Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Soc Sci Med ; 357: 117195, 2024 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39128248

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The MENA region has experienced extraordinary events in recent years, resulting in an influx of refugees and displaced people who are vulnerable to mental disorders. Several previous studies have examined their prevalence, but none have focused on this region. This systematic review provided an estimate of the prevalence of mental illness and associated risk factors in the MENA region, and overcame the methodological limitations of individual studies. METHODS: Thorough searches of the relevant databases were carried out to locate relevant published articles. Furthermore, cross-sectional studies were conducted to assess mental disorders in refugees, asylum seekers, migrants, or internally displaced people residing in the MENA region. Only studies meeting the aforementioned criteria were considered. For this purpose, RStudio software version 2023.12.0 + 369 with netmeta package was used for measurement and data analysis. JBI used to assess study quality. RESULTS: The results, including 32 cross-sectional studies with a total of 21659 participants were obtained and discussed. The overall prevalence was 42% (95% CI; 30%, 54%) for depression, 43% (95% CI; 31%, 57%) for anxiety, 22% (95% CI; 11%, 39%) for stress, and 45% (95% CI; 36%, 53%) for PTSD. As a result, it was noted that being female was associated with depression, and being female and unemployed was associated with PTSD, however being married was protective against this later. CONCLUSION: Compared to the rest of the globe, MENA has a greater rate of mental illness among refugees. Nevertheless, much effort should be devoted on listing causes associated, as well as their management and prevention.


Sujet(s)
Troubles mentaux , Réfugiés , Population de passage et migrants , Humains , Prévalence , Facteurs de risque , Troubles mentaux/épidémiologie , Population de passage et migrants/psychologie , Population de passage et migrants/statistiques et données numériques , Réfugiés/psychologie , Réfugiés/statistiques et données numériques , Études transversales , Femelle
2.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64011, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39109111

RÉSUMÉ

Introduction Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by widespread pain and fatigue, accompanied by symptoms such as decreased concentration, autonomic dysfunction, and abdominal pain. It can be either primary or secondary, notably to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tools (FAST 4), derived from the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), is a composite tool allowing for the rapid screening of FM. Our primary objective is to determine the prevalence of FM among RA patients using the FAST 4 index. Secondary objectives include comparing the FAST 4 index with the FiRST score and describing the correlation between FM and RA activity and different factors associated with FM in RA patients. Methods This was an observational cross-sectional study including patients diagnosed with RA according to the ACR/EULAR criteria. The FAST questionnaire comprises four sections assessing pain and fatigue on a visual analog scale, painful joints reported by the patient, and a list of 60 symptoms. A FAST 4 score of ≥ 3/4 indicates a positive screening for FM. Demographics and disease features were compared using descriptive statistics. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression models were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI. The sensitivity and specificity of the FAST 4 index were evaluated, and Fagan's nomograms were used to illustrate post-test probability. Statistically significant results were considered for p-values less than 0.05. Results The study enrolled 97 patients diagnosed with RA. The mean age of the patients was 56 ± 12.7 years, with a predominance of females (90.7%, N=88). The mean duration of RA was 13.5 ± 8.69 years. RA activity measured by DAS 28-ESR showed that 40.2% (N=39) had high disease activity, 38.1% (N=37) had moderate disease activity, 11.3% (N=11) had low disease activity, and 10.3% (N=10) were in remission. The prevalence of comorbid FM, according to the FAST 4 index, was 30.9% (N=30). Based on the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), depression was observed in 66.7% (N=20) patients with FM, while anxiety was reported in 60% (N=18). Moreover, 30.4% of patients screened positive for FM using the FiRST score. The FAST 4 index detected FM patients defined by FiRST with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 87.1%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 73.3%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 90%. Univariate analysis revealed that a positive FAST 4 index was associated with the number of painful and swollen joints (p<0.001 and 0.03, respectively). Additionally, patients with a positive FAST 4 index showed higher DAS 28 scores (p=0.002). No significant association was found with CRP levels (p=0.328), ESR (p=0.499), or the use of biological treatments (p=0.146) or corticosteroids (p=0.940). In multivariate analysis, only depression remained a risk factor, increasing the risk sixfold with an OR of 5.917, 95% CI (1.91-18.3), p=0.002. Conclusion Our study suggests a high prevalence of concomitant FM in our population, highlighting the importance of screening for FM, particularly using the FAST 4 index based solely on the MDHAQ questionnaire.

3.
Cureus ; 16(8): e66015, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39100814

RÉSUMÉ

Background In general, rheumatologists often have limited knowledge regarding the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among patients with rheumatic diseases. Understanding the prevalence, reasons for use, and perceived benefits of CAM can help improve patient care and guide clinical practices. This study aimed to assess the prevalence, reasons for use, and perceived benefits of cupping therapy, apitherapy, and traditional cautery treatments among patients with rheumatic diseases. Additionally, it aimed to explore adverse effects, location and pricing disparities in CAM practices, information sources, and the rate of reporting CAM use to treat rheumatologists and to identify factors associated with the use of these CAM approaches. Methodology This single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted in a Moroccan University Hospital and included patients receiving care for rheumatic diseases during hospitalization or outpatient visits from January 2024 to March 2024. The data were collected using a structured, validated, and pilot-tested questionnaire administered by attending rheumatologists. The questionnaire aimed to gather demographic information and to identify patients using CAM, collecting data related to their utilization. Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled (mean age: 52.3 ± 12.8 years, 75% female). Among them, 43% had chronic inflammatory rheumatism. Additionally, 46% reported using at least one of the three CAM methods studied, with 36% using cupping therapy (specifically the wet method), 9% using apitherapy, and 16% using traditional cautery. The main reason for using CAM was to alleviate their pain (55%). Perceptions of effectiveness were reported by 38% of patients using cupping therapy, 20% using apitherapy, and 5.9% using traditional cautery. The use of CAM was significantly lower in patients with a university education (odds ratio = 0.05, 95% confidence interval = 0.003-0.92). Conclusions Our study revealed a significant prevalence of CAM use among patients with rheumatic diseases in Morocco, with cupping therapy emerging as the most commonly utilized method. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing awareness and understanding of CAM practices among both patients and healthcare providers to promote more structured and informed CAM practices.

4.
Biochem Genet ; 2024 May 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717614

RÉSUMÉ

Infection by the recent SARS-CoV-2 virus causes the COVID-19 disease with variable clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic or mild respiratory symptoms to severe respiratory distress and multiorgan failure. The renin-angiotensin system, responsible for maintaining homeostasis and governing several critical processes, has been considered the main system involved in the pathogenesis and progression of COVID-19. Here, we aimed to assess the possible association between variants in the RAS-related genes and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity in a sample of the Moroccan population. A total of 325 individuals were recruited in this study, with 102 outpatients, 105 hospitalized patients, and 118 healthy controls negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection, and subjected to NGS gene panel sequencing containing eleven RAS pathway genes. A total of 65 functional variants were identified, including 63 missenses, 1 splice, and 1 INDEL. Most of them were rare, with 47 (72%) found in a single individual. According to the common disease/common variant hypothesis, five common candidate variants with MAF > 10% were identified (ACE2 rs2285666, TMPRSS2 rs12329760, AGT rs699 genes, ACE rs4341, and ACE rs4343). Statistical analysis showed that the ACE rs4343 AA genotype was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of severe COVID-19 (p = 0.026), and the T genotype of the ACE2 rs2285666 variant showed a borderline association with susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in males (p = 0.097). In conclusion, our results showed that the RAS pathway genes are highly conserved among Moroccans, and most of the identified variants are rare. Among the common variants, the ACE rs4343 polymorphism would lead to a genetic predisposition for severe COVID-19.

5.
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig ; 74(4): 395-406, 2023.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38117003

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Preventing overweight and obesity in early childhood is a priority for healthcare systems worldwide due to the harmful effects on health and economy over the medium and long term. Objective: The aim of this study is therefore the identification of the determinants predictive of overweight and obesity during the first 24 months of a child's life. Material and Methods: From May 2021 to January 2022, 1012 mother-child pairs were included in this study and were interviewed at urban and rural health centers in the Skhirat-Temara in Morocco prefecture using a questionnaire. The anthropometric measurements of the children were also taken according to World Health Organization standards. Results: The prevalence of overweight and obesity in children aged 0-24 months was 16.5%. This prevalence increased with age (12.5% for the 0-6 months group, and 15.5% and 21.5% respectively for the 7-12 months and 13-24 months groups). Cesarean delivery (aOR=1.78; 95%CI: 1.26-2.51; p=0.001), more than two living siblings in the household (aOR=1.48; 95%CI: 1.03-2.12; p=0.03), male gender (aOR=1.56; 95%CI: 1.10-2.20; p=0.01), and child age (aOR=0.94; 95%: 0.92-0.97; p <0.001) are significant predictors of overweight and obesity. Paternal smoking (aOR=2.16; 95%CI: 1.15- 4.06; p=0.01), short sleep duration (aOR=4.05; 95%CI: 1.27-12.88; p=0.01) in children aged 7-12 months, and combined breastfeeding (aOR=5.88; 95%CI: 2.07-16.72; p<0.001) during the first six months in children aged 13-24 months are also predictive determinants for this problem. Conclusion: The identification of early predictors of overweight and obesity can be used by public health decision-makers as a roadmap for action to prevent and improve health.


Sujet(s)
Surpoids , Obésité pédiatrique , Femelle , Mâle , Humains , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Surpoids/épidémiologie , Obésité pédiatrique/épidémiologie , Études transversales , Prévalence , Maroc/épidémiologie
7.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 17(5): e13142, 2023 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37180839

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Rapid antigen tests have emerged to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to reduce the spread of the disease. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 infection and test the sensitivity and specificity in Temara-Skhirat in symptomatic adults through PANBIOS® test. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in mid-September 2021. Two investigators conducted data collection from symptomatic adult patients. The diagnostic performance of the PANBIOS®, and the PCR was assessed to calculate sensitivity and the specificity. Results: Among 206 symptomatic participants, the mean age was 38 ± 12 years, and the majority were women (59%). In our population, 80% had benefited from the anti-COVID vaccine. The median duration of symptoms was 4 days; the most common symptoms were fatigue (62%), headache (52%), fever (48%), cough (34%), loss of smell (25%), loss of taste (24%), and sore throat (22%). Results revealed 23% of cases tested positive with PANBIOS® test versus 30% with the PCR test. The calculated medical decision between PCR versus PANBIOS® test showed high specificity of 95.7% and a sensitivity of 69.4%. There was concordance between the PANBIOS® test and the PCR. Conclusion: The prevalence tested remain high, and the sensitivity and specificity of the PANBIOS® versus PCR test are similar to other literatures and close to value described in WHO recommendations. PANBIOS® is a useful test for controlling the spread of COVID-19 allowing identification of active infection.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Adulte , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , COVID-19/diagnostic , COVID-19/épidémiologie , SARS-CoV-2/génétique , Pandémies , Prévalence , Maroc/épidémiologie , Sensibilité et spécificité
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE