Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
1.
Radiat Oncol ; 17(1): 75, 2022 Apr 15.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35428327

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Normofractionated radiation regimes for definitive prostate cancer treatment usually extend over 7-8 weeks. Recently, moderate hypofractionation with doses per fraction between 2.2 and 4 Gy has been shown to be safe and feasible with oncologic non-inferiority compared to normofractionation. Radiobiologic considerations lead to the assumption that prostate cancer might benefit in particular from hypofractionation in terms of tumor control and toxicity. First data related to ultrahypofractionation demonstrate that the overall treatment time can be reduced to 5-7 fractions with single doses > 6 Gy safely, even with simultaneous focal boosting of macroscopic tumor(s). With MR-guided linear accelerators (MR-linacs) entering clinical routine, invasive fiducial implantations become unnecessary. The aim of the multicentric SMILE study is to evaluate the use of MRI-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in 5 fractions regarding safety and feasibility. METHODS: The study is designed as a prospective, one-armed, two-stage, multi-center phase-II-trial with 68 patients planned. Low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer patients will be eligible for the study as well as early high-risk patients (cT3a and/or Gleason Score ≤ 8 and/or PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml) according to d'Amico. All patients will receive definitive MRI-guided stereotactic radiation therapy with a total dose of 37.5 Gy in 5 fractions (single dose 7.5 Gy) on alternating days. A focal simultaneous integrated boost to MRI-defined tumor(s) up to 40 Gy can optionally be applied. The primary composite endpoint includes the assessment of urogenital or gastrointestinal toxicity ≥ grade 2 or treatment-related discontinuation of therapy. The use of MRI-guided radiotherapy enables online plan adaptation and intrafractional gating to ensure optimal target volume coverage and protection of organs at risk. DISCUSSION: With moderate hypofractionation being the standard in definitive radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer at many institutions, ultrahypofractionation could be the next step towards reducing treatment time without compromising oncologic outcomes and toxicities. MRI-guided radiotherapy could qualify as an advantageous tool as no invasive procedures have to precede in therapeutic workflows. Furthermore, MRI guidance combined with gating and plan adaptation might be essential in order to increase treatment effectivity and reduce toxicity at the same time.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs de la prostate , Radiochirurgie , Humains , Imagerie par résonance magnétique/méthodes , Mâle , Études prospectives , Tumeurs de la prostate/imagerie diagnostique , Tumeurs de la prostate/radiothérapie , Hypofractionnement de dose , Radiochirurgie/méthodes
2.
Immunopharmacology ; 42(1-3): 209-18, 1999 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10408382

RÉSUMÉ

The capacity of recombinant human monoclonal anti-p185HER2 IgG (rhumAb anti-HER2) to activate human complement was investigated. Complement activation by rhumAb anti-HER2 on various human breast carcinoma cell lines resulted in deposition of complement proteins on these cells. Complement activation was also observed in a solid-phase binding assay, in which purified p185HER2 was immobilized onto a microtiter plate. rhumAb anti-HER2 induced some complement-mediated tumor cell lysis by rabbit complement, but not by human complement. Analysis of membrane complement regulatory proteins (mCRP) on breast carcinoma cells revealed a heterogenous expression of CD46, CD55 and CD59. After blocking the mCRP activity with specific antibodies, rhumAb anti-HER2 induced about 15% lysis of p185HER2-expressing tumor cells. Tumor cell sensitization with rabbit polyclonal anti-tumor antiserum following mCRP neutralization, augmented cell lysis from 10 to 80%. Expression of mCRP was upregulated by treatment with PMA, and correlated with increased protection of the tumor cells from complement lysis. These results suggest that humanized antibodies like rhumAb anti-HER2 promote complement activation leading to tumor cell phagocytosis and cell-mediated cytotoxicity. They further demonstrate that a successful tumor immunotherapeutical approach, based on antibody and complement treatment, requires mCRP neutralization.


Sujet(s)
Anticorps monoclonaux/pharmacologie , Tumeurs du sein/thérapie , Carcinomes/thérapie , Activation du complément/immunologie , Récepteur ErbB-2/immunologie , Animaux , Anticorps monoclonaux/immunologie , Spécificité des anticorps , Tumeurs du sein/immunologie , Tumeurs du sein/métabolisme , Carcinomes/immunologie , Carcinomes/métabolisme , Protéines du système du complément/physiologie , Cytométrie en flux , Humains , Immunisation passive , Immunoglobuline G/immunologie , Immunoglobuline G/pharmacologie , Protéines tumorales/immunologie , Protéines tumorales/métabolisme , Lapins , Récepteur ErbB-2/biosynthèse , Protéines recombinantes/immunologie , Protéines recombinantes/pharmacologie , Cellules cancéreuses en culture
3.
Mol Immunol ; 36(13-14): 929-39, 1999.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10698347

RÉSUMÉ

Clinical and experimental studies have suggested that complement may play a role in tumor cytotoxicity. However, the efficiency of complement-mediated tumor cell lysis is hampered by various protective mechanisms, which may be divided into two categories: basal and induced mechanisms. The basal mechanisms are spontaneously expressed in cells without a need for prior activation, whereas the induced mechanisms develop in cells subjected to stimulation with cytokines, hormones, drugs or with sublytic doses of complement and other pore-formers. Membrane-associated complement regulatory proteins, such as CD55 (DAF, Decay-Accelerating Factor), CD46 (MCP, Membrane Cofactor Protein), CD35 (CR1, Complement Receptor type 1) and CD59, which serve as an important mechanism of self protection and render autologous cells insensitive to the action of complement. appear to be over-expressed on certain tumors. Furthermore, tumor cells secrete several soluble complement inhibitors. Tumor cells may also express proteases that degrade complement proteins, such as C3, or ecto-protein kinases which can phosphorylate complement components, such as C9. Besides this basal resistance, nucleated cells resist, to some extent, complement damage by removing the membrane attack complexes (MAC) from their surface. Several biochemical pathways, including protein phosphorylation, activation of G-proteins and turnover of phosphoinositides have been implicated in resistance to complement. Calcium ion influx and activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) have also been demonstrated to be associated with the complement-induced enhanced resistance to lysis. The complete elucidation of the molecular mechanisms involved in basal and induced tumor cell resistance will enable the development of strategies for interfering with these evasion mechanisms and the use of the cytotoxic complement system against tumor cells.


Sujet(s)
Protéines du système du complément/métabolisme , Tumeurs/immunologie , Animaux , Protéoglycanes à chondroïtine sulfate/immunologie , Cytotoxicité immunologique , Endopeptidases/immunologie , Humains , Modèles biologiques , Protein kinases/immunologie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...