Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrer
1.
Am J Transplant ; 17(4): 880-892, 2017 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27862972

RÉSUMÉ

Due to the enduring organ shortage, living donor liver transplantation has been a valuable treatment strategy for advanced liver disease patients for over 20 years. A variety of reviews have summarized the extensive data now available on medical and psychosocial risks to living donors in the aftermath of donation. However, evidence on donor medical and psychosocial outcomes beyond the first year postdonation has not been synthesized in any previous review. The evidence base on such "long-term" outcomes has been growing in recent years. A review of this evidence would therefore be timely and could serve as an important resource to assist transplant centers in their efforts to fully educate prospective donors and gain informed consent, as well as develop appropriate postdonation clinical care and surveillance plans. We reviewed recent literature on long-term donor outcomes, considering (a) medical outcomes, including mortality risk, rates of complications, abnormalities detected in laboratory testing, and the progress of liver regeneration; and (b) donor-reported psychosocial outcomes reflecting physical, emotional, and interpersonal/socioeconomic well-being, as well as overall health-related quality of life. We summarize limitations and gaps in available evidence, and we provide recommendations for future research and clinical care activities focused on long-term outcomes in liver donors.


Sujet(s)
Régénération hépatique/physiologie , Transplantation hépatique/psychologie , Donneur vivant/psychologie , Qualité de vie , Humains , Facteurs temps
2.
Am J Transplant ; 17(4): 1081-1096, 2017 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27647626

RÉSUMÉ

Because results from single-center (mostly kidney) donor studies demonstrate interpersonal relationship and financial strains for some donors, we conducted a liver donor study involving nine centers within the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study 2 (A2ALL-2) consortium. Among other initiatives, A2ALL-2 examined the nature of these outcomes following donation. Using validated measures, donors were prospectively surveyed before donation and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo after donation. Repeated-measures regression models were used to examine social relationship and financial outcomes over time and to identify relevant predictors. Of 297 eligible donors, 271 (91%) consented and were interviewed at least once. Relationship changes were positive overall across postdonation time points, with nearly one-third reporting improved donor family and spousal or partner relationships and >50% reporting improved recipient relationships. The majority of donors, however, reported cumulative out-of-pocket medical and nonmedical expenses, which were judged burdensome by 44% of donors. Lower income predicted burdensome donation costs. Those who anticipated financial concerns and who held nonprofessional positions before donation were more likely to experience adverse financial outcomes. These data support the need for initiatives to reduce financial burden.


Sujet(s)
Transplantation hépatique , Donneur vivant/psychologie , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Acquisition d'organes et de tissus/économie , Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Relations interpersonnelles , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectives , Qualité de vie , Soutien social , Enquêtes et questionnaires
3.
Am J Transplant ; 17(5): 1286-1293, 2017 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27664940

RÉSUMÉ

Mobile health interventions may help transplant recipients follow their complex medical regimens. Pocket Personal Assistant for Tracking Health (Pocket PATH) is one such intervention tailored for lung transplant recipients. A randomized controlled trial showed Pocket PATH's superiority to usual care for promoting the self-management behaviors of adherence, self-monitoring and communication with clinicians during posttransplant year 1. Its long-term impact was unknown. In this study, we examined associations between Pocket PATH exposure during year 1 and longer term clinical outcomes-mortality and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS)-among 182 recipients who survived the original trial. Cox regression assessed whether (a) original group assignment and (b) performance of self-management behaviors during year 1 predicted time to outcomes. Median follow-up was 5.7 years after transplant (range 4.2-7.2 years). Pocket PATH exposure had no direct effect on outcomes (p-values >0.05). Self-monitoring was associated with reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.91; p = 0.027), and reporting abnormal health indicators to clinicians was associated with reduced risks of mortality (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.04-0.65; p = 0.011) and BOS (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.08-0.86; p = 0.026), regardless of intervention group assignment. Although Pocket PATH did not have a direct impact on long-term outcomes, early improvements in self-management facilitated by Pocket PATH may be associated with long-term clinical benefit.


Sujet(s)
Bronchiolite oblitérante/chirurgie , Transplantation pulmonaire/rééducation et réadaptation , Qualité de vie , Gestion de soi , Télémédecine/statistiques et données numériques , Receveurs de transplantation , Femelle , Études de suivi , Survie du greffon , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Pronostic
4.
Am J Transplant ; 13(10): 2672-84, 2013 Oct.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23924065

RÉSUMÉ

There are no evidence-based interventions to prevent adverse psychosocial consequences after living donation. We conducted a single-site randomized controlled trial to examine the postdonation impact of a preventive intervention utilizing motivational interviewing (MI) to target a major risk factor for poor psychosocial outcomes, residual ambivalence (i.e. lingering hesitation and uncertainty) about donating. Of 184 prospective kidney or liver donors, 131 screened positive for ambivalence; 113 were randomized to (a) the MI intervention, (b) an active comparison condition (health education) or (c) standard care only before donation. Ambivalence was reassessed postintervention (before donation). Primary trial outcomes-psychosocial variables in somatic, psychological and family interpersonal relationship domains-were assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months postdonation. MI subjects showed the greatest decline in ambivalence (p = 0.050). On somatic outcomes, by 3 months postdonation MI subjects reported fewer physical symptoms (p = 0.038), lower rates of fatigue (p = 0.021) and pain (p = 0.016), shorter recovery times (p = 0.041) and fewer unexpected medical problems (p = 0.023). Among psychological and interpersonal outcomes, they had a lower rate of anxiety symptoms (p = 0.046) and fewer unexpected family-related problems (p = 0.045). They did not differ on depression, feelings about donation or family relationship quality. The findings suggest that the intervention merits testing in a larger, multisite trial.


Sujet(s)
Assistance , Donneur vivant/psychologie , Troubles mentaux/prévention et contrôle , Transplantation d'organe/psychologie , Qualité de vie , Adulte , Études de faisabilité , Femelle , Humains , Relations interpersonnelles , Mâle , Pronostic
6.
Psychosomatics ; 34(3): 199-207, 1993.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8493301

RÉSUMÉ

This article discusses pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular insufficiencies. Hepatic metabolism of psychotropic drugs and of drugs commonly used in transplant patients that have neuropsychiatric side effects is discussed. Neuropsychiatric effects of immunosuppressant agents, including cyclosporine, corticosteroids, azathioprine, OKT3, and FK 506, are reviewed. Certain infections occur more often in immunosuppressed patients; their treatment with antiviral, antifungal, and antibiotic drugs may have neuropsychiatric consequences. Because of altered drug sensitivities and metabolism, drug interactions, and severe medical illness, most drugs are used in reduced doses.


Sujet(s)
Anti-infectieux/effets indésirables , Défaillance cardiaque/sang , Immunosuppresseurs/effets indésirables , Défaillance rénale chronique/sang , Défaillance hépatique/sang , Maladies du système nerveux/induit chimiquement , Transplantation d'organe/physiologie , Psychoanaleptiques/pharmacocinétique , Troubles liés à une substance/diagnostic , Anti-infectieux/administration et posologie , Anti-infectieux/pharmacocinétique , Défaillance cardiaque/chirurgie , Humains , Immunosuppresseurs/administration et posologie , Immunosuppresseurs/pharmacocinétique , Défaillance rénale chronique/chirurgie , Défaillance hépatique/chirurgie , Maladies du système nerveux/sang , Maladies du système nerveux/diagnostic , Équipe soignante , Psychoanaleptiques/administration et posologie , Psychoanaleptiques/effets indésirables , Troubles liés à une substance/sang , Troubles liés à une substance/psychologie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE