Longitudinal Examination of Swallowing Safety and Vocal Fold Mobility in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Aspiration and vocal fold mobility impairment (VFMI) are frequently reported in adults after cardiac surgery (CS) and impede recovery. Preoperative and postoperative laryngoscopic evaluations have not been undertaken, masking the incidence and evolution of dysphagia and VFMI in CS patients. We therefore sought to determine frequency of unsafe swallowing and VFMI before and after CS. METHODS: Thirty-five adults undergoing elective CS enrolled. Participants underwent fiberoptic endoscopic evaluations of swallowing and VFMI before and after surgical procedure. Trained raters performed duplicate, blinded ratings with the validated Penetration-Aspiration Scale, and a laryngologist performed blinded ratings of VFMI. Descriptive, Wilcoxon signed rank, and McNemar tests were performed. RESULTS: Preoperative swallowing safety profiles were 60% safe, 34% penetration, and 6% aspiration. Postoperative swallowing safety profiles were 14% safe, 63% penetration, and 23% aspiration. Significant differences in preoperative to postoperative swallowing outcomes were noted for Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores (P < .0001), unsafe swallowing (40% vs 86%; χ2 = 12.8; P = .0003), and aspiration (6% vs 23%; χ2 =6; P = .01). No differences in VFMI were noted preoperatively to postoperatively (partial VFMI, 9% vs 23%; P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: A 4-fold increase in aspiration was observed in CS patients. No cases of vocal fold paralysis were observed across time points. These data highlight the utility of instrumental laryngoscopic evaluations during the acute postoperative phase.

Relationship between pulmonary, cough, and swallowing functions in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Evaluations of pulmonary, cough, and swallow function are frequently performed to assess disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), yet the relationship between these functions remains unknown. We therefore aimed to determine relationships between these measures in individuals with ALS. METHODS: One hundred individuals with ALS underwent standardized tests: forced vital capacity (FVC), maximum expiratory/inspiratory pressure (MEP, MIP), voluntary cough peak expiratory flow (PEF), and videofluoroscopic swallow evaluation (VF). Duplicate raters completed independent, blinded ratings using the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale. Descriptives, Spearman's Rho correlations, Kruskal-Wallis analyses, and Pearson's chi-squared tests were completed. RESULTS: Mean and standard deviation across pulmonary and cough measures were FVC: 74.2% predicted (± 22.6), MEP: 91.6 cmH2O (± 46.4), MIP cmH2O: 61.1 (± 28.9), voluntary PEF: 352.7 L/min (± 141.6). DIGEST grades included: 0 (normal swallowing): 31%, 1 (mild dysphagia): 48%, 2 (moderate dysphagia): 10%, 3 (severe dysphagia): 10%, and 4 (life-threatening dysphagia): 1%. Positive correlations were observed: MEP-MIP: r = .76, MIP-PEF: r = .68, MEP-PEF: r = .61, MIP-FVC: r = .60, PEF-FVC: r = .49, and MEP-FVC: r = .46, p < .0001. MEP (p = .009) and PEF (p = .04) differed across DIGEST safety grades. Post hoc analyses revealed significant between group differences in MEP and PEF across DIGEST safety grades 0 versus 1 and grades 0 versus 3, (p < .05). DISCUSSION: In this cohort of individuals with ALS, pulmonary function, and voluntary cough were associated. Expiratory metrics (MEP, PEF) were diminished in individuals with unsafe swallowing, increasing their risk for effectively defending the airway.

Preoperative respiratory strength training is feasible and safe and improves pulmonary physiologic capacity in individuals undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

Objective: To determine the safety, feasibility, and physiologic impact of a preoperative respiratory strength training (RST) program in individuals undergoing elective cardiac surgery (CS). Methods: Twenty-five adults undergoing an elective CS at an academic hospital setting enrolled and completed RST 5 days/week (50 repetitions, 50% training load, ≥3 weeks) at home via telehealth in this open-label prospective cohort study. RST adherence, telehealth attendance, and adverse events were tracked. Pre- and post-RST outcomes of maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), voluntary cough spirometry, and patient-reported dyspnea were collected. Descriptive analyses and Wilcoxon signed rank-tests were performed. Results: Two participants (9%) did not complete the prescribed RST program. No significant RST-related adverse events occurred. Treatment adherence for all enrolled participants was 90%, and telehealth attendance was 99%. Of the CS patients who completed the prescribed program (n = 23; 91%), treatment adherence and telehealth attendance were excellent (98% and 100%, respectively). Significant increases in primary outcomes were observed: MEP mean change, +15.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], +3.4 to +27.3, P < .007); MIP mean change, +14.9 (95% CI, +9.4 to +20.4, P < .0001). No statistically significant differences in voluntary cough or perceived dyspnea outcomes were observed (P > .05). Conclusions: These preliminary data demonstrate that a preoperative RST program is safe and feasible and can improve short-term respiratory physiologic capacity (MEP and MIP) in CS patients. Future research is warranted to validate the current findings in a larger cohort of CS patients and to determine whether RST improves postoperative extubation outcomes, airway clearance capacity, and aspiration following cardiac surgery.

Profiling Number of Swallows per Bolus and Residue in Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

PURPOSE: Swallowing efficiency impairments are the most prevalent and earliest manifestation of dysphagia in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (pALS). We aimed to profile number of swallows elicited in pALS across thin liquid, moderately thick liquid, extremely thick liquid, and crackers compared to expected healthy reference data and to determine relationships between degree of pharyngeal residue, number of elicited swallows, and swallowing safety. METHOD: pALS underwent standardized videofluoroscopic swallowing studies of 10 bolus trials. Trained raters performed duplicate, independent, and blinded ratings to derive Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) efficiency and safety grades and Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics, and Timing (ASPEKT) percent total pharyngeal residue. Number of swallows per bolus was quantified (1 = typical, 2 = atypically high, 3 = extremely high). Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson chi-square, and odds ratio analyses were performed at bolus and participant levels. KEY RESULTS: At the bolus level (N = 2,523), number of swallows per bolus was observed to be, in rank order, as follows: atypically high (49.1%), extremely high (28.5%), and typical (22.4%). Mean number of swallows significantly differed by International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative level (p < .0001), with a higher number of swallows elicited in pALS for moderately thick versus thin liquids, extremely thick liquids, and crackers, p < .0001. Number of swallows per bolus increased with increasing DIGEST efficiency grades (p < .0001). Positive correlations were observed between ASPEKT percent residue and number of swallows for thin (r = .24) and moderately thick (r = .16) liquids, p < .05. DIGEST efficiency and safety grades were not significantly associated (p > .05). CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: pALS demonstrated a higher number of swallows per bolus compared to healthy reference data that may represent a compensation for reductions in swallowing efficiency to clear pharyngeal residue.

Provision of Oral Care in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit: Survey of Nursing Staff Training, Confidence, Methods, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers.

BACKGROUND: Poor oral health is associated with adverse outcomes in critical care settings. Although provision of oral care is a fundamental aspect of nursing practice, both formal training and practice among nursing staff remain unclear. METHOD: Cardiothoracic intensive care unit nurses were recruited to complete a 16-item survey regarding training, confidence, methods, prioritization, and barriers to provision of oral care. RESULTS: A total of 108 nurses participated (70% response rate). Formal training in oral care was reported by 38%, most frequently reported as less than 1 hour (53%) in duration. Of the respondents, 70% reported confidence in providing oral care. Nine methods and 16 products were identified, with variability in the frequency of provision. Prioritization of oral care was rated most frequently as moderate (53%), with 28% reporting barriers. CONCLUSION: Despite limited formal training, surveyed nurses reported confidence in providing oral care. Methods, frequency, and prioritization were variable. Both development of formal curricula and evaluation of adherence to standardized protocols for oral care are warranted. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2023;54(7):313-321.].

Sensitivity and specificity of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to detect dysarthria in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Given the widespread use of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) to measure disease progression in ALS and recent reports demonstrating its poor sensitivity, we aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale and speech item to detect validated clinical ratings of dysarthria in individuals with ALS. METHODS: Paired ALSFRS-R and validated Speech Intelligibility Test (SIT) data from individuals with ALS were analyzed. Trained raters completed duplicate, independent, and blinded ratings of audio recordings to obtain speech intelligibility (%) and speaking rate (words per minute, WPM). Binary dysarthria profiles were derived (dysarthria ≤96% intelligible and/or <150 WPM). Data were obtained using the Kruskal-Wallis test, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity percentages, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV). RESULTS: A total of 250 paired SIT and ALSFRS-R data points were analyzed. Dysarthria was confirmed in 72.4% (n = 181). Dysarthric speakers demonstrated lower ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale (8.9 vs. 11.2) and speech item (2.7 vs. 3.7) scores (P < .0001). The ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale score had an AUC of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.86). A subscale score of ≤11 yielded a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 57%, PPV of 84%, and NPV of 60% to correctly identify dysarthria status. The ALSFRS-R speech item score demonstrated an AUC of 0.81 to detect dysarthria (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85), with sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 75%, PPV of 89%, and NPV of 58% for a speech item cutpoint of ≤3. DISCUSSION: The ALSFRS-R bulbar and speech item subscale scores may be useful, inexpensive, and quick tools for monitoring dysarthria status in ALS.

A meta-analysis of post-exercise outcomes in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Objective: To systematically evaluate post-exercise outcomes related to function and quality of life in people with ALS. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were used for identifying and extracting articles. Levels of evidence and quality of articles were judged based on The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and the QualSyst. Outcomes were analyzed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2 software, random effects models, and Hedge's G. Effects were examined at 0-4 months, up to 6 months, and > 6 months. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses were performed for 1) controlled trials vs. all studies and 2) ALSFRS-R bulbar, respiratory, and motor subscales. Heterogeneity of pooled outcomes was computed with the I2 statistic. Results: 16 studies and seven functional outcomes met inclusion for the meta-analysis. Of the outcomes explored, the ALSFRS-R demonstrated a favorable summary effect size and had acceptable heterogeneity and dispersion. While FIM scores demonstrated a favorable summary effect size, heterogeneity limited interpretations. Other outcomes did not demonstrate a favorable summary effect size and/or could not be reported due to few studies reporting outcomes. Conclusions: This study provides inconclusive guidance regarding exercise regimens to maintain function and quality of life in people with ALS due to study limitations (e.g., small sample size, high attrition rate, heterogeneity in methods and participants, etc.). Future research is warranted to determine optimal treatment regimens and dosage parameters in this patient population.

Maximum Phonation Time as a Surrogate Marker for Airway Clearance Physiologic Capacity and Pulmonary Function in Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

PURPOSE: The increased use of telehealth practices has created a critical need for home-based surrogate markers for prognostic respiratory indicators of disease progression in persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (pALS). Given that phonation relies on the respiratory subsystem of speech production, we aimed to examine the relationships between maximum phonation time (MPT), forced vital capacity, and peak cough flow and to determine the discriminant ability of MPT to detect forced vital capacity and peak cough flow impairments in pALS. METHOD: MPT, peak cough flow, forced vital capacity, and ALS Functional Rating Scale scores were obtained from 62 pALS (El-Escorial Revised) every 3 months as part of a longitudinal natural history study. Pearson's correlations, linear regressions, and receiver operator characteristic curve analyses with the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: The mean age of pALS was 63.14 ± 10.95 years, 49% were female, and 43% had bulbar onset. MPT predicted forced vital capacity, F(1, 225) = 117.96, p < .0001, and peak cough flow, F(1, 217) = 98.79, p < .0001. A significant interaction was noted between MPT and ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised respiratory subscore for forced vital capacity, F(1, 222) = 6.7, p = .010, and peak cough flow, F(1, 215) = 4.37, p = .034. The discriminant ability of MPT was excellent for peak cough flow (AUC = 0.88) and acceptable for forced vital capacity (AUC = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: MPT is a simple clinical test that can be measured via telehealth and represents a potential surrogate marker for important respiratory and airway clearance indices. Further larger studies are required to validate these findings with remote data collection. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22186408.

A Clinician's Guide to Critically Appraising Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Speech-Language Pathology.

PURPOSE: When considering original research articles, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the highest level of research evidence. Given this, RCTS are often used by clinicians performing evidence-based practice to determine the most effective intervention for a specific patient or patient population. Although RCTs represent a high level of research evidence, it is important for clinicians to critically appraise RCTs to determine the validity of the study methods deployed, the statistical and clinical significance of treatment effects, and whether or not the results generalize to a particular patient, patient population, and/or clinical setting. Therefore, this tutorial will provide clinicians with an overview of what an RCT is, the various types of RCTs, when RCTs are appropriate to conduct and/or use to inform clinical practice, and the advantages and limitations of RCTs. Additionally, this tutorial will provide clinicians with practical tools to employ when reading an RCT, including checklists with questions, definitions of important terminology frequently used in RCTs, and demonstrations of how to critically appraise RCTs using literature examples from the speech-language pathology literature. CONCLUSIONS: Learning how to interpret and apply the results from RCTs to inform clinical practice for purposes of improving patient care is a critical evidence-based practice skill for clinicians to develop. This tutorial will assist clinicians in the field of speech-language pathology by furthering their fundamental knowledge of RCTs and by providing them with pragmatic tools to critically appraise RCTs to inform their clinical practice.

Profiles of Dysarthria and Dysphagia in Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

PURPOSE: While dysarthria and dysphagia are known bulbar manifestations of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the relative prevalence of speech and swallowing impairments and whether these bulbar symptoms emerge at the same time point or progress at similar rates is not yet clear. We, therefore, sought to determine the relative prevalence of speech and swallowing impairments in a cohort of individuals with ALS and to determine the impact of disease duration, severity, and onset type on bulbar impairments. METHOD: Eighty-eight individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of ALS completed the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), underwent videofluoroscopy (VF), and completed the Sentence Intelligibility Test (SIT) during a single visit. Demographic variables including disease duration and onset type were also obtained from participants. Duplicate, independent, and blinded ratings were completed using the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale and SIT to index dysphagia (DIGEST ≥ 1) and dysarthria (< 96% intelligible and/or < 150 words per minute) status. Descriptive statistics, Pearson chi-squared tests, independent-samples t tests, and odds ratios were performed. RESULTS: Dysphagia and dysarthria were instrumentally confirmed in 68% and 78% of individuals with ALS, respectively. Dysarthria and dysphagia were associated (p = .01), and bulbar impairment profile distributions in rank order included (a) dysphagia - dysarthria (59%, n = 52), (b) no dysphagia - dysarthria (19%, n = 17), (c) no dysphagia - no dysarthria (13%, n = 11), and (d) dysphagia - no dysarthria (9%, n = 8). Participants with dysphagia or dysarthria demonstrated 4.2 higher odds of exhibiting a bulbar impairment in the other domain than participants with normal speech and swallowing (95% CI [1.5, 12.2]). There were no differences in ALSFRS-R total scores or disease duration across bulbar impairment profiles (p > .05). ALSFRS-R bulbar subscale scores were significantly lower in individuals with dysphagia versus no dysphagia (8.4 vs. 10.4, p < .0001) and dysarthria versus no dysarthria (8.5 vs. 10.9, p < .0001). Dysphagia and onset type (p = .003) and dysarthria and onset type were associated (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the individuals with ALS in this study demonstrated both dysphagia and dysarthria. Of those with only one bulbar impairment, speech was twice as likely to be the first bulbar symptom to degrade. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the longitudinal progression of bulbar impairments in this patient population.

Autonomous Swallow Segment Extraction Using Deep Learning in Neck-Sensor Vibratory Signals From Patients With Dysphagia.

Dysphagia occurs secondary to a variety of underlying etiologies and can contribute to increased risk of adverse events such as aspiration pneumonia and premature mortality. Dysphagia is primarily diagnosed and characterized by instrumental swallowing exams such as videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. videofluoroscopic swallowing studies involve the inspection of a series of radiographic images for signs of swallowing dysfunction. Though effective, videofluoroscopic swallowing studies are only available in certain clinical settings and are not always desirable or feasible for certain patients. Because of the limitations of current instrumental swallow exams, research studies have explored the use of acceleration signals collected from neck sensors and demonstrated their potential in providing comparable radiation-free diagnostic value as videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. In this study, we used a hybrid deep convolutional recurrent neural network that can perform multi-level feature extraction (localized and across time) to annotate swallow segments automatically via multi-channel swallowing acceleration signals. In total, we used signals and videofluoroscopic swallowing study images of 3144 swallows from 248 patients with suspected dysphagia. Compared to other deep network variants, our network was superior at detecting swallow segments with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.807-0.841), and was in agreement with up to 90% of the gold standard-labeled segments.

A prospective examination of swallow and cough dysfunction after lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Swallow and cough dysfunction are possible surgical complications of lung transplantation (LT). We examined voluntary cough strength, sensorimotor reflexive cough integrity, and swallow-related respiratory rate (RR) across swallowing safety and aspiration response groups in recovering LT recipients. METHODS: Forty-five LT recipients underwent flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing indexed by the validated Penetration Aspiration Scale. RR before and after a 3-ounce water drinking task was measured. Voluntary and reflexive cough screening were performed to index motor and sensory outcomes. T-tests, one-way ANOVAs, and chi-square (odds ratios) were used. RESULTS: 60% of patients exhibited laryngeal penetration (n = 27) and 40% demonstrated tracheal aspiration (n = 18); 72% (n = 13) demonstrated silent aspiration. Baseline RR was higher in aspirators versus non-aspirators (26.5 vs. 22.6, p = 0.04) and in silent aspirators compared to non-silent aspirators (27.9 vs. 20.7, p = 0.01). RR change post-swallowing did not differ between aspiration response groups; however, it was significantly higher in aspirators compared to non-aspirators (3 vs. -2, p = 0.02). Compared to non-silent aspirators, silent aspirators demonstrated reduced voluntary cough peak expiratory flow (PEF; 166 vs. 324 L/min, p = 0.01). PEF, motor and urge to cough reflex cough ratings did not differ between aspirators and non-aspirators. Silent aspirators demonstrated a 7.5 times higher odds of failing reflex cough screening compared to non-silent aspirators (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: During the acute recovery period, all LT participants demonstrated some degree of unsafe swallowing and reduced voluntary cough strength. Silent aspirators exhibited elevated RR, reduced voluntary cough physiologic capacity to defend the airway, and a clinically distinguishable blunted motor response to reflex cough screening.

Comparison of Validated Videofluoroscopic Outcomes of Pharyngeal Residue: Concordance Between a Perceptual, Ordinal, and Bolus-Based Rating Scale and a Normalized Pixel-Based Quantitative Outcome.

PURPOSE: This study compared the concordance between two validated videofluoroscopic pharyngeal residue outcome scales used in clinical and research settings: the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) and the Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) percent residue metric. METHOD: Two trained raters completed independent and blinded videofluoroscopic ratings of both DIGEST efficiency and ASPEKT percent pharyngeal residue outcomes for bolus trials of 5 cc Varibar thin liquid (n = 223), thin liquid comfortable cup sips (n = 223), and 5 cc Varibar thin honey (n = 223). Spearman's rho and Kruskal-Wallis analyses were performed for each bolus type. RESULTS: Significant associations between DIGEST and ASPEKT pharyngeal residue outcomes were noted for 5 cc thin (r = .54, p < .001), cup sip thin (r = .41, p < .001), and 5 cc thin honey (r = .60, p < .001) bolus trials. ASPEKT percent residue increased across worsening DIGEST efficiency ordinal scale levels, with a main effect for each bolus type. Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences in the ASPEKT percent residue values between each DIGEST pairwise comparison for the thin cup sip bolus trial and for each pairwise comparison except between the moderate-to-severe (less than half vs. majority) ordinal levels for the 5 cc thin and 5 cc honey bolus trials, p < .05. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptual, ordinal (DIGEST) and quantitative, pixel-based (ASPEKT) videofluoroscopic pharyngeal residue outcomes were associated in this data set of 669 bolus trials. Future research is warranted to confirm these results.

Discriminant Ability of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 to Detect Swallowing Safety and Efficiency Impairments.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Quick, sensitive dysphagia screening tools are necessary to identify high-risk patients for further evaluation in busy multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinics. We examined the relationship between self-perceived dysphagia using the validated Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) and videofluoroscopic analysis of swallowing safety and efficiency. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational, longitudinal study. METHODS: Individuals with ALS completed the EAT-10 and a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Duplicate, independent, blinded analyses of the validated Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale were performed to index swallowing safety and efficiency (mild dysphagia: DIGEST ≥ 1, moderate dysphagia: DIGEST ≥ 2). A between-groups analysis of variance with Games-Howell test for post-hoc pairwise comparisons was performed to examine EAT-10 scores across dysphagia severity levels. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive-negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and odds ratios (OR) were derived. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty five paired EAT-10 and DIGEST scores were analyzed. Mean EAT-10 score was 8.48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.63-9.33). Individuals with dysphagia demonstrated higher EAT-10 scores (mild: 4.1 vs. 11.3, moderate: 6.0 vs. 17.5, P < .001). Mean EAT-10 scores increased across DIGEST levels (D0: 4.1, D1: 7.9, D2: 15.1, D3: 20.4, D4: 39.0). For mild dysphagia, an EAT-10 cut score of 3 was optimal: AUC 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.78; sensitivity: 77%; specificity: 53%; PPV: 71%; NPV: 60%; OR: 3.5). An EAT-10 cut score of 7 optimized detection of moderate dysphagia: AUC 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87; sensitivity: 81%; specificity: 66%; PPV: 39%; NPV: 93%; OR: 8.1). CONCLUSION: The EAT-10 is an easy-to-administer dysphagia screening tool with good discriminant ability for use in ALS clinics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 132:2319-2326, 2022.

How to Interpret and Evaluate a Meta-Analysis in the Field of Speech-Language Pathology: A Tutorial for Clinicians.

PURPOSE: This tutorial will provide speech-language pathologists with practical considerations and pragmatic tools for interpreting and critically evaluating a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis, which is a statistical procedure that involves combining research data across multiple high-quality research studies, is often considered the highest level of research evidence. Although meta-analyses are commonly deployed in clinical research after completing a systematic review, few clinicians or clinician scientists within the field of speech-language pathology receive formal training to conduct, interpret, or assess meta-analyses to determine the effectiveness of a treatment or procedure for evidence-based practice. CONCLUSION: Clinicians within the field of speech-language pathology may use the foundational knowledge and practical guidelines outlined in this tutorial about meta-analyses to expand their knowledge of research methods and to shape their clinical practice.

Establishing Reference Values for Temporal Kinematic Swallow Events Across the Lifespan in Healthy Community Dwelling Adults Using High-Resolution Cervical Auscultation.

Few research studies have investigated temporal kinematic swallow events in healthy adults to establish normative reference values. Determining cutoffs for normal and disordered swallowing is vital for differentially diagnosing presbyphagia, variants of normal swallowing, and dysphagia; and for ensuring that different swallowing research laboratories produce consistent results in common measurements from different samples within the same population. High-resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA), a sensor-based dysphagia screening method, has accurately annotated temporal kinematic swallow events in patients with dysphagia, but hasn't been used to annotate temporal kinematic swallow events in healthy adults to establish dysphagia screening cutoffs. This study aimed to determine: (1) Reference values for temporal kinematic swallow events, (2) Whether HRCA can annotate temporal kinematic swallow events in healthy adults. We hypothesized (1) Our reference values would align with a prior study; (2) HRCA would detect temporal kinematic swallow events as accurately as human judges. Trained judges completed temporal kinematic measurements on 659 swallows (N = 70 adults). Swallow reaction time and LVC duration weren't different (p > 0.05) from a previously published historical cohort (114 swallows, N = 38 adults), while other temporal kinematic measurements were different (p < 0.05), suggesting a need for further standardization to feasibly pool data analyses across laboratories. HRCA signal features were used as input to machine learning algorithms and annotated UES opening (69.96% accuracy), UES closure (64.52% accuracy), LVC (52.56% accuracy), and LV re-opening (69.97% accuracy); providing preliminary evidence that HRCA can noninvasively and accurately annotate temporal kinematic measurements in healthy adults to determine dysphagia screening cutoffs.

Characterizing Effortful Swallows from Healthy Community Dwelling Adults Across the Lifespan Using High-Resolution Cervical Auscultation Signals and MBSImP Scores: A Preliminary Study.

There is growing enthusiasm to develop inexpensive, non-invasive, and portable methods that accurately assess swallowing and provide biofeedback during dysphagia treatment. High-resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA), which uses acoustic and vibratory signals from non-invasive sensors attached to the anterior laryngeal framework during swallowing, is a novel method for quantifying swallowing physiology via advanced signal processing and machine learning techniques. HRCA has demonstrated potential as a dysphagia screening method and diagnostic adjunct to VFSSs by determining swallowing safety, annotating swallow kinematic events, and classifying swallows between healthy participants and patients with a high degree of accuracy. However, its feasibility as a non-invasive biofeedback system has not been explored. This study investigated 1. Whether HRCA can accurately differentiate between non-effortful and effortful swallows; 2. Whether differences exist in Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) scores (#9, #11, #14) between non-effortful and effortful swallows. We hypothesized that HRCA would accurately classify non-effortful and effortful swallows and that differences in MBSImP scores would exist between the types of swallows. We analyzed 247 thin liquid 3 mL command swallows (71 effortful) to minimize variation from 36 healthy adults who underwent standardized VFSSs with concurrent HRCA. Results revealed differences (p < 0.05) in 9 HRCA signal features between non-effortful and effortful swallows. Using HRCA signal features as input, decision trees classified swallows with 76% accuracy, 76% sensitivity, and 77% specificity. There were no differences in MBSImP component scores between non-effortful and effortful swallows. While preliminary in nature, this study demonstrates the feasibility/promise of HRCA as a biofeedback method for dysphagia treatment.

Discriminant ability of the 3-ounce water swallow test to detect aspiration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Given the need for quick and accurate dysphagia screening tools to optimize referral workflows and resource utilization in fast-paced multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinics, we evaluated the discriminant ability of the 3 oz. water swallow test (WST) to detect aspiration in individuals with ALS. METHODS: A total of 212 paired 3 oz. WST (index test) and standardized videofluoroscopic swallow studies (reference test) were completed in individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of ALS. Blinded raters analyzed swallowing safety using the validated penetration-aspiration scale (PAS; non-aspirator: PAS < 6; aspirator: PAS ≥ 6). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated. KEY RESULTS: Index test: 78 (36.8%) WSTs were scored as a fail and 134 (63.2%) as a pass. REFERENCE TEST: Aspiration was confirmed in 67 (31.6%) reference tests with 145 (68.4%) reference tests verified as having no aspiration. Sensitivity and specificity of the 3 oz. WST to detect radiographically confirmed aspiration was 55.2% and 71.7%, respectively (AUC: 0.635, PPV: 47.4%, NPV: 77.6%). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In this dataset, the 3 oz. WST did not demonstrate adequate sensitivity or specificity to detect aspiration in people with ALS as a stand-alone dysphagia screening tool.

Critically Appraising Systematic Reviews in the Field of Speech-Language Pathology: A How-to Guide for Clinician Readers.

Purpose This tutorial will provide speech-language pathologists with foundational knowledge about systematic reviews and their importance in everyday practice. It will also assist clinicians in developing critical appraisal skills so that current research can be translated judiciously to clinical environments for patient care. Systematic reviews are often regarded as the highest level of research evidence for implementing best evidence-based practice, because they synthesize research findings from multiple high-quality research studies, identify methodological weaknesses and biases from the studies included, and assist in illuminating areas for future research work based on current gaps in the literature. While systematic reviews can provide comprehensive knowledge to inform clinical practice, few speech-language pathologists receive training on appraising and applying the findings from systematic reviews appropriately within clinical settings. Conclusion Clinicians within the field of speech-language pathology can use the framework provided in this tutorial to evaluate systematic reviews as a preliminary step for determining appropriate assessment and treatment methods for implementing evidence-based practice within clinical settings.

Characterizing Swallows From People With Neurodegenerative Diseases Using High-Resolution Cervical Auscultation Signals and Temporal and Spatial Swallow Kinematic Measurements.

Purpose The prevalence of dysphagia in patients with neurodegenerative diseases (ND) is alarmingly high and frequently results in morbidity and accelerated mortality due to subsequent adverse events (e.g., aspiration pneumonia). Swallowing in patients with ND should be continuously monitored due to the progressive disease nature. Access to instrumental swallow evaluations can be challenging, and limited studies have quantified changes in temporal/spatial swallow kinematic measures in patients with ND. High-resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA), a dysphagia screening method, has accurately differentiated between safe and unsafe swallows, identified swallow kinematic events (e.g., laryngeal vestibule closure [LVC]), and classified swallows between healthy adults and patients with ND. This study aimed to (a) compare temporal/spatial swallow kinematic measures between patients with ND and healthy adults and (b) investigate HRCA's ability to annotate swallow kinematic events in patients with ND. We hypothesized there would be significant differences in temporal/spatial swallow measurements between groups and that HRCA would accurately annotate swallow kinematic events in patients with ND. Method Participants underwent videofluoroscopic swallowing studies with concurrent HRCA. We used linear mixed models to compare temporal/spatial swallow measurements (n = 170 ND patient swallows, n = 171 healthy adult swallows) and deep learning machine-learning algorithms to annotate specific temporal and spatial kinematic events in swallows from patients with ND. Results Differences (p < .05) were found between groups for several temporal and spatial swallow kinematic measures. HRCA signal features were used as input to machine-learning algorithms and annotated upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening, UES closure, LVC, laryngeal vestibule reopening, and hyoid bone displacement with 66.25%, 85%, 68.18%, 70.45%, and 44.6% accuracy, respectively, compared to human judges' measurements. Conclusion This study demonstrates HRCA's potential in characterizing swallow function in patients with ND and other patient populations.