Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
1.
Br J Radiol ; 85(1017): e654-60, 2012 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22919015

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: In radiotherapy, delineation uncertainties are important as they contribute to systematic errors and can lead to geographical miss of the target. For margin computation, standard deviations (SDs) of all uncertainties must be included as SDs. The aim of this study was to quantify the interobserver delineation variation for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung tumours using a cross-sectional study design. METHODS: 22 consecutive patients with 26 tumours were included. Positron emission tomography/CT scans were acquired for planning of SBRT. Three oncologists and three radiologists independently delineated the gross tumour volume. The interobserver variation was calculated as a mean of multiple SDs of distances to a reference contour, and calculated for the transversal plane (SD(trans)) and craniocaudal (CC) direction (SD(cc)) separately. Concordance indexes and volume deviations were also calculated. RESULTS: Median tumour volume was 13.0 cm(3), ranging from 0.3 to 60.4 cm(3). The mean SD(trans) was 0.15 cm (SD 0.08 cm) and the overall mean SD(cc) was 0.26 cm (SD 0.15 cm). Tumours with pleural contact had a significantly larger SD(trans) than tumours surrounded by lung tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver delineation variation was very small in this systematic cross-sectional analysis, although significantly larger in the CC direction than in the transversal plane, stressing that anisotropic margins should be applied. This study is the first to make a systematic cross-sectional analysis of delineation variation for peripheral lung tumours referred for SBRT, establishing the evidence that interobserver variation is very small for these tumours.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du poumon/diagnostic , Tumeurs du poumon/chirurgie , Imagerie multimodale/méthodes , Tomographie par émission de positons , Radiochirurgie , Radiothérapie guidée par l'image/méthodes , Tomodensitométrie , Sujet âgé , Études transversales , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Biais de l'observateur , Reproductibilité des résultats , Sensibilité et spécificité
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 188(8): 671-6, 2012 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22580623

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: Methods to estimate the likely origin of recurrences after radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are compared. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 25 patients meeting the following inclusion criteria were randomly selected: curatively intended intensity-modulated radiotherapy planned on a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) scan during the period 2005-2009; squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity, pharynx or larynx; complete clinical response followed by locoregional recurrence; and a CT scan at recurrence before any salvage therapy. Exclusion criteria were previous cancer in the area, surgery prior to radiotherapy, or a synchronous cancer. Three methods of estimating focal points of recurrence origin and two volume overlap methods assigning the recurrences to the most central target volumes encompassing at least 50% or 95% of the recurrence volumes were tested. Treatment planning and recurrence scans were rigid and deformable co-registered in order to transfer focal points to the treatment planning scan. Double determinations of all volumes, points, and co-registrations were made. RESULTS: The volume overlap methods assigned the recurrences to significantly more peripheral target volumes than focal methods (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons of 95% overlap vs. focal methods, p < 0.028 for all comparisons of 50% overlap vs. focal methods). Repeated registrations of the same point had higher reproducibility with deformable registration than with rigid registration (median distance 0.31 vs. 0.35 cm, p = 0.015). No significant differences were observed among the focal methods. CONCLUSION: Significant differences between methods were found which may affect strategies to improve radiotherapy based on pattern of failure analyses.


Sujet(s)
Carcinome épidermoïde/radiothérapie , Tumeurs de la tête et du cou/radiothérapie , Récidive tumorale locale/radiothérapie , Métastases d'origine inconnue/radiothérapie , Tumeurs oto-rhino-laryngologiques/radiothérapie , Planification de radiothérapie assistée par ordinateur/méthodes , Radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité/méthodes , Carcinome épidermoïde/imagerie diagnostique , Carcinome épidermoïde/anatomopathologie , Carcinome épidermoïde/chirurgie , Chimioradiothérapie , Association thérapeutique , Fractionnement de la dose d'irradiation , Femelle , Tumeurs de la tête et du cou/imagerie diagnostique , Tumeurs de la tête et du cou/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs de la tête et du cou/chirurgie , Humains , Tumeurs du larynx/imagerie diagnostique , Tumeurs du larynx/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du larynx/radiothérapie , Tumeurs du larynx/chirurgie , Mâle , Tumeurs de la bouche/imagerie diagnostique , Tumeurs de la bouche/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs de la bouche/radiothérapie , Tumeurs de la bouche/chirurgie , Imagerie multimodale , Récidive tumorale locale/imagerie diagnostique , Récidive tumorale locale/anatomopathologie , Récidive tumorale locale/chirurgie , Métastases d'origine inconnue/imagerie diagnostique , Métastases d'origine inconnue/anatomopathologie , Métastases d'origine inconnue/chirurgie , Tumeurs oto-rhino-laryngologiques/imagerie diagnostique , Tumeurs oto-rhino-laryngologiques/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs oto-rhino-laryngologiques/chirurgie , Tumeurs du pharynx/imagerie diagnostique , Tumeurs du pharynx/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du pharynx/radiothérapie , Tumeurs du pharynx/chirurgie , Tomographie par émission de positons , Dosimétrie en radiothérapie , Thérapie de rattrapage , Carcinome épidermoïde de la tête et du cou , Tomodensitométrie , Charge tumorale
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE