized by the presence of pain in the posterior pelvic area, distally and laterally to the fifth lumbar vertebra, and/or at the pubic symphysis. PGP is a very common pain condition in women, especially during pregnancy and postpartum. After delivery, pain prevalence decreases to 7 % in the first three months. The current literature describes an association between pelvic girdle pain and different perineal characteristics and symptoms. OBJECTIVES: A better understanding of perineal structures influence on PGP could assist towards the management of this condition. The aim of this review is to describe the peer-reviewed literature about perineal function in patients with PGP. METHODS: A bibliographic search on PubMed was conducted. The key words used were: pelvic girdle pain, pregnacy-related low back pain, lumbopelvic pain, posterior pelvic pain, peripartum pelvic pain, pelvic girdle relaxation, pelvic joint instability, peripartum pelvic pain, sacroiliac joint pain, sacroiliac joint dysfunction, sacroiliac-joint related pelvic pain and pelvic floor. Two hundred and twenty-one (221) articles were identified. Out of them, a total of nine articles were selected. The level of evidence was determined using Oxford's scale. RESULTS: Patients with PGP showed increased activity of the pelvic floor muscles (P=0.05) (LE3), decreased urogenital hiatus area (PGP 12.4 cm2±2.7, control 13.7 cm2±2.8, P=0.015) (LE3), shorter endurance time (PGP 17.8 s; control 54.0 s, P=0.00) (LE3), significantly later onset time during affected side leg elevation (PGP 25ms, control -129ms, P=0.01) (LE3), levator ani and obturator internus tenderness (PGP 25/26; control 5/25, P<0.001) (LE3) and a higher prevalence of vesico-sphincteric disorders compared to asymptomatic subjects (LE3). CONCLUSION: This review confirms that subjects suffering PGP present particular perineal characteristics regarding morphology and biomechanics. It would be interesting to develop clinical research concerning pelvic floor release effect in PGP.


Sujet(s)
Douleur de la ceinture pelvienne , Périnée/physiopathologie , Phénomènes biomécaniques , Femelle , Humains , Douleur de la ceinture pelvienne/diagnostic , Douleur de la ceinture pelvienne/étiologie , Grossesse , Évaluation des symptômes
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...