Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
2.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 237(3): 319-322, 2020 Mar.
Article de Allemand | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30477040

RÉSUMÉ

Radiation Retinopathy is a progressive chronic disease triggered by ionising radiation and is characterised by vascular endothelial damage that can lead to macular edema, optic disc edema and proliferative retinopathy. We discuss a case of a patient with radiation retinopathy and optic disc edema who we treated with a combination of intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone. After 3 injections of bevacizumab, and one of dexamethasone, the patient experienced a resolution of optic disc edema and a marked increase of his visual acuity and remained stable throughout the follow-up period.


Sujet(s)
Inhibiteurs de l'angiogenèse/usage thérapeutique , Rétinopathie diabétique/traitement médicamenteux , Bévacizumab/usage thérapeutique , Dexaméthasone/usage thérapeutique , Glucocorticoïdes/usage thérapeutique , Humains , Injections intravitréennes , Tomographie par cohérence optique , Facteur de croissance endothéliale vasculaire de type A
3.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 237(8): 961-967, 2020 Aug.
Article de Allemand | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266074

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: A large number of myopic patients were treated by radial keratotomy (RK) in recent years. Despite being effective in many cases, the refractive results of this surgical intervention proved to be of limited predictability, and it frequently resulted in over- or under-correction in the long term. In this study, we discuss the intermediate and long-term results of a topography-guided photorefractive keratotomy (PRK) in a consecutive series of patients who were previously treated for myopia by radial keratotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective case series, we examined the refraction and visual acuity in a consecutive series of patients-16 eyes-who were treated by PRK for residual refractive errors after radial keratotomy in the past. Mean follow up was 41 months (min. 9, max. 96). RESULTS: All treated eyes showed an improvement in uncorrected visual acuity, and 56% had an improvement in corrected visual acuity. No serious or sight-threatening complications were recorded. Refraction was stable throughout the study period in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, photorefractive keratotomy was shown to be an effective treatment method for secondary ametropia after radial keratotomy. Apart from the correct planning and execution of the PRK, it is of critical importance to inform the patients about the limitations and the anticipated refractive result of the procedure.


Sujet(s)
Kératotomie radiaire , Photokératectomie réfractive , Cornée , Études de suivi , Humains , Lasers à excimères , Réfraction oculaire , Réintervention , Études rétrospectives
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE