Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 64(7): e65-e72, 2017 11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28206705

RÉSUMÉ

Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae is a facultatively anaerobic Gram-positive bacillus found mostly in swine, fish and sheep. E. rhusiopathiae classically causes cutaneous eruptions in butchers, fish handlers and veterinarians. Based solely on case reports, 90% of E. rhusiopathiae bloodstream infections (BSI) have been associated with infective endocarditis (IE). To assess the true frequency of IE in E. rhusiopathiae BSI as well as other clinical associations, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of E. rhusiopathiae BSI at Mayo Clinic. This is a single-centre, retrospective study conducted between 1/1/1994 and 20/6/2016 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, E. rhusiopathiae BSI, anti-microbial susceptibilities, incidence of IE, patient comorbidities, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and duration of antibiotics. Five cases of E. rhusiopathiae BSI were identified. Risk factors included animal exposures, immunosuppression, diabetes and kidney disease. All cases involved penicillin-sensitive strains and high-grade BSI. Four cases showed no signs of IE on transesophageal echocardiogram. All patients recovered fully with intravenous antibiotics. Our retrospective review illustrates that E. rhusiopathiae can cause invasive BSI in the absence of IE and that the previously reported 90% association between BSI and IE may be overestimated due to reporting bias. E. rhusiopathiae should be suspected in any patient with Gram-positive bacilli in blood cultures and the aforementioned risk factors. A limitation of our study was the low sample size, and future studies may involve multicentre collaborations and the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or serologic testing to increase the number of diagnoses..


Sujet(s)
Bactériémie/microbiologie , Infections à Erysipelothrix/épidémiologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Animaux , Bactériémie/épidémiologie , Erysipelothrix , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Minnesota , Études rétrospectives , Zoonoses
2.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 74(6): 613-34, 1999 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10377939

RÉSUMÉ

In addition to erythromycin, macrolides now available in the United States include azithromycin and clarithromycin. These two new macrolides are more chemically stable and better tolerated than erythromycin, and they have a broader antimicrobial spectrum than erythromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Haemophilus influenzae, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and Chlamydia trachomatis. All three macrolides have excellent activity against the atypical respiratory pathogens (C. pneumoniae and Mycoplasma species) and the Legionella species. Azithromycin and clarithromycin have pharmacokinetics that allow shorter dosing schedules because of prolonged tissue levels. Both azithromycin and clarithromycin are active agents for MAC prophylaxis in patients with late-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), although azithromycin may be the preferable agent because of fewer drug-drug interactions. Clarithromycin is the most active MAC antimicrobial agent and should be part of any drug regimen for treating active MAC disease in patients with or without AIDS. Although both azithromycin and clarithromycin are well tolerated by children, azithromycin has the advantage of shorter treatment regimens and improved tolerance, potentially improving compliance in the treatment of respiratory tract and skin or soft tissue infections. Intravenously administered azithromycin has been approved for treatment of adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory diseases. An area of concern is the increasing macrolide resistance that is being reported with some of the common pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, group A streptococci, and H. influenzae. The emergence of macrolide resistance with these common pathogens may limit the clinical usefulness of this class of antimicrobial agents in the future.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens/pharmacologie , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Antibactériens/administration et posologie , Antibactériens/effets indésirables , Azithromycine/composition chimique , Azithromycine/pharmacologie , Azithromycine/usage thérapeutique , Enfant , Clarithromycine/composition chimique , Clarithromycine/pharmacologie , Clarithromycine/usage thérapeutique , Résistance microbienne aux médicaments , Érythromycine/composition chimique , Érythromycine/pharmacologie , Érythromycine/usage thérapeutique , Humains , Tests de sensibilité microbienne
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 36(7): 1919-22, 1998 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9650936

RÉSUMÉ

An inherent problem in the diagnostic PCR assay is the presence of ill-defined inhibitors of amplification which may cause false-negative results. Addition of an amplifiable fragment of foreign DNA in the PCR to serve as a hybrid internal control (HIC) would allow for a simple way to identify specimens containing inhibitors. Two oligonucleotide hybrid primers were synthesized to contain nucleic acid sequences of the Chlamydia pneumoniae 16S rRNA primers in a position flanking two primers that target the sequences of a 650-bp lambda phage DNA segment. By using the hybrid primers, hybrid DNA comprising a large sequence of lambda phage DNA flanked by short pieces of chlamydia DNA was subsequently generated by PCR, cloned into a plasmid vector, and purified. Plasmids containing the hybrid DNA were diluted and used as a HIC by adding them to each C. pneumoniae PCR test. Consequently, C. pneumoniae primers were able to amplify both chlamydia DNA and the HIC DNA. The production of a 689-bp HIC DNA band on an acrylamide gel indicated that the specimen contained no inhibitors and that internal conditions were compatible with PCR. Subsequently, a biotinylated RNA probe for the HIC was transcribed from a nested sequence of the HIC and was used for its hybridization. Detection of the HIC DNA-RNA hybrid was achieved by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). This PCR-EIA system with a HIC was initially tested with 12 previously PCR-positive and 14 previously PCR-negative specimens. Of the 12 PCR-positive specimens, 11 were reconfirmed as positive; 1 had a negative HIC value, indicating inhibition. Of the 14 previously PCR-negative specimens, 13 were confirmed as true negative; 1 had a negative HIC value, indicating inhibition. The assay was then used with 237 nasopharyngeal specimens from patients with pneumonia. Twenty-one of 237 (8.9%) were positive for C. pneumoniae, and 42 (17.7%) were found to inhibit the PCR. Specimens showing inhibitory activity were diluted 1:10 and were retested. Ten specimens were still inhibitory to the PCR and required further DNA purification. No additional positive samples were detected and 3 nasopharyngeal specimens remained inhibitory to PCR. Coamplification of a HIC DNA can help confirm true-negative PCR results by ruling out the presence of inhibitors of DNA amplification.


Sujet(s)
Bactériophage lambda/génétique , Infections à Chlamydia/diagnostic , Chlamydophila pneumoniae/génétique , Chlamydophila pneumoniae/isolement et purification , Techniques immunoenzymatiques , Réaction de polymérisation en chaîne/méthodes , ADN bactérien/analyse , Humains , Partie nasale du pharynx/microbiologie , Hybridation d'acides nucléiques , Sondes d'ARN
4.
J Infect Dis ; 155(5): 954-8, 1987 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3644854

RÉSUMÉ

The combination of penicillin and streptomycin did not act synergistically in vitro against three streptomycin-resistant strains (MIC, greater than or equal to 1,000 micrograms of streptomycin/ml) of penicillin-susceptible streptococci. Using a model of experimental infective endocarditis, we infected rabbits with a control streptomycin-susceptible strain, with an intermediately streptomycin-resistant strain (MIC, 1,000 micrograms/ml), and with a highly streptomycin-resistant strain (MIC, greater than 32,000 micrograms/ml). Treating animals with a combination of procaine penicillin and streptomycin was more effective (P less than .01) than treating them with procaine penicillin alone only for those animals infected with the control streptomycin-susceptible strain. Treatment with procaine penicillin plus gentamicin was more effective (P less than .01) than treatment with procaine penicillin alone for all three treatment groups and was more effective (P less than .01) than treatment with procaine penicillin and streptomycin for those animals infected with an intermediately or highly streptomycin-resistant strain of streptococci.


Sujet(s)
Endocardite bactérienne/traitement médicamenteux , Benzylpénicilline procaïne/pharmacologie , Benzylpénicilline/pharmacologie , Infections à streptocoques/traitement médicamenteux , Streptococcus/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Streptomycine/pharmacologie , Animaux , Synergie des médicaments , Association de médicaments , Endocardite bactérienne/microbiologie , Gentamicine/pharmacologie , Gentamicine/usage thérapeutique , Humains , Benzylpénicilline procaïne/usage thérapeutique , Résistance aux pénicillines , Lapins , Infections à streptocoques/microbiologie , Streptomycine/usage thérapeutique
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE