Relationship of Subendocardial Perfusion to Myocardial Injury, Cardiac Structure, and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction has been implicated in the development of hypertensive heart disease and heart failure, with subendocardial ischemia identified as a driver of sustained myocardial injury and fibrosis. We aimed to evaluate the relationships of subendocardial perfusion with cardiac injury, structure, and a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events consisting of death, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke. METHODS: Layer-specific blood flow and myocardial flow reserve (MFR; stress/rest myocardial blood flow) were assessed by 13N-ammonia perfusion positron emission tomography in consecutive patients with hypertension without flow-limiting coronary artery disease (summed stress score <3) imaged at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) from 2015 to 2021. In this post hoc observational study, biomarkers, echocardiographic parameters, and longitudinal clinical outcomes were compared by tertiles of subendocardial MFR (MFRsubendo). RESULTS: Among 358 patients, the mean age was 70.6±12.0 years, and 53.4% were male. The median MFRsubendo was 2.57 (interquartile range, 2.08-3.10), and lower MFRsubendo was associated with older age, diabetes, lower renal function, greater coronary calcium burden, and higher systolic blood pressure (P<0.05 for all). In cross-sectional multivariable regression analyses, the lowest tertile of MFRsubendo was associated with myocardial injury and with greater left ventricular wall thickness and volumes compared with the highest tertile. Relative to the highest tertile, low MFRsubendo was independently associated with an increased rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.99 [95% CI, 1.39-6.44]; P=0.005) and heart failure hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.04-7.32; P=0.042) over 1.1 (interquartile range, 0.6-2.8) years median follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with hypertension without flow-limiting coronary artery disease, impaired MFRsubendo was associated with cardiovascular risk factors, elevated cardiac biomarkers, cardiac structure, and clinical events.

Septal late enhancement by cardiac CT is associated with repeat ablation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.

INTRODUCTION: Scar substrate in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients is often difficult to identify. Advances in cardiac imaging, especially using late iodine-enhanced computed tomography (LIE-CT), allow better characterization of scars giving rise to ventricular tachycardia (VT). Currently, there are limited data on clinical correlates of CT-derived scar substrates in NICM. We sought assess the relationship between scar location on LIE-CT and outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in NICM patients with VT. METHODS: From 2020 to 2022, consecutive patients with NICM undergoing VT RFCA with integration of cardiac CT scar modeling (inHeart, Pessac, France) were included at two US tertiary care centers. The CT protocol included both arterial-enhanced imaging for anatomical modeling and LIE-CT for scar assessment. The distribution of substrate on CT was analyzed in relation to patient outcomes, with primary endpoints being VT recurrence and the need for repeat ablation procedure. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included (age 64 ± 12 years, 90% men). Over a median follow-up of 120 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 41-365), repeat ablation procedures were required in 32 (53%). VT recurrence occurred in 46 (77%), with a median time to recurrence of 40 days (IQR: 8-65). CT-derived total scar volume positively correlated with intrinsic QRS duration (r = .34, p = 0.008). Septal scar was found on CT in 34 (57%), and lateral scar in 40 (7%). On univariate logistic regression, septal scar was associated with increased odds of repeat ablation (odds ratio [OR]: 2.9 [1.0-8.4]; p = 0.046), while lateral scar was not (OR: 0.9 [0.3-2.7]; p = 0.855). Septal scar better predicted VT recurrence when compared to lateral scar, but neither were statistically significant (septal scar OR: 3.0 [0.9-10.7]; p = 0.078; lateral scar OR: 1.7 [0.5-5.9]; p = 0.391). CONCLUSION: In this tertiary care referral population, patients with NICM undergoing VT catheter ablation with septal LIE-CT have nearly threefold increased risk of need for repeat ablation.

Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor among patients with and without diabetes Mellitus: the Mass General Brigham Lp(a) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and Lp(a) are well-established predictors of coronary artery disease (CAD) outcomes. However, their combined association remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between elevated Lp(a) and DM with CAD outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the MGB Lp(a) Registry involving patients ≥ 18 years who underwent Lp(a) measurements between 2000 and 2019. Exclusion criteria were severe kidney dysfunction, malignant neoplasms, and prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The primary outcome was a combination of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (MI). Elevated Lp(a) was defined as > 90th percentile (≥ 216 nmol/L). RESULTS: Among 6,238 patients who met the eligibility criteria, the median age was 54, 45% were women, and 12% had DM. Patients with DM were older, more frequently male, and had a higher prevalence of additional cardiovascular risk factors. Over a median follow-up of 12.9 years, patients with either DM or elevated Lp(a) experienced higher rates of the primary outcome. Notably, those with elevated Lp(a) had a higher incidence of the primary outcome regardless of their DM status. The annual event rates were as follows: No-DM and Lp(a) < 90th% - 0.6%; No-DM and Lp(a) > 90th% - 1.3%; DM and Lp(a) < 90th% - 1.9%; DM and Lp(a) > 90th% - 4.7% (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, elevated Lp(a) remained independently associated with the primary outcome among both patients with DM (HR = 2.66 [95%CI: 1.55-4.58], p < 0.001) and those without DM (HR = 2.01 [95%CI: 1.48-2.74], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Lp(a) constitutes an independent and incremental risk factor for CAD outcomes in patients with and without DM.

Comparative effectiveness of positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for predicting risk in patients with cardiometabolic disease.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of coronary artery disease (CAD) has shifted, with increasing prevalence of cardiometabolic disease and decreasing findings of obstructive CAD on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), defined as impaired myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by positron emission tomography (PET), has emerged as a key mediator of risk. We aimed to assess whether PET MFR provides additive value for risk stratification of cardiometabolic disease patients compared with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI. METHODS: We retrospectively followed patients referred for PET, exercise SPECT, or pharmacologic SPECT MPI with cardiometabolic disease (obesity, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease) and without known CAD. We compared rates and hazards of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (annualized cardiac mortality or acute myocardial infarction) among propensity-matched PET and SPECT patients using Poisson and Cox regression. Normal SPECT was defined as a total perfusion deficit (TPD) of <5%, reflecting the absence of obstructive CAD. Normal PET was defined as a TPD of <5% plus an MFR of ≥2.0. RESULTS: Among 21,544 patients referred from 2006 to 2020, cardiometabolic disease was highly prevalent (PET: 2308 [67%], SPECT: 9984 [55%]) and higher among patients referred to PET (P < 0.001). Obstructive CAD findings (TPD > 5%) were uncommon (PET: 21% and SPECT: 11%). Conversely, impaired MFR on PET (<2.0) was common (62%). In a propensity-matched analysis over a median 6.4-year follow-up, normal PET identified low-risk (0.9%/year MACE) patients, and abnormal PET identified high-risk (4.2%/year MACE) patients with cardiometabolic disease; conversely, those with normal pharmacologic SPECT remained moderate-risk (1.6%/year, P < 0.001 compared to normal PET). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiometabolic disease is common among patients referred for MPI and is associated with a heterogenous level of risk. Compared with pharmacologic SPECT, PET with MFR can detect nonobstructive CAD including CMD and can more accurately discriminate low-risk from higher-risk individuals.

Association of Lipoprotein (a) and Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Incident Myocardial Infarction: The Mass General Brigham Lp(a) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a robust predictor of coronary heart disease outcomes, with targeted therapies currently under investigation. We aimed to evaluate the association of high Lp(a) with standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs) for incident first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study used the Mass General Brigham Lp(a) Registry, which included patients aged ≥18 years with an Lp(a) measurement between 2000 and 2019. Exclusion criteria were severe kidney dysfunction, malignant neoplasm, and prior known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking were considered SMuRFs. High Lp(a) was defined as >90th percentile, and low Lp(a) was defined as <50th percentile. The primary outcome was fatal or nonfatal AMI. A combination of natural language processing algorithms, International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, and laboratory data was used to identify the outcome and covariates. A total of 6238 patients met the eligibility criteria. The median age was 54 (interquartile range, 43-65) years, and 45% were women. Overall, 23.7% had no SMuRFs, and 17.8% had ≥3 SMuRFs. Over a median follow-up of 8.8 (interquartile range, 4.2-12.8) years, the incidence of AMI increased gradually, with higher number of SMuRFs among patients with high (log-rank P=0.031) and low Lp(a) (log-rank P<0.001). Across all SMuRF subgroups, the incidence of AMI was significantly higher for patients with high Lp(a) versus low Lp(a). The risk of high Lp(a) was similar to having 2 SMuRFs. Following adjustment for confounders and number of SMuRFs, high Lp(a) remained significantly associated with the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.0-4.3]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with no prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, high Lp(a) is associated with significantly higher risk for first AMI regardless of the number of SMuRFs.

Prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve vs corrected myocardial flow reserve in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by positron emission tomography (PET) is a validated measure of cardiovascular risk. Elevated resting rate pressure product (RPP = heart rate x systolic blood pressure) can cause high resting myocardial blood flow (MBF), resulting in reduced MFR despite normal/near-normal peak stress MBF. When resting MBF is high, it is not known if RPP-corrected MFR (MFRcorrected) helps reclassify CV risk. We aimed to study this question in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients referred for rest/stress cardiac PET at our center from 2006 to 2020. Patients with abnormal perfusion (summed stress score >3) or prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were excluded. MFRcorrected was defined as stress MBF/corrected rest MBF where corrected rest MBF = rest MBF x 10,000/RPP. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular events (MACE): cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. Associations of MFR and MFRcorrected with MACE were assessed using unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: 3276 patients were followed for a median of 7 (IQR 3-12) years. 1685 patients (51%) had MFR <2.0, and of those 366 (22%) had an MFR ≥2.0 after RPP correction. MFR <2.0 was associated with an increased absolute risk of MACE (HR 2.24 [1.79-2.81], P < 0.0001). Among patients with MFR <2.0, the risk of MACE was not statistically different between patients with an MFRcorrected ≥2.0 compared with those with MFRcorrected <2.0 (1.9% vs 2.3% MACE/year, HR 0.84 [0.63-1.13], P = 0.26) even after adjustment for confounders (P = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: In patients without overt obstructive CAD and MFR< 2.0, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular risk between patients with discordant (≥2.0) and concordant (<2) MFR following RPP correction. This suggests that RPP-corrected MFR may not consistently provide accurate risk stratification in patients with normal perfusion and MFR <2.0. Stress MBF and uncorrected MFR should be reported to more reliably convey cardiovascular risk beyond perfusion results.

Coronary Microvascular Function Following Severe Preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific hypertensive disorder associated with an imbalance in circulating proangiogenic and antiangiogenic proteins. Preclinical evidence implicates microvascular dysfunction as a potential mediator of preeclampsia-associated cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Women with singleton pregnancies complicated by severe antepartum-onset preeclampsia and a comparator group with normotensive deliveries underwent cardiac positron emission tomography within 4 weeks of delivery. A control group of premenopausal, nonpostpartum women was also included. Myocardial flow reserve, myocardial blood flow, and coronary vascular resistance were compared across groups. sFlt-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor-1) and PlGF (placental growth factor) were measured at imaging. RESULTS: The primary cohort included 19 women with severe preeclampsia (imaged at a mean of 15.3 days postpartum), 5 with normotensive pregnancy (mean, 14.4 days postpartum), and 13 nonpostpartum female controls. Preeclampsia was associated with lower myocardial flow reserve (ß, -0.67 [95% CI, -1.21 to -0.13]; P=0.016), lower stress myocardial blood flow (ß, -0.68 [95% CI, -1.07 to -0.29] mL/min per g; P=0.001), and higher stress coronary vascular resistance (ß, +12.4 [95% CI, 6.0 to 18.7] mm Hg/mL per min/g; P=0.001) versus nonpostpartum controls. Myocardial flow reserve and coronary vascular resistance after normotensive pregnancy were intermediate between preeclamptic and nonpostpartum groups. Following preeclampsia, myocardial flow reserve was positively associated with time following delivery (P=0.008). The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio strongly correlated with rest myocardial blood flow (r=0.71; P<0.001), independent of hemodynamics. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory cross-sectional study, we observed reduced coronary microvascular function in the early postpartum period following preeclampsia, suggesting that systemic microvascular dysfunction in preeclampsia involves coronary microcirculation. Further research is needed to establish interventions to mitigate the risk of preeclampsia-associated cardiovascular disease.