RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Over the last 6 years, our center has introduced a novel technique combining peripheral nerve blocks (femoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves) with sedation using propofol with alfentanil target-controlled infusion for hip fracture surgery. The purpose of this review was to identify if adverse outcomes (of mortality and length of stay) were associated with its introduction compared to spinal or general anesthesia. METHODS: Retrospective data collection from hospital fracture database. Data were analyzed using Cox regression (adjusted for age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade) to compare survival and length of stay data across the different anesthetic techniques used for hip fracture surgery. RESULTS: This technique was used in 472 (20%) of 2360 hip fractures. There was no significant difference between peripheral nerve blocks with propofol/alfentanil sedation/analgesia for mortality up to 120days (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.06; P=.11) and length of stay (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.17; P=.63) when compared to the other anesthetic techniques of spinal and general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: This novel technique does not appear to be associated with adverse mortality or length of stay after hip fracture surgery.
Sujet(s)
Alfentanil/administration et posologie , Sédation consciente/méthodes , Fractures de la hanche/chirurgie , Bloc nerveux/méthodes , Propofol/administration et posologie , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Anesthésie générale/effets indésirables , Anesthésie générale/méthodes , Rachianesthésie/effets indésirables , Rachianesthésie/méthodes , Sédation consciente/effets indésirables , Femelle , Nerf fémoral , Ostéosynthèse interne/méthodes , Hémiarthroplastie/méthodes , Humains , Hypnotiques et sédatifs/administration et posologie , Perfusions veineuses , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle , Bloc nerveux/effets indésirables , Études rétrospectives , Analyse de survieRÉSUMÉ
Air travel has increased steadily over the last decade, and its effect on the health of passengers has been the subject of much debate. There is a paucity of evidence on the effects of air travel on oxygen saturation in general populations. The peripheral oxygen saturation and pulse rate of 84 passengers, aged 1-78 years, were measured by pulse oximetry at round level and altitude during air travel. There was a statistically significant reduction in oxygen saturation in all passengers travelling long haul and short haul flights (p < 0.05). The mean [range] (SD) SpO(2) for all flights at ground level was 97% [93-100] (1.33) and at cruising altitude 93% [85-98] (2.33). Fifty-four per cent of passengers had SpO(2) values of 94% or less at cruising altitude. This is a value which may prompt physicians to administer supplemental oxygen in hospital patients.
