Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrer
1.
Curr Oncol ; 27(6): e596-e606, 2020 12.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33380875

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Evidence about the impact of marital status before hematopoietic cell transplantation (hct) on outcomes after hct is conflicting. Methods: We identified patients 40 years of age and older within the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry who underwent hct between January 2008 and December 2015. Marital status before hct was declared as one of: married or living with a partner, single (never married), separated or divorced, and widowed. We performed a multivariable analysis to determine the association of marital status with outcomes after hct. Results: We identified 10,226 allogeneic and 5714 autologous hct cases with, respectively, a median follow-up of 37 months (range: 1-102 months) and 40 months (range: 1-106 months). No association between marital status and overall survival was observed in either the allogeneic (p = 0.58) or autologous (p = 0.17) setting. However, marital status was associated with grades 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (gvhd), p < 0.001, and chronic gvhd, p = 0.04. The risk of grades 2-4 acute gvhd was increased in separated compared with married patients [hazard ratio (hr): 1.13; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.03 to 1.24], and single patients had a reduced risk of grades 2-4 acute gvhd (hr: 0.87; 95% ci: 0.77 to 0.98). The risk of chronic gvhd was lower in widowed compared with married patients (hr: 0.82; 95% ci: 0.67 to 0.99). Conclusions: Overall survival after hct is not influenced by marital status, but associations were evident between marital status and grades 2-4 acute and chronic gvhd. To better appreciate the effects of marital status and social support, future research should consider using validated scales to measure social support and patient and caregiver reports of caregiver commitment, and to assess health-related quality of life together with health care utilization.


Sujet(s)
Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/épidémiologie , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/étiologie , Humains , Situation de famille , Qualité de vie
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 51(1): 58-66, 2016 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26437062

RÉSUMÉ

Grade 3 follicular lymphoma (FL) has aggressive clinical behavior. To evaluate the optimal first transplantation approach in relapsed/refractory grade 3 FL patients, we compared the long-term outcomes after allogeneic (allo-) vs autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in the rituximab era. A total of 197 patients undergoing first reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT or first auto-HCT during 2000-2012 were included. Rituximab-naive patients were excluded. Allo-HCT recipients were younger, more heavily pretreated and had a longer interval between diagnosis and HCT. The 5-year probabilities of non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression, PFS and overall survival (OS) for auto-HCT vs allo-HCT groups were 4% vs 27% (P<0.001), 61% vs 20% (P<0.001), 36% vs 51% (P=0.07) and 59% vs 54% (P=0.7), respectively. On multivariate analysis, auto-HCT was associated with reduced risk of NRM (relative risk (RR)=0.20; P=0.001). Within the first 11 months post HCT, auto- and allo-HCT had similar risks of relapse/progression and PFS. Beyond 11 months, auto-HCT was associated with higher risk of relapse/progression (RR=21.3; P=0.003) and inferior PFS (RR=3.2; P=0.005). In the first 24 months post HCT, auto-HCT was associated with improved OS (RR=0.42; P=0.005), but in long-time survivors (beyond 24 months) it was associated with inferior OS (RR=3.6; P=0.04). RIC allo-HCT as the first transplant approach can provide improved PFS and OS, in long-term survivors.


Sujet(s)
Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Lymphome folliculaire/mortalité , Lymphome folliculaire/thérapie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Allogreffes , Autogreffes , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Humains , Lymphome folliculaire/anatomopathologie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Taux de survie , Facteurs temps
3.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 50(11): 1416-23, 2015 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26237164

RÉSUMÉ

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AutoHCT) is a potentially curative treatment modality for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, no large studies have evaluated pretransplant factors predictive of outcomes of AutoHCT in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA, age <30 years). In a retrospective study, we analyzed 606 CAYA patients (median age 23 years) with relapsed/refractory HL who underwent AutoHCT between 1995 and 2010. The probabilities of PFS at 1, 5 and 10 years were 66% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62-70), 52% (95% CI: 48-57) and 47% (95% CI: 42-51), respectively. Multivariate analysis for PFS demonstrated that at the time of AutoHCT patients with Karnofsky/Lansky score ⩾90, no extranodal involvement and chemosensitive disease had significantly improved PFS. Patients with time from diagnosis to first relapse of <1 year had a significantly inferior PFS. A prognostic model for PFS was developed that stratified patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, predicting for 5-year PFS probabilities of 72% (95% CI: 64-80), 53% (95% CI: 47-59) and 23% (95% CI: 9-36), respectively. This large study identifies a group of CAYA patients with relapsed/refractory HL who are at high risk of progression after AutoHCT. Such patients should be targeted for novel therapeutic and/or maintenance approaches post-AutoHCT.


Sujet(s)
Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Maladie de Hodgkin/thérapie , Modèles théoriques , Adolescent , Adulte , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Cause de décès , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Association thérapeutique , Évolution de la maladie , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Études de suivi , Maladie de Hodgkin/traitement médicamenteux , Maladie de Hodgkin/mortalité , Maladie de Hodgkin/radiothérapie , Humains , Mâle , Seconde tumeur primitive/épidémiologie , Pronostic , Modèles des risques proportionnels , Études rétrospectives , Thérapie de rattrapage , Transplantation autologue , Jeune adulte
4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 50(12): 1513-8, 2015 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26301967

RÉSUMÉ

In patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT), peripheral blood progenitor cells may be collected following mobilization with growth factor alone (GF) or cytotoxic chemotherapy plus GF (CC+GF). It is uncertain whether the method of mobilization affects post-transplant outcomes. We compared these mobilization strategies in a retrospective analysis of 968 patients with MM from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database who received an auto-HCT in the US and Canada between 2007 and 2012. The kinetics of neutrophil engraftment (⩾0.5 × 10(9)/L) was similar between groups (13 vs 13 days, P=0.69) while platelet engraftment (⩾20 × 10(9)/L) was slightly faster with CC+GF (19 vs 18 days, P=0.006). Adjusted 3-year PFS was 43% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-48) in GF and 40% (95% CI 35-45) in CC+GF, P=0.33. Adjusted 3-year OS was 82% (95% CI 78-86) vs 80% (95% CI 75-84), P=0.43 and adjusted 5-year OS was 62% (95% CI 54-68) vs 60% (95% CI 52-67), P=0.76, for GF and CC+GF, respectively. We conclude that MM patients undergoing auto-HCT have similar outcomes irrespective of the method of mobilization and found no evidence that the addition of chemotherapy to mobilization contributes to disease control.


Sujet(s)
Mobilisation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/méthodes , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Myélome multiple/sang , Myélome multiple/thérapie , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Autogreffes , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Humains , Numération des leucocytes , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Numération des plaquettes , Études prospectives , Récupération fonctionnelle , Taux de survie
5.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(11): 1360-5, 2014 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25068422

RÉSUMÉ

We describe outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome (MF/SS). Outcomes of 129 subjects with MF/SS reported to the Center for the International Blood and Marrow Transplant from 2000-2009. Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 30 (4-206) months and most subjects were with multiply relapsed/ refractory disease. The majority (64%) received non-myeloablative conditioning (NST) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). NST/RIC recipients were older in age compared with myeloablative recipients (median age 51 vs 44 years, P=0.005) and transplanted in recent years. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 and 5 years was 19% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12-27%) and 22% (95% CI 15-31%), respectively. Risk of disease progression was 50% (95% CI 41-60%) at 1 year and 61% (95% CI 50-71%) at 5 years. PFS at 1 and 5 years was 31% (95% CI 22-40%) and 17% (95% CI 9-26%), respectively. OS at 1 and 5 years was 54% (95% CI 45-63%) and 32% (95% CI 22-44%), respectively. Allogeneic HCT in MF/SS results in 5-year survival in approximately one-third of patients and of those, half remain disease-free.


Sujet(s)
Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Mycosis fongoïde , Syndrome de Sézary , Conditionnement pour greffe , Adulte , Facteurs âges , Sujet âgé , Allogreffes , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mycosis fongoïde/mortalité , Mycosis fongoïde/thérapie , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Syndrome de Sézary/mortalité , Syndrome de Sézary/thérapie , Taux de survie
6.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(3): 416-21, 2014 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24270389

RÉSUMÉ

There is no standard therapy for multiple myeloma relapsing after an autotransplant. We compared the outcomes of a second autotransplant (N=137) with those of an allotransplant (N=152) after non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning (NST/RIC) in 289 subjects reported to the CIBMTR from 1995 to 2008. NST/RIC recipients were younger (median age 53 vs 56 years; P<0.001) and had a shorter time to progression after their first autotransplant. Non-relapse mortality at 1-year post transplant was higher in the NST/RIC cohort, 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8-19) vs 2% (95% CI, 1-5, P0.001). Three-year PFS and OS for the NST/RIC cohort were 6% (95% CI, 3-10%) and 20% (95% CI, 14-27%). Similar outcomes for the autotransplant cohort were 12% (95% CI, 7-19%, P=0.038) and 46% (95% CI, 37-55%, P=0.001). In multivariate analyses, risk of death was higher in NST/RIC recipients (hazard ratio (HR) 2.38 (95% CI, 1.79-3.16), P<0.001), those with Karnofsky performance score<90 (HR 1.96 (95% CI, 1.47-2.62), P<0.001) and transplant before 2004 (HR 1.77 (95% CI, 1.34-2.35) P0.001). In conclusion, NST/RIC was associated with higher TRM and lower survival than an autotransplant. As disease status was not available for most allotransplant recipients, it is not possible to determine which type of transplant is superior after autotransplant failure.


Sujet(s)
Myélome multiple/thérapie , Conditionnement pour greffe/méthodes , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Évolution de la maladie , Femelle , Humains , Études longitudinales , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Myélome multiple/mortalité , Analyse multifactorielle , Récidive tumorale locale , Modèles des risques proportionnels , Transplantation autologue , Transplantation homologue , Résultat thérapeutique
7.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 47(6): 831-7, 2012 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21946381

RÉSUMÉ

We evaluated the effect of acute and chronic GVHD on relapse and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) for multiple myeloma using non-myeloablative conditioning (NMA) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). The outcomes of 177 HLA-identical sibling HSCT recipients between 1997 and 2005, following NMA (n=98) or RIC (n=79) were analyzed. In 105 patients, autografting was followed by planned NMA/RIC allogeneic transplantation. The impact of GVHD was assessed as a time-dependent covariate using Cox models. The incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD; grades I-IV) was 42% (95% confidence interval (CI), 35-49%) and of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 5 years was 59% (95% CI, 49-69%), with 70% developing extensive cGVHD. In multivariate analysis, aGVHD (≥ grade I) was associated with an increased risk of TRM (relative risk (RR)=2.42, P=0.016), whereas limited cGVHD significantly decreased the risk of myeloma relapse (RR=0.35, P=0.035) and was associated with superior EFS (RR=0.40, P=0.027). aGVHD had a detrimental effect on survival, especially in those receiving autologous followed by allogeneic HSCT (RR=3.52, P=0.001). The reduction in relapse risk associated with cGVHD is consistent with a beneficial graft-vs-myeloma effect, but this did not translate into a survival advantage.


Sujet(s)
Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/mortalité , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Myélome multiple/mortalité , Myélome multiple/thérapie , Conditionnement pour greffe , Maladie aigüe , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Maladie chronique , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/thérapie , Réaction du greffon contre la tumeur , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Taux de survie , Transplantation homologue
8.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 44(9): 559-69, 2009 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19701250

RÉSUMÉ

Although autologous hematopoietic SCT (auto-HSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for lymphoma that has relapsed after conventional chemotherapy, the prognosis of patients with disease recurrence after auto-HSCT is poor. Some highly selected patients can benefit from second transplants. One-third with late recurrence after initial auto-HSCT may attain a prolonged remission after second auto-HSCT. Non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT) has been used successfully after auto-HSCT failures, especially in subjects who have an HLA-compatible donor, chemosensitive disease and good performance status. Patients with chemosenstive disease recurrence who have completed at least 1 year after their first auto-HSCT should be considered for a second auto-HSCT. Patients who have chemoresistant disease are best served by participation in a well-designed clinical trial examining novel antitumor agents.


Sujet(s)
Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/méthodes , Lymphomes/thérapie , Femelle , Humains , Lymphomes/prévention et contrôle , Mâle
9.
Leukemia ; 23(8): 1528-34, 2009 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19322205

RÉSUMÉ

The international staging system (ISS) for multiple myeloma (MM) is a validated alternative to the Durie-Salmon staging system (DSS) for predicting survival at diagnosis. We compared these staging systems for predicting outcomes after upfront autologous stem cell transplantation by analyzing the outcomes of 729 patients between 1995 and 2002. With a median follow-up of 56 months, the univariate probabilities (95% CI) of non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 7, 68, 25 and 52%, respectively. The median OS for stages I, II, III by DSS and ISS were 82, 68, 50 and 64, 68, 45 months, respectively. The concordance between the two staging systems was only 36%. Staging systems were formally compared using Cox models fit with DSS and ISS stages. The relative risks of PFS and OS were significantly different for stages I vs II and II vs III for DSS, but only for stages II vs III for ISS. Although both systems were predictive of PFS and OS, the DSS was superior in formal statistical comparison using Brier score. However, neither system was strongly predictive of outcomes, indicating the need for newer schemes incorporating other prognostic markers.


Sujet(s)
Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Myélome multiple/anatomopathologie , Stadification tumorale/méthodes , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Évolution de la maladie , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Estimation de Kaplan-Meier , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Myélome multiple/mortalité , Myélome multiple/chirurgie , Valeur prédictive des tests , Modèles des risques proportionnels , Études rétrospectives , Conditionnement pour greffe , Transplantation autologue , Résultat thérapeutique
10.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 41(6): 537-45, 2008 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18084340

RÉSUMÉ

We reviewed 66 women with poor-risk metastatic breast cancer from 15 centers to describe the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Median follow-up for survivors was 40 months (range, 3-64). A total of 39 patients (59%) received myeloablative and 27 (41%) reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. More patients in the RIC group had poor pretransplant performance status (63 vs 26%, P=0.002). RIC group developed less chronic GVHD (8 vs 36% at 1 year, P=0.003). Treatment-related mortality rates were lower with RIC (7 vs 29% at 100 days, P=0.03). A total of 9 of 33 patients (27%) who underwent immune manipulation for persistent or progressive disease had disease control, suggesting a graft-vs-tumor (GVT) effect. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year was 23% with myeloablative conditioning and 8% with RIC (P=0.09). Women who developed acute GVHD after an RIC regimen had lower risks of relapse or progression than those who did not (relative risk, 3.05: P=0.03), consistent with a GVT effect, but this did not affect PFS. These findings support the need for preclinical and clinical studies that facilitate targeted adoptive immunotherapy for breast cancer to explore the benefit of a GVT effect in breast cancer.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein/thérapie , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Adulte , Antinéoplasiques/usage thérapeutique , Tumeurs du sein/mortalité , Association thérapeutique , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/mortalité , Réaction du greffon contre la tumeur , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/mortalité , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Agonistes myélo-ablatifs/usage thérapeutique , Métastase tumorale , Récidive , Études rétrospectives , Analyse de survie , Transplantation homologue
11.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 40(2): 151-5, 2007 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17530005

RÉSUMÉ

Multidrug-resistant pathogens have important effects on clinical outcomes. Antibiotic cycling is one approach to control anti-microbial resistance, but few studies have examined cycling in hematology-oncology units. Antibiotic cycling was implemented in January 1999 at our hematology-oncology unit, alternating piperacillin-tazobactam (pip-tazo) and cefepime in 3 months periods, until June 2004. Clinical isolates were compared in post- and pre-intervention periods and with the susceptibility among the solid organ transplant intensive care unit (TICU) isolates. The rate of Gram-negative isolates remained stable. Among Gram-negatives, susceptibility to cefepime and pip-tazo remained stable. There was an increase in Enterococcus spp. (P=0.007), and susceptibility to ampicillin and vancomycin decreased (odds ratio (OR): 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17-0.89 and OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09-0.58). Compared with the TICU, there was increased susceptibility to pip-tazo and cefepime among enterics (OR: 7.32, 95% CI: 4.44-12.07 and OR: 8.82, 95% CI: 2.1-37.13) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR: 4.27, 95% CI: 1.47-12.4 and OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 1.75-12.1) and decreased susceptibility to ampicillin and vancomycin among enterococci (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30-0.63 and OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.56). Cycling was associated with preserved antibiotic susceptibility among Gram-negatives, but with an increase in Enterococcus spp. and vancomycin and ampicillin resistance among enterococci.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens/administration et posologie , Infections bactériennes/prévention et contrôle , Transplantation de moelle osseuse/méthodes , Infections bactériennes/traitement médicamenteux , Infections bactériennes/étiologie , Transplantation de moelle osseuse/effets indésirables , Résistance bactérienne aux médicaments , Bactéries à Gram négatif/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Bactéries à Gram négatif/isolement et purification , Bactéries à Gram positif/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Bactéries à Gram positif/isolement et purification , Tumeurs hématologiques/thérapie , Hématologie , Humains , Unités de soins intensifs , Texas , Facteurs temps
12.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 37(5): 517-21, 2006 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16435018

RÉSUMÉ

Diarrhea is a major cause of morbidity and discomfort for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT). There are multiple causes of diarrhea in patients undergoing transplantation including antineoplastic chemotherapy, antimicrobials and infection, including Clostridium difficile as the most common pathogen involved. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) 1 week before and 30 days after APBSCT, and to identify risk factors for the development of CDAD including diagnosis. Two hundred and forty-two patients underwent APBSCT for multiple myeloma and lymphoma between October 1996 and October 2001 in two teaching hospitals. Diarrhea was reported in 157 (64.9%) subjects. One hundred and thirty-five out of the 157 subjects were tested for the presence of C. difficile toxin A. These subjects constitute the study group. The incidence of CDAD was 15%. Two thirds of the patients who developed CDAD had multiple myeloma and one third had lymphoma; this difference did not attain statistical significance. The use of cephalosporins (P = 0.03) and the use of intravenous vancomycin (P = 0.02) were the only identified risk factors associated with the development of CDAD. Patients treated with paclitaxel as part of the mobilization regimen had a lower incidence of CDAD than patients who received hematopoietic growth factor only (P = 0.01).


Sujet(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Diarrhée/étiologie , Lymphomes/thérapie , Myélome multiple/thérapie , Transplantation de cellules souches de sang périphérique/effets indésirables , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Céphalosporines/effets indésirables , Diarrhée/induit chimiquement , Diarrhée/microbiologie , Entérocolite pseudomembraneuse/étiologie , Femelle , Facteurs de croissance hématopoïétique/effets indésirables , Mobilisation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/effets indésirables , Mobilisation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/méthodes , Humains , Incidence , Lymphomes/complications , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Myélome multiple/complications , Paclitaxel/effets indésirables , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Transplantation autologue , Vancomycine/effets indésirables
13.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 34(11): 963-8, 2004 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15489869

RÉSUMÉ

The serotonin type-3 (5-HT3) antagonists represent a significant advance in the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting (N/V) from highly emetogenic chemotherapy. We sought to determine if any differences in efficacy or adverse effects exist between two such agents, ondansetron and granisetron, during conditioning therapy for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients were randomized to receive either ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg intravenously every 8 h or granisetron 10 microg/kg intravenously daily. Additionally, all patients received scheduled dexamethasone and lorazepam. Prophylaxis was continued until 24 h after completion of chemotherapy. Nausea and distress were measured subjectively with visual analog scales and emetic episodes were quantified. Of the 110 randomized patients, 96 were evaluable for efficacy and safety. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the ondansetron- and granisetron-treated patients, evaluated by comparing the degree of nausea and distress, number of emetic episodes and overall control of emesis. The adverse effects were also comparable and no patients were removed from study because of severe toxicities. This trial demonstrates that ondansetron and granisetron are equally effective at preventing acute N/V associated with conditioning therapy frequently used for HSCT. The agent of choice should be based on drug acquisition cost or preference.


Sujet(s)
Antiémétiques/administration et posologie , Granisétron/administration et posologie , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Nausée/prévention et contrôle , Ondansétron/administration et posologie , Conditionnement pour greffe/effets indésirables , Vomissement/prévention et contrôle , Antiémétiques/effets indésirables , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Granisétron/effets indésirables , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études multicentriques comme sujet , Nausée/étiologie , Ondansétron/effets indésirables , Études prospectives , Vomissement/étiologie
14.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 32(12): 1135-43, 2003 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14647267

RÉSUMÉ

The role of autologous stem cell transplantation (AuSCT) in older multiple myeloma patients is unclear. Using data from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry, we compared the outcome of 110 patients >/=the age of 60 (median 63; range 60-73) years, undergoing AuSCT with that of 382 patients <60 (median 52; range 30-59) years. The two groups were similar except that older patients had a higher beta(2)-microglobulin level at diagnosis (P=0.016) and fewer had lytic lesions (P=0.007). Day 100 mortality was 6% (95% confidence interval 4-9) and 1-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 9% (6-13) in patients <60 years, compared with 5% (2-10) and 8% (4-14), respectively, in patients >/=60 years. The relapse rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups were also similar. Multivariate analysis of all patients identified only an interval from diagnosis to AuSCT >12 months and the use of two prior chemotherapy regimens within 6 months of AuSCT as adverse prognostic factors. Our results indicate that AuSCT can be safely performed in selected older patients: the best results were observed in patients undergoing AuSCT relatively early in their disease course.


Sujet(s)
Myélome multiple/thérapie , Transplantation de cellules souches de sang périphérique , Adulte , Facteurs âges , Sujet âgé , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Humains , Tables de survie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Myélome multiple/mortalité , Amérique du Nord , Ostéolyse/étiologie , Transplantation de cellules souches de sang périphérique/mortalité , Transplantation de cellules souches de sang périphérique/statistiques et données numériques , Enregistrements , Études rétrospectives , Amérique du Sud , Analyse de survie , Conditionnement pour greffe , Transplantation autologue , Résultat thérapeutique
15.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 30(6): 389-95, 2002 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12235524

RÉSUMÉ

Patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSC) frequently require the sequential insertion of two central venous catheters, one for leukapheresis and one for transplant support. Hybrid catheters suitable for leukapheresis and long-term use have been increasingly used, but there is limited information regarding their performance and complication rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of the Pheres-Flow hybrid catheter when utilized for both leukapheresis and transplant support, with particular emphasis on the incidence of infectious and occlusive complications. We prospectively analyzed the performance of 92 catheters in 82 consecutive patients who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Occlusion was the most frequent complication of this catheter with 29% of the patients experiencing difficulty drawing blood or infusing fluids. Infection was another frequent complication. Twenty-two percent of patients developed catheter-related bloodstream infections and 15 catheters had to be removed because of proven or suspected infection that did not respond to antibiotic therapy. Nevertheless, 77% of patients were able to complete leukapheresis and transplant support with only one catheter. We conclude that the utilization of the Pheres-Flow catheter for both leukapheresis and transplant support is feasible, but that new strategies need to be developed to decrease the incidence of occlusive and infectious complications of hybrid catheters.


Sujet(s)
Cathétérisme veineux central/instrumentation , Leucaphérèse/instrumentation , Transplantation de cellules souches de sang périphérique/instrumentation , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Coagulation sanguine , Cathétérisme veineux central/effets indésirables , Femelle , Fièvre , Humains , Infections , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs/thérapie , Transplantation de cellules souches de sang périphérique/effets indésirables , Études prospectives , Transplantation autologue
16.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 8(8): 420-8, 2002.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12234167

RÉSUMÉ

Conventional preparative regimens for allogeneic stem cell transplantation are associated with excessive regimen-related toxicity (RRT) in some patients because of underlying comorbidities, advanced age, or prior treatment. We studied a preparative regimen designed to reduce RRT, yet allow for adequate engraftment and development of a graft-versus-malignancy effect. Thirty patients (median age, 57 years) were entered on study. Twenty-nine patientsreceived stem cells from HLA-identical siblings and 1 from a sibling mismatched for 1 antigen at the A locus. Sixteen patients had received previous stem cell transplants (6 allogeneic and 10 autologous). The preparative regimen consisted of fludarabine 30 mg/M2 per day IV on day -10 to day -5, busulfan 1 mg/kg per dose PO (n = 6) or 0.8 mg/kg per dose IV (n = 24) for 8 doses every 6 hours on day -6 to day -5, and horse-derived antithymocyte globulin 5 mg/kg per day IV (n = 12) or 15 mg/kg per day IV (n = 18) on day -4 to day -1. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine (CYA) 3 mg/kg BID PO starting on day -3 (n = 13) or CYA and methotrexate 15 mg/m2 IV on day +1 and 10 mg/m2 IV on day +3 and day +6 (n = 17). The median number of CD34 cells transplanted was 3.19 x 10(6)/kg. All patients demonstrated recovery of hematopoietic function. Twenty-six (89%) of 29 evaluable patients achieved greater than 90% donor cell chimerism before day 100. Three patients never achieved greater than 90% donor chimerism, and another 3 patients subsequently lost donor chimerism. All 6 of these patients had autologous reconstitution with progressive disease. RRT was minimal; 7 patients had greater than grade II nonhematologic toxicity and there were no toxic deaths attributable to the conditioning regimen. Transplantation-related mortality was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-8%) at 3 months and 28% (95% CI, 23%-34%) at 12 months after transplantation. Non-relapse-related mortality was most often due to infection. Grade II or greater GVHD developed in 56% of evaluable patients, and all patients with disease response developed GVHD. Actuarial estimates of overall and disease-free survival at 12 months were 52% (95% CI, 43%-63%) and 30% (95% CI, 24%-37%), respectively. Although this preparative regimen allowed adequate engraftment with minimal RRT, GVHD and infectious complications caused significant morbidity and mortality. Further study to define appropriate patient populations for this regimen, while limiting GVHD and infection risks, is needed.


Sujet(s)
Hémopathies/thérapie , Transplantation de cellules souches de sang périphérique/méthodes , Conditionnement pour greffe/méthodes , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Femelle , Survie du greffon , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/traitement médicamenteux , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/prévention et contrôle , Hémopathies/complications , Hémopathies/mortalité , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Infections opportunistes/traitement médicamenteux , Infections opportunistes/microbiologie , Transplantation de cellules souches de sang périphérique/mortalité , Analyse de survie , Conditionnement pour greffe/effets indésirables , Transplantation homologue/immunologie , Transplantation isogénique
17.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 27(4): 387-96, 2001 Feb.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11313668

RÉSUMÉ

Although patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease have a poor prognosis with conventional therapies, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autotransplantation) may provide long-term progression-free survival. We reviewed data from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTR) to determine relapse, disease-free survival, overall survival, and prognostic factors in this group of patients. Detailed records from the ABMTR on 414 patients with Hodgkin's disease in first relapse (n = 295) or second complete remission (CR) (n = 119) receiving an autotransplant from 1989 to 1995 were reviewed. Median age was 29 (range, 7-64) years. Median time from diagnosis to relapse was 18 (range, 6-219) months; median time from relapse to transplant was 5 (range, <1-215) months. Most patients received high-dose chemotherapy without total body irradiation for conditioning (n = 370). The most frequently used high-dose regimen was cyclophosphamide, BCNU, VP-16 (CBV) (n = 240). The graft consisted of bone marrow (n = 246), blood stem cells (n = 112), or both (n = 56). Median follow-up was 46 (range, 5-96) months. One hundred-day mortality (95% confidence interval) was 7 (5-9)%. One hundred and sixty-five of 295 patients (56%) transplanted in relapse achieved CR after autotransplantation. Of these, 61 (37%) recurred. Twenty-four of 119 patients (20%) transplanted in CR recurred. The probability of disease-free survival at 3 years was 46 (40-52)% for transplants in first relapse and 64 (53-72)% for those in second remission (P < 0.001). Overall survival at 3 years was 58 (52-64)% after transplantation in first relapse and 75 (66-83)% after transplantation in second CR (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Karnofsky performance score <90% at transplant, abnormal serum LDH at transplant, and chemotherapy resistance were adverse prognostic factors for outcome. Progression of Hodgkin's disease accounted for 69% of all deaths. Autotransplantation should be considered for patients with Hodgkin's disease in first relapse or second remission. Future investigations should focus on strategies designed to decrease relapse after autotransplantation, particularly in patients at high risk for relapse.


Sujet(s)
Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/mortalité , Maladie de Hodgkin/mortalité , Maladie de Hodgkin/thérapie , Adolescent , Adulte , Cause de décès , Enfant , Survie sans rechute , Femelle , Études de suivi , Maladie de Hodgkin/diagnostic , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Analyse multifactorielle , Pronostic , Récidive , Enregistrements , Induction de rémission , Taux de survie , Conditionnement pour greffe/méthodes , Transplantation autologue/mortalité
18.
J Clin Oncol ; 19(2): 406-13, 2001 Jan 15.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11208832

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (autotransplants) in patients with diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who never achieve a complete remission with conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Detailed records from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTR) on 184 patients with diffuse aggressive NHL who never achieved a complete remission with conventional chemotherapy and subsequently received an autotransplant were evaluated. Transplants were performed between 1989 and 1995 and were reported to the ABMTR by 48 centers in North and South America. RESULTS: Seventy-nine (44%) of 184 patients achieved a complete remission or a complete remission with residual imaging abnormalities of unknown significance after autotransplantation. Thirty-four (19%) of 184 had a partial remission and 55 (31%) of 184 had no response or progressive disease. Eleven patients (6%) were not assessable for response because of early death. The probabilities of progression-free and overall survival at 5 years after transplantation were 31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24% to 38%) and 37% (95% CI, 30% to 45%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, chemotherapy resistance, Karnofsky performance status score less than 80 at transplantation, age > or = 55 years at transplantation, receiving three or more prior chemotherapy regimens, and not receiving pre- or posttransplant involved-field irradiation therapy were adverse prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation should be considered for patients with diffuse aggressive NHL who never achieve a complete remission but who are still chemotherapy-sensitive and are otherwise transplant candidates.


Sujet(s)
Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Lymphome malin non hodgkinien/thérapie , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Enfant , Association thérapeutique , Femelle , Humains , Lymphome malin non hodgkinien/traitement médicamenteux , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Analyse multifactorielle , Maladie résiduelle , Modèles des risques proportionnels , Induction de rémission , Analyse de survie , Transplantation autologue
19.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 26(10): 1107-9, 2000 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11108311

RÉSUMÉ

Melphalan can rarely cause interstitial pneumonitis and fibrosis. Although it has been reported previously in patients after conventional doses, we report four cases developing diffuse interstitial pneumonitis (DIP) after high-dose melphalan-based therapy. In a 3-year period, four of 57 (7%) consecutive patients undergoing high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2; MEL 200) were identified with DIP. Two patients who were heavily pre-treated with alkylators developed progressive respiratory failure despite high-dose steroids and eventually died. The other two patients previously treated with vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (VAD) improved dramatically on high-dose steroids with complete resolution of their pneumonitis. Melphalan should be added to the growing list of alkylators causing pulmonary toxicity.


Sujet(s)
Antinéoplasiques alcoylants/effets indésirables , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/effets indésirables , Poumon/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Melphalan/effets indésirables , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Transplantation autologue
20.
J Hematother Stem Cell Res ; 9(5): 737-48, 2000 Oct.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11091498

RÉSUMÉ

We designed a randomized, prospective three-arm mobilization study to determine the kinetics of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in 60 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients primed with cyclophosphamide (CTX) in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (arm A), granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF (arm B) or GM-CSF/G-CSF (arm C). We also compared mobilization and transplant-related toxicities, pre- and post-transplant support and the probability of survival among the three arms. To date, 35 patients have been enrolled in the study; 13 patients have been enrolled in arm A, 10 patients in arm B, and 13 patients in arm C. Successful collection of the target of > or = 2 X 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in one to four apheresis collections was 10/13, 6/10, and 7/12 in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The differences between arms were not statistically significant. The median time to achieve the target CD34+ cells in patients who successfully mobilized the target CD34+ cells was 3 days, 2 days, and 1 day, in patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The time for neutrophil engraftment was 11, 10, and 10 days in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The time for platelet engraftment was 11 days for patients in all arms of the study. Most importantly, no significant differences were observed among the three arms in the duration of neutropenic fever, the extent of mucositis, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting, or in the number of units of platelets or red cells transfused after transplantation. Risk factors associated with poor mobilization were > or = 3 regimens of chemotherapy prior to mobilization, older age, and disease histology (follicular versus diffuse). Therefore, we conclude that the type of growth factor used for mobilization did not play a major role in the outcome of mobilization and recommend mobilizing NHL patients before they receive multiple regimens of chemotherapy.


Sujet(s)
Cyclophosphamide/usage thérapeutique , Facteur de stimulation des colonies de granulocytes/usage thérapeutique , Facteur de stimulation des colonies de granulocytes et de macrophages/usage thérapeutique , Mobilisation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/méthodes , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques , Lymphome malin non hodgkinien/thérapie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Antigènes CD/sang , Antigènes CD34/analyse , Cyclophosphamide/administration et posologie , Calendrier d'administration des médicaments , Association de médicaments , Femelle , Facteur de stimulation des colonies de granulocytes/administration et posologie , Facteur de stimulation des colonies de granulocytes et de macrophages/administration et posologie , Transplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques/effets indésirables , Humains , Antigènes CD45/sang , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectives , Protéines recombinantes , Résultat thérapeutique
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE