The pupillary dilation reflex to a nociceptive stimulus as a tool for analgesia management: A diagnostic study.

BACKGROUND: More than 70% of patients demonstrate pain after endotracheal aspiration. Tools are needed to objectify the need for analgesia in non-communicative critically ill patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the lowest intensity electrical stimulus for detecting pain before daily care interventions. METHODS: Study of diagnostic tests to assess pupillometry to detect pain through the pupillary dilation response to noxious stimuli versus the Behavioural Pain Scale. Patients older than 18 years, under analgosedation, subjected to invasive ventilation, baseline Behavioural Pain Scale of 3, and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale between -1 and -4 were studied. We assessed the Behavioural Pain Scale and the pupillary dilation response to 10, 20, 30, and 40 mA stimuli. We studied the diagnostic performance based on sensitivity and specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of the selected points after the different stimulations. AlgiScan® Pupillometer measured the pupillary dilation response. The presence of pain was considered as a Behavioural Pain Scale score of ≥4. Significance was defined as p <0.05. RESULTS: Measurements were performed on 31 patients. In the 20 mA stimulus, we found an area under the curve of 0.85 (0.69-1.0). The cut-off point of pupillary dilation was 11.5%, with a sensitivity of 100% (34.2-100) and a specificity of 75.9% (57.9-87.8). This point had an accuracy of 77.4 (60.2-88.6) and a Youden's Index of 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: Pupillary variation measurement during a 20 mA stimulus could help assess the need for analgesia before potentially painful interventions. Further studies are needed to confirm this. REGISTRATION: Phase 1 of the project PUPIPAIN ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04078113.

Pupillary dilation reflex and behavioural pain scale: Study of diagnostic test.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the value of the pupillary dilation reflex as an assessment pain tool in critically ill patients. It is important to continue working for the well-being and security of critically ill patients. METHODS: We studied the diagnostic accuracy of the pupillary dilation reflex against the Behavioral Pain Scale. Inclusion criteria were: age greater than 18, receiving mechanical ventilation, with a basal score of the Behavioural Pain Scale of three and a Richmond Agitation and Sedation score between -1 and -4. We studied the responses to a non-painful stimulus, four calibrated stimuli, after a tracheal aspiration and with and without pain. The receiver operating curve was plotted and we calculated the area under the curve. We identified the cut-off points showing the highest sensitivity and specificity and studied diagnostic performance based on negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy. These were reported with their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: 183 measurements were performed. An AUC of 0.88(95% CI 0.83-0.94) was obtained. The pupillary dilation reflex of 11.5% had a sensitivity of 89.8%(95% CI 78.2-95.6) and a specificity of 78.4%(95% CI 70.6-84.5) with an accuracy of 81.4(75.2-86.4). The pupillary dilation reflex detected nociceptive pain response in 15.8% of the measurements that did not show pain according to the Behavioural Pain Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Pupillometry may be a valid alternative for identifying pain in critically ill patients.

"Geographical distribution of risk genotypes in pediatric patients with celiac disease in Spain".

Celiac disease is strongly associated with HLA DQ, specifically with haplotypes. DRB1*03-DQA1*05:01/DQB1*02:01 (DQ2.5),DRB1*07-DQA1*02:01/DQB1*02:02 (DQ2.2), DRB1*11-DQA1*05:05/DQB1*03:01 (DQ7.5), and DRB1*04-DQA1*03:01/DQB1*03:02 (DQ8). The distribution of these risk haplotypes in patients with celiac disease is different in the geographical areas investigated. A high frequency of DRB1*07- DQA1*02:01/DQB1*02:02 (DQ2.2) and DRB1*11-DQA1*05:05/DQB1*03:01 (DQ7.5), has been described in Southern Europe. We analyzed 2102 confirmed CD cases with information on both DQB1* alelles and their distribution by geographical area in Spain. According to the presence of this haplotype in one or two chromosomes, the genotype is classified in: DQ2 homozygous, DQ2 heterozygous (cis or trans), DQ8 homozygous, DQ8/DQ2.5, DQ 2.2 homozygous and genotype known as "half DQ2". Two different patterns of risks related to CD were identified. In the Basque Country and Navarre, the Mediterranean Area (Aragon, Catalonia, Valencia, Balearic Islands, and Murcia), the South of Spain (Andalucía and Extremadura), and the Canary Islands, higher frequency of DQ2.5 trans, and more than 80% of DQ2.5/DQ2.2 homozygosis were described. The Cantabrian Coast (Cantabria, Asturias, and Galicia) and Central Areas (Castilla-León and Castilla-La Mancha) showed a higher percentage of DQ2.5/DQ2.5 homozygosis and a lower DQ2.5 in trans frequency, as in Northern Europe. Madrid has an intermediate model between the two described above. 17 cases (0.8%) did not carry any CD risk haplotypes.

ESPGHAN 2012 Guidelines for Coeliac Disease Diagnosis: Validation Through a Retrospective Spanish Multicentric Study.

OBJECTIVES: A large retrospective multicentre study was conducted in Spain to evaluate the efficiency of the new European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) criteria for the diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD). METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (Valencia, Spain). The present study included 2177 children (ages 0.6-15.9 years) with small bowel biopsy (SBB) performed for diagnostic purposes (from 2000 to 2009) and with a minimum 2-year follow-up after biopsy. RESULTS: CD was diagnosed in 2126 patients (97.5%) and excluded in 51 (2.5%). Tissue transglutaminase antibodies (TG2A), anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA), and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) were reported in 751 patients, 640 symptomatic and 111 asymptomatic. TG2A levels >10 times the upper limit of normal, plus positive EMA and HLA DQ2 and/or DQ8 haplotypes, were found in 336 symptomatic patients, all of them with final diagnosis of CD. In 65 of 69 asymptomatic patients, 65 had confirmed CD and 4 did not have CD. According to the 2012 ESPGHAN guidelines, SBB may have been omitted in 52% of the symptomatic patients with CD with serologic and HLA available data. Gluten challenge was performed in 158 children, 75 of them <2 years at first biopsy. Only 1 patient in whom according to the new proposed diagnostic criteria gluten challenge would not have been mandatory did not relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the new ESPGHAN 2012 guidelines for diagnosis of CD can be safely used without the risk of overdiagnosis. A prospective multicentre study is needed to confirm our results.