RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative embolization is used as an endovascular adjunct to surgical resection of meningiomas. However, there is no standardized system to assess the efficacy or extent of embolization during the embolization procedure. We sought to establish a purely angiographic grading system to facilitate consistent reporting of the outcome of meningioma embolization and to characterize the anatomic and other features of meningiomas that predict the degree of devascularization achieved through preoperative embolization. METHODS: We identified patients with meningiomas who underwent preoperative cerebral angiography and subsequent resection between 2015 and 2021. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were collected in a research registry. We defined an angiographic devascularization grading scale as follows: grade 0 for no embolization, 1 for partial embolization, 2 for majority embolization, 3 for complete external carotid artery embolization, and 4 for complete embolization. RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients were included, 60 of whom underwent preoperative tumor embolization (20 underwent angiography with an intention to treat but ultimately not embolization). Embolized tumors were larger (59.0 vs 35.9 cc; P = .03). Gross total resection, length of stay, and complication rates did not differ among groups. The distribution of arterial feeders differed significantly across tumors in a location-specific manner. Both the tumor location and the identity of arterial feeders were predictive of the extent of embolization. Anterior midline meningiomas were associated with internal carotid (ophthalmic, ethmoidal) supply and lower devascularization grades (P = .03). Tumors fed by meningeal feeders (convexity, falcine, lateral sphenoid wing) were associated with higher devascularization grades (P < .01). The procedural complication rate for tumor embolization was 2.5%. CONCLUSION: Angiographic outcomes can be graded to indicate the extent of tumor embolization. This system may facilitate consistency of reported angiographic results. In addition, arterial feeders vary in a manner predicted by tumor location, and these patterns correlate with typical degrees of devascularization achieved in those tumor locations.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Reduction of surgical site infections (SSIs) is important in improving cervical spine surgery outcomes. Plastic surgery involvement and an enhanced modified prophylaxis protocol may reduce infection rates. Methods: A total of 962 cervical spine operations were conducted by a single surgeon (TFC). An enhanced modified prophylaxis protocol and plastic surgery were used in some operations. Differences in infection rates, surgical approach, previous operations, prophylaxis use, and plastic surgery involvement were compared using Fisher's exact tests and multivariate linear regression. Results: Four patients (0.42%) experienced SSIs. All 4 infections involved the standard protocol, posterior approach, and did not involve plastic surgery. The infection rate was lower in the enhanced protocol group when compared to the standard protocol (ß -0.78, 95% CI -1.23 to -0.33, P = .0008). The enhanced protocol group had an increased percentage of operations with plastic surgery (ß 0.19, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.28, P < .0001). The infection rate among the plastics group was 0.00% compared to 0.60% for the non-plastics group (P = .32). The plastics group had a lower rate of anterior approach when compared to the non-plastics group (ß -0.20, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.15, P = .049). Among the posterior approach group, procedures with plastic surgery had an infection rate of 0.00% compared to 2.53% without plastic surgery (P = .13). Conclusion: The enhanced protocol was associated with a lower SSI rate and increased plastic surgery involvement. Posterior approaches were associated with increased infection rates and the likelihood of utilizing plastic surgery. Both the enhanced protocol and plastic surgery may decrease infection.
Contexte: La réduction des infections du site opératoire est importante pour améliorer les résultats de la chirurgie de la colonne cervicale. L'implication de la chirurgie plastique et d'un protocole amélioré de prophylaxie modifiée peuvent réduire les taux d'infection. Méthodes: Un total de 962 opérations sur la colonne cervicale a été effectué par un seul chirurgien (TFC). Un protocole amélioré de prophylaxie modifiée et la chirurgie plastique ont été utilisés au cours de certaines interventions. Les différences dans les taux d'infection, l'abord chirurgical, les opérations précédentes, l'utilisation de la prophylaxie et l'implication de la chirurgie plastique ont été évalués au moyen de tests exacts de Fisher et d'une régression linéaire multifactorielle. Résultats: Quatre patients (0.42%) ont présenté une infection de la cicatrice opératoire (ICO). Les quatre infections impliquaient le protocole standard, l'abord postérieur et l'absence de chirurgie plastique. Le taux d'infection a été moindre dans le groupe de protocole amélioré, comparativement au protocole standard (ß −0.78, IC à 95%: −1.23 à −0.33, P = .0008). Le pourcentage d'opérations avec chirurgie plastique était augmenté dans le groupe au protocole amélioré (ß 0.19, IC à 95%: 0.10 à 0.28, P < .0001). La fréquence des infections dans le groupe de chirurgie plastique était de 0.00%, comparée à 0.60% dans le groupe sans chirurgie plastique (P = .32). Le groupe avec chirurgie plastique avait un taux d'abord antérieur inférieur comparativement au groupe sans chirurgie plastique (ß −0.20, IC à 95%: −0.24 à −0.15, P = .049). Dans le groupe avec abord postérieur, le taux d'infections était de 0.00% avec chirurgie plastique contre 2.53% sans chirurgie plastique (P = .13). Conclusion: Le protocole amélioré a été associé à un taux d'OCI inférieur et à une plus grande implication de la chirurgie plastique. Un abord postérieur a été associé à des taux augmentés d'infection et à une plus grande probabilité d'utilisation de la chirurgie plastique. Le protocole amélioré et la chirurgie plastique peuvent tous deux réduire les infections.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: The alignment between environmental stimuli (e.g., dark, light) and behavior cycles (e.g., rest, activity) is an essential feature of the circadian timing system, a key contributor to metabolic health. However, no previous studies have investigated light-activity alignment in relation to glycemic control in human populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis included â¼7,000 adults (aged 20-80 years) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2011-2014) with actigraphy-measured, multiday, 24-h activity and light data. We used phasor analysis to derive phasor magnitude and phasor angle, which measures coupling strength and phase difference between the activity-rest and light-dark cycles, respectively. We used multinomial logistic regression and multiple linear regression to study phasor magnitude and phasor angle in relation to diabetes (primary outcome) and multiple secondary biomarkers of glycemic control. RESULTS: Lower alignment strength (i.e., a shorter phasor magnitude) and more delayed activity relative to the light cycle (i.e., a larger phasor angle) were both associated with diabetes. Specifically, compared with individuals in the quintiles indicating the most proper alignment (Q5 for phasor magnitude and Q1 for phasor angle), those in the quintiles with the most impaired alignment had a >70% increase in the odds of diabetes for phasor magnitude (odds ratio 1.76 [95% CI 1.39, 2.24]) and for phasor angle (1.73 [1.34, 2.25]). Similar associations were observed for biomarkers for glucose metabolism. The results were generally consistent across diverse sociodemographic and obesity groups. CONCLUSIONS: The alignment pattern between 24-h activity-rest and light-dark cycles may be a critical factor in metabolic health.
Sujet(s)
Rythme circadien , Diabète , Humains , Adulte , Enquêtes nutritionnelles , Diabète/épidémiologie , Glucose , Marqueurs biologiquesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The concept of a 'black cloud' is a common unfounded perception in the healthcare workforce that attributes a heavier workload to specific individuals or teams. Prior studies in non-surgical disciplines have demonstrated that 'black cloud' perceptions are not associated with workload, albeit such perceptions may influence behavior. The influence of 'black cloud' perceptions on surgical resident workload and burnout remains to be investigated. This study assesses the associations between 'black cloud' self-perception with actual workload and burnout among surgical residents in different specialties. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study of postgraduate year (PGY) 2 and 3 residents enrolled in different surgical residencies at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai was conducted between September-November 2021. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 62.1% (41/66). 46.3% of respondents were female. The majority of subjects were single (61%) and PGY2 trainees (56.1%). In a multivariate regression analysis demographic factors and workload variables, such as the number of pages responded, notes, and amount of sleep, were not significant predictors of a 'black cloud'-self-perception. A significantly lower Burnout Index Score (BIS) was observed among females (p< .001). A significantly higher BIS was observed among residents who are single (p = .003), training in general surgery (p = .02), and orthopedic surgery (p = .03). There was no significant association between 'black cloud' self-perception and BIS. DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrate that a 'black cloud' self-perception is not associated with a high workload and burnout among surgical residents. Gender, marriage/domestic partnership, and certain surgical specialties influenced burnout among the study cohort.
Sujet(s)
Épuisement professionnel , Internat et résidence , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Charge de travail , Études transversales , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: High altitude may affect concussion, but prior studies are limited . We tested whether high altitude affects sport-related concussion (SRC) incidence, severity, and recovery. METHODS: Twenty-five thousand eight hundred fifteen baseline and post-injury Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing results were compiled from Florida and Colorado, low (27 m or 62 m) and high (1,640 m or 1,991 m) altitude locations, respectively. Incidence, severity, and recovery of injury were compared between altitudes. RESULTS: High altitude was associated with increased suspected concussion incidence (adjusted OR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.86 to 2.24];P < .0001). However, high altitude was associated with lower concussion severity measured by Severity Index (SI) (adjusted OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.49];P < .0001). High altitude was associated with decreased recovery from post-concussive symptoms in the migraine (ß, -2.72 [95% CI, -3.31 to -2.13]; P < .0001), cognitive (ß, -1.88 [95% CI, -2.40 to -1.36]; P < .0001), and sleep symptom clusters (ß, -0.30 [95% CI, -0.52 to -0.08]; P = .007). Athletes with initial SI≥8 showed prolonged neurocognitive dysfunction at high altitude (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.81]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: High altitude was associated with increased suspected concussions and prolonged recovery but less severe initial injury.
Sujet(s)
Traumatismes sportifs , Commotion de l'encéphale , Altitude , Athlètes , Traumatismes sportifs/complications , Traumatismes sportifs/diagnostic , Traumatismes sportifs/épidémiologie , Commotion de l'encéphale/complications , Commotion de l'encéphale/diagnostic , Commotion de l'encéphale/épidémiologie , Humains , Incidence , Tests neuropsychologiquesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Previously studied risk factors for sports-related concussion in soccer players include sex, age, and player position. However, prior studies were limited in number, they reported conflicting results, and most did not assess initial concussion severity. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to conduct an in-depth analysis of soccer players across key demographic groups (sex, age, position) for both concussion incidence and severity. It was hypothesized that concussion incidence and severity would be higher among male players, players aged ≥17 years, and goalkeepers. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The authors analyzed baseline and postinjury ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) scores for athletes aged 12 to 22 years between July 2009 and June 2019. Players were assigned to an age group based on when they had their most recent baseline test. Concussion incidence and concussion severity index were compared using t tests and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: For 1189 individuals who reported soccer as their primary sport, 1032 contributed 1754 baseline ImPACT tests (some individuals had multiple baseline tests), whereas 445 individuals were suspected of sustaining a concussion and then referred for a postinjury 1 test. Of these players, 254 (24.6%) had both a baseline and a postinjury test and were analyzed for concussion severity. Linear regression showed that forwards had a lower incidence of ImPACT-proxied concussions than goalkeepers had (P = .008). Female players had a significantly higher incidence of ImPACT concussions compared with male players (mean, 0.07 [female] vs 0.04 [male] concussions per person-year; P = .05). Players in the ≥17-year age group had a higher incidence of ImPACT concussions than players in the 15- to 16-year age group (P = .04), although the 15- to 16-year age group had more severe concussions than the ≥17-year age group (mean severity index, 2.91 [age 15-16 years] vs 1.73 [age ≥17 years]; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Female soccer players experienced a higher incidence of concussion than did male players, and goalkeepers experienced a greater incidence of ImPACT concussions than did forwards. Players of both sexes and all positions in the 15- to 16-year age group showed increased initial concussion severity compared with the ≥17-year age group, despite a lower comparative incidence of ImPACT concussions. Further study is needed to understand whether sex and player position affect concussion severity.
RÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Nonspecific low back pain (LBP) is an idiopathic musculoskeletal condition that affects four of five individuals in their lifetime and is the leading cause of job-related disability in the United States. The interest in interactive and dynamic telehealth treatments for LBP continues to grow, and it is important for the medical community to remain up-to-date on the state of the science. LITERATURE SURVEY: Relevant studies published from March 2016 until March 2021 were identified through a systematic search of EMBASE, MedLine, and Web of Science. The search strategy combined the concepts of back pain, telehealth, and mobile applications. METHODOLOGY: Titles and abstracts were screened to select full-text randomized controlled trials or protocols, and methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Data were synthesized narratively. SYNTHESIS: We included seven concluded randomized-controlled trials and two study protocols reporting mobile health (mHealth) solutions for LBP. Six of the seven concluded trials found a significant improvement in self-reported numerical pain rating scale compared to the control group. A single trial compared a mHealth solution to physical therapy, with the majority of studies comparing interventions to "usual care." Substantial heterogeneity in reporting of sample characteristics was found, indicating a lack of standardization through the field. CONCLUSIONS: mHealth solutions may positively impact people with LBP. Larger trials should be encouraged and the field should coalesce around a set of baseline variables for collection and reporting. Because many interventions involve patient engagement, future trials should aim to further quantify adherence levels and begin to define telehealth "doses" associated with better outcomes.
Sujet(s)
Lombalgie , Télémédecine , Dorsalgie , Humains , Lombalgie/thérapie , Participation des patientsRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage remains the deadliest form of stroke worldwide, inducing neuronal death through a wide variety of pathways. Therapeutic hypothermia is a robust and well-studied neuroprotectant widely used across a variety of specialties. AIMS: This review summarizes results from preclinical and clinical studies to highlight the overall effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia to improve long-term intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes while also elucidating optimal protocol regimens to maximize therapeutic effect. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: A systematic review was conducted across three databases to identify trials investigating the use of therapeutic hypothermia to treat intracerebral hemorrhage. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted on preclinical studies, looking at neurobehavioral outcomes, blood brain barrier breakdown, cerebral edema, hematoma volume, and tissue loss. Several mixed-methods meta-regression models were also performed to adjust for variance and variations in hypothermia induction procedures. Twwenty-one preclinical studies and five human studies were identified. The meta-analysis of preclinical studies demonstrated a significant benefit in behavioral scores (ES = -0.43, p = 0.02), cerebral edema (ES = 1.32, p = 0.0001), and blood brain barrier (ES = 2.73, p ≤ 0.00001). Therapeutic hypothermia was not found to significantly affect hematoma expansion (ES = -0.24, p = 0.12) or tissue loss (ES = 0.06, p = 0.68). Clinical study outcome reporting was heterogeneous; however, there was recurring evidence of therapeutic hypothermia-induced edema reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The combined preclinical evidence demonstrates that therapeutic hypothermia reduced multiple cell death mechanisms initiated by intracerebral hemorrhage; yet, there is no definitive evidence in clinical studies. The cooling strategies employed in both preclinical and clinical studies were highly diverse, and focused refinement of cooling protocols should be developed in future preclinical studies. The current data for therapeutic hypothermia in intracerebral hemorrhage remains questionable despite the highly promising indications in preclinical studies. Definitive randomized controlled studies are still required to answer this therapeutic question.
Sujet(s)
Oedème cérébral , Hypothermie provoquée , Accident vasculaire cérébral , Oedème cérébral/étiologie , Oedème cérébral/thérapie , Hémorragie cérébrale/thérapie , Hématome/thérapie , Humains , Accident vasculaire cérébral/thérapieRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Academic productivity, a key feature of academic neurosurgery, has been linked to academic rank, subspecialty, and institutional rank. Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) has emerged as a new metric of scholarly output that can make field-normalized comparisons between researchers, a feature unavailable in prior metrics such as h-index. Here we evaluate the influence of academic rank and neurosurgical subspecialties on RCR scores. METHODS: We identified 1640 academic neurosurgeons from 115 ACGME-accredited programs in the United States, along with their neurosurgical specialty and demographic information, using publicly available data. Mean RCR (m-RCR) and weighted RCR (w-RCR) for each neurosurgeon were queried from the iCite database, which included publications from 2002-2020. m-RCR and w-RCR scores were compared across subspecialties and academic rank using multivariable regression while controlling for demographic factors. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis indicated that academic neurosurgeons in general neurosurgery (P = 0.039) and pediatric neurosurgery (P = 0.003) had lower m-RCR scores than their peers in other subspecialties. w-RCR did not differ significantly among subspecialties. Higher academic rank was associated with increased m-RCR (P < 0.05) and w-RCR scores (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Professors have a higher m-RCR score relative to assistant professors, while general and pediatric neurosurgery were linked to lower m-RCR values. Although neurosurgical subspecialty choice did not influence w-RCR, a higher w-RCR score corresponded to a higher academic rank. Overall, the RCR metric can be utilized for field-normalized comparisons of faculty who differ in academic rank and subspecialty.
Sujet(s)
Neurochirurgie , Bibliométrie , Enfant , Rendement , Corps enseignant , Humains , Neurochirurgiens , États-UnisRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Contact level affects the incidence of sports-related concussion. However, the effects of contact level on injury severity and recovery are less clear and are the focus of this study. METHOD: Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) for athletes aged 12-22 was performed at baseline (n = 10,907 for 7,058 athletes), after suspected concussion determined by physicians or athletic trainers (n = 5,062 for 4,419 athletes), and during follow-up visits (n = 3,264 for 2,098 athletes). Athletes played contact/collision (CC), limited contact (LC), and noncontact (NC) sports. Injury incidence, severity, and recovery were measured using raw and change from baseline neurocognitive test scores. Comparisons between groups used univariate analysis and multivariable regression controlling for demographic variables. RESULTS: Compared to CC athletes, LC and NC athletes showed decreased suspected concussion incidence. At initial post-injury testing, all neurocognitive test scores were similar between groups except changes from baseline for processing speed were improved for LC compared to CC athletes. Upon follow-up testing, raw neurocognitive scores were better for NC compared to the contact collision athletes in verbal memory, processing speed, total symptom score, migraine cluster, cognitive cluster, and neuropsychiatric cluster scores. For change from baseline scores, LC athletes exhibited better performance on verbal memory, processing speed, and reaction time but also showed higher neuropsychiatric scores than CC athletes. CONCLUSION: Neurocognitive scores between contact levels were similar at the first post-injury test. However, follow up showed many improved scores and symptoms for limited and NC sports compared to CC sports, which may indicate faster recovery.
Sujet(s)
Traumatismes sportifs , Commotion de l'encéphale , Sports , Athlètes , Traumatismes sportifs/complications , Commotion de l'encéphale/complications , Humains , Tests neuropsychologiquesRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Gender differences in neurocognitive function have been reported over the past few decades. However, multiple studies that report gender differences in Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tests composite scores ignore potential confounders which may lead to inaccurate results. METHODS: A total of 4829 male and 2477 female baseline Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tests from 2009 to 2019 of subjects ages 12-18 years were used to evaluate gender differences in baseline neurocognitive scores and symptom severity ratings. Regression analyses were used to assess the effects of gender on neurocognitive performance at baseline while controlling for a number of potential confounders including symptom burden at the time of testing. RESULTS: Differences in 3 of 5 composite scores as well as severity rating scores were maintained in multivariate analysis. Females had increased Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (ß = 3.54, 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 4.16, P < .0001) along with higher verbal memory (ß = 1.82, 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 2.50, P < .0001) and visual motor (ß = 1.29, 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.72, P < .0001) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant gender differences were found in baseline neurocognitive function. This study clarifies for the first time that gender differences in these neurocognitive domains are not simply an artifact of differences in symptom burden. However, the small effect sizes call into question the clinical relevance of these differences.
Sujet(s)
Traumatismes sportifs , Commotion de l'encéphale , Adolescent , Athlètes/psychologie , Traumatismes sportifs/diagnostic , Commotion de l'encéphale/diagnostic , Commotion de l'encéphale/psychologie , Enfant , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Tests neuropsychologiques , Facteurs sexuels , ÉtudiantsRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may affect concussion risk and recovery in youth athletes. PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between incidence of concussion and postinjury recovery of symptoms and neurocognitive dysfunction among youth athletes with ADHD and differential stimulant use. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: From 2009 to 2019, the authors administered the Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) to youth athletes at the beginning of each season. Throughout the season, athletes with concussions were examined and readministered the ImPACT both postinjury and again 7 days after the postinjury administration. These athletes (N = 7453) were divided into those with ADHD on stimulant-based therapy (ADHD+meds; n = 167), those with ADHD not on stimulant-based therapy (ADHD-only; n = 354), and those with no ADHD (non-ADHD; n = 6932). Recovery of neurocognitive dysfunction at postinjury and follow-up was calculated using the ImPACT symptom score, verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor skills, and reaction time (calculated as standardized deviations from baseline). Univariate results were confirmed with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The ADHD+meds cohort had a lower incidence of concussion (37.3 concussions per 100 patient-years) compared with the ADHD-only group (57.0 concussions per 100 patient-years) (odds ratio [OR], 0.51 [95% CI, 0.37-0.71]; P < .0001) and non-ADHD group (52.8 concussions per 100 patient-years) (OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.37-0.67]; P < .0001). At postinjury, ImPACT scores were elevated from baseline to a similar extent in the ADHD+meds cohort compared with the other 2 groups. By follow-up, however, deviations from baseline were lower among the ADHD+meds group compared with the non-ADHD group in verbal memory (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.28-0.76]; P = .002), visual memory (OR, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.10-0.66]; P = .005), and visual motor skills (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.33-0.99]; P = .048). The deviation at follow-up was also lower among the ADHD+meds group compared with the ADHD-only group in visual memory (OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.33-0.96]; P = .04) and visual motor skills (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.22-0.81]; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Stimulant use among youth athletes with ADHD was independently associated with reduced incidence for concussion and lower deviation from baseline in verbal memory, visual memory, and visual motor skills at 7 days postconcussion, suggesting lower neurocognitive impairment at follow-up in this group versus their peers.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Given concerns about the potential long-term effects of concussion in young athletes, concussion prevention has become a major focus for amateur sports leagues. Athletes have been known to frequently use anti-inflammatory medications to manage injuries, expedite return to play, and treat concussion symptoms. However, the effects of baseline nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use on the susceptibility to head injury and concussion remain unclear. This study aims to assess the effects of preinjury NSAID use on concussion incidence, severity, and recovery in young athletes. METHODS: Data from 25,815 ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) tests were obtained through a research agreement with ImPACT Applications Inc. Subjects ranged in age from 12 to 22 years old. Those who reported NSAID use at baseline were assigned to one (anti-inflammatory [AI]) cohort, whereas all others were assigned to the control (CT) cohort. Differences in head trauma and concussion incidence, severity, and recovery were assessed using chi-square tests, unpaired t-tests, and Kaplan-Meier plots. RESULTS: The CT cohort comprised a higher percentage (p < 0.0001) of males (66.30%) than the AI cohort (44.16%) and had a significantly greater portion of athletes who played football (p = 0.004). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two cohorts in terms of the incidence of head trauma (CT = 0.489, AI = 0.500, p = 0.9219), concussion incidence (CT = 0.175, AI = 0.169, p = 0.7201), injury severity, or median concussion recovery time (CT = 8, AI = 8, p = 0.6416). In a multivariable analysis controlling for baseline differences between the cohorts, no association was found between NSAID use and concussion incidence or severity. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, the authors found no evidence that preinjury use of NSAIDs affects concussion risk in adolescent athletes. They also found no indication that preinjury NSAID use affects the severity of initial injury presentation or concussion recovery.
Sujet(s)
Anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens/usage thérapeutique , Athlètes , Traumatismes sportifs/traitement médicamenteux , Traumatismes sportifs/épidémiologie , Commotion de l'encéphale/traitement médicamenteux , Commotion de l'encéphale/épidémiologie , Adolescent , Traumatismes sportifs/psychologie , Commotion de l'encéphale/psychologie , Enfant , Études de cohortes , Femelle , Football américain/traumatismes , Humains , Incidence , Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Estimation de Kaplan-Meier , Mâle , Troubles de la mémoire/étiologie , Troubles de la mémoire/psychologie , Tests neuropsychologiques , Récupération fonctionnelle , Facteurs sexuels , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Previous research in neurosurgery has examined academic productivity for U.S. medical graduates and residents. However, associations between scholarly output and international medical education, residency training, and fellowship training are scarcely documented. METHODS: We identified 1671 U.S. academic neurosurgeons in 2020 using publicly available data along with their countries of medical school, residency, and fellowship training. Using Scopus, h-index, number of publications, and number of times publications were cited were compiled. Demographic, subspeciality, and academic productivity variables were compared between training locations using univariate analysis and multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Of the current neurosurgery faculty workforce, 16% completed at least 1 component of their training abroad. Canada was the most represented international country in the cohort. Academic productivity for neurosurgeons with international medical school and/or international residency did not significantly differ from that of neurosurgeons trained in the United States. Neurosurgeons with ≥1 U.S. fellowships or ≥1 international fellowships did not have higher academic productivity than neurosurgeons without a fellowship. However, dual fellowship training in both domestic and international programs was associated with higher mean h-index (ß = 6.00, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 10.98, P = 0.02), higher citations (ß = 2092.0, 95% confidence interval 460.1 to 3724.0, P = 0.01), and a trend toward higher publications (ß = 36.82, 95% confidence interval -0.21 to 73.85, P = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgeon scholarly output was not significantly affected by international training in medical school or residency. Dual fellowship training in both a domestic and an international program was associated with higher academic productivity.
Sujet(s)
Médecins diplômés à l'étranger/statistiques et données numériques , Neurochirurgiens/statistiques et données numériques , Neurochirurgie/tendances , Bibliométrie , Études de cohortes , Rendement , Corps enseignant et administratif en médecine , Humains , Internat et résidence , Édition , Écoles de médecine , États-UnisRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Concussions in youth sports comprise an estimated 1.6-3.8 million annual injuries in the US. Sex, age, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been identified as salient risk factors for concussion. This study seeks to evaluate the role of premorbid depression or anxiety (DA), with or without antidepressant use, on the incidence of concussion and the recovery of symptoms and neurocognitive dysfunction after concussion. METHODS: Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) was administered to 7453 youth athletes at baseline. Throughout the season, concussions were examined by physicians and athletic trainers, followed by readministration of ImPACT postinjury (PI) and again at follow-up, a median of 7 days PI. Individuals were divided into three categories: 1) unmedicated athletes with DA (DA-only, n = 315), athletes taking antidepressants (DA-meds, n = 81), and those without DA or antidepressant use (non-DA, n = 7039). Concussion incidence was calculated as the total number of concussions per total number of patient-years. The recovery of neurocognitive measures PI was calculated as standardized deviations from baseline to PI and then follow-up in the 5 composite ImPACT scores: symptom score, verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor skills, and reaction time. Univariate results were confirmed with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: There was no difference in concussion incidence between the DA-only cohort and the non-DA group. However, the DA-meds group had a significantly greater incidence of concussion than both the DA-only group (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.88-7.18, p = 0.0001) and the non-DA group (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.16-4.12, p = 0.02). Deviation from baseline in PI symptom scores was greater among the DA-meds group as compared to the non-DA group (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28, p = 0.03). At follow-up, the deviation from baseline in symptom scores remained elevated among the DA-meds group as compared to the non-DA group (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.20-2.20, p = 0.002) and the DA-only group (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.12-3.10, p = 0.02). Deviation from baseline in follow-up verbal memory was also greater among the DA-meds group as compared to both the non-DA group (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.08-2.27, p = 0.02) and the DA-only group (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.03-2.69, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Premorbid DA itself does not seem to affect the incidence of concussion or the recovery of symptoms and neurocognitive dysfunction PI. However, antidepressant use for DA is associated with 1) increased concussion incidence and 2) elevated symptom scores and verbal memory scores up to 7 days after concussion, suggesting impaired symptomatic and neurocognitive recovery on ImPACT.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The sex of an athlete is thought to modulate concussion incidence; however, the effects of sex on concussion severity and recovery are less clear. PURPOSE: To evaluate sex differences in concussion severity and recovery using a large, heterogeneous sample of young student-athletes with the goal of understanding how sex affects concussion outcomes in young athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing results of 11,563 baseline and 5216 postinjury tests were used to calculate the incidence of concussion of adolescent male and female student-athletes ages 12 to 22 years (median, 15 years). The postinjury tests of 3465 male and 1751 female student-athletes evaluated for concussion or head trauma were used to assess differences in the Severity Index (SI) and recovery. Chi-square tests and t tests were used to compare differences in demographic characteristics, incidence, and SI between the 2 cohorts. Multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to control for differences between cohorts in analyses of incidence, SI, and recovery. RESULTS: When we controlled for demographic differences, female participants had higher odds of concussion (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.40-1.86; P < .0001) and higher SI after concussion (ß = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.02-1.32; P = .04). This discrepancy in SI was a result of differences in Symptom (2.40 vs 2.94; P < .0001) and Processing Speed (0.91 vs 1.06; P = .01) composite scores between male and female participants, respectively. We found no effect of sex on time to recovery when controlling for initial concussion SI (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.12; P = .48). CONCLUSION: Using large, multisport cohorts, this study provides evidence that female athletes are at higher risk for more concussions and these concussions are more severe, but male and female athletes have similar recovery times when the analysis controls for initial concussion SI.
Sujet(s)
Traumatismes sportifs , Commotion de l'encéphale , Adolescent , Adulte , Athlètes , Traumatismes sportifs/épidémiologie , Commotion de l'encéphale/épidémiologie , Enfant , Études de cohortes , Femelle , Humains , Incidence , Mâle , Tests neuropsychologiques , Caractères sexuels , Étudiants , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as stay-at-home orders and school closures have been employed to limit the spread of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This study measures the impact of social distancing policies on COVID-19 transmission in US states during the early outbreak phase to assess which policies were most effective. METHODS: To measure transmissibility, we analyze the average effective reproductive number (Rt) in each state the week following its 500th case and doubling time from 500 to 1000 cases. Linear and logistic regressions were performed to assess the impact of various NPIs while controlling for population density, GDP, and certain health metrics. This analysis was repeated for deaths with doubling time to 100 deaths with several healthcare infrastructure control variables. RESULTS: States with stay-at-home orders in place at the time of their 500th case were associated with lower average Rt the following week compared to states without them (p<0.001) and significantly less likely to have an Rt>1 (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.37, p = 0.004). These states also experienced longer doubling time from 500 to 1000 cases (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.72, p = 0.004). States in the highest quartile of average time spent at home were also slower to reach 1000 cases than those in the lowest quartile (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06-0.53, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Stay-at-home orders had the largest effect of any policy analyzed. Multivariate analyses with cellphone tracking data suggest social distancing adherence drives these effects. States that plan to scale back such measures should carefully monitor transmission metrics.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Épidémies de maladies , Politique de santé , Distanciation physique , Quarantaine , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , COVID-19/transmission , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Études rétrospectives , États-UnisRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of recurrent concussions on the incidence, severity, and recovery of significant neurocognitive dysfunction (SND) in young athletes. SETTING: Various US youth sports organizations that utilize Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) for baseline and postinjury concussion testing. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 11 563 ImPACT baseline evaluations of US student-athletes aged 12 to 22 years were separated into 2 cohorts: subjects reporting 2 or more previous concussions (PC; n = 976 baseline evaluations) at baseline and a control group reporting zero previous concussions (CT; n = 7743 baseline evaluations). Subjects reporting 1 prior concussion were excluded. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. MAIN MEASURES: Differences in SND incidence, severity, and recovery between the 2 cohorts were assessed using chi-squared tests, t tests, survival analyses, and multivariate regressions. RESULTS: The PC cohort had a higher incidence of head injury leading to ImPACT (436.7 per 1000 person-years vs 194.4 per 1000 person-years, P < .0001) and a higher incidence of SND (140.4 vs 71.8, P < .0001) than controls. However, the Severity Index (SI) demonstrated that SND severity was lower in the PC group (7.55 vs 8.59, P = .04). Adjusted analyses similarly demonstrated that the PC cohort had increased SND incidence (odds ratio = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.31; P < .0001), decreased SI (ß = -1.37; 95% CI, -2.40 to -0.34; P = .009), and equivalent recovery (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.72; P = .90). CONCLUSION: Participants with a history of concussion have a higher incidence of SND but present with lower severity SND, which may be a result of increased concussion education or symptom awareness. Recurrent concussion has no significant impact on acute neurocognitive recovery. Together, these results provide evidence against the supposition that a history of concussion increases the severity of future SND.
Sujet(s)
Traumatismes sportifs , Commotion de l'encéphale , Adolescent , Athlètes , Traumatismes sportifs/diagnostic , Traumatismes sportifs/épidémiologie , Commotion de l'encéphale/diagnostic , Commotion de l'encéphale/épidémiologie , Humains , Incidence , Tests neuropsychologiques , Études rétrospectives , ÉtudiantsRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: There has been much interest in environmental temperature and race as modulators of Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection and mortality. However, in the United States race and temperature correlate with various other social determinants of health, comorbidities, and environmental influences that could be responsible for noted effects. This study investigates the independent effects of race and environmental temperature on COVID-19 incidence and mortality in United States counties. METHODS: Data on COVID-19 and risk factors in all United States counties was collected. 661 counties with at least 50 COVID-19 cases and 217 with at least 10 deaths were included in analyses. Upper and lower quartiles for cases/100,000 people and halves for deaths/100,000 people were compared with t-tests. Adjusted linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent effects of race and environmental temperature. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analyses demonstrated Black race is a risk factor for increased COVID-19 cases (OR=1.22, 95% CI: 1.09-1.40, P=0.001) and deaths independent of comorbidities, poverty, access to health care, and other risk factors. Higher environmental temperature independently reduced caseload (OR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.91, P=0.0009), but not deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Higher environmental temperatures correlated with reduced COVID-19 cases, but this benefit does not yet appear in mortality models. Black race was an independent risk factor for increased COVID-19 cases and deaths. Thus, many proposed mechanisms through which Black race might increase risk for COVID-19, such as socioeconomic and healthcare-related predispositions, are inadequate in explaining the full magnitude of this health disparity.
Sujet(s)
/statistiques et données numériques , Infections à coronavirus/ethnologie , Modèles statistiques , Pneumopathie virale/ethnologie , Température , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infections à coronavirus/mortalité , Femelle , Humains , Incidence , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Analyse multifactorielle , Pandémies , Pneumopathie virale/mortalité , SARS-CoV-2 , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
With September having seen the end of the registration period for the introductory phase of the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) Energy Efficiency Scheme, healthcare sector participants should already be monitoring their energy usage, and preparing their carbon reduction strategies. John Durbin, engineering department manager at air conditioning equipment specialist Daikin U.K., argues that, to minimise an organisation's legal liabilities and trade successfully in carbon allowances, a holistic view should be taken of climate control systems across health estates--"and that means incorporating the latest heat recovery techniques".