Clinical outcome after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in paediatric patients with recurrent patella instability.

PURPOSE: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has recently been broadly accepted as primary surgical treatment in adults. Reconstruction techniques with osseous fixation in femur cannot be used for patients with open growth plates. Operative treatment of patella instability in children therefore is a challenge and requires alternative MPFL reconstruction techniques. Limited knowledge exists concerning outcome after MPFL reconstruction in children and adolescents. This study present clinical outcome in a consecutive single clinic series of children treated with paediatric MPFL reconstruction using a soft tissue femoral fixation technique. METHODS: Twenty-four MPFL reconstructions in 20 operated children aged 8-16 were included in the study. Indication for surgery was two or more patella dislocations. MPFL reconstruction was performed by looping the released gracilis tendon around the adductor magnus tendon insertion and through drill holes in the proximal medial patella edge. Clinical outcome was evaluated by Kujala score and NRS pain score preoperatively, at 1-year follow-up and final follow-up at 39 months. Outcome was compared with a cohort of 179 adult patients with recurrent patella instability operated with an adult MPFL reconstruction technique. RESULTS: Kujala score improved from 61 (13) to 81 (16). NRS pain score improved from 3.0 (3.1) to 1.5 (1.3) in activity. Four patients (20%) experienced redislocation within the first postoperative year compared with 5% in an adult patient population. Five patients (25%) experienced subluxations. One patient with a redislocation was re-operated with adult MPFL reconstruction technique. Cartilage injury was seen in six patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are clinical relevant improvements in knee function and pain after MPFL reconstruction in paediatric patients. Patella stability after MPFL reconstruction using femoral soft tissue graft fixation in paediatric patients was inferior to MPFL reconstruction using bony femoral fixation in adult patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-Control study, Level III.

Clinical outcome after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in patients with recurrent patella instability.

PURPOSE: We present the clinical results of a large consecutive, prospective, single-clinic series of patients treated with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. METHODS: The study included 224 patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction in a total of 240 knees between 2008 and 2011. Indication for surgery was two or more patellar dislocations and ADL limitations due to patella instability. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: A gracilis tendon autograft was fixed in drill holes in the medial edge of the patella and with screws at the femoral MPFL insertion point. Outcomes were evaluated with the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Score and pain scores preoperatively and at follow-up (12-60 months). Furthermore, incidences of re-dislocations, subluxations and revision surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: The Kujala score improved from 62.5 (17) to 80.4 (18) (p<0.001) at the 1-year follow-up. Pain during activity improved from 3.2 (2.6) to 1.3 (2.7) at 1 year (p<0.001). The revision rate was 2.8%. Some degree of pain at the medial femoral condyle was seen in 30% of the patients. The reconstruction was supplemented with a tibial tuberosity osteotomy in 23% of cases. The outcome for these patients did not differ from that of patients with isolated MPFL reconstruction. Female gender BMI>30, age>30 years and grade 3-4 cartilage injury predisposed a poor subjective outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the largest MPFL reconstruction patient material reported to date. MPFL reconstruction with a gracilis tendon autograft consistently normalised the patella stability and improved knee function. Moderate medial pain was seen. Age above 30, obesity, cartilage injury and female gender are predictors of a poor subjective outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.