Feasibility of a transmucosal sublingual fentanyl tablet as a procedural pain treatment in colonoscopy patients: a prospective placebo-controlled randomized study.

Since patients often experience pain and unpleasantness during a colonoscopy, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sublingually administered fentanyl tablets for pain treatment. Furthermore, since the use of intravenous drugs significantly increases colonoscopy costs, sublingual tablets could be a cost-effective alternative to intravenous sedation. We conducted a prospective placebo-controlled randomized study of 158 patients to evaluate the analgesic effect of a 100 µg dose of sublingual fentanyl administered before a colonoscopy. Pain, sedation, nausea, and satisfaction were assessed during the colonoscopy by the patients as well as the endoscopists and nurses. Respiratory rate and peripheral arteriolar oxygen saturation were monitored throughout the procedure. There were no differences between the fentanyl and placebo groups in any of the measured variables. The median pain intensity values, as measured using a numerical rating scale, were 4.5 in the fentanyl group and 5 in the placebo group. The sedation and oxygen saturation levels and the respiratory rate did not differ between the groups. The majority of the colonoscopies were completed.Our results indicate that a 100 µg dose of sublingual fentanyl is not beneficial compared to the placebo in the treatment of procedural pain during a colonoscopy.

Voriconazole greatly increases the exposure to oral buprenorphine.

PURPOSE: Buprenorphine has low oral bioavailability. Regardless of sublingual administration, a notable part of buprenorphine is exposed to extensive first-pass metabolism by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. As drug interaction studies with buprenorphine are limited, we wanted to investigate the effect of voriconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral buprenorphine. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers were given either placebo or voriconazole (orally, 400 mg twice on day 1 and 200 mg twice on days 2-5) for 5 days in a randomized, cross-over study. On day 5, they ingested 0.2 mg (3.6 mg during placebo phase) oral buprenorphine. We measured plasma and urine concentrations of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine and monitored their pharmacological effects. Pharmacokinetic parameters were normalized for a buprenorphine dose of 1.0 mg. RESULTS: Voriconazole greatly increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-18) of buprenorphine (4.3-fold, P < 0.001), its peak concentration (Cmax) (3.9-fold), half-life (P < 0.05), and excretion into urine (Ae; P < 0.001). Voriconazole also markedly enhanced the Cmax (P < 0.001), AUC0-18 (P < 0.001), and Ae (P < 0.05) of unconjugated norbuprenorphine but decreased its renal clearance (P < 0.001). Mild dizziness and nausea occurred during both study phases. CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole greatly increases exposure to oral buprenorphine, mainly by inhibiting intestinal and liver CYP3A4. Effect on some transporters may explain elevated norbuprenorphine concentrations. Although oral buprenorphine is not commonly used, this interaction may become relevant in patients receiving sublingual buprenorphine together with voriconazole or other CYP3A4 or transporter inhibitors.

Voriconazole more likely than posaconazole increases plasma exposure to sublingual buprenorphine causing a risk of a clinically important interaction.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine possible effects of voriconazole and posaconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects of sublingual buprenorphine. METHODS: We used a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study design with 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects were given a dose of 0.4 mg (0.6 mg during placebo phase) sublingual buprenorphine after a 5-day oral pretreatment with either (i) placebo, (ii) voriconazole 400 mg twice daily on the first day and 200 mg twice daily thereafter or (iii) posaconazole 400 mg twice daily. Plasma and urine concentrations of buprenorphine and its primary active metabolite norbuprenorphine were monitored over 18 h and pharmacological effects were measured. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, voriconazole increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) of buprenorphine 1.80-fold (90 % confidence interval 1.45-2.24; P < 0.001), its peak concentration (Cmax) 1.37-fold (P < 0.013) and half-life (t ½ ) 1.37-fold (P < 0.001). Posaconazole increased the AUC00-∞ of buprenorphine 1.25-fold (P < 0.001). Most of the plasma norbuprenorphine concentrations were below the limit of quantification (0.05 ng/ml). Voriconazole, unlike posaconazole, increased the urinary excretion of norbuprenorphine 1.58-fold (90 % confidence interval 1.18-2.12; P < 0.001) but there was no quantifiable parent buprenorphine in urine. Plasma buprenorphine concentrations correlated with the pharmacological effects, but the effects did not differ significantly between the phases. CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole, and to a minor extent posaconazole, increase plasma exposure to sublingual buprenorphine, probably via inhibition of cytochrome P450 3 A and/or P-glycoprotein. Care should be exercised in the combined use of buprenorphine with triazole antimycotics, particularly with voriconazole, because their interaction can be of clinical importance.

Rifampicin decreases exposure to sublingual buprenorphine in healthy subjects.

Buprenorphine is mainly metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of first-pass metabolism in the interaction of rifampicin and analgesic doses of buprenorphine. A four-session paired cross-over study design was used. Twelve subjects ingested either 600 mg oral rifampicin or placebo once daily in a randomized order for 7 days. In the first part of the study, subjects were given 0.6-mg (placebo phase) or 0.8-mg (rifampicin phase) buprenorphine sublingually on day 7. In the second part of the study, subjects received 0.4-mg buprenorphine intravenously. Plasma concentrations of buprenorphine and urine concentrations of buprenorphine and its primary metabolite norbuprenorphine were measured over 18 h. Adverse effects were recorded. Rifampicin decreased the mean area under the dose-corrected plasma concentration-time curve (AUC 0-18) of sublingual buprenorphine by 25% (geometric mean ratio (GMR): 0.75; 90% confidence interval (CI) of GMR: 0.60, 0.93) and tended to decrease the bioavailability of sublingual buprenorphine, from 22% to 16% (P = 0.31). Plasma concentrations of intravenously administered buprenorphine were not influenced by rifampicin. The amount of norbuprenorphine excreted in the urine was decreased by 65% (P < 0.001) and 52% (P < 0.001) after sublingual and intravenous administration, respectively, by rifampicin. Adverse effects were frequent. Rifampicin decreases the exposure to sublingual but not intravenous buprenorphine. This can be mainly explained by an enhancement of CYP3A-mediated first-pass metabolism, which sublingual buprenorphine only partially bypasses. Concomitant use of rifampicin and low-dose sublingual buprenorphine may compromise the analgesic effect of buprenorphine.