Standard versus fractionated high-dose cisplatin plus radiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: Results of the CisFRad (GORTEC 2015-02) randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin (HD-Cis: 100 mg/m2 q3w for three cycles) is the standard of care (SOC) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Cumulative delivered dose of cisplatin is prognostic of survival, even beyond 200 mg/m2 but high toxicity compromises its delivery. AIM: Cisplatin fractionation may allow, by decreasing the peak serum concentration, to decrease toxicity. To date, no direct comparison was done of HD-Cis versus fractionated high dose cisplatin (FHD-Cis). METHODS: This is a multi-institutional randomized phase II trial, stratified on postoperative or definitive chemoradiotherapy, comparing HD-Cis to FHD-Cis (25 mg/m2/d d1-4 q3w for 3 cycles) in patients with LA-HNSCC. The primary endpoint was the cumulative delivered cisplatin dose. RESULTS: Between December 2015 and April 2018, 124 patients were randomized. Median cisplatin cumulative delivered dose was 291 mg/m2 (IQR: 251;298) in the FHD-Cis arm and 274 mg/m2 (IQR: 198;295) in the HD-Cis arm (P = 0.054). The proportion of patients receiving a third cycle of cisplatin was higher, with a lower proportion of grade 3-4 acute AEs in the FHD-Cis arm compared to the HD-Cis arm: 81 % vs. 64 % (P = 0.04) and 10 % vs. 17 % (P = 0.002), respectively. With a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR: 41;55), locoregional failure rate, PFS and OS were similar between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Although the primary endpoint was not met, FHD-Cis allowed more cycles of cisplatin to be delivered with lower toxicity, when compared to SOC. FHD-Cis concurrently with RT is a treatment option which deserves further consideration.

A double-blind phase III trial of immunomodulating nutritional formula during adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients: IMPATOX.

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase II study an immunonutrient supplement was found to reduce severe acute toxicities for head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) patients treated with concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate efficacy of the same immunonutrient supplement on severe mucositis. Secondary objectives included tolerance, compliance to oral supplementation, chemotherapy interruptions and delays, quality of life, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 2, and 3 y. METHODS: Between November 2009 and June 2013, 180 HNSCC patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery with curative intent were included in our double-blind phase III multicenter trial. They were assigned to receive oral supplementation (3 sachets/d) of either a formula enriched with l-arginine and omega-3 (n-3) fatty and ribonucleic acids (experimental arm), or an isocaloric isonitrogenous control (control arm), for 5 d before each of 3 cycles of cisplatin. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were undertaken, along with subgroup analyses of ≥75% compliant patients, to compare the incidence of acute mucositis (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and WHO scales) and 36-mo survival. RESULTS: At 1 mo after terminating chemoradiotherapy (CRT), no differences were observed in the incidence of grade 3-4 mucositis between treatment groups, in the ITT, PP (172 patients), and subgroup (≥75% compliance, n = 112) analyses. The immunomodulating supplement did not significantly improve survival in the ITT and PP analyses at 3 y after CRT. Among ≥75% compliant patients, however, OS at 3 y was significantly improved in the immunomodulating formula group (81%; 95% CI: 67%, 89%) compared with controls (61%; 95% CI: 46%, 73%; P = 0.034), as well as PFS (73%; 95% CI: 58%, 83% compared with 50%; 95% CI: 36%, 63%; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Although this immunomodulating formula failed to reduce severe mucositis during CRT, the findings suggest that the long-term survival of compliant HNSCC patients was improved.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01149642.

Induction chemotherapy with the EXTREME regimen in frail patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy (IC) with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5FU) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) is limited to fit patients. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the use of the EXTREME regimen (platinum-based therapy, 5FU, cetuximab) as IC in frail patients with LAHNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with unresectable LAHNSCC treated with the EXTREME regimen, with or without 5FU as IC, from two French centers from 2008 to 2015. We assessed the rate of completed sequence defined as at least two cycles of IC and definitive radiation therapy. RESULTS: We included 34 patients with a median age of 56 years [44-70]. The primary site of tumor development was the oropharynx (67%, n=23, all HPV negative), hypopharynx (21%, n=7) and the oral cavity (12%, n=4). At inclusion, patients presented: T4 76, 5% (n=26), N2c 41% (n=14), N3 26% (n=9), stage disease IVa 62% (n=21), IVb 38% (n=13), ECOG PS2 38% (n=13), decreased weight (10% in one month or 15% in 6 months) 74% (n=25). The sequence was achieved for 76% (n=26) of patients and 80% (n=27) presented a clinical response after the chemotherapy course with notably increased weight (40%, n=11) or general status (75%, n=26). Median PFS and OS were 5.7 and 15.5 months, respectively. Disease progression at 3 months was significantly associated with decreased median overall survival (13.6 versus 21.9 months, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report the use of the EXTREME regimen as induction chemotherapy, and although this IC was used in a very frail population, the majority completed the sequence with significant clinical benefit.