Bennett's Fracture Management: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Bennett's fracture is a relatively common fracture of the base of the thumb with no consensus on optimum management. Determining the optimal treatment method for Bennett's fractures remain a challenge and has been the subject of much debate. This systematic review aims to investigate present and past literature and determine the optimum treatment intervention for Bennett's fracture-dislocation. The primary outcome measure is post-traumatic arthritis, and the secondary outcome measures are reoperation, pain, infection, and nonunion. As per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient demographics, clinical profile, management, and treatment outcomes. Two authors independently performed electronic searches of the Embase, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), and Cochrane databases. Studies conducted between 1963 and 2021 with articles reporting Bennett's fracture management were included. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021295464). In the initial screening, 58 articles were identified, of which 13 articles met the criteria and were included in the final review, evaluating 558 patients. Out of these, 439 were managed by various surgical procedures, and 119 were treated by manipulation and plaster of Paris (POP) immobilization. Of the 13 studies considered, eight have a clear mention of post-traumatic osteoarthritis, with a total of 50 (9%) patients. Secondary outcomes included pain in 76 (13%) patients, infection in four patients, reoperation in 11 (2%) patients, and no nonunion. This review was conducted with the help of retrospective studies as there is no randomized controlled trial on the management of Bennett's fracture. Our primary outcome measure of post-traumatic arthritis in patients being treated by operative and conservative methods was mentioned in these studies. However, due to the sample size being small and the heterogenicity of these studies, the strength of these findings is low. Due to these shortfalls, this review study cannot recommend any single (or) particular treatment for all patients with Bennett's fracture.

Metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty and its influence on implant choice: a delphi consensus study amongst orthopaedic arthroplasty surgeons.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to obtain a consensus amongst joint arthroplasty experts with regards to metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty and the choice of implant in patients with potential metal allergy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web based Delphi consensus study was used including orthopaedic surgeons that had previously published on the topic of knee, hip or shoulder arthroplasty. Two rounds of questionnaires were sent via electronic mail. Consensus was considered reached if agreement was 60% or higher. RESULTS: Eighteen surgeons responded to the first and 17 to the second round of questionnaires. There was consensus that patients having metal arthroplasty surgery should not be routinely questioned about metal allergy prior to surgery. There was consensus that patch testing is not necessary even if metal allergy is suspected. Most respondents agreed in proceeding with cobalt chromium or stainless steel implant in patients suspected of metal allergy regardless of the results of cutaneous patch testing. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus study suggests that routine metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty is not essential. The use of traditional cobalt chromium/stainless steel implants is recommended regardless of the patient's metal allergy status based on expert opinion through this study.

Conservative, open or percutaneous repair for acute rupture of the Achilles tendon.

PURPOSE: To review the complications and recovery of patients with Achilles tendon rupture managed by percutaneous repair, open repair, and non-operative means in a tertiary referral centre between 2001 and 2003. METHODS: The operating theatre register and logbooks of the Consultants were used to identify surgically managed patients, while plaster room records were used for conservatively managed patients. We collated demographic and management details. RESULTS: The number of plaster changes (p < 0.001), median length of time in cast (p < 0.001), and number of outpatient visits (p < 0.05) was greater in conservatively managed patients. We performed no formal statistical analysis given the small numbers. Conservative management was the least expensive and open surgery the most costly modality of management. Percutaneous surgery was approximately a third of the cost of open surgery when performed under local anaesthetic. CONCLUSION: In our setting, percutaneous repair and conservative management are viable alternatives to open surgery, which carries higher complications rates and was the most costly of the three. Individual patients will have different needs due to their age, occupation, or level of sporting activity.

Total knee arthroplasty: good agreement of clinical severity scores between patients and consultants.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 20,000 patients per year in the UK receive total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One of the problems faced by the health services of many developed countries is the length of time patients spend waiting for elective treatment. We therefore report the results of a study in which the Salisbury Priority Scoring System (SPSS) was used by both the surgeon and their patients to ascertain whether there were differences between the surgeon generated and patient generated Salisbury Priority Scores. METHODS: The Salisbury Priority Scoring System (SPSS) was used to assign relative priority to patients with knee osteoarthritis as part of a randomised controlled trial comparing the standard medial parapatellar approach versus the sub-vastus approach in TKA. The operating surgeons and each patient completed the SPSS at the same pre-assessment clinic. The SPSS assesses four criteria, namely progression of disease, pain or distress, disability or dependence on others, and loss of usual occupation. Crosstabs and agreement measures (Cohen's kappa) were performed. RESULTS: Overall, the four SPSS criteria showed a kappa value of 0.526, 0.796, 0.813, and 0.820, respectively, showing moderate to very good agreement between the patient and the operating consultant. Male patients showed better agreement than female patients. CONCLUSION: The Salisbury Priority Scoring System is a good means of assessing patients' needs in relation to elective surgery, with high agreement between the patient and the operating surgeon.